In yet another legal blow, a federal judge has dismissed the Trump administration's lawsuit trying to overturn Minnesota's policy of giving in-state tuition ratesIn yet another legal blow, a federal judge has dismissed the Trump administration's lawsuit trying to overturn Minnesota's policy of giving in-state tuition rates

'Plain text is clear': Trump admin suit thrown out in latest courtroom humiliation

2026/03/28 06:17
2 min read
For feedback or concerns regarding this content, please contact us at crypto.news@mexc.com

In yet another legal blow, a federal judge has dismissed the Trump administration's lawsuit trying to overturn Minnesota's policy of giving in-state tuition rates to certain immigrants without legal status.

The case, heard by U.S. District Judge Katherine Menendez, argued that Minnesota's policy is pre-empted by the federal Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act, which states that "Notwithstanding any other provision of law, an alien who is not lawfully present in the United States shall not be eligible on the basis of residence within a State (or a political subdivision) for any postsecondary education benefit unless a citizen or national of the United States is eligible for such a benefit (in no less an amount, duration, and scope) without regard to whether the citizen or national is such a resident."

Specifically, the Trump administration pointed to the Resident Tuition Statute, its use in the Resident Student Statute that defines a "resident student," and these laws' use in qualification for the North Star Promise program for free tuition. They argued that technically, the way this is worded, some immigrants could qualify for free tuition that similarly situated citizens could not.

Menendez rejected this argument by pointing out that the tuition law doesn't solely apply to people who live in Minnesota, or universally apply to all people in the state; the requirements, she noted, are residency-neutral, only turning on how many years have been completed at a Minnesota high school.

"The plain text of § 1623 is clear: it does not preempt the Minnesota statutes because the Resident Tuition Statute does not determine eligibility for Resident Tuition on the basis of residence. Defendants’ Motion [to dismiss] is granted," wrote Menendez.

This comes as judges around the country find Trump's administration has been trying to illegally rewrite the law across the board, from immigration law to even infrastructure law.

Market Opportunity
Notcoin Logo
Notcoin Price(NOT)
$0,0003478
$0,0003478$0,0003478
-1,30%
USD
Notcoin (NOT) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact crypto.news@mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.
Tags: