The European Commission is advancing proposals to shift direct supervisory authority over crypto exchanges, stock exchanges, and clearing houses to the European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA), according to the Financial Times. The move aims to eliminate regulatory fragmentation across the EU’s 27 member states and strengthen the bloc’s capital markets union. Under the plan, ESMA would assume oversight of “the most significant cross-border entities,” including crypto asset service providers currently regulated under individual national authorities through the Markets in Crypto-Assets (MiCA) framework. The initiative has gained backing from ECB President Christine Lagarde and her predecessor, Mario Draghi, who highlighted centralized supervision as essential for European competitiveness against the U.S.European Central Bank President Christine Lagarde, at the European Central Bank Governors’ Meeting, Frankfurt | Source: Al Majalla Fragmentation Undermines Market Efficiency The current system has created significant inefficiencies, according to ESMA chair Verena Ross. National regulators across all 27 member states had to build separate crypto supervision frameworks, a process she described as duplicative and costly. “It clearly takes a lot of effort from us and the national supervisors to achieve alignment,” Ross told the Financial Times. “Specific new resources had to be built up 27 times, once in each member state, which could have been done more efficiently at a European level.“ ESMA’s July peer review of Malta’s Financial Services Authority exposed these inconsistencies. While acknowledging adequate staffing, the review found Malta only “partially met expectations” in authorizing crypto asset service providers, with material issues left unaddressed during approval stages. The Paris-based authority emphasized that consistent application of MiCA is essential for standardizing how crypto firms are licensed and supervised throughout the bloc. Divided Support Among Member States Germany’s government under Chancellor Friedrich Merz has recently signaled openness to centralized oversight after long opposing it. France remains a strong backer, with Bank of France Governor François Villeroy de Galhau warning that the current passporting system risks regulatory loopholes and uneven oversight. “This framework would benefit from much stricter regulation of the multi-issuance of the same stablecoin within and outside the European Union, to reduce arbitrage risks in times of stress,” he said in October. Meanwhile, smaller financial centers are resisting the shift. Luxembourg Finance Minister Gilles Roth said his country prefers “supervisory convergence rather than creating a costly and ineffective centralized model.” Malta has explicitly rejected expanded ESMA powers, with its Financial Services Authority warning that centralization would introduce bureaucratic layers that would hinder competitiveness during a period when the EU is striving to enhance its global position. Ireland and Luxembourg similarly fear the move could disadvantage their national financial sectors, remaining skeptical that EU regulators would act in the best interests of smaller nations. Exchange groups and industry lobbies have raised concerns about higher compliance costs. “Expanding Esma’s supervisory responsibilities would mean higher fees paid by the industry,” said Marin Capelle, policy adviser at Efama, the fund industry lobby. Broader Capital Markets Integration The commission is expected to present its “markets integration package” in December. Beyond crypto exchanges, ESMA would also gain binding dispute resolution powers between national supervisors overseeing large asset managers, though it would not directly supervise them. The initiative forms part of a broader effort to complete the EU’s capital markets union. The current landscape, with dozens of national and regional regulators and hundreds of trading institutions, raises costs for cross-border trades, a significant obstacle for startups scaling in Europe rather than the U.S. Ross emphasized the need for capital markets to support the EU’s long-term goals. “This would provide a key impetus towards having a capital market in Europe that is more integrated and globally competitive,” she said. ESMA will begin overseeing the consolidation of equity and bond prices, alongside ESG ratings, from 2026 onward. Cryptocurrency oversight would extend the regulator’s authority as Europe pushes for tighter market integrationThe