PANews reported on October 23rd that Ocean Protocol issued a statement explaining its withdrawal from the ASI Alliance , refuting "false accusations" and accusing its partners, SingularityNET and Fetch, of violating the alliance's core commitment to retaining control of their assets. Ocean pointed out that after the merger, SingularityNET engaged in reckless financial maneuvers and massively drained market liquidity, including issuing an additional $100 million in tokens and maintaining a massive monthly burn of $6 million. Fetch founder Sheikh was accused of disregarding the principles of decentralization, not only by selling a large number of tokens but also by attempting to force Ocean to convert all assets in its independently operated community treasury, OceanDAO, into FET tokens. Ocean requested withdrawal as early as April 2024 due to a loss of cooperative foundation, but was met with legal threats. Ultimately, Fetch and SingularityNET attempted to unilaterally shut down the token bridge in August 2025, violating the charter and forcing Ocean to file legal action and withdraw from the alliance. Ocean noted that the 93% drop in FET token prices from its peak was primarily due to the massive sell-offs by SingularityNET and Fetch, as well as the failure of Fetch's own high-risk "TRNR" transaction, rather than its own withdrawal. Throughout this process, Ocean has remained committed to the principle of decentralization, which states that individuals have undisputed sovereignty over their assets. This withdrawal is intended to prevent further harm to the interests of the Ocean community, and Ocean will continue to focus on the independent development of its technology and products. According to previous news, Bubblemaps stated that Ocean Protocol is suspected of selling more than $100 million in community tokens, and Fetch AI has publicly accused it of misconduct .PANews reported on October 23rd that Ocean Protocol issued a statement explaining its withdrawal from the ASI Alliance , refuting "false accusations" and accusing its partners, SingularityNET and Fetch, of violating the alliance's core commitment to retaining control of their assets. Ocean pointed out that after the merger, SingularityNET engaged in reckless financial maneuvers and massively drained market liquidity, including issuing an additional $100 million in tokens and maintaining a massive monthly burn of $6 million. Fetch founder Sheikh was accused of disregarding the principles of decentralization, not only by selling a large number of tokens but also by attempting to force Ocean to convert all assets in its independently operated community treasury, OceanDAO, into FET tokens. Ocean requested withdrawal as early as April 2024 due to a loss of cooperative foundation, but was met with legal threats. Ultimately, Fetch and SingularityNET attempted to unilaterally shut down the token bridge in August 2025, violating the charter and forcing Ocean to file legal action and withdraw from the alliance. Ocean noted that the 93% drop in FET token prices from its peak was primarily due to the massive sell-offs by SingularityNET and Fetch, as well as the failure of Fetch's own high-risk "TRNR" transaction, rather than its own withdrawal. Throughout this process, Ocean has remained committed to the principle of decentralization, which states that individuals have undisputed sovereignty over their assets. This withdrawal is intended to prevent further harm to the interests of the Ocean community, and Ocean will continue to focus on the independent development of its technology and products. According to previous news, Bubblemaps stated that Ocean Protocol is suspected of selling more than $100 million in community tokens, and Fetch AI has publicly accused it of misconduct .

Ocean Protocol explains its withdrawal from the ASI Alliance, accusing two partners and stating it has filed a lawsuit

2025/10/23 19:15

PANews reported on October 23rd that Ocean Protocol issued a statement explaining its withdrawal from the ASI Alliance , refuting "false accusations" and accusing its partners, SingularityNET and Fetch, of violating the alliance's core commitment to retaining control of their assets. Ocean pointed out that after the merger, SingularityNET engaged in reckless financial maneuvers and massively drained market liquidity, including issuing an additional $100 million in tokens and maintaining a massive monthly burn of $6 million. Fetch founder Sheikh was accused of disregarding the principles of decentralization, not only by selling a large number of tokens but also by attempting to force Ocean to convert all assets in its independently operated community treasury, OceanDAO, into FET tokens. Ocean requested withdrawal as early as April 2024 due to a loss of cooperative foundation, but was met with legal threats. Ultimately, Fetch and SingularityNET attempted to unilaterally shut down the token bridge in August 2025, violating the charter and forcing Ocean to file legal action and withdraw from the alliance.

Ocean noted that the 93% drop in FET token prices from its peak was primarily due to the massive sell-offs by SingularityNET and Fetch, as well as the failure of Fetch's own high-risk "TRNR" transaction, rather than its own withdrawal. Throughout this process, Ocean has remained committed to the principle of decentralization, which states that individuals have undisputed sovereignty over their assets. This withdrawal is intended to prevent further harm to the interests of the Ocean community, and Ocean will continue to focus on the independent development of its technology and products.

According to previous news, Bubblemaps stated that Ocean Protocol is suspected of selling more than $100 million in community tokens, and Fetch AI has publicly accused it of misconduct .

Market Opportunity
Sender Logo
Sender Price(ASI)
$0.001824
$0.001824$0.001824
-3.64%
USD
Sender (ASI) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Cashing In On University Patents Means Giving Up On Our Innovation Future

Cashing In On University Patents Means Giving Up On Our Innovation Future

The post Cashing In On University Patents Means Giving Up On Our Innovation Future appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. “It’s a raid on American innovation that would deliver pennies to the Treasury while kneecapping the very engine of our economic and medical progress,” writes Pipes. Getty Images Washington is addicted to taxing success. Now, Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick is floating a plan to skim half the patent earnings from inventions developed at universities with federal funding. It’s being sold as a way to shore up programs like Social Security. In reality, it’s a raid on American innovation that would deliver pennies to the Treasury while kneecapping the very engine of our economic and medical progress. Yes, taxpayer dollars support early-stage research. But the real payoff comes later—in the jobs created, cures discovered, and industries launched when universities and private industry turn those discoveries into real products. By comparison, the sums at stake in patent licensing are trivial. Universities collectively earn only about $3.6 billion annually in patent income—less than the federal government spends on Social Security in a single day. Even confiscating half would barely register against a $6 trillion federal budget. And yet the damage from such a policy would be anything but trivial. The true return on taxpayer investment isn’t in licensing checks sent to Washington, but in the downstream economic activity that federally supported research unleashes. Thanks to the bipartisan Bayh-Dole Act of 1980, universities and private industry have powerful incentives to translate early-stage discoveries into real-world products. Before Bayh-Dole, the government hoarded patents from federally funded research, and fewer than 5% were ever licensed. Once universities could own and license their own inventions, innovation exploded. The result has been one of the best returns on investment in government history. Since 1996, university research has added nearly $2 trillion to U.S. industrial output, supported 6.5 million jobs, and launched more than 19,000 startups. Those companies pay…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 03:26
Trump Reviews Candidates to Succeed Fed Chair Powell

Trump Reviews Candidates to Succeed Fed Chair Powell

The post Trump Reviews Candidates to Succeed Fed Chair Powell appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Key Points: Trump evaluates Fed Chair candidates, considering
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/12/19 08:34
Will XRP Price Increase In September 2025?

Will XRP Price Increase In September 2025?

Ripple XRP is a cryptocurrency that primarily focuses on building a decentralised payments network to facilitate low-cost and cross-border transactions. It’s a native digital currency of the Ripple network, which works as a blockchain called the XRP Ledger (XRPL). It utilised a shared, distributed ledger to track account balances and transactions. What Do XRP Charts Reveal? […]
Share
Tronweekly2025/09/18 00:00