ExchangeDEX+
Buy CryptoMarketsSpotFuturesGOLDEarnEvent Center
More
Commodity Zero-Fee Gala
The post MARA Holdings (MARA) Suing Texas Officials Over Local Regulation appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. MARA has filed a suit to halt Hood County’s incorporation into a city. Hood County residents have proposed an incorporation to enable them to make their own rules. Neighbors in Hood County have complained about noise pollution from MARA Holdings’ mining activities. Bitcoin mining company MARA Holdings has filed a lawsuit to halt ongoing plans to incorporate a region in Texas into a city, citing that the citizen-led petition for incorporation does not meet legal standards.  MARA filed a federal lawsuit on Monday, which prompted the court to give Hood County officials until Thursday to respond. The Bitcoin miner also accused the county officials of colluding to support the proposed incorporation. Residents Complain Over Noise Pollution For context, neighbors along Mitchell Bend Highway, south of Granbury, complained about noise pollution from MARA Holdings’ mining activities. According to them, the noise from the computer cooling systems is ruining their peace. Allegedly, the noise pollution comes from systems that cool more than 60,000 computer units in constant operation during the Bitcoin mining process. Following the alleged discomfort, residents of the region initiated moves to incorporate and become a city, which would allow them to set their own rules. Some members of the neighborhood claim that MARA’s presence in the region is ruining their original plans and motivation for moving to the location. Related: https://coinedition.com/france-plan-surplus-electricity-bitcoin-mining/ MARA’s Defense Amid Increasing Allegations According to reports, most people living along Mitchell Bend Highway claim that they relocated to the area because of its calm country life. However, MARA Holdings’ presence since 2023 has changed their way of life, restricting them from enjoying the external atmosphere, since “the roar” of the Bitcoin miners’ cooling systems has become discomforting. A county commissioner reportedly described the noise pollution like “sleeping with a leafblower under your pillow.” According to him,… The post MARA Holdings (MARA) Suing Texas Officials Over Local Regulation appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. MARA has filed a suit to halt Hood County’s incorporation into a city. Hood County residents have proposed an incorporation to enable them to make their own rules. Neighbors in Hood County have complained about noise pollution from MARA Holdings’ mining activities. Bitcoin mining company MARA Holdings has filed a lawsuit to halt ongoing plans to incorporate a region in Texas into a city, citing that the citizen-led petition for incorporation does not meet legal standards.  MARA filed a federal lawsuit on Monday, which prompted the court to give Hood County officials until Thursday to respond. The Bitcoin miner also accused the county officials of colluding to support the proposed incorporation. Residents Complain Over Noise Pollution For context, neighbors along Mitchell Bend Highway, south of Granbury, complained about noise pollution from MARA Holdings’ mining activities. According to them, the noise from the computer cooling systems is ruining their peace. Allegedly, the noise pollution comes from systems that cool more than 60,000 computer units in constant operation during the Bitcoin mining process. Following the alleged discomfort, residents of the region initiated moves to incorporate and become a city, which would allow them to set their own rules. Some members of the neighborhood claim that MARA’s presence in the region is ruining their original plans and motivation for moving to the location. Related: https://coinedition.com/france-plan-surplus-electricity-bitcoin-mining/ MARA’s Defense Amid Increasing Allegations According to reports, most people living along Mitchell Bend Highway claim that they relocated to the area because of its calm country life. However, MARA Holdings’ presence since 2023 has changed their way of life, restricting them from enjoying the external atmosphere, since “the roar” of the Bitcoin miners’ cooling systems has become discomforting. A county commissioner reportedly described the noise pollution like “sleeping with a leafblower under your pillow.” According to him,…

MARA Holdings (MARA) Suing Texas Officials Over Local Regulation

Author: BitcoinEthereumNews
Source: BitcoinEthereumNews
2025/11/04 06:48
3 min read
Manchester City Fan
CITY$0,6656-8,34%
Notcoin
NOT$0,0003687-3,65%
Moonveil
MORE$0,0006558-1,24%
ConstitutionDAO
PEOPLE$0,006466-3,95%
  • MARA has filed a suit to halt Hood County’s incorporation into a city.
  • Hood County residents have proposed an incorporation to enable them to make their own rules.
  • Neighbors in Hood County have complained about noise pollution from MARA Holdings’ mining activities.

Bitcoin mining company MARA Holdings has filed a lawsuit to halt ongoing plans to incorporate a region in Texas into a city, citing that the citizen-led petition for incorporation does not meet legal standards. 

MARA filed a federal lawsuit on Monday, which prompted the court to give Hood County officials until Thursday to respond. The Bitcoin miner also accused the county officials of colluding to support the proposed incorporation.

Residents Complain Over Noise Pollution

For context, neighbors along Mitchell Bend Highway, south of Granbury, complained about noise pollution from MARA Holdings’ mining activities. According to them, the noise from the computer cooling systems is ruining their peace. Allegedly, the noise pollution comes from systems that cool more than 60,000 computer units in constant operation during the Bitcoin mining process.

