A proposed 10% cap on U.S. credit card interest rates revives Canadian debate over bank profits, consumer savings, and unintended consequences. The post Credit A proposed 10% cap on U.S. credit card interest rates revives Canadian debate over bank profits, consumer savings, and unintended consequences. The post Credit

Credit card interest rates: How high is too high?

2026/01/16 02:22

U.S. President Donald Trump’s proposal to cap credit card interest rates at 10% for a year echoes what some advocates in Canada have long been pushing for, and banks pushing against. Consumer advocate Duff Conacher, co-founder of Democracy Watch, last month pushed the government to act on the issue to stop what he characterized as “bank gouging.” The financial industry, meanwhile, has generally pushed against measures to limit interest rates, saying such actions would cut some consumers off from the credit option and force others to pay more through fees or alternative services.

Credit card rate caps spark debate

The Canadian Bankers Association said in a statement Monday that Canada’s credit card market is highly competitive and well regulated.

“Regulatory interventions aimed at artificially capping credit card interest rates can lead to unintended consequences that harm consumers, such as reducing credit availability for many Canadians and business owners,” said spokeswoman Nathalie Bergeron in an email. “Such a cap could drive customers towards more costly alternatives and reduce the value that all consumers receive from credit cards.”

Conacher, who’s been pushing for lower credit card rates in Canada for decades, said that banks always say they’ll have to stop offering credit to some, but never provide proof. “Whenever the banks say we wouldn’t be able to afford, we wouldn’t have these margins, and then as a result, we’d have to cut off people, they should be required to prove that’s true,” he said. “No one should accept it at face value, given their profit levels.”

He pointed out how credit card rates have stayed the same, generally hovering around 20%, despite wide fluctuations in interest rates over the last two decades, as evidence there is room to reduce.

Also read

Best low interest credit cards in Canada

Studies suggest rate caps could save billions

Research in the U.S., after Trump first put out the plan as a campaign pledge, found that Americans would save about US$100 billion in interest a year if credit card rates were capped at 10%. The same researchers found that while the credit card industry would take a major hit, it would still be profitable, although credit card rewards and other perks might be scaled back.

In remarks from late 2024 to a parliamentary committee, the banking association’s senior vice-president for banking policy, Darren Hannah, said that 71% of Canadians pay off their balance every month, while there are also some lower-interest card options. He said credit cards offer great value to consumers, that there are some options to switch credit card debt to instalment loans at potentially lower interest, and that the industry has worked with consumers during tough times like the COVID-19 pandemic when it provided deferrals on credit cards.

What didn’t happen during the pandemic though, was much of any change in credit card interest rates. The lack of change, despite the historically low Bank of Canada policy rate, prompted the Canadian Labour Congress to call for a better response from banks in 2020. 

Federal interest caps stop short of credit cards

The question of what level of interest rate is acceptable is an age-old question, but one the federal government has worked to tackle recently. Ottawa officially lowered the maximum allowable interest rates on loans to 35% on an annual percentage rate from 48%, while separately setting out lower maximums for payday loan charges. The change wasn’t enough to affect credit cards, though.

And while interest rates are certainly key, it’s also important to look at hidden charges and other costs like interchange fees, said Claire Celerier, Canada Research Chair in household finance at the University of Toronto’s Rotman School of Management. “The risk is that if you cap the interest rate and if there is no cap on late payment fees, interchange fees, and so on, banks are going to recover by increasing all the other fees.” Such fees are generally more hidden than the interest rate, raising the potential of further distorting the market. 

Lower-income cardholders tend to bear hidden costs

Low-income people can sometimes shoulder a disproportionate share of fees, like the interchange fee charged to merchants, because while stores spread out the costs among all shoppers, high-earners get some costs back in credit card rewards. “I think what Trump is doing, the effect is that banks are going to increase their fees and it will be at the expense of the poor.” 

The federal government in 2024 did secure an agreement on reduced interchange fees, though the rates still stand much higher than in Europe. 

Derek Holt, vice president of Scotiabank Economics, said in a note Monday that a lowering of the cap on rates would also likely mean higher monthly minimum payments, card companies raising other fees and many losing access to free credit. “In short, education and efforts to raise financial literacy may be more effective than rate caps and so could efforts to address severe income disparities within the U.S. economy that are not the fault of the cards industry.” 

Newsletter

Get free MoneySense financial tips, news & advice in your inbox.

Read more about news:

  • How to turn your child’s first phone into a money lesson
  • How to find room to save in 2026—even with tight budgets
  • CCB payment dates in 2026, and more to know about the Canada Child Benefit
  • Plan for financial success in 2026

The post Credit card interest rates: How high is too high? appeared first on MoneySense.

