However, the effort has stalled, as regulators remain locked in a dispute over who should be allowed to issue stablecoins—pushing […] The post South Korea’s StablecoinHowever, the effort has stalled, as regulators remain locked in a dispute over who should be allowed to issue stablecoins—pushing […] The post South Korea’s Stablecoin

South Korea’s Stablecoin Ambitions Hit Regulatory Roadblock

2025/12/30 20:30
4분 읽기
이 콘텐츠에 대한 의견이나 우려 사항이 있으시면 crypto.news@mexc.com으로 연락주시기 바랍니다

However, the effort has stalled, as regulators remain locked in a dispute over who should be allowed to issue stablecoins—pushing final legislation into next year.

Key takeaways:

  • South Korea plans strict reserve and custody rules for stablecoin issuers
  • Issuers may be required to back tokens with bank deposits or government bonds
  • Regulators are divided over whether only bank-led entities should issue stablecoins
  • The legislative deadlock has delayed the framework into 2026

The proposed rules are part of the Financial Services Commission’s draft Digital Asset Basic Act, which aims to extend investor protections in crypto markets to a level comparable with traditional finance.

Bank-Grade Rules for Stablecoins

Under the draft framework, stablecoin issuers would be required to hold reserve assets exclusively in highly secure instruments, such as bank deposits or government bonds. In addition, one hundred percent of those reserves would need to be entrusted to approved custodians, including commercial banks.

The goal is to prevent a stablecoin issuer’s failure from spilling over into losses for users, effectively isolating customer funds from corporate insolvency risk. Regulators are seeking to close loopholes exposed by past stablecoin collapses, where insufficient or poorly managed reserves amplified investor losses.

Beyond stablecoins, the bill would impose broader obligations on digital asset service providers. These include stricter disclosure requirements, standardized terms of service, and tighter advertising rules. Providers could also be held financially liable for damages resulting from hacks or system failures, even without proven negligence—mirroring liability standards already applied to online retail platforms.

ICOs May Return—Under Tight Conditions

The proposal also opens the door to a conditional return of initial coin offerings. ICOs have been banned in South Korea since 2017, but the new framework would allow domestic projects to launch tokens if they meet rigorous disclosure and risk-management standards.

READ MORE:

China’s Top Court Pushes for New Crypto Laws Amid Rising Cybercrime

If implemented, this would mark a significant shift in policy, potentially reviving local token fundraising—albeit under heavy regulatory supervision designed to limit speculation and fraud.

A Regulatory Deadlock at the Core

Despite progress on paper, the most contentious issue remains unresolved: who gets to issue stablecoins. The Bank of Korea has taken a conservative stance, arguing that stablecoin issuance should be restricted to consortia in which banks hold at least a fifty-one percent controlling stake. From the central bank’s perspective, this is essential to preserve monetary stability and reduce systemic risk.

The Financial Services Commission, however, disagrees. It has warned that imposing rigid ownership thresholds would crowd out technology firms, limit competition, and slow innovation in digital finance. The two institutions are also divided on governance, with the Bank of Korea pushing for a new licensing committee, while the FSC argues existing structures are sufficient.

The standoff has delayed the bill’s timeline, prompting South Korea’s ruling Democratic Party to draft a separate proposal that consolidates various lawmaker-led digital asset initiatives.

Stablecoins, Sovereignty, and the Bigger Picture

The debate is unfolding against a broader strategic backdrop. President Lee Jae Myung, elected earlier this year, has made the development of a Korean won-pegged stablecoin ecosystem a policy priority, framing it as a way to protect monetary sovereignty in a market increasingly dominated by U.S. dollar-based stablecoins.

The Digital Asset Basic Act represents the second phase of South Korea’s comprehensive crypto regulatory push. The first phase, passed in 2023 and implemented in 2024, focused on combating market abuse such as insider trading and price manipulation.

Whether South Korea ultimately opts for a bank-centric stablecoin model or a more open issuance framework remains unresolved. What is clear is that the country is positioning itself for a tightly controlled—but potentially influential—role in the next stage of global digital asset regulation.


The information provided in this article is for educational purposes only and does not constitute financial, investment, or trading advice. Coindoo.com does not endorse or recommend any specific investment strategy or cryptocurrency. Always conduct your own research and consult with a licensed financial advisor before making any investment decisions.

The post South Korea’s Stablecoin Ambitions Hit Regulatory Roadblock appeared first on Coindoo.

면책 조항: 본 사이트에 재게시된 글들은 공개 플랫폼에서 가져온 것으로 정보 제공 목적으로만 제공됩니다. 이는 반드시 MEXC의 견해를 반영하는 것은 아닙니다. 모든 권리는 원저자에게 있습니다. 제3자의 권리를 침해하는 콘텐츠가 있다고 판단될 경우, crypto.news@mexc.com으로 연락하여 삭제 요청을 해주시기 바랍니다. MEXC는 콘텐츠의 정확성, 완전성 또는 시의적절성에 대해 어떠한 보증도 하지 않으며, 제공된 정보에 기반하여 취해진 어떠한 조치에 대해서도 책임을 지지 않습니다. 본 콘텐츠는 금융, 법률 또는 기타 전문적인 조언을 구성하지 않으며, MEXC의 추천이나 보증으로 간주되어서는 안 됩니다.