The post California’s High-Speed Rail Project Is A Disgraceful Boondoggle appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. A shinkansen N700A series, or high speed bullet train, arrives at night in Tokyo on March 21, 2021. (Photo by Charly TRIBALLEAU / AFP) (Photo by CHARLY TRIBALLEAU/AFP via Getty Images) AFP via Getty Images California’s misbegotten high-speed train project is an expensive example of Ronald Reagan’s insight that a government program “is the nearest thing to eternal life we’ll ever see on this earth.” Back in the early 2000s, California politicians fell in love with the idea of a 520-mile bullet train connecting San Francisco and Los Angeles, with various stops in between. After all, countries like China, Japan and various European nations had passenger trains that could run at remarkable top speeds of 200 mph or faster. Plans and dazzling PR presentations were put together. Voters were impressed and approved a nearly $10 billion referendum in 2008 to get the thing started. However, the passenger projections and the revenues the bullet train would supposedly collect were pure fantasy, verging on fraud. So were cost estimates. Original estimates were $33 billion, and the train was supposed to be completed by 2020. The whole thing has been a disgraceful boondoggle, even by government standards. Here we are five years after the bullet train was to be up and running, and the state hasn’t even begun to lay the 119-mile track between two cities, both far from the original destinations of LA and San Francisco. Track-laying for this won’t even start until early next year. The latest cost calculations for this project are $135 billion, and rising. Completion date? Sometime in the next decade, and maybe not even then. Long ago, most normal people concluded that this fiasco should be abandoned. But sensible thinking from pyramid-loving politicians and folks who hate cars and planes has been conspicuously absent. The California legislature… The post California’s High-Speed Rail Project Is A Disgraceful Boondoggle appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. A shinkansen N700A series, or high speed bullet train, arrives at night in Tokyo on March 21, 2021. (Photo by Charly TRIBALLEAU / AFP) (Photo by CHARLY TRIBALLEAU/AFP via Getty Images) AFP via Getty Images California’s misbegotten high-speed train project is an expensive example of Ronald Reagan’s insight that a government program “is the nearest thing to eternal life we’ll ever see on this earth.” Back in the early 2000s, California politicians fell in love with the idea of a 520-mile bullet train connecting San Francisco and Los Angeles, with various stops in between. After all, countries like China, Japan and various European nations had passenger trains that could run at remarkable top speeds of 200 mph or faster. Plans and dazzling PR presentations were put together. Voters were impressed and approved a nearly $10 billion referendum in 2008 to get the thing started. However, the passenger projections and the revenues the bullet train would supposedly collect were pure fantasy, verging on fraud. So were cost estimates. Original estimates were $33 billion, and the train was supposed to be completed by 2020. The whole thing has been a disgraceful boondoggle, even by government standards. Here we are five years after the bullet train was to be up and running, and the state hasn’t even begun to lay the 119-mile track between two cities, both far from the original destinations of LA and San Francisco. Track-laying for this won’t even start until early next year. The latest cost calculations for this project are $135 billion, and rising. Completion date? Sometime in the next decade, and maybe not even then. Long ago, most normal people concluded that this fiasco should be abandoned. But sensible thinking from pyramid-loving politicians and folks who hate cars and planes has been conspicuously absent. The California legislature…

California’s High-Speed Rail Project Is A Disgraceful Boondoggle

For feedback or concerns regarding this content, please contact us at crypto.news@mexc.com

A shinkansen N700A series, or high speed bullet train, arrives at night in Tokyo on March 21, 2021. (Photo by Charly TRIBALLEAU / AFP) (Photo by CHARLY TRIBALLEAU/AFP via Getty Images)

AFP via Getty Images

California’s misbegotten high-speed train project is an expensive example of Ronald Reagan’s insight that a government program “is the nearest thing to eternal life we’ll ever see on this earth.”

Back in the early 2000s, California politicians fell in love with the idea of a 520-mile bullet train connecting San Francisco and Los Angeles, with various stops in between. After all, countries like China, Japan and various European nations had passenger trains that could run at remarkable top speeds of 200 mph or faster. Plans and dazzling PR presentations were put together. Voters were impressed and approved a nearly $10 billion referendum in 2008 to get the thing started.

However, the passenger projections and the revenues the bullet train would supposedly collect were pure fantasy, verging on fraud. So were cost estimates. Original estimates were $33 billion, and the train was supposed to be completed by 2020.