European Commission is advancing proposals to shift direct supervisory authority over crypto exchanges, stock exchanges, and clearing houses to the European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA), according to the Financial Times. The move aims to eliminate regulatory fragmentation across the EU’s 27 member states and strengthen the bloc’s capital markets union. Under the plan, ESMA would assume oversight of “the most significant cross-border entities,” including crypto asset service providers currently regulated under individual national authorities through the Markets in Crypto-Assets (MiCA) framework. The initiative has gained backing from ECB President Christine Lagarde and her predecessor, Mario Draghi, who highlighted centralized supervision as essential for European competitiveness against the U.S.European Central Bank President Christine Lagarde, at the European Central Bank Governors’ Meeting, Frankfurt | Source: Al Majalla Fragmentation Undermines Market Efficiency The current system has created significant inefficiencies, according to ESMA chair Verena Ross. National regulators across all 27 member states had to build separate crypto supervision frameworks, a process she described as duplicative and costly. “It clearly takes a lot of effort from us and the national supervisors to achieve alignment,” Ross told the Financial Times. “Specific new resources had to be built up 27 times, once in each member state, which could have been done more efficiently at a European level.“ ESMA’s July peer review of Malta’s Financial Services Authority exposed these inconsistencies. While acknowledging adequate staffing, the review found Malta only “partially met expectations” in authorizing crypto asset service providers, with material issues left unaddressed during approval stages. The Paris-based authority emphasized that consistent application of MiCA is essential for standardizing how crypto firms are licensed and supervised throughout the bloc. Divided Support Among Member States Germany’s government under Chancellor Friedrich Merz has recently signaled openness to centralized oversight after long opposing it. France remains a strong backer, with Bank of France Governor François Villeroy de Galhau warning that the current passporting system risks regulatory loopholes and uneven oversight. “This framework would benefit from much stricter regulation of the multi-issuance of the same stablecoin within and outside the European Union, to reduce arbitrage risks in times of stress,” he said in October. Meanwhile, smaller financial centers are resisting the shift. Luxembourg Finance Minister Gilles Roth said his country prefers “supervisory convergence rather than creating a costly and ineffective centralized model.” Malta has explicitly rejected expanded ESMA powers, with its Financial Services Authority warning that centralization would introduce bureaucratic layers that would hinder competitiveness during a period when the EU is striving to enhance its global position. Ireland and Luxembourg similarly fear the move could disadvantage their national financial sectors, remaining skeptical that EU regulators would act in the best interests of smaller nations. Exchange groups and industry lobbies have raised concerns about higher compliance costs. “Expanding Esma’s supervisory responsibilities would mean higher fees paid by the industry,” said Marin Capelle, policy adviser at Efama, the fund industry lobby. Broader Capital Markets Integration The commission is expected to present its “markets integration package” in December. Beyond crypto exchanges, ESMA would also gain binding dispute resolution powers between national supervisors overseeing large asset managers, though it would not directly supervise them. The initiative forms part of a broader effort to complete the EU’s capital markets union. The current landscape, with dozens of national and regional regulators and hundreds of trading institutions, raises costs for cross-border trades, a significant obstacle for startups scaling in Europe rather than the U.S. Ross emphasized the need for capital markets to support the EU’s long-term goals. “This would provide a key impetus towards having a capital market in Europe that is more integrated and globally competitive,” she said. ESMA will begin overseeing the consolidation of equity and bond prices, alongside ESG ratings, from 2026 onward. Cryptocurrency oversight would extend the regulator’s authority as Europe pushes for tighter market integration

