NEW ENVOY. Chinese Ambassador Jing Quan pays a call on President Ferdinand Marcos Jr. on December 11, 2025, the same day he presented his credentials as BeijingNEW ENVOY. Chinese Ambassador Jing Quan pays a call on President Ferdinand Marcos Jr. on December 11, 2025, the same day he presented his credentials as Beijing

PH files protest vs China embassy: Sobriety, respect not against national interest

2026/01/26 15:26

CEBU, Philippines — The Department of Foreign Affairs (DFA) announced Monday, January 26, that it had filed a protest before the Chinese ambassador and the Chinese embassy in Manila amid a very public word war between Beijing’s envoys in the country and top Philippine government officials, including sitting senators. 

In a statement, the DFA said it “made firm representations…conveying serious concerns with the escalation of public exchanges between the Chinese Embassy and Philippine legislators, such as Senator Risa Hontiveros, Senator Kiko Pangilinan, Senator Erwin Tulfo, and other government officials.”

The DFA did not say when the protest was filed or who from the Chinese embassy received the protest. 

For most of January, the Chinese embassy through its deputy spokesperson has released one strongly-worded statement after another in reaction to statements made by lawmakers, the spokesperson of the uniformed service, and even the National Maritime Council, a body composed of officials from the executive branch. 

In those statements, the embassy rehashed China’s position on the South China Sea, including its rejection of the 2016 Arbitral Award which largely favored the Philippines. 

While strong statements from the Chinese embassy in Manila are nothing new, the tempo and tone of recent statements, which started when Jing Quen assumed his post as ambassador, are. 

Must Read

View from Manila: The wolf (warrior) is back 

The DFA reminded Beijing’s embassy in Manila that the views of officials in the Philippines “in defense of Philippine sovereignty, sovereign rights, and jurisdiction” — and even “disagreeing voices” — “are an inescapable part of the robust plurality of ideas that animate our democratic society.”

“At the same time, while the Philippines values debate on our differences in national positions, the Department recognizes the need for sober, professional and respectful exchanges in the public sphere. Such is not contradictory to the national interest,” said the DFA. 

Over the weekend, several other Philippine government bodies — the Defense Department and the National Security Council — issued statements against the Chinese embassy’s series of statements. 

In some of its statements, the Chinese embassy in Manila prefaced its public statements by insisting that they would not back down from defending their position on issues, particularly those concerning the South China Sea. 

The DFA added: “The Department believes that circumspection in language and actions are necessary so that the exchanges between the two sides, especially in the public domain, do not and will not unnecessarily derail the diplomatic space needed to manage the tensions in the maritime domain and constructively collaborate in the non-sensitive areas of cooperation, such as in establishing formal communication channels between the two coast guards, developing scientific cooperation on ocean meteorology, and reinvigorating our trade and investment ties, agriculture cooperation, and people-to-people interaction.“

Both the DFA and President Ferdinand Marcos Jr. have said that tensions between the Philippines and China in and on the South China Sea should not make up the “totality” of the bilateral relationship. 

China claims almost all of the vast South China Sea, a critical trade waterway where over a third of global trade passes. 

Their claim — defined through the so-called 9-dash line — is without basis, at least according to the 2016 Arbitral Award. Beijing refuses to recognize that award. 

Beijing claims waters and features in part of the South China Sea that Manila calls the West Philippine Sea — an area that includes the Philippine exclusive economic zone and even features beyond it 

China’s territorial claim over these features and waters has meant the constant presence of Chinese vessels, even in features occupied by Filipino soldiers and civilians.

It has also meant harassment of Filipino vessels during military or coast guard operations or civilian fishing expeditions when Beijing’s ships try to drive them away.

Recently, the China Coast Guard rescued Filipino seafarers after their cargo ship sank close to Scarborough Shoal, a feature in the West Philippine Sea that Beijing controls. It was a rare instance of public cooperations between the two coast guards. – Rappler.com

면책 조항: 본 사이트에 재게시된 글들은 공개 플랫폼에서 가져온 것으로 정보 제공 목적으로만 제공됩니다. 이는 반드시 MEXC의 견해를 반영하는 것은 아닙니다. 모든 권리는 원저자에게 있습니다. 제3자의 권리를 침해하는 콘텐츠가 있다고 판단될 경우, service@support.mexc.com으로 연락하여 삭제 요청을 해주시기 바랍니다. MEXC는 콘텐츠의 정확성, 완전성 또는 시의적절성에 대해 어떠한 보증도 하지 않으며, 제공된 정보에 기반하여 취해진 어떠한 조치에 대해서도 책임을 지지 않습니다. 본 콘텐츠는 금융, 법률 또는 기타 전문적인 조언을 구성하지 않으며, MEXC의 추천이나 보증으로 간주되어서는 안 됩니다.