President Donald Trump's supporters handed him a 17-page draft proposal on how to declare a national emergency to seize control of state election administrationPresident Donald Trump's supporters handed him a 17-page draft proposal on how to declare a national emergency to seize control of state election administration

'Sad': MAGA buried over plot to cook up 'sham national emergency' to usurp elections

2026/02/27 04:55
2 min read

President Donald Trump's supporters handed him a 17-page draft proposal on how to declare a national emergency to seize control of state election administration, according to reports on Thursday.

Under the order, Trump would claim that China interfered in the 2020 presidential election, which would be used as justification for Trump to dictate how states run their elections in the midterm — presumably imposing by executive fiat some of the provisions in the GOP-backed SAVE America Act, which places several new restrictions and identification requirements on voting.

The report triggered immediate reaction from officials on social media, with many saying this scheme is illegal on its face — and would hit a brick wall in the courts if Trump dared to try it.

"We’ve been raising the alarm for weeks about Trump’s attacks on our elections — now we’re getting details about how they might be planning to do it," wrote Sen. Mark Warner (D-VA). "Let’s be clear: there’s no national emergency. This is a plot to interfere with the will of voters."

"There’s no national emergency exception to Art 1, Sec 4 of the Constitution," wrote Rep. Ted Lieu (D-CA). "States regulate elections unless Congress passes law. That’s why trump desperately wants to pass the save act to suppress voting. Courts will slap trump down just like they did with his illegal tariffs."

"Yet more nonsense," wrote columnist James Surowiecki. "Declaring a national emergency does not allow the president to steal the power over elections that the Constitution gives to the states and to Congress. The president was quite deliberately given no power over election rules. Trump can't take it."

"Sad. And pathetic," wrote activist Amy Siskind in response to the news. "See you in November!"

"The Constitution gives STATES power over election law with oversight from CONGRESS," wrote the account for Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW). "Notice who's missing? The president. Trump may try to cook up a sham national emergency to try to seize control of elections but it won't stand up to scrutiny."

Market Opportunity
OFFICIAL TRUMP Logo
OFFICIAL TRUMP Price(TRUMP)
$3.429
$3.429$3.429
-1.97%
USD
OFFICIAL TRUMP (TRUMP) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact crypto.news@mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Is Hyperliquid the new frontier for innovation?

Is Hyperliquid the new frontier for innovation?

The post Is Hyperliquid the new frontier for innovation? appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. This is a segment from the 0xResearch newsletter. To read full editions, subscribe. One of the key things I like to track in crypto is a subjective criterion I call “where are new interesting developments and proposals taking place.” There are plenty of dashboards and analytics sites for this, the most popular being the Electric Capital site. The issue is that it still shows Polkadot as having a lot of developers. (At Blockworks we solved the noise problem with active users; maybe we can try the same for active developers.) Because of this noise, I prefer to track two simple observations: What is the velocity of new products launching, and how much mindshare are these products capturing? Are many people getting nerdsniped into discussing the novelties and intricacies of the chain? A related point is the caliber of people being attracted to new ecosystems. For example, over the past few years, Solana (and Ethereum) attracted the majority of talent. Talent generally goes where: It can solve interesting problems or create interesting projects. It can make a lot of money. In a podcast I did with Icebergy about a year ago, we discussed how crypto still wasn’t attracting talent at the levels AI was, despite offering faster exits and more money. AI was (and probably still is) more interesting to most talent and seen as more prestigious. After FTX, crypto lost a lot of credibility and has only recently started recovering as larger institutional players re-entered. Apart from FTX, crypto has also been criticized for being full of low-effort forks and limited utility products. This dynamic isn’t unique to crypto though. Many AI companies are also just building wrappers around GPT, which is as uninteresting as some projects in crypto. Anyway, to the point: Historically, Solana has captured the majority of…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 08:13
Vitalik Buterin Maps Quantum Upgrade to Ethereum to Replace Core Cryptography

Vitalik Buterin Maps Quantum Upgrade to Ethereum to Replace Core Cryptography

The post Vitalik Buterin Maps Quantum Upgrade to Ethereum to Replace Core Cryptography appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. In brief Buterin pointed out four Ethereum
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/02/27 07:44
Power Protocol Surges 96%: On-Chain Data Reveals Why POWER Entered Top 115

Power Protocol Surges 96%: On-Chain Data Reveals Why POWER Entered Top 115

Power Protocol's native token has posted a stunning 96% gain in 24 hours, propelling it to rank #115 with a $381.6 million market cap. Our analysis of on-chain
Share
Blockchainmagazine2026/02/27 07:07