The study proposes that the core-accretion and migration model best explains the presence of hot Jupiters, with the inner gas disk halting their inward journey.The study proposes that the core-accretion and migration model best explains the presence of hot Jupiters, with the inner gas disk halting their inward journey.

Are We on the Verge of a Breakthrough in Understanding Planet Formation?

2025/10/07 04:09
9분 읽기
이 콘텐츠에 대한 의견이나 우려 사항이 있으시면 crypto.news@mexc.com으로 연락주시기 바랍니다

Abstract and 1 Introduction

  1. Sample selection and properties

  2. Results

  3. Discussion

  4. Concluding remarks and References

    Appendix A: Sample selection

    Appendix B: Properties of the TOIs in this work

    Appendix C: Pre-MS estimates

5. Concluding remarks

The lack of a solid observational background on exoplanets around intermediate-mass stars (analogous to the background present around low-mass stars) affects our knowledge of planet formation in general and of hot Jupiters in particular. In this work we have analysed such type of planets, selected from a combination of TESS and Gaia data. Our analysis has focused on the physical limit of their innermost planetary orbits, regardless of the ongoing debate on the frequency of hot Jupiters around intermediate-mass stars (e.g., Sebastian et al. 2022, and references therein). In principle, our analysis is also independent of observational developments that would eventually lead to larger samples of intermediate-mass stars hosting smaller exoplanets at longer orbital radii. We provide tentative evidence to support the notion that hot Jupiters’ orbits around intermediate-mass stars are mostly determined by the protoplanetary disk gas-truncation radius – and not by the dust-destruction radius. Although gravitational instabilities may play a role in the formation of long-period giant planets around such stars, we have suggested that the origin of hot Jupiters is probably similar than it is for lower-mass sources. This is based on a combination between the core-accretion paradigm and migration up to the inner gas edge. Finally, the comparison between low- and intermediate-mass stars suggests that the gas barrier indeed fixes the innermost planetary orbits for the whole stellar mass regime. Future tests of the previous hypothesis require larger samples of intermediate-mass stars with hot Jupiters. Two examples of such types of tests are outlined below.

\ First, the size of the magnetosphere is limited by the disk co-rotation radius, which is smaller for larger stellar rotational velocities (Shu et al. 1994). Thus, if the magnetosphere controls the innermost planetary orbits these should be smaller for fastrotating stars (see, e.g., the related discussion in Lee & Chiang 2017). This is in agreement with the recent finding, showing that shorter orbital periods are observed in more massive stars with shorter rotational periods, at least considering FGK spectral types (García et al. 2023). However, it is hard to make a conclusive test only based on low-mass stars, given their narrow range of small projected rotational velocities. In contrast, velocities of intermediate-mass stars span from a few to a few hundred km/s, making them ideal for such a test. Gaia-based projected rotational velocities are presently only available for a dozen of all the sources analyzed in this work. Additional velocity estimates will be helpful in carrying out this task.

\ Second, that magnetospheres act as gas barriers ceasing inward migration immediately implies that if those are absent, then the probability that planets are swallowed by their host stars increases (Nelson et al. 2000). Indirect evidence of planets swallowed by their hosts have been provided only for a few solar-type stars (e.g., Israelian et al. 2001; De et al. 2023, and references therein). Notably, magnetospheres are likely to be lacking in most Herbig stars with masses & 3-4 M⊙ (Wichittanakom et al. 2020; Vioque et al. 2022), for which the gas disk may reach the central source trough a boundary layer (Mendigutía 2020, and references therein). Thus, if magnetospheres are the ultimate barrier preventing unlimited planet migration, then the planet engulfment scenario would be most efficient for stellar masses of > 3-4 M⊙. These stars may show a deficit of hot Jupiters, as compared to the case of less massive stars.

\ Acknowledgements. The authors acknowledge the anonymous referee, whose suggestions have served to improve the manuscript. IM’s research is funded by grants PID2022-138366NA-I00, by the Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation/State Agency of Research MCIN/AEI/10.13039/501100011033 and by the European Union, and by a Ramón y Cajal fellowship RyC2019-026992-I. J.L.-B. is partly funded by the Spanish MCIN/AEI/10.13039/501100011033 and NextGenerationEU/PRTR grants PID2019-107061GB-C61 and CNS2023- 144309, and by the Ramón y Cajal fellowship RYC2021-031640-I. BM is supported by grant MCIN/AEI/PID2021-127289-NB-I00. We acknowledge the use of public TOI Release data from pipelines at the TESS Science Office and at the TESS Science Processing Operations Center. Funding for the TESS mission is provided by NASA’s Science Mission directorate. This work has made use of data from the European Space Agency (ESA) mission Gaia (https://www.cosmos.esa.int/gaia), processed by the Gaia Data Processing and Analysis Consortium (DPAC, https://www.cosmos.esa.int/web/gaia/dpac/consortium). Funding for the DPAC has been provided by national institutions, in particular the institutions participating in the Gaia Multilateral Agreement.

\

References

Baruteau, C., Meru, F., & Paardekooper, S.-J. 2011, MNRAS, 416, 1971

\ Batygin, K., Adams, F. C., & Becker, J. 2023, ApJ, 951, L19

\ Benkendorff, L., Flammini Dotti, F., Stock, K., Cai, M. X., & Spurzem, R. 2024, MNRAS, 528, 2834

\ Borucki, W. J., Koch, D., Basri, G., et al. 2010, Science, 327, 977

\ Boss, A. P. 1998, ApJ, 503, 923

\ Bouvier, J., Alencar, S. H. P., Harries, T. J., Johns-Krull, C. M., & Romanova, M. M. 2007, in Protostars and Planets V, ed. B. Reipurth, D. Jewitt, & K. Keil, 479

\ Brittain, S. D., Kamp, I., Meeus, G., Oudmaijer, R. D., & Waters, L. B. F. M. 2023, Space Sci. Rev., 219, 7

\ Cantiello, M. & Braithwaite, J. 2019, ApJ, 883, 106

\ Creevey, O. L., Sordo, R., Pailler, F., et al. 2023, A&A, 674, A26

\ De, K., MacLeod, M., Karambelkar, V., et al. 2023, Nature, 617, 55

\ Dong, R., Najita, J. R., & Brittain, S. 2018, ApJ, 862, 103

\ Drazkowska, J., Bitsch, B., Lambrechts, M., et al. 2023, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, Vol. 534, Protostars and Planets VII, ed. S. Inutsuka, Y. Aikawa, T. Muto, K. Tomida, & M. Tamura, 717

\ Flock, M., Turner, N. J., Mulders, G. D., et al. 2019, A&A, 630, A147

\ Fouesneau, M., Frémat, Y., Andrae, R., et al. 2023, A&A, 674, A28

\ Gaia Collaboration, Arenou, F., Babusiaux, C., et al. 2023a, A&A, 674, A34

\ Gaia Collaboration, Prusti, T., de Bruijne, J. H. J., et al. 2016, A&A, 595, A1

\ Gaia Collaboration, Vallenari, A., Brown, A. G. A., et al. 2023b, A&A, 674, A1

\ Gammie, C. F. 2001, ApJ, 553, 174

\ García, R. A., Gourvès, C., Santos, A. R. G., et al. 2023, A&A, 679, L12

\ Giacalone, S., Dressing, C. D., Jensen, E. L. N., et al. 2021, AJ, 161, 24

\ Gravity Collaboration, Wojtczak, J. A., Labadie, L., et al. 2023, A&A, 669, A59

\ Guerrero, N. M., Seager, S., Huang, C. X., et al. 2021, ApJS, 254, 39

\ Hussain, G. A. J. & Alecian, E. 2014, in Magnetic Fields throughout Stellar Evolution, ed. P. Petit, M. Jardine, & H. C. Spruit, Vol. 302, 25–37

\ Israelian, G., Santos, N. C., Mayor, M., & Rebolo, R. 2001, Nature, 411, 163

\ Kley, W. & Nelson, R. P. 2012, ARA&A, 50, 211

\ Koenigl, A. 1991, ApJ, 370, L39

\ Koumpia, E., de Wit, W. J., Oudmaijer, R. D., et al. 2021, A&A, 654, A109

\ Kunimoto, M. & Matthews, J. M. 2020, AJ, 159, 248

\ Lee, E. J. & Chiang, E. 2017, ApJ, 842, 40

\ Lillo-Box, J., Morales-Calderón, M., Barrado, D., et al. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2404.06316

\ Lin, D. N. C., Bodenheimer, P., & Richardson, D. C. 1996, Nature, 380, 606

\ Marcos-Arenal, P., Mendigutía, I., Koumpia, E., et al. 2021, A&A, 652, A68

\ Mayor, M. & Queloz, D. 1995, Nature, 378, 355

\ Mendigutía, I. 2020, Galaxies, 8, 39

\ Mendigutía, I., Solano, E., Vioque, M., et al. 2022, A&A, 664, A66

\ Michael, S., Durisen, R. H., & Boley, A. C. 2011, ApJ, 737, L42

\ Monnier, J. D. & Millan-Gabet, R. 2002, ApJ, 579, 694

\ Mulders, G. D., Pascucci, I., & Apai, D. 2015, ApJ, 798, 112

\ Mulders, G. D., Pascucci, I., Ciesla, F. J., & Fernandes, R. B. 2021, ApJ, 920, 66

\ Nelson, R. P., Papaloizou, J. C. B., Masset, F., & Kley, W. 2000, MNRAS, 318, 18

\ Pinte, C., Ménard, F., Berger, J. P., Benisty, M., & Malbet, F. 2008, ApJ, 673, L63

\ Ribas, Á., Bouy, H., & Merín, B. 2015, A&A, 576, A52

\ Ricker, G. R., Winn, J. N., Vanderspek, R., et al. 2015, Journal of Astronomical Telescopes, Instruments, and Systems, 1, 014003

\ Romanova, M. M., Lii, P. S., Koldoba, A. V., et al. 2019, MNRAS, 485, 2666

\ Salaris, M. & Cassisi, S. 2006, Evolution of Stars and Stellar Populations

\ Sebastian, D., Guenther, E. W., Deleuil, M., et al. 2022, MNRAS, 516, 636

\ Shu, F., Najita, J., Ostriker, E., et al. 1994, ApJ, 429, 781

\ Siess, L., Dufour, E., & Forestini, M. 2000, A&A, 358, 593

\ Simon, T., Ayres, T. R., Redfield, S., & Linsky, J. L. 2002, ApJ, 579, 800

\ Stassun, K. G., Feiden, G. A., & Torres, G. 2014, New A Rev., 60, 1

\ Tarrants, T. & Mendes, E. 2023, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2310.12380

\ Tuthill, P. G., Monnier, J. D., & Danchi, W. C. 2001, Nature, 409, 1012

\ Vioque, M., Oudmaijer, R. D., Wichittanakom, C., et al. 2022, ApJ, 930, 39

\ Wichittanakom, C., Oudmaijer, R. D., Fairlamb, J. R., et al. 2020, MNRAS, 493, 234

\ Yee, S. W. & Winn, J. N. 2023, ApJ, 949, L21

\ Zhou, G., Huang, C. X., Bakos, G. Á., et al. 2019, AJ, 158, 141

\ Zhu, Z., Stone, J. M., & Calvet, N. 2024, MNRAS, 528, 2883

\

:::info Authors:

(1) I. Mendigutía, Centro de Astrobiología (CAB), CSIC-INTA, Camino Bajo del Castillo s/n, 28692, Villanueva de la Cañada, Madrid, Spain;

(2) J. Lillo-Box, Centro de Astrobiología (CAB), CSIC-INTA, Camino Bajo del Castillo s/n, 28692, Villanueva de la Cañada, Madrid, Spain;

(3) M. Vioque, European Southern Observatory, Karl-Schwarzschild-Strasse 2, D-85748 Garching bei München, Germany and Joint ALMA Observatory, Alonso de Córdova 3107, Vitacura, Santiago 763-0355, Chile;

(4) J. Maldonado, INAF – Osservatorio Astronomico di Palermo, Piazza del Parlamento 1, I-90134 Palermo, Italy;

(8) B. Montesinos, Centro de Astrobiología (CAB), CSIC-INTA, Camino Bajo del Castillo s/n, 28692, Villanueva de la Cañada, Madrid, Spain;

(6) N. Huélamo, Centro de Astrobiología (CAB), CSIC-INTA, Camino Bajo del Castillo s/n, 28692, Villanueva de la Cañada, Madrid, Spain;

(7) J. Wang, Departamento de Física Teórica, Módulo 15, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, 28049 Madrid, Spain.

:::


:::info This paper is available on arxiv under CC BY-SA 4.0 DEED license.

:::

\

시장 기회
Core DAO 로고
Core DAO 가격(CORE)
$0.03972
$0.03972$0.03972
+21.65%
USD
Core DAO (CORE) 실시간 가격 차트
면책 조항: 본 사이트에 재게시된 글들은 공개 플랫폼에서 가져온 것으로 정보 제공 목적으로만 제공됩니다. 이는 반드시 MEXC의 견해를 반영하는 것은 아닙니다. 모든 권리는 원저자에게 있습니다. 제3자의 권리를 침해하는 콘텐츠가 있다고 판단될 경우, crypto.news@mexc.com으로 연락하여 삭제 요청을 해주시기 바랍니다. MEXC는 콘텐츠의 정확성, 완전성 또는 시의적절성에 대해 어떠한 보증도 하지 않으며, 제공된 정보에 기반하여 취해진 어떠한 조치에 대해서도 책임을 지지 않습니다. 본 콘텐츠는 금융, 법률 또는 기타 전문적인 조언을 구성하지 않으며, MEXC의 추천이나 보증으로 간주되어서는 안 됩니다.

USD1 Genesis: 0 Fees + 12% APR

USD1 Genesis: 0 Fees + 12% APRUSD1 Genesis: 0 Fees + 12% APR

New users: stake for up to 600% APR. Limited time!