CNN anchor Nicolle Wallace roasted Republican lawmakers for muddying the waters of a legitimate testimonial session concerning President Donald Trumpo’s Jan. 6 CNN anchor Nicolle Wallace roasted Republican lawmakers for muddying the waters of a legitimate testimonial session concerning President Donald Trumpo’s Jan. 6

'Suited for Fox News': Nicolle Wallace calls out GOP's Jack Smith conspiracies

2026/01/23 06:05

CNN anchor Nicolle Wallace roasted Republican lawmakers for muddying the waters of a legitimate testimonial session concerning President Donald Trumpo’s Jan. 6 insurrection attempt.

“Questions from lawmakers … ranged from the inquisitive to the ludicrous,” said Wallace. … [Former special prosecutor] Jack smith came into this hearing today as a political target for Republicans. They barely let him speak. At times, they interrupted him with absurd conspiracy theories and what-aboutism better suited for Fox News.”

But when Smith did get a chance to speak uninterrupted, Wallace said “he was crystal clear” in his testimony about how confident he was with his case and pushing back against conspiracy theories that the Biden justice system was weaponized against President Donald Trump.

At one point, Smith had to pushback at Rep. Ben Cline’s (R-Va.) claim that there could be no proof of Trump intimidating witnesses over the Jan. 6 attempted coup because intimidated witnesses “would fail to come forward.”

Smith replied that proof was prevalent, possibly from Republican witnesses who ignored Trump’s threats and approached the prosecutor’s office anyway. Smith added that the best source of much of the witness testimony for his investigation came from Republicans in correspondence with Trump in the days leading up to Trump’s insurrection attempt. After all, Trump was not approaching Democrats for help in overthrowing the election.

“We had extremely thorough evidence that his statements were having an effect on the proceedings that is not permitted in any court of law in the United States.”

“Don't you think it's a pretty low bar to clear if you're trying to silence a candidate for president?” Cline pressed. “I mean, if you can't identify a single witness who's intimidated then maybe you should reconsider the gag order.”

“Both courts upheld the orders, and it is not incumbent on a prosecutor to wait until someone gets killed before they move for an order to protect the proceedings,” Smith replied.

- YouTube youtu.be

  • george conway
  • noam chomsky
  • civil war
  • Kayleigh mcenany
  • Melania trump
  • drudge report
  • paul krugman
  • Lindsey graham
  • Lincoln project
  • al franken bill maher
  • People of praise
  • Ivanka trump
  • eric trump
면책 조항: 본 사이트에 재게시된 글들은 공개 플랫폼에서 가져온 것으로 정보 제공 목적으로만 제공됩니다. 이는 반드시 MEXC의 견해를 반영하는 것은 아닙니다. 모든 권리는 원저자에게 있습니다. 제3자의 권리를 침해하는 콘텐츠가 있다고 판단될 경우, service@support.mexc.com으로 연락하여 삭제 요청을 해주시기 바랍니다. MEXC는 콘텐츠의 정확성, 완전성 또는 시의적절성에 대해 어떠한 보증도 하지 않으며, 제공된 정보에 기반하여 취해진 어떠한 조치에 대해서도 책임을 지지 않습니다. 본 콘텐츠는 금융, 법률 또는 기타 전문적인 조언을 구성하지 않으며, MEXC의 추천이나 보증으로 간주되어서는 안 됩니다.