Hong Kong starts a big insider trading investigation involving HKEX, the SFC, brokers, and social media influencers.Hong Kong starts a big insider trading investigation involving HKEX, the SFC, brokers, and social media influencers.

Hong Kong goes after large scale insider trading ring

Hong Kong has begun one of its most high-profile insider trading investigations. The investigation is focusing on whether people within the city’s elite financial institutions leaked material nonpublic information.

The investigation revolves around the staff of Hong Kong Exchanges & Clearing (HKEX) and the Securities and Futures Commission (SFC). Sources familiar with the inquiry said social media influencers and brokers are also under investigation. Authorities are looking into whether regulatory personnel helped traders and others learn about major announcements before they were made.

The leaks reportedly concerned dozens of listed companies over the years. According to local reports, some information concerns privatization plans that have become increasingly common.

The investigations have been chugging along in relative silence for months and will probably continue for years. 

Market leaks call into question the trading fairness 

Market observers have raised red flags over the sudden movements in Hong Kong shares. There have been a few examples, with the shares of Hong Kong companies rallying in the days before privatization announcements. There is no indication that these specific cases are part of the current investigation, but they illustrate the wider problem at play.

Shares of IMAX China Holdings, for example, spiked two days before a buyout offer in 2023. It was also the year that NWS Holdings saw its biggest one-year gain four days before a takeover announcement.

According to a study, more than 10% of the deals showed evidence of insiders possibly sharing information. Hong Kong lags behind markets such as South Korea and the United States in terms of transparency.

For years, Hong Kong markets have been tormented by unexplained price spikes that have fractured confidence for foreign investors.

The SFC has already promised tighter regulation. In recent months, its chairman, Kelvin Wong, has vowed a “multipronged and uncompromising” enforcement approach. He added that the regulator would not compromise in protecting the integrity of Hong Kong’s financial markets.

The city imposed new rules last year in response to the leaks. The SFC also issued guidance in November 2024 on how brokers should handle inside information ahead of block trades. These rules came into force in May 2025.

Hong Kong insider trading probe could trigger criminal charges

If wrongdoing is confirmed, the investigation could lead to serious criminal charges for individuals involved, including regulatory staff, brokers, and possibly corporate insiders. Insider trading carries heavy penalties in Hong Kong, including fines and imprisonment, reflecting the city’s effort to maintain its reputation as a fair and transparent financial hub.

Past cases highlight the risks for those in positions of trust. In 2024, a senior SFC official was charged with making HK$11 million in profits from insider tips, while another official faced conspiracy charges for attempting to obstruct justice. A former co-head of HKEX’s IPO vetting team was previously charged with bribery but was ultimately acquitted.

The current inquiry could also push regulators to introduce even stricter rules on handling sensitive information, tightening oversight of both HKEX and SFC staff and brokers. This may include more rigorous reporting requirements, enhanced monitoring of trading activity ahead of major corporate announcements, and sharper penalties for those found in violation.

The outcome of the investigation could have lasting implications for Hong Kong’s financial landscape. Beyond potential prosecutions, it may reshape how insider information is monitored and handled, influencing corporate governance, investor confidence, and the city’s standing as a global financial hub.

Get seen where it counts. Advertise in Cryptopolitan Research and reach crypto’s sharpest investors and builders.

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny

Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny

The post Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. The cryptocurrency world is buzzing with a recent controversy surrounding a bold OpenVPP partnership claim. This week, OpenVPP (OVPP) announced what it presented as a significant collaboration with the U.S. government in the innovative field of energy tokenization. However, this claim quickly drew the sharp eye of on-chain analyst ZachXBT, who highlighted a swift and official rebuttal that has sent ripples through the digital asset community. What Sparked the OpenVPP Partnership Claim Controversy? The core of the issue revolves around OpenVPP’s assertion of a U.S. government partnership. This kind of collaboration would typically be a monumental endorsement for any private cryptocurrency project, especially given the current regulatory climate. Such a partnership could signify a new era of mainstream adoption and legitimacy for energy tokenization initiatives. OpenVPP initially claimed cooperation with the U.S. government. This alleged partnership was said to be in the domain of energy tokenization. The announcement generated considerable interest and discussion online. ZachXBT, known for his diligent on-chain investigations, was quick to flag the development. He brought attention to the fact that U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Commissioner Hester Peirce had directly addressed the OpenVPP partnership claim. Her response, delivered within hours, was unequivocal and starkly contradicted OpenVPP’s narrative. How Did Regulatory Authorities Respond to the OpenVPP Partnership Claim? Commissioner Hester Peirce’s statement was a crucial turning point in this unfolding story. She clearly stated that the SEC, as an agency, does not engage in partnerships with private cryptocurrency projects. This response effectively dismantled the credibility of OpenVPP’s initial announcement regarding their supposed government collaboration. Peirce’s swift clarification underscores a fundamental principle of regulatory bodies: maintaining impartiality and avoiding endorsements of private entities. Her statement serves as a vital reminder to the crypto community about the official stance of government agencies concerning private ventures. Moreover, ZachXBT’s analysis…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 02:13
LMAX Group Deepens Ripple Partnership With RLUSD Collateral Rollout

LMAX Group Deepens Ripple Partnership With RLUSD Collateral Rollout

LMAX Group has revealed a multi-year partnership with Ripple to integrate traditional finance with digital asset markets. As part of the agreement, LMAX will introduce
Share
Tronweekly2026/01/16 23:00
Pastor Involved in High-Stakes Crypto Fraud

Pastor Involved in High-Stakes Crypto Fraud

A gripping tale of deception has captured the media’s spotlight, especially in foreign outlets, centering on a cryptocurrency fraud case from Denver, Colorado. Eli Regalado, a pastor, alongside his wife Kaitlyn, was convicted, but what makes this case particularly intriguing is their unconventional defense.Continue Reading:Pastor Involved in High-Stakes Crypto Fraud
Share
Coinstats2025/09/18 00:38