시장 기회
Lorenzo Protocol 로고
Lorenzo Protocol 가격(BANK)
$0.05103
$0.05103$0.05103
-2.92%
USD
Lorenzo Protocol (BANK) 실시간 가격 차트
면책 조항: 본 사이트에 재게시된 글들은 공개 플랫폼에서 가져온 것으로 정보 제공 목적으로만 제공됩니다. 이는 반드시 MEXC의 견해를 반영하는 것은 아닙니다. 모든 권리는 원저자에게 있습니다. 제3자의 권리를 침해하는 콘텐츠가 있다고 판단될 경우, service@support.mexc.com으로 연락하여 삭제 요청을 해주시기 바랍니다. MEXC는 콘텐츠의 정확성, 완전성 또는 시의적절성에 대해 어떠한 보증도 하지 않으며, 제공된 정보에 기반하여 취해진 어떠한 조치에 대해서도 책임을 지지 않습니다. 본 콘텐츠는 금융, 법률 또는 기타 전문적인 조언을 구성하지 않으며, MEXC의 추천이나 보증으로 간주되어서는 안 됩니다.

추천 콘텐츠

Seeker (SKR) will soon be listed on Bybit Spot, Alpha, and Byreal.

Seeker (SKR) will soon be listed on Bybit Spot, Alpha, and Byreal.

PANews reported on January 21 that Bybit will launch Seeker (SKR) on its spot, Alpha, and Byreal platforms. Users can quickly trade without setting up a separate
공유하기
PANews2026/01/21 08:20
Perpetual DEX in testing with cross‑chain liquidity and ADL

Perpetual DEX in testing with cross‑chain liquidity and ADL

The post Perpetual DEX in testing with cross‑chain liquidity and ADL appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Sunperp, a new perpetual DEX being tested on the Tron blockchain, promises millisecond executions, cross-chain liquidity aggregation, and an integrated auto-deleveraging (ADL) system. Justin Sun reshared the announcement on X, inviting users to try it and highlighting dedicated incentives, while numerous economic details and operational metrics remain to be confirmed. According to the data collected by on-chain analysts and industry reports, in May 2025 TRON hosted over 75 billion USDT, with the network recording over 8.3 million daily transactions and approximately 306 million active accounts, a context that justifies the interest in USDT-collateralized derivatives. Market analysts following perpetual DEX also note that the massive availability of USDT on TRON facilitates cross-chain arbitrage operations and reduces costs for market makers. What is Sunperp and what it brings differently to Tron Sunperp is a platform perp DEX that uses USDT as collateral, with profits and losses calculated in USDT. The architecture separates matching, executed off-chain to maximize speed, from settlement, recorded on-chain to ensure transparency of trading results. In this context, the debut announcement was originally reported by Jamie Redman; the team also states that, while in the testing phase, the core contracts are non-upgradable. Main Technical Features Order types: market, limit (with FOK – Fill-or-Kill, GTC – Good-Till-Cancelled, and IOC – Immediate-or-Cancel modes), post-only orders, plan orders, trailing, and TWAP (Time-Weighted Average Price). Use of multi-source oracles to determine the mark price employed in the calculation of profits and liquidations. Primary collateral: USDT, with P&L calculated in the same currency. Core contracts declared non-upgradable in an environment still in testing. Cross-chain liquidity: less slippage and tighter spreads The protocol claims to aggregate liquidity flows from various networks in order to increase market depth and improve order execution, thereby reducing slippage and spreads in large-size trades. However, the actual effect will depend…
공유하기
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/22 17:20
Akash Network’s Strategic Move: A Crucial Burn for AKT’s Future

