The post Balchunas says tokenized stocks unlikely to disrupt ETFs as SEC gears up for rule change appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Bloomberg senior ETF analyst Eric Balchunas said tokenized stocks are unlikely to pose a major threat to exchange-traded funds, even as the SEC considers a rule change that could bring shares of companies such as Tesla and Nvidia onto crypto exchanges. Balchunas framed the potential change as more of a convenience for digital asset investors than a disruption of traditional markets. He likened it to how ETFs gave retail investors exposure to cryptocurrencies in a familiar wrapper. He added that tokenized stocks would give crypto-native traders access to conventional equities in their preferred format but are unlikely to erode ETF market share in a meaningful way. Balchunas wrote on social media: “This is just allowing crypto natives to buy regular person investments in a format they prefer. Only this side of the equation has way more money, which is why tokens likely won’t dent ETF market share much.” The rumored regulatory shift highlights how U.S. regulators are beginning to test the intersection of Wall Street and blockchain technology. Tokenized equities would represent traditional shares on-chain, offering near-instant settlement, fractional trading, and global accessibility, features long touted as advantages of blockchain-based markets. Globally, tokenization has gained momentum as banks and financial infrastructure providers pilot blockchain-based trading and settlement systems. UBS and JPMorgan have launched tokenized bond and fund offerings, while Hong Kong and Singapore have introduced regulatory sandboxes to test tokenized securities platforms. Meanwhile, in Europe, Deutsche Börse has made significant progress in digital bond issuance and settlement using DLT. Supporters argue that tokenization could eventually modernize capital markets by reducing intermediaries, cutting costs, and opening access to a wider pool of investors. However, critics have raised persistent questions regarding custody, compliance, and investor protection. In the U.S., regulators have historically been cautious, often citing the need to ensure that new technologies… The post Balchunas says tokenized stocks unlikely to disrupt ETFs as SEC gears up for rule change appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Bloomberg senior ETF analyst Eric Balchunas said tokenized stocks are unlikely to pose a major threat to exchange-traded funds, even as the SEC considers a rule change that could bring shares of companies such as Tesla and Nvidia onto crypto exchanges. Balchunas framed the potential change as more of a convenience for digital asset investors than a disruption of traditional markets. He likened it to how ETFs gave retail investors exposure to cryptocurrencies in a familiar wrapper. He added that tokenized stocks would give crypto-native traders access to conventional equities in their preferred format but are unlikely to erode ETF market share in a meaningful way. Balchunas wrote on social media: “This is just allowing crypto natives to buy regular person investments in a format they prefer. Only this side of the equation has way more money, which is why tokens likely won’t dent ETF market share much.” The rumored regulatory shift highlights how U.S. regulators are beginning to test the intersection of Wall Street and blockchain technology. Tokenized equities would represent traditional shares on-chain, offering near-instant settlement, fractional trading, and global accessibility, features long touted as advantages of blockchain-based markets. Globally, tokenization has gained momentum as banks and financial infrastructure providers pilot blockchain-based trading and settlement systems. UBS and JPMorgan have launched tokenized bond and fund offerings, while Hong Kong and Singapore have introduced regulatory sandboxes to test tokenized securities platforms. Meanwhile, in Europe, Deutsche Börse has made significant progress in digital bond issuance and settlement using DLT. Supporters argue that tokenization could eventually modernize capital markets by reducing intermediaries, cutting costs, and opening access to a wider pool of investors. However, critics have raised persistent questions regarding custody, compliance, and investor protection. In the U.S., regulators have historically been cautious, often citing the need to ensure that new technologies…