The whole thing has been a disgraceful boondoggle, even by government standards. Here we are five years after the bullet train was to be up and running, and the state hasn’t even begun to lay the 119-mile track between two cities, both far from the original destinations of LA and San Francisco. Track-laying for this won’t even start until early next year.

The latest cost calculations for this project are $135 billion, and rising. Completion date? Sometime in the next decade, and maybe not even then.

Long ago, most normal people concluded that this fiasco should be abandoned. But sensible thinking from pyramid-loving politicians and folks who hate cars and planes has been conspicuously absent.

The California legislature is planning to provide $20 billion for the financially- and managerially-challenged California High-Speed Rail Authority that’s in charge of this scheme. The funds will come from the state’s convoluted cap-and-trade program, which makes emitters of greenhouse gases buy pollution credits. The catch is that the authority will get only $1 billion a year from this legislation over the next 20 years.

Meanwhile, the Trump Administration is wisely clawing back $4 billion in allocated funds, on the grounds that the authority defaulted on the original terms. In other words, it lied about plausible estimates of time and costs. Moreover, from the get-go changes to the plan were made for political reasons.

Desperate for money, the rail authority is now plotting to lease some of the land it seized by eminent domain to real estate developers. Another scam to get money is to build solar facilities to provide electricity not only for the train but also for sale to private commercial customers. You wanna bet that if this undertaking happens, it will be a big money loser?

It’s long past time to derail this fiscal fiasco.

Source: https://www.forbes.com/sites/steveforbes/2025/09/17/californias-high-speed-rail-project-is-a-disgraceful-boondoggle/

Market Opportunity
Threshold Logo
Threshold Price(T)
$0.00662
$0.00662$0.00662
-4.19%
USD
Threshold (T) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact crypto.news@mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Ripple’s Hidden Road acquisition could ‘supercharge XRP’s utility’

Ripple’s Hidden Road acquisition could ‘supercharge XRP’s utility’

The post Ripple’s Hidden Road acquisition could ‘supercharge XRP’s utility’ appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. On Monday, March 2, 2026, the Depository Trust
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/03/03 18:12
S&P 500 Slides as Gas Prices Rise

S&P 500 Slides as Gas Prices Rise

The post S&P 500 Slides as Gas Prices Rise appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. U.S. stocks opened sharply lower Tuesday with the Dow Jones Industrial Average and
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/03/03 18:35
Aave DAO to Shut Down 50% of L2s While Doubling Down on GHO

Aave DAO to Shut Down 50% of L2s While Doubling Down on GHO

The post Aave DAO to Shut Down 50% of L2s While Doubling Down on GHO appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Aave DAO is gearing up for a significant overhaul by shutting down over 50% of underperforming L2 instances. It is also restructuring its governance framework and deploying over $100 million to boost GHO. This could be a pivotal moment that propels Aave back to the forefront of on-chain lending or sparks unprecedented controversy within the DeFi community. Sponsored Sponsored ACI Proposes Shutting Down 50% of L2s The “State of the Union” report by the Aave Chan Initiative (ACI) paints a candid picture. After a turbulent period in the DeFi market and internal challenges, Aave (AAVE) now leads in key metrics: TVL, revenue, market share, and borrowing volume. Aave’s annual revenue of $130 million surpasses the combined cash reserves of its competitors. Tokenomics improvements and the AAVE token buyback program have also contributed to the ecosystem’s growth. Aave global metrics. Source: Aave However, the ACI’s report also highlights several pain points. First, regarding the Layer-2 (L2) strategy. While Aave’s L2 strategy was once a key driver of success, it is no longer fit for purpose. Over half of Aave’s instances on L2s and alt-L1s are not economically viable. Based on year-to-date data, over 86.6% of Aave’s revenue comes from the mainnet, indicating that everything else is a side quest. On this basis, ACI proposes closing underperforming networks. The DAO should invest in key networks with significant differentiators. Second, ACI is pushing for a complete overhaul of the “friendly fork” framework, as most have been unimpressive regarding TVL and revenue. In some cases, attackers have exploited them to Aave’s detriment, as seen with Spark. Sponsored Sponsored “The friendly fork model had a good intention but bad execution where the DAO was too friendly towards these forks, allowing the DAO only little upside,” the report states. Third, the instance model, once a smart…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 02:28