With $35 million in funding, led by veteran VCs like PolyChain and Framework, Allora has been performing incredibly well recently. I've seen many people call it a "prediction market." Wrong. Let me share my understanding of this project: 1) To be precise, Allora is a decentralized AI reasoning service platform. Users can pay for AI agents to provide services for any needs requiring AI judgment, including price prediction, strategy optimization, and risk assessment. Therefore, the prediction market is only one application scenario of Allora, not the only one. 2) Given the inherently uneven inference and output capabilities of AI models, how can Allora become a mature upstream supplier of mass output? The answer lies in building an aggregation platform that leverages the collective power and competitive collaboration of AI models. The mechanism is straightforward. For example, if a user wants to predict whether ETH will rise or fall and decide how to set the LP price range, the traditional approach involves observing K-line charts, listening to key opinion leaders (KOLs) analysis, or purchasing customized AI model APIs for predictions, which often yield a variety of inconsistent answers. Is it possible to develop an aggregated inference service platform that can handle this comparative screening process? The key lies here. After the user sends the demand to Allora, the 280,000 nodes in the network architecture will compete to give answers. Some say it will rise, some say it will fall, and some say it will go sideways. Allora will vote for these models and record historical performance reports. It will give higher weight to AI models with a high prediction success rate and send token rewards. At the same time, it will deduct points and deposits from those who make blind guesses. This creates a positive flywheel: models with accurate predictions earn more, gain increasing weight, and take on more tasks; those that keep guessing are eliminated. 3) Therefore, I prefer Allora as the infrastructure layer for AI inference services, with the ability to call AI model combinations on demand. There are two main application scenarios: DeFAI: When the AI Agent executes on-chain transactions, it needs to determine whether a transaction is MEV, provide the optimal price range in real time when adjusting Uniswap LP, determine whether AAVE has liquidation risks, and how the Yield pool dynamically adjusts the leverage ratio, etc. Prediction market: Use AI models to dynamically adjust and update probabilities. Compared with the pricing mechanism based solely on trading volume, AI's aggregate reasoning can provide users with a smarter prediction starting point, avoiding pure follow-the-crowd. However, Allora is essentially just an infrastructure service facility. In the early stages, when there are few models, little data, and insufficient accuracy, it will also go through a long period of accumulating energy. However, if DeFAi and prediction markets, two promising markets, can become mainstream in the future, the value of its infrastructure services will be highlighted.With $35 million in funding, led by veteran VCs like PolyChain and Framework, Allora has been performing incredibly well recently. I've seen many people call it a "prediction market." Wrong. Let me share my understanding of this project: 1) To be precise, Allora is a decentralized AI reasoning service platform. Users can pay for AI agents to provide services for any needs requiring AI judgment, including price prediction, strategy optimization, and risk assessment. Therefore, the prediction market is only one application scenario of Allora, not the only one. 2) Given the inherently uneven inference and output capabilities of AI models, how can Allora become a mature upstream supplier of mass output? The answer lies in building an aggregation platform that leverages the collective power and competitive collaboration of AI models. The mechanism is straightforward. For example, if a user wants to predict whether ETH will rise or fall and decide how to set the LP price range, the traditional approach involves observing K-line charts, listening to key opinion leaders (KOLs) analysis, or purchasing customized AI model APIs for predictions, which often yield a variety of inconsistent answers. Is it possible to develop an aggregated inference service platform that can handle this comparative screening process? The key lies here. After the user sends the demand to Allora, the 280,000 nodes in the network architecture will compete to give answers. Some say it will rise, some say it will fall, and some say it will go sideways. Allora will vote for these models and record historical performance reports. It will give higher weight to AI models with a high prediction success rate and send token rewards. At the same time, it will deduct points and deposits from those who make blind guesses. This creates a positive flywheel: models with accurate predictions earn more, gain increasing weight, and take on more tasks; those that keep guessing are eliminated. 3) Therefore, I prefer Allora as the infrastructure layer for AI inference services, with the ability to call AI model combinations on demand. There are two main application scenarios: DeFAI: When the AI Agent executes on-chain transactions, it needs to determine whether a transaction is MEV, provide the optimal price range in real time when adjusting Uniswap LP, determine whether AAVE has liquidation risks, and how the Yield pool dynamically adjusts the leverage ratio, etc. Prediction market: Use AI models to dynamically adjust and update probabilities. Compared with the pricing mechanism based solely on trading volume, AI's aggregate reasoning can provide users with a smarter prediction starting point, avoiding pure follow-the-crowd. However, Allora is essentially just an infrastructure service facility. In the early stages, when there are few models, little data, and insufficient accuracy, it will also go through a long period of accumulating energy. However, if DeFAi and prediction markets, two promising markets, can become mainstream in the future, the value of its infrastructure services will be highlighted.