Following the alleged discomfort, residents of the region initiated moves to incorporate and become a city, which would allow them to set their own rules. Some members of the neighborhood claim that MARA’s presence in the region is ruining their original plans and motivation for moving to the location.

Related: https://coinedition.com/france-plan-surplus-electricity-bitcoin-mining/

MARA’s Defense Amid Increasing Allegations

According to reports, most people living along Mitchell Bend Highway claim that they relocated to the area because of its calm country life. However, MARA Holdings’ presence since 2023 has changed their way of life, restricting them from enjoying the external atmosphere, since “the roar” of the Bitcoin miners’ cooling systems has become discomforting.

A county commissioner reportedly described the noise pollution like “sleeping with a leafblower under your pillow.” According to him, the noise is not only discomforting but also relentless.

In the meantime, MARA, which has three other mining facilities in Texas, has continued to defend its presence in the region. In a letter sent to the authorities in August, MARA Holdings claimed that some people who live outside the area signed the petition. The firm also noted the economic benefits its establishment brings to the community, affirming its commitment to maintaining the recommended standard health and safety measures.

Related: https://coinedition.com/union-jack-oil-plans-bitcoin-mining-operation-using-natural-gas-at-west-newton/

Disclaimer: The information presented in this article is for informational and educational purposes only. The article does not constitute financial advice or advice of any kind. Coin Edition is not responsible for any losses incurred as a result of the utilization of content, products, or services mentioned. Readers are advised to exercise caution before taking any action related to the company.

Source: https://coinedition.com/mara-holdings-mara-suing-texas-officials-over-local-regulation/

Market Opportunity
Manchester City Fan Logo
Manchester City Fan Price(CITY)
$0,6656
$0,6656$0,6656
-5,90%
USD
Manchester City Fan (CITY) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Pippin (PIPPIN) Price Prediction 2026–2030: Can PIPPIN Hit $0.70 Soon?

Pippin (PIPPIN) Price Prediction 2026–2030: Can PIPPIN Hit $0.70 Soon?

PIPPIN has surged sharply on the daily timeframe, printing a powerful bullish candle with over 25% gains. RSI is holding above 60, signaling strengthening momentum
Share
Coinstats2026/02/23 04:29
Will Cardano Reach $10 by 2030? Analysts Break Down ADA’s Growth Cycles

Will Cardano Reach $10 by 2030? Analysts Break Down ADA’s Growth Cycles

The post Will Cardano Reach $10 by 2030? Analysts Break Down ADA’s Growth Cycles appeared first on Coinpedia Fintech News Cardano (ADA) is trading at $0.9024 with a market cap of $32.91 billion. Experts say ADA has the potential to climb much higher, with some placing long-term targets as high as $10. The token continues to benefit from stronger visibility, rising liquidity, and increasing inflows from both institutional and retail markets. Can Cardano Hit $10 …
Share
CoinPedia2025/09/18 17:19
Crypto whale loses $6M to sneaky phishing scheme targeting staked Ethereum

Crypto whale loses $6M to sneaky phishing scheme targeting staked Ethereum

The post Crypto whale loses $6M to sneaky phishing scheme targeting staked Ethereum appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. A crypto whale lost more than $6 million in staked Ethereum (stETH) and Aave-wrapped Bitcoin (aEthWBTC) after approving malicious signatures in a phishing scheme on Sept. 18, according to blockchain security firm Scam Sniffer. According to the firm, the attackers disguised their move as a routine wallet confirmation through “Permit” signatures, which tricked the victim into authorizing fund transfers without triggering obvious red flags. Yu Xian, founder of blockchain security company SlowMist, noted that the victim did not recognize the danger because the transaction required no gas fees. He wrote: “From the victim’s perspective, he just clicked a few times to confirm the wallet’s pop-up signature requests, didn’t spend a single penny of gas, and $6.28 million was gone.” How Permit exploits work Permit approvals were originally designed to simplify token transfers. Instead of submitting an on-chain approval and paying fees, a user can sign an off-chain message authorizing a spender. That efficiency, however, has created a new attack surface for malicious players. Once a user signs such a permit, attackers can combine two functions—Permit and TransferFrom—to drain assets directly. Because the authorization takes place off-chain, wallet dashboards show no unusual activity until the funds move. As a result, the assets are gone when the approval executes on-chain, and tokens are redirected to the attacker’s wallet. This loophole has made permit exploits increasingly attractive for malicious actors, who can siphon millions without needing complex hacks or high-cost gas wars. Phishing losses The latest theft highlights a wider trend of escalating phishing campaigns. Scam Sniffer reported that in August alone, attackers stole $12.17 million from more than 15,200 victims. That figure represented a 72% jump in losses compared with July. According to the firm, the most significant share of August’s damages came from three large accounts that accounted for nearly half…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/19 02:31