Zero Hash filed an application for a National Trust Bank Charter with the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency on March 4, 2026, joining a growing list of Zero Hash filed an application for a National Trust Bank Charter with the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency on March 4, 2026, joining a growing list of

Major Crypto Company Applied for a Federal Bank Charter

2026/03/05 20:01
4 min read
For feedback or concerns regarding this content, please contact us at crypto.news@mexc.com

Zero Hash filed an application for a National Trust Bank Charter with the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency on March 4, 2026, joining a growing list of crypto infrastructure firms seeking federal oversight as the regulatory environment shifts toward clarity.

What Zero Hash Actually Does

Zero Hash is not a consumer-facing exchange. Most people have never heard of it, which is precisely what makes its charter application significant. The company powers the crypto infrastructure behind Morgan Stanley, Stripe, and Interactive Brokers, among others. When those platforms process a crypto transaction, Zero Hash is frequently the engine running underneath.

A federal charter for Zero Hash is therefore not just a regulatory milestone for one company. It is a structural upgrade for the infrastructure layer that multiple major financial institutions already depend on.

The proposed entity, Zero Hash National Trust Bank, would offer custody for digital assets and fiat, stablecoin management and reserve oversight, custodial staking and validation, and trade execution, settlement, and clearing services.

Why Federal Is Better Than State by State

Zero Hash currently operates under a patchwork of state-level money transmission licenses, the standard compliance structure for crypto firms in the United States. Each state has different rules, different requirements, and different renewal processes. Operating nationally means managing dozens of regulatory relationships simultaneously, with conflicting requirements that can make product development and expansion slow and expensive.

A national trust bank charter from the OCC replaces all of that with a single federal framework that preempts state-level regulation. One regulator, one set of rules, uniform operation across all fifty states. For a company whose entire business model is being the reliable infrastructure layer for institutional clients, that simplification has direct commercial value. Institutional clients prefer counterparties with clear, federal regulatory standing over those navigating state-by-state complexity.

SEC Sent a Crypto Regulatory Framework to the White House: What It Actually Says

The Industry Pattern Behind This Application

Zero Hash is not moving alone. The OCC granted conditional approvals in December 2025 to Circle, Ripple, BitGo, Fidelity Digital Assets, and Paxos. Morgan Stanley applied for its own digital trust charter in late February 2026, covered in yesterday’s reporting. The applications are arriving in a cluster because the regulatory environment has shifted enough to make approval plausible in a way it was not two years ago.

Stephen Gardner, Zero Hash’s Chief Legal and Compliance Officer, has been proposed as CEO of the new trust bank. Putting the top legal officer in charge of the chartered entity signals that the company views regulatory credibility as the primary value proposition of the new structure, not product expansion or revenue growth. The charter is the product.

One important limitation: as a national trust bank, Zero Hash National Trust Bank cannot take customer deposits or engage in commercial lending. This is not a full banking license. It is a narrower instrument specifically designed for custody, settlement, and asset management functions. That scope limitation is appropriate for what Zero Hash does and removes the systemic risk concerns that a full deposit-taking license would invite.

What This Week’s Pattern Means

Three separate entities applied for or progressed toward OCC trust charters in the span of days: Morgan Stanley in late February, Zero Hash on March 4, and the SEC submitting its interpretive framework to the White House on March 3. These are not coincidental. Firms apply for federal charters when they believe approval is achievable, and the current administration has made its position on crypto infrastructure clear enough that the calculation has changed.

The infrastructure layer of the crypto industry is federalizing. The firms that secure charters now will operate under cleaner regulatory standing than those that wait. That advantage compounds over time as institutional clients make custody and settlement decisions based partly on regulatory profile.

The post Major Crypto Company Applied for a Federal Bank Charter appeared first on ETHNews.

Market Opportunity
Lorenzo Protocol Logo
Lorenzo Protocol Price(BANK)
$0.04119
$0.04119$0.04119
+0.80%
USD
Lorenzo Protocol (BANK) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact crypto.news@mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Russian Central Bank Proposes Allowing Banks and Brokers to Obtain Crypto Licenses

Russian Central Bank Proposes Allowing Banks and Brokers to Obtain Crypto Licenses

The Bank of Russia has proposed allowing banks and brokerage firms to obtain licenses to operate crypto exchanges, a move that would place traditional financial
Share
Financemagnates2026/03/05 22:54
CME pushes Solana, XRP into derivatives spotlight with new options

CME pushes Solana, XRP into derivatives spotlight with new options

CME Group is launching options for Solana and XRP futures this October. The move signals a major shift, acknowledging that institutional liquidity is now firmly expanding beyond the established dominance of Bitcoin and Ether. According to a press release dated…
Share
Crypto.news2025/09/18 01:18
How The ByteDance App Survived Trump And A US Ban

How The ByteDance App Survived Trump And A US Ban

The post How The ByteDance App Survived Trump And A US Ban appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. WASHINGTON, DC – MARCH 13: Participants hold signs in support of TikTok outside the U.S. Capitol Building on March 13, 2024 in Washington, DC. (Photo by Anna Moneymaker/Getty Images) Getty Images From President Trump’s first ban attempt to a near-blackout earlier this year, TikTok’s five-year roller coaster ride looks like it’s finally slowing down now that Trump has unveiled a deal framework to keep the ByteDance app alive in the U.S. A look back at the saga around TikTok starting in 2020, however, shows just how close the app came to being shut out of the US – how it narrowly averted a ban and forced sale that found rare bipartisan backing in Washington. Recapping TikTok’s dramatic five-year battle When I interviewed Brendan Carr back in 2022, for example, the future FCC chairman was already certain at that point that TikTok’s days were numbered. For a litany of perceived sins — everything from the too-cozy relationship of the app’s parent company with China’s ruling regime to the app’s repeated floating of user privacy — Carr was already convinced, at least during his conversation with me, that: “The tide is going out on TikTok.” It was, in fact, one of the few issues that Washington lawmakers seemed to agree on. Even then-President Biden was on board, having resurrected Trump’s aborted TikTok ban from his first term and signed it into law. “It feels different now than it did two years ago at the end of the Trump administration, when concerns were first raised,” Carr told me then, in August of 2022. “I think, like a lot of things in the Trump era, people sort of picked sides on the issue based on the fact that it was Trump.” One thing led to another, though, and it looked like Carr was probably…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 07:29