PolyChain leads the investment. How does Allora use the "model flywheel" to reshape AI reasoning services?

2025/10/21 09:00
3분 읽기
이 콘텐츠에 대한 의견이나 우려 사항이 있으시면 crypto.news@mexc.com으로 연락주시기 바랍니다

With $35 million in funding, led by veteran VCs like PolyChain and Framework, Allora has been performing incredibly well recently. I've seen many people call it a "prediction market." Wrong. Let me share my understanding of this project:

1) To be precise, Allora is a decentralized AI reasoning service platform. Users can pay for AI agents to provide services for any needs requiring AI judgment, including price prediction, strategy optimization, and risk assessment. Therefore, the prediction market is only one application scenario of Allora, not the only one.

2) Given the inherently uneven inference and output capabilities of AI models, how can Allora become a mature upstream supplier of mass output? The answer lies in building an aggregation platform that leverages the collective power and competitive collaboration of AI models.

The mechanism is straightforward. For example, if a user wants to predict whether ETH will rise or fall and decide how to set the LP price range, the traditional approach involves observing K-line charts, listening to key opinion leaders (KOLs) analysis, or purchasing customized AI model APIs for predictions, which often yield a variety of inconsistent answers. Is it possible to develop an aggregated inference service platform that can handle this comparative screening process?

The key lies here. After the user sends the demand to Allora, the 280,000 nodes in the network architecture will compete to give answers. Some say it will rise, some say it will fall, and some say it will go sideways. Allora will vote for these models and record historical performance reports. It will give higher weight to AI models with a high prediction success rate and send token rewards. At the same time, it will deduct points and deposits from those who make blind guesses.

This creates a positive flywheel: models with accurate predictions earn more, gain increasing weight, and take on more tasks; those that keep guessing are eliminated.

3) Therefore, I prefer Allora as the infrastructure layer for AI inference services, with the ability to call AI model combinations on demand. There are two main application scenarios:

DeFAI: When the AI Agent executes on-chain transactions, it needs to determine whether a transaction is MEV, provide the optimal price range in real time when adjusting Uniswap LP, determine whether AAVE has liquidation risks, and how the Yield pool dynamically adjusts the leverage ratio, etc.

Prediction market: Use AI models to dynamically adjust and update probabilities. Compared with the pricing mechanism based solely on trading volume, AI's aggregate reasoning can provide users with a smarter prediction starting point, avoiding pure follow-the-crowd.

However, Allora is essentially just an infrastructure service facility. In the early stages, when there are few models, little data, and insufficient accuracy, it will also go through a long period of accumulating energy.

However, if DeFAi and prediction markets, two promising markets, can become mainstream in the future, the value of its infrastructure services will be highlighted.

면책 조항: 본 사이트에 재게시된 글들은 공개 플랫폼에서 가져온 것으로 정보 제공 목적으로만 제공됩니다. 이는 반드시 MEXC의 견해를 반영하는 것은 아닙니다. 모든 권리는 원저자에게 있습니다. 제3자의 권리를 침해하는 콘텐츠가 있다고 판단될 경우, crypto.news@mexc.com으로 연락하여 삭제 요청을 해주시기 바랍니다. MEXC는 콘텐츠의 정확성, 완전성 또는 시의적절성에 대해 어떠한 보증도 하지 않으며, 제공된 정보에 기반하여 취해진 어떠한 조치에 대해서도 책임을 지지 않습니다. 본 콘텐츠는 금융, 법률 또는 기타 전문적인 조언을 구성하지 않으며, MEXC의 추천이나 보증으로 간주되어서는 안 됩니다.

USD1 Genesis: 0 Fees + 12% APR

USD1 Genesis: 0 Fees + 12% APRUSD1 Genesis: 0 Fees + 12% APR

New users: stake for up to 600% APR. Limited time!