EU Plans to Give ESMA Direct Power Over Crypto Exchanges

2025/11/04 00:19
4분 읽기
이 콘텐츠에 대한 의견이나 우려 사항이 있으시면 crypto.news@mexc.com으로 연락주시기 바랍니다

The European Commission is advancing proposals to shift direct supervisory authority over crypto exchanges, stock exchanges, and clearing houses to the European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA), according to the Financial Times.

The move aims to eliminate regulatory fragmentation across the EU’s 27 member states and strengthen the bloc’s capital markets union.

Under the plan, ESMA would assume oversight of “the most significant cross-border entities,” including crypto asset service providers currently regulated under individual national authorities through the Markets in Crypto-Assets (MiCA) framework.

The initiative has gained backing from ECB President Christine Lagarde and her predecessor, Mario Draghi, who highlighted centralized supervision as essential for European competitiveness against the U.S.

European Central Bank President Christine Lagarde, at the European Central Bank Governors’ Meeting, Frankfurt | Source: Al Majalla

Fragmentation Undermines Market Efficiency

The current system has created significant inefficiencies, according to ESMA chair Verena Ross.

National regulators across all 27 member states had to build separate crypto supervision frameworks, a process she described as duplicative and costly.

It clearly takes a lot of effort from us and the national supervisors to achieve alignment,” Ross told the Financial Times.

Specific new resources had to be built up 27 times, once in each member state, which could have been done more efficiently at a European level.

ESMA’s July peer review of Malta’s Financial Services Authority exposed these inconsistencies.

While acknowledging adequate staffing, the review found Malta only “partially met expectations” in authorizing crypto asset service providers, with material issues left unaddressed during approval stages.

The Paris-based authority emphasized that consistent application of MiCA is essential for standardizing how crypto firms are licensed and supervised throughout the bloc.

Divided Support Among Member States

Germany’s government under Chancellor Friedrich Merz has recently signaled openness to centralized oversight after long opposing it.

France remains a strong backer, with Bank of France Governor François Villeroy de Galhau warning that the current passporting system risks regulatory loopholes and uneven oversight.

This framework would benefit from much stricter regulation of the multi-issuance of the same stablecoin within and outside the European Union, to reduce arbitrage risks in times of stress,” he said in October.

Meanwhile, smaller financial centers are resisting the shift.

Luxembourg Finance Minister Gilles Roth said his country prefers “supervisory convergence rather than creating a costly and ineffective centralized model.

Malta has explicitly rejected expanded ESMA powers, with its Financial Services Authority warning that centralization would introduce bureaucratic layers that would hinder competitiveness during a period when the EU is striving to enhance its global position.

Ireland and Luxembourg similarly fear the move could disadvantage their national financial sectors, remaining skeptical that EU regulators would act in the best interests of smaller nations.

Exchange groups and industry lobbies have raised concerns about higher compliance costs.

Expanding Esma’s supervisory responsibilities would mean higher fees paid by the industry,” said Marin Capelle, policy adviser at Efama, the fund industry lobby.

Broader Capital Markets Integration

The commission is expected to present its “markets integration package” in December.

Beyond crypto exchanges, ESMA would also gain binding dispute resolution powers between national supervisors overseeing large asset managers, though it would not directly supervise them.

The initiative forms part of a broader effort to complete the EU’s capital markets union.

The current landscape, with dozens of national and regional regulators and hundreds of trading institutions, raises costs for cross-border trades, a significant obstacle for startups scaling in Europe rather than the U.S.

Ross emphasized the need for capital markets to support the EU’s long-term goals. “This would provide a key impetus towards having a capital market in Europe that is more integrated and globally competitive,” she said.

ESMA will begin overseeing the consolidation of equity and bond prices, alongside ESG ratings, from 2026 onward. Cryptocurrency oversight would extend the regulator’s authority as Europe pushes for tighter market integration.

면책 조항: 본 사이트에 재게시된 글들은 공개 플랫폼에서 가져온 것으로 정보 제공 목적으로만 제공됩니다. 이는 반드시 MEXC의 견해를 반영하는 것은 아닙니다. 모든 권리는 원저자에게 있습니다. 제3자의 권리를 침해하는 콘텐츠가 있다고 판단될 경우, crypto.news@mexc.com으로 연락하여 삭제 요청을 해주시기 바랍니다. MEXC는 콘텐츠의 정확성, 완전성 또는 시의적절성에 대해 어떠한 보증도 하지 않으며, 제공된 정보에 기반하여 취해진 어떠한 조치에 대해서도 책임을 지지 않습니다. 본 콘텐츠는 금융, 법률 또는 기타 전문적인 조언을 구성하지 않으며, MEXC의 추천이나 보증으로 간주되어서는 안 됩니다.

Roll the Dice & Win Up to 1 BTC

Roll the Dice & Win Up to 1 BTCRoll the Dice & Win Up to 1 BTC

Invite friends & share 500,000 USDT!