Akash Network’s Strategic Move: A Crucial Burn for AKT’s Future

BitcoinWorld Akash Network’s Strategic Move: A Crucial Burn for AKT’s Future In the dynamic world of decentralized computing, exciting developments are constantly shaping the future. Today, all eyes are on Akash Network, the innovative supercloud project, as it proposes a significant change to its tokenomics. This move aims to strengthen the value of its native token, AKT, and further solidify its position in the competitive blockchain space. The community is buzzing about a newly submitted governance proposal that could introduce a game-changing Burn Mint Equilibrium (BME) model. What is the Burn Mint Equilibrium (BME) for Akash Network? The core of this proposal revolves around a concept called Burn Mint Equilibrium, or BME. Essentially, this model is designed to create a balance in the token’s circulating supply by systematically removing a portion of tokens from existence. For Akash Network, this means burning an amount of AKT that is equivalent to the U.S. dollar value of fees paid by network users. Fee Conversion: When users pay for cloud services on the Akash Network, these fees are typically collected in various cryptocurrencies or stablecoins. AKT Equivalence: The proposal suggests converting the U.S. dollar value of these collected fees into an equivalent amount of AKT. Token Burn: This calculated amount of AKT would then be permanently removed from circulation, or ‘burned’. This mechanism creates a direct link between network utility and token supply reduction. As more users utilize the decentralized supercloud, more AKT will be burned, potentially impacting the token’s scarcity and value. Why is This Proposal Crucial for AKT Holders? For anyone holding AKT, or considering investing in the Akash Network ecosystem, this proposal carries significant weight. Token burning mechanisms are often viewed as a positive development because they can lead to increased scarcity. When supply decreases while demand remains constant or grows, the price per unit tends to increase. Here are some key benefits: Increased Scarcity: Burning tokens reduces the total circulating supply of AKT. This makes each remaining token potentially more valuable over time. Demand-Supply Dynamics: The BME model directly ties the burning of AKT to network usage. Higher adoption of the Akash Network supercloud translates into more fees, and thus more AKT burned. Long-Term Value Proposition: By creating a deflationary pressure, the proposal aims to enhance AKT’s long-term value, making it a more attractive asset for investors and long-term holders. This strategic move demonstrates a commitment from the Akash Network community to optimize its tokenomics for sustainable growth and value appreciation. How Does BME Impact the Decentralized Supercloud Mission? Beyond token value, the BME proposal aligns perfectly with the broader mission of the Akash Network. As a decentralized supercloud, Akash provides a marketplace for cloud computing resources, allowing users to deploy applications faster, more efficiently, and at a lower cost than traditional providers. The BME model reinforces this utility. Consider these impacts: Network Health: A stronger AKT token can incentivize more validators and providers to secure and contribute resources to the network, improving its overall health and resilience. Ecosystem Growth: Enhanced token value can attract more developers and projects to build on the Akash Network, fostering a vibrant and diverse ecosystem. User Incentive: While users pay fees, the potential appreciation of AKT could indirectly benefit those who hold the token, creating a circular economy within the supercloud. This proposal is not just about burning tokens; it’s about building a more robust, self-sustaining, and economically sound decentralized cloud infrastructure for the future. What Are the Next Steps for the Akash Network Community? As a governance proposal, the BME model will now undergo a period of community discussion and voting. This is a crucial phase where AKT holders and network participants can voice their opinions, debate the merits, and ultimately decide on the future direction of the project. Transparency and community engagement are hallmarks of decentralized projects like Akash Network. Challenges and Considerations: Implementation Complexity: Ensuring the burning mechanism is technically sound and transparent will be vital. Community Consensus: Achieving broad agreement within the diverse Akash Network community is key for successful adoption. The outcome of this vote will significantly shape the tokenomics and economic model of the Akash Network, influencing its trajectory in the rapidly evolving decentralized cloud landscape. The proposal to introduce a Burn Mint Equilibrium model represents a bold and strategic step for Akash Network. By directly linking network usage to token scarcity, the project aims to create a more resilient and valuable AKT token, ultimately strengthening its position as a leading decentralized supercloud provider. This move underscores the project’s commitment to innovative tokenomics and sustainable growth, promising an exciting future for both users and investors in the Akash Network ecosystem. It’s a clear signal that Akash is actively working to enhance its value proposition and maintain its competitive edge in the decentralized future. Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) 1. What is the main goal of the Burn Mint Equilibrium (BME) proposal for Akash Network? The primary goal is to adjust the circulating supply of AKT tokens by burning a portion of network fees, thereby creating deflationary pressure and potentially enhancing the token’s long-term value and scarcity. 2. How will the amount of AKT to be burned be determined? The proposal suggests burning an amount of AKT equivalent to the U.S. dollar value of fees paid by users on the Akash Network for cloud services. 3. What are the potential benefits for AKT token holders? Token holders could benefit from increased scarcity of AKT, which may lead to higher demand and appreciation in value over time, especially as network usage grows. 4. How does this proposal relate to the overall mission of Akash Network? The BME model reinforces the Akash Network‘s mission by creating a stronger, more economically robust ecosystem. A healthier token incentivizes network participants, fostering growth and stability for the decentralized supercloud. 5. What is the next step for this governance proposal? The proposal will undergo a period of community discussion and voting by AKT token holders. The community’s decision will determine if the BME model is implemented on the Akash Network. If you found this article insightful, consider sharing it with your network! Your support helps us bring more valuable insights into the world of decentralized technology. Stay informed and help spread the word about the exciting developments happening within Akash Network. To learn more about the latest crypto market trends, explore our article on key developments shaping decentralized cloud solutions price action. This post Akash Network’s Strategic Move: A Crucial Burn for AKT’s Future first appeared on BitcoinWorld.
공유하기
Coinstats2025/09/22 21:35