Revenue from President Donald Trump’s tariffs jumped in August. However, a recent court setback for the White House has raised the prospect that some of the money may have to be paid back. Treasury Department figures show the U.S. collected $30 billion in tariff revenue in August, bringing the year-to-date total to $165 billion. By […]Revenue from President Donald Trump’s tariffs jumped in August. However, a recent court setback for the White House has raised the prospect that some of the money may have to be paid back. Treasury Department figures show the U.S. collected $30 billion in tariff revenue in August, bringing the year-to-date total to $165 billion. By […]

U.S. collected $30 billion in tariffs in August and $165 billion so far this year

2025/09/13 05:30
4 min read
For feedback or concerns regarding this content, please contact us at crypto.news@mexc.com

Revenue from President Donald Trump’s tariffs jumped in August. However, a recent court setback for the White House has raised the prospect that some of the money may have to be paid back.

Treasury Department figures show the U.S. collected $30 billion in tariff revenue in August, bringing the year-to-date total to $165 billion.

By contrast, August 2024 yielded $7 billion, with $70 billion gathered over the same period a year earlier. That puts the increase in tariff receipts this year at $95 billion. The gains could be temporary, however, if courts ultimately rule the approach unlawful and order refunds.

Earlier this month, a federal appeals court found that Trump lacked authority to use the International Economic Emergency Powers Act to impose the duties at issue. The administration is appealing, sending the dispute to the Supreme Court.

“We would have to give a refund on about half the tariffs, which would be terrible for the treasury,” Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said on NBC’s “Meet the Press.” In a court filing, Bessent said between $750 billion and $1 trillion in tariffs could be collected by June 2026, which is when the Supreme Court is expected to issue its ruling. The justices agreed to fast-track the case, with arguments set for November.

Court loss may not end tariffs completely

Even if the court sides against the administration, the tariffs might not vanish, according to Jeff Buchbinder, chief equity strategist at LPL Financial.

He wrote that the White House has other legal routes it could use to re-establish duties. Whether previously collected tariff revenue would have to be paid back remains unresolved. “Regardless of how the highest U.S. court rules, expect most of the current tariffs to remain in place,” Buchbinder wrote.

Not every tariff is at stake in the case.

At issue are the “reciprocal tariffs” on a range of partners and the fentanyl-related duties on Canada, China, and Mexico. Sector-specific tariffs on items such as foreign cars, steel, and copper are outside the lawsuit because they rest on a different legal basis and remain in force.

The economic backdrop has grown more complicated. U.S. consumer prices rose in August by the most in seven months, driven by housing and food, Labor Department data showed Thursday. At the same time, a surge in first-time applications for jobless benefits last week left the Federal Reserve on track to cut interest rates next Wednesday.

Together, firmer inflation and a softer job market have revived stagflation worries and complicate the Fed’s choices after Wednesday’s meeting. Trump has also said recently that the U.S would be “completely destroyed” without tariff money, as reported by Cryptopolitan.

Tariffs and travel drive up prices

Part of the price pressure reflects companies passing along higher costs tied to Trump’s broad tariffs, alongside a rebound in demand for travel. Visitor numbers to the United States slumped in the spring and early summer amid boycotts and the administration’s immigration crackdown before turning higher.

The Consumer Price Index increased 0.4% in August after a 0.2% rise in July, the largest monthly gain since January, the Bureau of Labor Statistics said.

Housing costs rose 0.4%. Food prices went up 0.5%, with supermarket prices up 0.6%. Fruits and vegetables saw the biggest rise at 1.6%. Tomato prices jumped 4.5%, the highest since January 2020.

Beef rose 2.7% in the month and stood 13.9% higher than a year earlier. Coffee was up 3.6% for the month and 20.9% from a year earlier. Tariffs likely contributed to some of these increases, while past droughts that reduced the national cattle herd probably helped push beef higher.

Want your project in front of crypto’s top minds? Feature it in our next industry report, where data meets impact.

Market Opportunity
Union Logo
Union Price(U)
$0.000988
$0.000988$0.000988
+4.00%
USD
Union (U) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact crypto.news@mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny

Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny

The post Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. The cryptocurrency world is buzzing with a recent controversy surrounding a bold OpenVPP partnership claim. This week, OpenVPP (OVPP) announced what it presented as a significant collaboration with the U.S. government in the innovative field of energy tokenization. However, this claim quickly drew the sharp eye of on-chain analyst ZachXBT, who highlighted a swift and official rebuttal that has sent ripples through the digital asset community. What Sparked the OpenVPP Partnership Claim Controversy? The core of the issue revolves around OpenVPP’s assertion of a U.S. government partnership. This kind of collaboration would typically be a monumental endorsement for any private cryptocurrency project, especially given the current regulatory climate. Such a partnership could signify a new era of mainstream adoption and legitimacy for energy tokenization initiatives. OpenVPP initially claimed cooperation with the U.S. government. This alleged partnership was said to be in the domain of energy tokenization. The announcement generated considerable interest and discussion online. ZachXBT, known for his diligent on-chain investigations, was quick to flag the development. He brought attention to the fact that U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Commissioner Hester Peirce had directly addressed the OpenVPP partnership claim. Her response, delivered within hours, was unequivocal and starkly contradicted OpenVPP’s narrative. How Did Regulatory Authorities Respond to the OpenVPP Partnership Claim? Commissioner Hester Peirce’s statement was a crucial turning point in this unfolding story. She clearly stated that the SEC, as an agency, does not engage in partnerships with private cryptocurrency projects. This response effectively dismantled the credibility of OpenVPP’s initial announcement regarding their supposed government collaboration. Peirce’s swift clarification underscores a fundamental principle of regulatory bodies: maintaining impartiality and avoiding endorsements of private entities. Her statement serves as a vital reminder to the crypto community about the official stance of government agencies concerning private ventures. Moreover, ZachXBT’s analysis…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 02:13
South Korea Orders Crypto Custody Overhaul After Police Lose Seized BTC

South Korea Orders Crypto Custody Overhaul After Police Lose Seized BTC

TLDR South Korea introduced new custody rules after police lost seized Bitcoin worth $1.4 million. The Finance Minister confirmed a full inspection of digital asset
Share
Coincentral2026/03/03 01:00
Trump Justice Department’s motion to take Michigan voter rolls misspelled 'United States'

Trump Justice Department’s motion to take Michigan voter rolls misspelled 'United States'

The Justice Department filed an emergency motion at the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals on Monday against the state of Michigan over its refusal to share voter rolls
Share
Alternet2026/03/03 01:25