Policy Share Share this article Copy linkX (Twitter)LinkedInFacebookEmail U.S. banking agencies say capital should be s Policy Share Share this article Copy linkX (Twitter)LinkedInFacebookEmail U.S. banking agencies say capital should be s

U.S. banking agencies say capital should be same for standard or tokenized securities

2026/03/06 05:47
5 min read
For feedback or concerns regarding this content, please contact us at crypto.news@mexc.com
Share
Share this article
Copy linkX (Twitter)LinkedInFacebookEmail

U.S. banking agencies say capital should be same for standard or tokenized securities

The Federal Reserve and other banking regulators clarified that the capital tally in banks needs identical treatment whether securities are tokenized or not.

By Jesse Hamilton|Edited by Nikhilesh De
Mar 5, 2026, 9:47 p.m.
Make us preferred on Google
The U.S. banking regulators clarified that banks should maintain the same capital for tokenized securities and they do for regular securities.(Unsplash)

What to know:

  • The trio of primary U.S. banking regulators issued a document to clarify how much capital banks need to back tokenized securities, which they said should match regular, non-tokenized versions.
  • The directive from the Federal Reserve and other agencies further inserts crypto assets into the regular course of business at banks, and treating the tokens and same as the underlying securities means the crypto aspect won't be financially penalized in their treatment by regulators.

The U.S. Federal Reserve and other regulators told bankers that they need to maintain the same amount of capital to back tokenized securities as they do regulator securities.

"The technologies used to issue and transact in a security do not generally impact its capital treatment," according to the agencies, also including the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. The three sent a new frequently-asked-questions document on Thursday to the banks they regulated.

The legal rights to owners of securities are meant to be the same whichever way the securities transact, and the regulators say the capital should also be the same. The assets themselves may also be used as financial collateral in the same way that securities are, the agencies clarified, "subject to the same haircuts applicable to the non-tokenized form of the security."

Banks and other financial firms are required by their regulators to maintain capital as a cushion against financial distress, setting aside certain levels of liquid assets to be able to protect themselves and their customers. Setting the same standard for both forms of securities ownership means the crypto-linked assets won't face more stringent treatment.

The same capital treatment also applies whether the tokens are issued on permissioned or permissionless blockchains, the regulators said, and that technology-neutral approach holds true for the capital tied to derivatives that reference tokenized securities, as well.

Tokenization of securities is a rising segment of crypto activity, in which such assets as stocks, bonds and real estate can be represented in a token issued on a blockchain. The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission is also working on policies to direct how the tokens are handled.

Capital requirements represent a core compliance demand in the banking business, and clarity on such aspects of crypto capital further advances the assets into melding with U.S. banking. Though U.S. bank watchdogs were hesitant in recent years to embrace crypto and blockchain technology, the incoming leaders appointed during the administration of President Donald Trump last year have made it a special point to champion pro-crypto moves.


Read More: Market infrastructure firms warn tokenized securities face higher costs, split liquidity without interoperability

Federal ReserveTokenized SecuritiesBankRegulations

More For You

Pudgy Penguins: Challenging the Pokemon and Disney Legacy in the Global IP Race

CoinDesk Research looks into how Pudgy Penguins disrupts traditional toys market via a phygital model. With 2M+ units sold, they scale via global partnerships and events.

What to know:

  • Disrupting a Stagnant Market: Pudgy Penguins is utilizing a "Negative CAC" model to challenge the traditional $31.7B licensed toy industry by treating physical merchandise as a profitable user acquisition tool rather than just a final product.
View Full Report

More For You

SEC, Justin Sun reach settlement over Tron lawsuit

Rainberry, a company affiliated with the Tron network, will pay a $10 million fine. Charges against Sun will be dismissed.

Read full story
Latest Crypto News

SEC, Justin Sun reach settlement over Tron lawsuit

Short seller Culper bets against ether, Tom Lee's BitMine citing 'death spiral' risk

Ripple adds Coinbase crypto futures to its $3 trillion clearing platform

Kraken's surprise Fed win may harken onslaught of crypto firms with narrow Fed access

U.S. judge freezes BlockFills assets in dispute over 70 bitcoin with creditor Dominion Capital

Son of U.S. government contractor, accused of stealing millions in seized crypto, arrested in France

Top Stories

Bitcoin pulls back to near $71,000 even as software sector soars

New York Stock Exchange owner values crypto exchange OKX at $25 billion in new partnership

Trump-backed American Bitcoin board members scoop up stock following earnings

Bitcoin traders, alert: The rally is nearing a two-year 'make or break' price zone

Andreessen Horowitz crypto arm said to seek $2 billion for fifth fund: Fortune

Market Opportunity
Union Logo
Union Price(U)
$0.000993
$0.000993$0.000993
-9.14%
USD
Union (U) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact crypto.news@mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.