The EU claims that TikTok and Meta did not follow transparency rules set by a major tech law.The EU claims that TikTok and Meta did not follow transparency rules set by a major tech law.

European Commission targets Meta and TikTok for violating landmark DSA rules

The European Commission has issued preliminary findings accusing Meta and TikTok of violating the EU’s Digital Services Act (DSA), a landmark regulation designed to enhance online safety and transparency. These findings mark the first time Meta has been formally accused under the DSA.

The investigation reveals that both platforms failed to provide adequate access to public data for researchers, hindering efforts to assess their impact on public health and safety.

Additionally, Meta is accused of implementing deceptive design practices, known as “dark patterns,” that make it difficult for users to report illegal content. These practices contravene the DSA’s requirements for straightforward “Notice and Action” processes.

In response, a Meta spokesperson contested the claims, stating that the company had already implemented changes aligned with DSA standards.

The EU urges tech firms to comply with the regulations set

The EU has established several regulations to govern large tech companies. An example is the Digital Services Act, which limits the influence of these tech giants. Sources have also discovered that the EU’s executive branch has been initiating multiple investigations under another significant law, the Digital Markets Act. 

Regarding the commission’s allegations against Meta, individuals in the tech ecosystem have raised heated debates. To address these concerns, Ben Walters, a spokesperson for the tech company, stated that they disagree with any claims filed against them regarding the alleged violation of the DSA. 

He further pointed out the company’s efforts to find a common ground on the situation as they were still negotiating with the European Commission on these issues.

When reporters asked Walters to comment on their operation, the representative stated that since the introduction of the DSA in the European Union, they have made several adjustments to their content reporting options, appeals process, and tools for data access. Therefore, with these changes in place, Walters believes that Meta meets the law’s requirements. 

TikTok declined to comment on a request from reporters. Still, the EU emphasized that it is important for researchers to access information from social media platforms. This enables the public to examine any tech-related physical or mental health impacts.

TikTok finds itself in trouble again with the EU 

In preliminary findings, the commission noted that Facebook, Instagram, and TikTok may have implemented complex procedures and tools that hindered researchers from seeking public data.

As a result, researchers regularly end up with incomplete or unreliable data, making it hard for them to study whether users, including young people, are exposed to illegal or harmful content. To tackle this issue, the Commission has called on these tech firms to review its findings and reply in writing.

Suppose the Commission’s initial findings are correct, it can make a non-compliance decision, which could ultimately lead to a fine of up to 6% of their total yearly revenue globally. This is a significant amount for Meta and ByteDance, the parent company of TikTok.

In the meantime, Ireland’s privacy regulator earlier imposed a substantial fine of about €530 million, equivalent to around $601.3 million, on TikTok. This was after they alleged that the tech company had transferred users’ data in the EU to China.

According to the Irish Data Protection Commission (DPC), which oversees TikTok’s privacy matters in the EU, TikTok violated the GDPR data protection law by sending European user data to China.  

To serve as an example to other tech firms with similar intentions to TikTok, the regulator ordered the tech company to ensure its data processing meets the rules within six months. It also mentioned its intentions to stop TikTok from sending data to China if it does not adhere to the rules set at that time.

Want your project in front of crypto’s top minds? Feature it in our next industry report, where data meets impact.

Market Opportunity
Notcoin Logo
Notcoin Price(NOT)
$0.0005183
$0.0005183$0.0005183
+2.04%
USD
Notcoin (NOT) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

The Top 10 Altcoins Most Purchased by Investors in 2025 Have Been Revealed! There’s a Trump Detail Too!

The Top 10 Altcoins Most Purchased by Investors in 2025 Have Been Revealed! There’s a Trump Detail Too!

The post The Top 10 Altcoins Most Purchased by Investors in 2025 Have Been Revealed! There’s a Trump Detail Too! appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. The Top
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/12/25 17:36
The high premium of silver funds has attracted attention; Guotou Silver LOF will be suspended from trading from the opening of the market on December 26 until 10:30 a.m. on the same day.

The high premium of silver funds has attracted attention; Guotou Silver LOF will be suspended from trading from the opening of the market on December 26 until 10:30 a.m. on the same day.

PANews reported on December 25th that Guotou Silver LOF announced it will suspend trading from the market opening on December 26th until 10:30 AM, resuming trading
Share
PANews2025/12/25 17:10
Why The Green Bay Packers Must Take The Cleveland Browns Seriously — As Hard As That Might Be

Why The Green Bay Packers Must Take The Cleveland Browns Seriously — As Hard As That Might Be

The post Why The Green Bay Packers Must Take The Cleveland Browns Seriously — As Hard As That Might Be appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Jordan Love and the Green Bay Packers are off to a 2-0 start. Getty Images The Green Bay Packers are, once again, one of the NFL’s better teams. The Cleveland Browns are, once again, one of the league’s doormats. It’s why unbeaten Green Bay (2-0) is a 8-point favorite at winless Cleveland (0-2) Sunday according to betmgm.com. The money line is also Green Bay -500. Most expect this to be a Packers’ rout, and it very well could be. But Green Bay knows taking anyone in this league for granted can prove costly. “I think if you look at their roster, the paper, who they have on that team, what they can do, they got a lot of talent and things can turn around quickly for them,” Packers safety Xavier McKinney said. “We just got to kind of keep that in mind and know we not just walking into something and they just going to lay down. That’s not what they going to do.” The Browns certainly haven’t laid down on defense. Far from. Cleveland is allowing an NFL-best 191.5 yards per game. The Browns gave up 141 yards to Cincinnati in Week 1, including just seven in the second half, but still lost, 17-16. Cleveland has given up an NFL-best 45.5 rushing yards per game and just 2.1 rushing yards per attempt. “The biggest thing is our defensive line is much, much improved over last year and I think we’ve got back to our personality,” defensive coordinator Jim Schwartz said recently. “When we play our best, our D-line leads us there as our engine.” The Browns rank third in the league in passing defense, allowing just 146.0 yards per game. Cleveland has also gone 30 straight games without allowing a 300-yard passer, the longest active streak in the NFL.…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:41