Trillanes denied receiving a supposed $2 million bribe for ICC investigators, and filed criminal complaints against the 'ex-Marines' and other personalitiesTrillanes denied receiving a supposed $2 million bribe for ICC investigators, and filed criminal complaints against the 'ex-Marines' and other personalities

FACT CHECK: Trillanes not arrested over alleged ICC ‘bribe’

2026/03/05 14:36
3 min read
For feedback or concerns regarding this content, please contact us at crypto.news@mexc.com

Claim: Former senator Antonio Trillanes IV was arrested and imprisoned for receiving $2 million to bribe the investigators of the International Criminal Court (ICC).

Rating: FALSE

Why we fact-checked this: Several Facebook and YouTube posts are spreading these allegations, with one from the channel “News Update Files” reaching more than 11,000 views, 1,100 likes, and 90 comments as of writing.

The video’s title reads, “Kinarma na! Antonio Trillanes nakulong na! Deserved! Arestado na! Bilyon-bilyong pera nabulgar na.”

(Karma has struck! Antonio Trillanes is now imprisoned! Deserved! Under arrest! Billions of pesos have been exposed!)

The claim surfaced following a press conference on February 24, in which a group of 18 “ex-Marines,” represented by lawyer Levi Baligod, claimed that $2 million was delivered to Trillanes from former lawmaker Zaldy Co, supposedly to fund “witness operations” and facilitate the ICC’s probe into former president Rodrigo Duterte’s crimes against humanity case linked to his administration’s war on drugs.

The facts: Trillanes has not been arrested or imprisoned, contrary to the claim. He has also dismissed the allegations, calling them a “blatant lie.”

“I vehemently deny that I received $2 million or any amount from Zaldy Co for the ICC investigation or any other purpose. This is an attempt to discredit the ongoing ICC proceedings against Duterte,” Trillanes said in a February 24 Facebook post.

He also questioned the timing of the allegations, which coincided with Duterte’s pre-trial hearing, held from February 23 to 27.

Speaking to journalist Jessica Soho, Trillanes said, “Bakit ngayon kung kailan kasagsagan ng confirmation of charges hearing? Bakit ngayon sila mag-eexpose? Those are the spin. Kasi kailangan nila palabasin na sinuhulan, para magamit ni Kaufman, na sasabihin, corrupt ‘yung mga ICC investigators.

(Why now, when the confirmation of charges hearing is in full swing? Why are they exposing these claims now? That’s spin. Because they need to make it appear that there was bribery, so that [Duterte’s lead defense counsel Nicholas] Kaufman can say that ICC investigators are corrupt.)

On Thursday, March 5, Trillanes filed a perjury complaint against the 18 “ex-Marines” due to their “false testimonies,” and a cyber libel and incriminating an innocent person complaint against Baligod and several other personalities.

Independent probe: Asked about the former soldiers’ allegations, the ICC prosecution clarified that it conducted its investigations into Duterte’s case independently, using funds from the court.

“The Office independently collects the information relevant to its investigations, identifies the individuals from whom it collects witness statements, and assesses the credibility, reliability, and relevance of all sources of information it requests and receives, and examines incriminating and exonerating evidence equally,” the Office of the Prosecutor said in a statement to Rappler. (READ: Ex-marines’ affidavit dragging ICC a ‘deliberate intimidation’ – deputy prosecutor)

Questionable identities: Additionally, the Philippine Navy revealed that, based on their records, four of the supposed “bagmen” presented by Baligod were never members of the Philippine Navy or the Philippine Marine Corps, and that the “majority” of the rest were dishonorably discharged.

The Philippine Marine Corps slammed the group of alleged bagmen as “opportunistic.”

PMC Commandant Major General Vicente Blanco III said individuals who were dishonorably discharged are not “true” Marines, adding, “We should always look with disdain against opportunistic groups or individuals trying to link their actions as being true Marines — they are unworthy of our respect.” – Princess Leah Sagaad/Rappler.com

Keep us aware of suspicious Facebook pages, groups, accounts, websites, articles, or photos in your network by contacting us at factcheck@rappler.com. Let us battle disinformation one Fact Check at a time.

Market Opportunity
Notcoin Logo
Notcoin Price(NOT)
$0.0003864
$0.0003864$0.0003864
-0.97%
USD
Notcoin (NOT) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact crypto.news@mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The post The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Visions of future technology are often prescient about the broad strokes while flubbing the details. The tablets in “2001: A Space Odyssey” do indeed look like iPads, but you never see the astronauts paying for subscriptions or wasting hours on Candy Crush.  Channel factories are one vision that arose early in the history of the Lightning Network to address some challenges that Lightning has faced from the beginning. Despite having grown to become Bitcoin’s most successful layer-2 scaling solution, with instant and low-fee payments, Lightning’s scale is limited by its reliance on payment channels. Although Lightning shifts most transactions off-chain, each payment channel still requires an on-chain transaction to open and (usually) another to close. As adoption grows, pressure on the blockchain grows with it. The need for a more scalable approach to managing channels is clear. Channel factories were supposed to meet this need, but where are they? In 2025, subnetworks are emerging that revive the impetus of channel factories with some new details that vastly increase their potential. They are natively interoperable with Lightning and achieve greater scale by allowing a group of participants to open a shared multisig UTXO and create multiple bilateral channels, which reduces the number of on-chain transactions and improves capital efficiency. Achieving greater scale by reducing complexity, Ark and Spark perform the same function as traditional channel factories with new designs and additional capabilities based on shared UTXOs.  Channel Factories 101 Channel factories have been around since the inception of Lightning. A factory is a multiparty contract where multiple users (not just two, as in a Dryja-Poon channel) cooperatively lock funds in a single multisig UTXO. They can open, close and update channels off-chain without updating the blockchain for each operation. Only when participants leave or the factory dissolves is an on-chain transaction…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:09
‘Customers are awake’- Eric Trump slams banks over stablecoin yield opposition

‘Customers are awake’- Eric Trump slams banks over stablecoin yield opposition

The post ‘Customers are awake’- Eric Trump slams banks over stablecoin yield opposition appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Eric Trump, the son of U.S. President
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/03/05 18:19
Pi Network (PI) climbs on Pi Day update, token unlocks risk

Pi Network (PI) climbs on Pi Day update, token unlocks risk

Pi Network (PI) rally as Bitcoin meets $74,000 resistance Pi Network’s PI outperformed the broader crypto market, notching a multi-week high while Bitcoin stalled
Share
CoinLive2026/03/05 18:39