TLDR Venus Protocol recovers $13.5M lost in a phishing attack via governance actions. Phishing attack compromised a whale wallet, draining $13.5M worth of assets. Venus halted the protocol and used a governance vote to liquidate the attacker’s positions. XVS token dropped 10% during the event but regained confidence after recovery. Venus Protocol has successfully recovered [...] The post Venus Protocol Restores $13.5M Stolen in Phishing Attack Using Governance appeared first on CoinCentral.TLDR Venus Protocol recovers $13.5M lost in a phishing attack via governance actions. Phishing attack compromised a whale wallet, draining $13.5M worth of assets. Venus halted the protocol and used a governance vote to liquidate the attacker’s positions. XVS token dropped 10% during the event but regained confidence after recovery. Venus Protocol has successfully recovered [...] The post Venus Protocol Restores $13.5M Stolen in Phishing Attack Using Governance appeared first on CoinCentral.

Venus Protocol Restores $13.5M Stolen in Phishing Attack Using Governance

TLDR

  • Venus Protocol recovers $13.5M lost in a phishing attack via governance actions.
  • Phishing attack compromised a whale wallet, draining $13.5M worth of assets.
  • Venus halted the protocol and used a governance vote to liquidate the attacker’s positions.
  • XVS token dropped 10% during the event but regained confidence after recovery.

Venus Protocol has successfully recovered $13.5 million lost in a phishing attack. The swift intervention by the community helped restore the stolen funds, raising questions about decentralization in DeFi governance.

Phishing Attack Drains $13.5 Million from Venus Protocol

On September 2, Venus Protocol, one of the largest decentralized finance (DeFi) lending platforms on the BNB Chain, reported a significant phishing attack. The attack led to a loss of around $13.5 million after a high-value user, or “whale wallet,” approved a malicious transaction.

The initial estimates of the damage reached $27 million, but these were revised after considering the user’s outstanding debt. Stolen assets included wrapped Bitcoin (BTCB), vUSDT, vUSDC, vXRP, and vETH. However, Venus Protocol emphasized that the attack was caused by user-level compromise, not a breach of its smart contracts.

Phishing, a common attack vector in the crypto space, exploits social engineering tactics, tricking users into approving malicious transactions via fake websites or pop-ups. This attack shows the ongoing risks DeFi platforms face, especially as they rely on user behavior rather than just protocol security.

Swift Action and Governance Intervention

Venus Protocol acted quickly to minimize the damage. Upon detecting the breach, the platform paused all activity on the protocol to prevent the attacker from transferring or mixing the stolen funds. This pause allowed for the activation of emergency governance measures, where the community voted to liquidate the attacker’s positions and freeze the stolen assets.

The decision to freeze and liquidate the funds before they could be moved or laundered proved successful. By September 3, security firm PeckShield confirmed that the funds had been fully restored. The assets were returned to the protocol’s reserves, and operations resumed after additional security checks were completed.

Venus announced that it would release a detailed post-mortem report to explain the steps taken during the recovery. Despite the successful recovery, the incident raised concerns about the centralization of governance in DeFi protocols.

Market Reaction and Community Impact

The news of the attack initially caused a sharp drop in Venus’s governance token, XVS, which fell nearly 10% as trading volumes spiked. Investors were concerned about the security and stability of the platform in light of the breach.

However, after the recovery was confirmed, XVS regained stability, reflecting restored confidence in Venus Protocol’s ability to respond effectively to security challenges.

The incident has sparked a broader conversation in the DeFi community about the balance between decentralization and the need for quick action in crisis management. Venus’s ability to intervene swiftly through governance measures has shown the benefits of a responsive system. However, it also raises questions about how much control should be centralized within the platform’s governance to prevent further threats.

The post Venus Protocol Restores $13.5M Stolen in Phishing Attack Using Governance appeared first on CoinCentral.

Market Opportunity
Venus Logo
Venus Price(XVS)
$4.2603
$4.2603$4.2603
+0.26%
USD
Venus (XVS) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

China Launches Cross-Border QR Code Payment Trial

China Launches Cross-Border QR Code Payment Trial

The post China Launches Cross-Border QR Code Payment Trial appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Key Points: Main event involves China initiating a cross-border QR code payment trial. Alipay and Ant International are key participants. Impact on financial security and regulatory focus on illicit finance. China’s central bank, led by Deputy Governor Lu Lei, initiated a trial of a unified cross-border QR code payment gateway with Alipay and Ant International as participants. This pilot addresses cross-border fund risks, aiming to enhance financial security amid rising money laundering through digital channels, despite muted crypto market reactions. China’s Cross-Border Payment Gateway Trial with Alipay The trial operation of a unified cross-border QR code payment gateway marks a milestone in China’s financial landscape. Prominent entities such as Alipay and Ant International are at the forefront, participating as the initial institutions in this venture. Lu Lei, Deputy Governor of the People’s Bank of China, highlighted the systemic risks posed by increased cross-border fund flows. Changes are expected in the dynamics of digital transactions, potentially enhancing transaction efficiency while tightening regulations around illicit finance. The initiative underscores China’s commitment to bolstering financial security amidst growing global fund movements. “The scale of cross-border fund flows is expanding, and the frequency is accelerating, providing opportunities for risks such as cross-border money laundering and terrorist financing. Some overseas illegal platforms transfer funds through channels such as virtual currencies and underground banks, creating a ‘resonance’ of risks at home and abroad, posing a challenge to China’s foreign exchange management and financial security.” — Lu Lei, Deputy Governor, People’s Bank of China Bitcoin and Impact of China’s Financial Initiatives Did you know? China’s latest initiative echoes the Payment Connect project of June 2025, furthering real-time cross-boundary remittances and expanding its influence on global financial systems. As of September 17, 2025, Bitcoin (BTC) stands at $115,748.72 with a market cap of $2.31 trillion, showing a 0.97%…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 05:28
Sberbank issues Russia’s first crypto-secured loan

Sberbank issues Russia’s first crypto-secured loan

The post Sberbank issues Russia’s first crypto-secured loan appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. The largest Russian financial institution by assets, Sberbank,
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/12/26 23:29
Academic Publishing and Fairness: A Game-Theoretic Model of Peer-Review Bias

Academic Publishing and Fairness: A Game-Theoretic Model of Peer-Review Bias

Exploring how biases in the peer-review system impact researchers' choices, showing how principles of fairness relate to the production of scientific knowledge based on topic importance and hardness.
Share
Hackernoon2025/09/17 23:15