The post Money laundering fraudsters favoring stablecoins over Bitcoin as preferred digital currency appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Chainalysis research has found that stablecoins are replacing Bitcoin as the preferred digital currency to run money laundering schemes. The crypto analytics firm claimed that these fiat-pegged tokens were used in nearly 63% of money laundering transactions in 2024. The Chainalysis report asserted that stablecoins are mostly preferred because they are easy to send overseas. They can also be traded informally without identity verifications. The report says stablecoins are the new “back accounts” for criminal organizations. A “back account” is the final drop account from which the funds transferred across several accounts are withdrawn. The first account where deceived victims deposit their money is referred to as the “front account.” The report claims that, until 2021, Bitcoin was used almost exclusively for various money laundering crimes; however, stablecoins have recently become more untraceable, especially across borders. The growth of stablecoins has also led to a corresponding increase in their illegal use. FATF supports Chainalysis’s findings The Financial Action Task Force (FATF) reported in June that the use of stablecoin by criminals has increased significantly since last year. The FATF also claimed that the majority of illicit activities on blockchains involve stablecoins.   The United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC) also published a report in January claiming Tether (USDT) was the most popular currency for criminal gangs in Southeast Asia. The main reason stablecoins were used for laundering proceeds from criminal activities is their versatility. The UNODC noted the difficulty in smuggling fiat currencies overseas; converting them in Korea is even more challenging.  The Chainalysis report also found that converting criminal proceeds into stablecoins allows for easy cross-border remittance. Money launderers can bypass exchanges by using overseas crypto exchanges that don’t require KYC (know your customer) verification. They can also use OTC (over-the-counter) transactions. The report noted that while stablecoins… The post Money laundering fraudsters favoring stablecoins over Bitcoin as preferred digital currency appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Chainalysis research has found that stablecoins are replacing Bitcoin as the preferred digital currency to run money laundering schemes. The crypto analytics firm claimed that these fiat-pegged tokens were used in nearly 63% of money laundering transactions in 2024. The Chainalysis report asserted that stablecoins are mostly preferred because they are easy to send overseas. They can also be traded informally without identity verifications. The report says stablecoins are the new “back accounts” for criminal organizations. A “back account” is the final drop account from which the funds transferred across several accounts are withdrawn. The first account where deceived victims deposit their money is referred to as the “front account.” The report claims that, until 2021, Bitcoin was used almost exclusively for various money laundering crimes; however, stablecoins have recently become more untraceable, especially across borders. The growth of stablecoins has also led to a corresponding increase in their illegal use. FATF supports Chainalysis’s findings The Financial Action Task Force (FATF) reported in June that the use of stablecoin by criminals has increased significantly since last year. The FATF also claimed that the majority of illicit activities on blockchains involve stablecoins.   The United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC) also published a report in January claiming Tether (USDT) was the most popular currency for criminal gangs in Southeast Asia. The main reason stablecoins were used for laundering proceeds from criminal activities is their versatility. The UNODC noted the difficulty in smuggling fiat currencies overseas; converting them in Korea is even more challenging.  The Chainalysis report also found that converting criminal proceeds into stablecoins allows for easy cross-border remittance. Money launderers can bypass exchanges by using overseas crypto exchanges that don’t require KYC (know your customer) verification. They can also use OTC (over-the-counter) transactions. The report noted that while stablecoins…

Money laundering fraudsters favoring stablecoins over Bitcoin as preferred digital currency

Chainalysis research has found that stablecoins are replacing Bitcoin as the preferred digital currency to run money laundering schemes. The crypto analytics firm claimed that these fiat-pegged tokens were used in nearly 63% of money laundering transactions in 2024.

The Chainalysis report asserted that stablecoins are mostly preferred because they are easy to send overseas. They can also be traded informally without identity verifications. The report says stablecoins are the new “back accounts” for criminal organizations.

A “back account” is the final drop account from which the funds transferred across several accounts are withdrawn. The first account where deceived victims deposit their money is referred to as the “front account.”

The report claims that, until 2021, Bitcoin was used almost exclusively for various money laundering crimes; however, stablecoins have recently become more untraceable, especially across borders. The growth of stablecoins has also led to a corresponding increase in their illegal use.

FATF supports Chainalysis’s findings

The Financial Action Task Force (FATF) reported in June that the use of stablecoin by criminals has increased significantly since last year. The FATF also claimed that the majority of illicit activities on blockchains involve stablecoins.  

The United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC) also published a report in January claiming Tether (USDT) was the most popular currency for criminal gangs in Southeast Asia. The main reason stablecoins were used for laundering proceeds from criminal activities is their versatility. The UNODC noted the difficulty in smuggling fiat currencies overseas; converting them in Korea is even more challenging. 

The Chainalysis report also found that converting criminal proceeds into stablecoins allows for easy cross-border remittance. Money launderers can bypass exchanges by using overseas crypto exchanges that don’t require KYC (know your customer) verification. They can also use OTC (over-the-counter) transactions.

The report noted that while stablecoins are fundamentally traceable, their decentralized nature allows them to avoid government control.  It further noted that although the transactions may leave a trail, crypto wallets make tracking difficult because they use randomized alphanumeric characters. Tumbled or mixed stablecoins become even more challenging to track.  

The report also found that Korean criminals are increasingly turning to stablecoins for the so-called “Oda Jangip fraud”. The scam begins with false advertising on online shopping stores or second-hand marketplaces, and then money is scammed from unsuspecting buyers.

