Vitalik Buterin declared that Ethereum has ditched eWASM in support of RISC-V. These discontinuities in The Merge and the swift development of SNARK technology Vitalik Buterin declared that Ethereum has ditched eWASM in support of RISC-V. These discontinuities in The Merge and the swift development of SNARK technology

Why Ethereum Abandoned eWASM for RISC-V Architecture

2025/12/29 02:30
3분 읽기
이 콘텐츠에 대한 의견이나 우려 사항이 있으시면 crypto.news@mexc.com으로 연락주시기 바랍니다

Vitalik Buterin declared that Ethereum has ditched eWASM in support of RISC-V. These discontinuities in The Merge and the swift development of SNARK technology necessitated the critical shift to zkEVM compatibility.

Ethereum gave up on its long-awaited eWASM upgrade. Instead, the network has been made compatible with the RISC-V architecture. This change was described by co-founder Vitalik Buterin at Pragma Taipei in April 2025.

Buterin explained why this change occurred, according to WuBlockchain on X. The Merge was heavily delayed, and the SNARK technology developed much faster, changing the technical priorities of Ethereum.

Source: WuBlockchain 

eWASM was developed as a replacement for the faulty EVM that was destined to be high-performing and compatible. The upgrade was supposed to bring Ethereum to a more modern level of its execution layer, yet its implementation took longer than anticipated. When scaling became necessary with zero-knowledge proofs, cryptographic verification systems became the focus of development.

The SNARK Revolution Changed Everything

SNARK-friendliness was finally the criterion. Ethereum required an execution environment that is effectively compatible with zero-knowledge proofs, and eWASM failed to satisfy that need.

RISC-V had a definite advantage. RISC-V-style models, which are the natural choice in SNARK systems, are already used in most zkEVM implementations. Production of WebAssembly proofs was less efficient and more complicated.

According to Butterin, RISC-V is now the right standard. The open-source instruction set is compatible with cryptographic verification and has fewer circuit complexity requirements regarding zero-knowledge proofs.

You might also like: Court Examines Whether Solana Transaction Ordering and MEV Tools Harmed Retail Users

zkEVM Adoption Drove the Decision

Several zkEVM projects already have RISC-V-compatible architectures, including zkSync and Polygon zkEVM, which have similar instruction sets. This usage became widespread and impacted how Ethereum was directed, making it less fragmented and allowing developers to be able to share tools across platforms.

The scaling roadmap of the network focuses on rollups. These systems would pack transactions off-chain and provide cryptographic evidence back to Ethereum. Layer-2 solutions rely on effective generation of proof, and RISC-V fits this model well, simplifying the verification of networks.

Ethereum is still adopting a modular development philosophy. The shift encourages continuous enhancement without significant disturbances, enhancing rollup performance over time and retaining long-term decentralization as a priority. RISC-V is flexible enough to support protocol upgrades in the future and invite a wider spectrum of ecosystem members.

The post Why Ethereum Abandoned eWASM for RISC-V Architecture appeared first on Live Bitcoin News.

시장 기회
Belong 로고
Belong 가격(LONG)
$0.001477
$0.001477$0.001477
-2.89%
USD
Belong (LONG) 실시간 가격 차트
면책 조항: 본 사이트에 재게시된 글들은 공개 플랫폼에서 가져온 것으로 정보 제공 목적으로만 제공됩니다. 이는 반드시 MEXC의 견해를 반영하는 것은 아닙니다. 모든 권리는 원저자에게 있습니다. 제3자의 권리를 침해하는 콘텐츠가 있다고 판단될 경우, crypto.news@mexc.com으로 연락하여 삭제 요청을 해주시기 바랍니다. MEXC는 콘텐츠의 정확성, 완전성 또는 시의적절성에 대해 어떠한 보증도 하지 않으며, 제공된 정보에 기반하여 취해진 어떠한 조치에 대해서도 책임을 지지 않습니다. 본 콘텐츠는 금융, 법률 또는 기타 전문적인 조언을 구성하지 않으며, MEXC의 추천이나 보증으로 간주되어서는 안 됩니다.

USD1 Genesis: 0 Fees + 12% APR

USD1 Genesis: 0 Fees + 12% APRUSD1 Genesis: 0 Fees + 12% APR

New users: stake for up to 600% APR. Limited time!