Benjamin Netanyahu’s brazen admission at the UN General Assembly on September 27, 2025, about "greenlighting" the pager attacks in Lebanon wasn’t just a political statement—it was a stark revelation of Israel’s deep penetration into global technology infrastructure. As dozens of delegates walked out in protest, Netanyahu’s threats exposed a chilling reality, It is possible that the very tools millions of Arabs and Muslims rely on for digital privacy may be feeding their data directly to the Israeli adversaries. This is possibly not just a massive privacy crisis for the people, but also a transformational innovation opportunity for truly independent Decentralized privacy technologies ( Example is Nym’s Decentralized Mixnet architecture )
This isn’t a conspiracy theory, it’s documented corporate ownership. Kape Technologies, a UK-based cybersecurity firm with strong Israeli roots, owns several leading VPN providers, including ExpressVPN, CyberGhost, Private Internet Access, and ZenMate. As the largest VPN brand owner globally, Kape holds a significant position in the consumer VPN market. The company was founded by Israeli billionaire Teddy Sagi, who has donated to Israeli military initiatives, including $3 million for soldier scholarships and approximately $250,000 (NIS 1 million) to fund transportation for soldiers during operations in Gaza.
Key leadership at Kape includes individuals with military backgrounds: - CEO Ido Erlichman, a veteran of Unit 217 (Duvdevan), an elite IDF commando unit focused on intelligence and operations. - Co-founder Koby Menachemi and other executives from Unit 8200, which specializes in cyber intelligence and has been compared to the U.S. NSA. As of June 2025, over 1,400 veterans of Israeli intelligence units, including 900 from Unit 8200, are employed in U.S. Big Tech companies, contributing to technologies like surveillance tools such as Pegasus spyware, which has been used to target journalists and activists in over 50 countries, including in the Middle East. Kape’s origins as Crossrider, which distributed adware before rebranding in 2018, add to concerns about data practices in a sector where centralized control can create vulnerabilities for metadata analysis.
Teddy Sagi isn’t just a businessman, he’s actively funding Israeli military operations:
- Donated $3 million for Israeli military scholarships
- Contributed $250,000 to transport soldiers during Gaza operations
- Owns surveillance and data analytics companies beyond VPNs
Users in Arab and Muslim countries face a unique double bind that creates both massive privacy challenges and business opportunities. Local governments implement extensive censorship and surveillance systems, driving demand for privacy tools. Simultaneously, the privacy tools many users rely on may be compromised by foreign intelligence services with adversarial interests. This creates several specific vulnerability scenarios that traditional privacy analyses often miss.
Targeting Coordination: Israeli intelligence could potentially identify high-value targets (activists, journalists, political figures) through VPN usage patterns, then coordinate with local intelligence services or use other means to act against these individuals. The recent revelations about Pegasus spyware targeting journalists across the region demonstrate this threat is real, not theoretical.
Movement Pattern Analysis: VPN logs, even if not containing content, can reveal travel patterns, meeting locations, and association networks. For dissidents operating across borders or coordinating international activities, this metadata could prove extremely valuable to hostile intelligence services.
Communications Metadata: Even with encrypted content, VPN providers can potentially analyze communication timing, frequency, and destinations to build profiles of user behavior and associations. This metadata analysis represents one of Israeli intelligence’s core competencies.
Infrastructure Vulnerabilities: Users connecting through Israeli-controlled VPN infrastructure may face selective service degradation, traffic analysis, or complete service cutoffs during sensitive periods. The ability to control when and how users can access privacy tools represents a strategic leverage point.
1. All your traffic flows through their servers- creating a perfect surveillance point
2. They can decrypt and analyze everything despite marketing claims about "no logs"
3. Metadata reveals your patterns - when you connect, for how long, to which sites
4. Single point of failure- one compromised company exposes millions of users
1. Unit 8200 pioneered traffic analysis techniques now used globally
2. They have AI systems that can identify individuals from metadata alone
3. Timing correlation attacks can link your real identity to anonymous activities
4. Partnership networks allow data sharing across intelligence agencies
1. ProtonVPN and NordVPN still use centralized architecture
2. Any government can pressure, hack, or infiltrate single companies
3. Legal jurisdictions provide no protection against intelligence operations
4. Technical audits can’t detect intelligence agency backdoors or cooperation
- Your data bounces through multiple independent operators
- No single company, government, or intelligence agency can spy on you
- Even if some nodes are compromised, your privacy remains intact
- Adds fake traffic and timing delays to hide your patterns
- Makes timing correlation attacks impossible
- Protects not just what you do, but when and how you do it
- No Israeli intelligence veterans in leadership
- Open source code audited by global security researchers
- Community-governed with blockchain incentives for node operators
- Generates fake activity to hide your real usage
- Makes traffic analysis useless even for advanced adversaries
- Protects you even when you’re not actively browsing.
When VPNs turn into traps: Unit 8200 and the hidden dangers of corporate VPNs for users in… was originally published in Coinmonks on Medium, where people are continuing the conversation by highlighting and responding to this story.


US lawmakers are proposing a $200 tax exemption for stablecoin payments and a