Stablecoins are used to launder proceeds from small-scale frauds (hundreds of thousands of dollars) and large-scale scams (hundreds of millions of dollars and more).

However, the report suggests that criminals involved in stablecoin-related crimes often receive lenient sentences. Chainalysis gave an example of one criminal who laundered over $188 million while working for a voice phishing ring in January. The criminal, whom the analytics firm chose to call Person A, bought Ethereum and transferred it to an overseas crypto exchange. 

The ETH was then swapped for USDT and transferred to a crypto wallet controlled by the ring. The money laundering process began with domestic bank accounts, ETH, overseas crypto exchanges, stablecoins, and then a crypto wallet. However, the criminal received only one year and six months in prison, suspended for three years in August. 

Another criminal was reportedly sentenced to eight months in prison and two years’ probation for deceiving a victim who bought perfume through a second-hand marketplace. The criminal received the customer’s 220,000 won deposit through a fake bank account, and then exchanged it for USDT to cash out.  

The report noted that financial fraud organizations that use stablecoins primarily use tactics such as voice phishing, stock/coin “leading room” scams, and second-hand market fraud. They then seek ways to launder the proceeds cleanly and withdraw them as cash. 

The smartest crypto minds already read our newsletter. Want in? Join them.

Source: https://www.cryptopolitan.com/stablecoins-replace-bitcoin-laundering/

Market Opportunity
Suilend Logo
Suilend Price(SEND)
$0.1927
$0.1927$0.1927
+0.67%
USD
Suilend (SEND) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The post The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Visions of future technology are often prescient about the broad strokes while flubbing the details. The tablets in “2001: A Space Odyssey” do indeed look like iPads, but you never see the astronauts paying for subscriptions or wasting hours on Candy Crush.  Channel factories are one vision that arose early in the history of the Lightning Network to address some challenges that Lightning has faced from the beginning. Despite having grown to become Bitcoin’s most successful layer-2 scaling solution, with instant and low-fee payments, Lightning’s scale is limited by its reliance on payment channels. Although Lightning shifts most transactions off-chain, each payment channel still requires an on-chain transaction to open and (usually) another to close. As adoption grows, pressure on the blockchain grows with it. The need for a more scalable approach to managing channels is clear. Channel factories were supposed to meet this need, but where are they? In 2025, subnetworks are emerging that revive the impetus of channel factories with some new details that vastly increase their potential. They are natively interoperable with Lightning and achieve greater scale by allowing a group of participants to open a shared multisig UTXO and create multiple bilateral channels, which reduces the number of on-chain transactions and improves capital efficiency. Achieving greater scale by reducing complexity, Ark and Spark perform the same function as traditional channel factories with new designs and additional capabilities based on shared UTXOs.  Channel Factories 101 Channel factories have been around since the inception of Lightning. A factory is a multiparty contract where multiple users (not just two, as in a Dryja-Poon channel) cooperatively lock funds in a single multisig UTXO. They can open, close and update channels off-chain without updating the blockchain for each operation. Only when participants leave or the factory dissolves is an on-chain transaction…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:09
Onyxcoin Price Breakout Coming — Is a 38% Move Next?

Onyxcoin Price Breakout Coming — Is a 38% Move Next?

The post Onyxcoin Price Breakout Coming — Is a 38% Move Next? appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Onyxcoin price action has entered a tense standoff between bulls
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/01/14 00:33
CEO Sandeep Nailwal Shared Highlights About RWA on Polygon

CEO Sandeep Nailwal Shared Highlights About RWA on Polygon

The post CEO Sandeep Nailwal Shared Highlights About RWA on Polygon appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Polygon CEO Sandeep Nailwal highlighted Polygon’s lead in global bonds, Spiko US T-Bill, and Spiko Euro T-Bill. Polygon published an X post to share that its roadmap to GigaGas was still scaling. Sentiments around POL price were last seen to be bearish. Polygon CEO Sandeep Nailwal shared key pointers from the Dune and RWA.xyz report. These pertain to highlights about RWA on Polygon. Simultaneously, Polygon underlined its roadmap towards GigaGas. Sentiments around POL price were last seen fumbling under bearish emotions. Polygon CEO Sandeep Nailwal on Polygon RWA CEO Sandeep Nailwal highlighted three key points from the Dune and RWA.xyz report. The Chief Executive of Polygon maintained that Polygon PoS was hosting RWA TVL worth $1.13 billion across 269 assets plus 2,900 holders. Nailwal confirmed from the report that RWA was happening on Polygon. The Dune and https://t.co/W6WSFlHoQF report on RWA is out and it shows that RWA is happening on Polygon. Here are a few highlights: – Leading in Global Bonds: Polygon holds 62% share of tokenized global bonds (driven by Spiko’s euro MMF and Cashlink euro issues) – Spiko U.S.… — Sandeep | CEO, Polygon Foundation (※,※) (@sandeepnailwal) September 17, 2025 The X post published by Polygon CEO Sandeep Nailwal underlined that the ecosystem was leading in global bonds by holding a 62% share of tokenized global bonds. He further highlighted that Polygon was leading with Spiko US T-Bill at approximately 29% share of TVL along with Ethereum, adding that the ecosystem had more than 50% share in the number of holders. Finally, Sandeep highlighted from the report that there was a strong adoption for Spiko Euro T-Bill with 38% share of TVL. He added that 68% of returns were on Polygon across all the chains. Polygon Roadmap to GigaGas In a different update from Polygon, the community…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 01:10