Ripple CTO Schwartz counters Craig Wright’s Bitcoin white paper claims. Schwartz explains why Bitcoin remains viable for payments despite rising prices. Legal rulings consistently dismiss Wright’s Satoshi Nakamoto identity assertions. The saga surrounding Craig Wright’s claim to be Satoshi Nakamoto, Bitcoin’s creator, resurfaced this week with a sharp response from Ripple’s CTO, David Schwartz. Wright, the self-proclaimed creator, recently argued that civil courts cannot declare fraud, implying that past rulings against him were mere opinions, not legal conclusions. This challenges the consistent legal rulings that have dismissed his claims of authorship of the Bitcoin white paper published in 2008. Schwartz quickly countered, pointing out that fraud is a well-defined legal concept, and Wright’s actions have consistently been deemed fraudulent in court. Also Read: Cardano Founder Charles Hoskinson Urges Crypto Community to Unite for Massive Bullrun David Schwartz Responds to Wright’s Fraud Argument Schwartz’s response focused on the legal definition of fraud, which involves misrepresentation and harm caused by false or reckless statements. Schwartz emphasized that Wright’s use of forged documents and inconsistent statements in court has led to multiple legal decisions rejecting his claims. According to Schwartz, these decisions were not opinions, but formal legal rulings that conclusively found Wright’s arguments lacking in credibility. By referencing these legal findings, Schwartz reinforced the point that Wright’s claims to be Satoshi have not stood up to the scrutiny of the courts. Schwartz’s rebuttal highlights the importance of legal rulings in clarifying the truth and preventing the narrative around Wright’s identity from being distorted. The Ripple CTO’s response served to remind the crypto community that the legal process has consistently dismantled Wright’s claims. Ripple CTO Discusses Bitcoin’s Utility in Payments Amid Rising Prices In a separate discussion, David Schwartz also addressed the growing role of Bitcoin in payments, particularly in light of Jack Dorsey’s announcement that Square had introduced Bitcoin payment services for four million U.S. merchants. The service, offering zero fees until 2027, has sparked debate over Bitcoin’s utility as a payment method given its rising price. When asked who would pay in Bitcoin, Schwartz simply replied, “everyone,” explaining that people are willing to spend Bitcoin because it is valued by the recipient. His response underscores Bitcoin’s continued relevance as a payment method, despite its volatile price. Repetitive Narrative of Wright’s Claims Wright’s identity debate continues to follow a repetitive pattern. His claims are consistently met with legal rulings that dismiss them, but he continues to reshape the narrative. While the crypto community moves forward with new developments, Wright’s efforts to reignite the conversation only remind people of the long-standing legal conclusions that have already closed the case on his claims to be Satoshi. Also Read: Scaramucci Family Invests Over $100 Million into American Bitcoin: Details The post Ripple CTO Clashes with Craig Wright Over Bitcoin White Paper Identity Debate appeared first on 36Crypto. Ripple CTO Schwartz counters Craig Wright’s Bitcoin white paper claims. Schwartz explains why Bitcoin remains viable for payments despite rising prices. Legal rulings consistently dismiss Wright’s Satoshi Nakamoto identity assertions. The saga surrounding Craig Wright’s claim to be Satoshi Nakamoto, Bitcoin’s creator, resurfaced this week with a sharp response from Ripple’s CTO, David Schwartz. Wright, the self-proclaimed creator, recently argued that civil courts cannot declare fraud, implying that past rulings against him were mere opinions, not legal conclusions. This challenges the consistent legal rulings that have dismissed his claims of authorship of the Bitcoin white paper published in 2008. Schwartz quickly countered, pointing out that fraud is a well-defined legal concept, and Wright’s actions have consistently been deemed fraudulent in court. Also Read: Cardano Founder Charles Hoskinson Urges Crypto Community to Unite for Massive Bullrun David Schwartz Responds to Wright’s Fraud Argument Schwartz’s response focused on the legal definition of fraud, which involves misrepresentation and harm caused by false or reckless statements. Schwartz emphasized that Wright’s use of forged documents and inconsistent statements in court has led to multiple legal decisions rejecting his claims. According to Schwartz, these decisions were not opinions, but formal legal rulings that conclusively found Wright’s arguments lacking in credibility. By referencing these legal findings, Schwartz reinforced the point that Wright’s claims to be Satoshi have not stood up to the scrutiny of the courts. Schwartz’s rebuttal highlights the importance of legal rulings in clarifying the truth and preventing the narrative around Wright’s identity from being distorted. The Ripple CTO’s response served to remind the crypto community that the legal process has consistently dismantled Wright’s claims. Ripple CTO Discusses Bitcoin’s Utility in Payments Amid Rising Prices In a separate discussion, David Schwartz also addressed the growing role of Bitcoin in payments, particularly in light of Jack Dorsey’s announcement that Square had introduced Bitcoin payment services for four million U.S. merchants. The service, offering zero fees until 2027, has sparked debate over Bitcoin’s utility as a payment method given its rising price. When asked who would pay in Bitcoin, Schwartz simply replied, “everyone,” explaining that people are willing to spend Bitcoin because it is valued by the recipient. His response underscores Bitcoin’s continued relevance as a payment method, despite its volatile price. Repetitive Narrative of Wright’s Claims Wright’s identity debate continues to follow a repetitive pattern. His claims are consistently met with legal rulings that dismiss them, but he continues to reshape the narrative. While the crypto community moves forward with new developments, Wright’s efforts to reignite the conversation only remind people of the long-standing legal conclusions that have already closed the case on his claims to be Satoshi. Also Read: Scaramucci Family Invests Over $100 Million into American Bitcoin: Details The post Ripple CTO Clashes with Craig Wright Over Bitcoin White Paper Identity Debate appeared first on 36Crypto.

Ripple CTO Clashes with Craig Wright Over Bitcoin White Paper Identity Debate

  • Ripple CTO Schwartz counters Craig Wright’s Bitcoin white paper claims.
  • Schwartz explains why Bitcoin remains viable for payments despite rising prices.
  • Legal rulings consistently dismiss Wright’s Satoshi Nakamoto identity assertions.

The saga surrounding Craig Wright’s claim to be Satoshi Nakamoto, Bitcoin’s creator, resurfaced this week with a sharp response from Ripple’s CTO, David Schwartz. Wright, the self-proclaimed creator, recently argued that civil courts cannot declare fraud, implying that past rulings against him were mere opinions, not legal conclusions.


This challenges the consistent legal rulings that have dismissed his claims of authorship of the Bitcoin white paper published in 2008. Schwartz quickly countered, pointing out that fraud is a well-defined legal concept, and Wright’s actions have consistently been deemed fraudulent in court.


Also Read: Cardano Founder Charles Hoskinson Urges Crypto Community to Unite for Massive Bullrun


David Schwartz Responds to Wright’s Fraud Argument

Schwartz’s response focused on the legal definition of fraud, which involves misrepresentation and harm caused by false or reckless statements. Schwartz emphasized that Wright’s use of forged documents and inconsistent statements in court has led to multiple legal decisions rejecting his claims.


According to Schwartz, these decisions were not opinions, but formal legal rulings that conclusively found Wright’s arguments lacking in credibility. By referencing these legal findings, Schwartz reinforced the point that Wright’s claims to be Satoshi have not stood up to the scrutiny of the courts.


Schwartz’s rebuttal highlights the importance of legal rulings in clarifying the truth and preventing the narrative around Wright’s identity from being distorted. The Ripple CTO’s response served to remind the crypto community that the legal process has consistently dismantled Wright’s claims.


Ripple CTO Discusses Bitcoin’s Utility in Payments Amid Rising Prices

In a separate discussion, David Schwartz also addressed the growing role of Bitcoin in payments, particularly in light of Jack Dorsey’s announcement that Square had introduced Bitcoin payment services for four million U.S. merchants. The service, offering zero fees until 2027, has sparked debate over Bitcoin’s utility as a payment method given its rising price.


When asked who would pay in Bitcoin, Schwartz simply replied, “everyone,” explaining that people are willing to spend Bitcoin because it is valued by the recipient. His response underscores Bitcoin’s continued relevance as a payment method, despite its volatile price.


Repetitive Narrative of Wright’s Claims

Wright’s identity debate continues to follow a repetitive pattern. His claims are consistently met with legal rulings that dismiss them, but he continues to reshape the narrative.


While the crypto community moves forward with new developments, Wright’s efforts to reignite the conversation only remind people of the long-standing legal conclusions that have already closed the case on his claims to be Satoshi.


Also Read: Scaramucci Family Invests Over $100 Million into American Bitcoin: Details


The post Ripple CTO Clashes with Craig Wright Over Bitcoin White Paper Identity Debate appeared first on 36Crypto.

Market Opportunity
Whiterock Logo
Whiterock Price(WHITE)
$0.0001257
$0.0001257$0.0001257
-3.82%
USD
Whiterock (WHITE) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

What Could Help Pi Coin Rebound?

What Could Help Pi Coin Rebound?

The post What Could Help Pi Coin Rebound? appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Pi Coin has extended its decline for a third straight week, falling sharply from
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/12/19 21:09
Foreigner’s Lou Gramm Revisits The Band’s Classic ‘4’ Album, Now Reissued

Foreigner’s Lou Gramm Revisits The Band’s Classic ‘4’ Album, Now Reissued

The post Foreigner’s Lou Gramm Revisits The Band’s Classic ‘4’ Album, Now Reissued appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. American-based rock band Foreigner performs onstage at the Rosemont Horizon, Rosemont, Illinois, November 8, 1981. Pictured are, from left, Mick Jones, on guitar, and vocalist Lou Gramm. (Photo by Paul Natkin/Getty Images) Getty Images Singer Lou Gramm has a vivid memory of recording the ballad “Waiting for a Girl Like You” at New York City’s Electric Lady Studio for his band Foreigner more than 40 years ago. Gramm was adding his vocals for the track in the control room on the other side of the glass when he noticed a beautiful woman walking through the door. “She sits on the sofa in front of the board,” he says. “She looked at me while I was singing. And every now and then, she had a little smile on her face. I’m not sure what that was, but it was driving me crazy. “And at the end of the song, when I’m singing the ad-libs and stuff like that, she gets up,” he continues. “She gives me a little smile and walks out of the room. And when the song ended, I would look up every now and then to see where Mick [Jones] and Mutt [Lange] were, and they were pushing buttons and turning knobs. They were not aware that she was even in the room. So when the song ended, I said, ‘Guys, who was that woman who walked in? She was beautiful.’ And they looked at each other, and they went, ‘What are you talking about? We didn’t see anything.’ But you know what? I think they put her up to it. Doesn’t that sound more like them?” “Waiting for a Girl Like You” became a massive hit in 1981 for Foreigner off their album 4, which peaked at number one on the Billboard chart for 10 weeks and…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 01:26
Why BitDelta’s Winter WonderTrade Stands Out

Why BitDelta’s Winter WonderTrade Stands Out

The post Why BitDelta’s Winter WonderTrade Stands Out appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Crypto Projects As the crypto market widens in scope and participation
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/12/19 21:26