South Dakota lawmakers are once again weighing whether Bitcoin should play a role in managing public funds. On Jan. 27, State Representative Logan Manhart reintroducedSouth Dakota lawmakers are once again weighing whether Bitcoin should play a role in managing public funds. On Jan. 27, State Representative Logan Manhart reintroduced

South Dakota lawmaker renews push to allow state Bitcoin investments

2026/01/28 11:45

South Dakota lawmakers are once again weighing whether Bitcoin should play a role in managing public funds.

Summary
  • A new bill would allow South Dakota to invest up to 10% of public funds in Bitcoin
  • The proposal closely mirrors a failed 2025 attempt but adds clearer custody rules
  • The move reflects growing interest among U.S. states in Bitcoin as a reserve asset

On Jan. 27, State Representative Logan Manhart reintroduced a bill that would allow South Dakota to invest a portion of its state-managed funds in Bitcoin.

The proposal, filed as House Bill 1155, closely mirrors a similar measure Manhart introduced in 2025 that failed to advance out of committee.

If approved, the bill would mark another step in a growing trend among U.S. states exploring Bitcoin (BTC) as a long-term store of value.

Bitcoin allocation capped at 10%

HB 1155 would amend South Dakota’s investment code to permit the State Investment Council to allocate up to 10% of public funds into Bitcoin. Based on previous estimates placing the state’s investment pool between $16 billion and $17 billion, the measure could open the door to multi-billion-dollar exposure if fully used.

The bill allows for Bitcoin exposure through direct holdings or regulated exchange-traded products. Any direct holdings would need to meet strict custody standards, including the use of qualified custodians such as federally or state-chartered banks or trust companies.

Exchange-traded products would need approval from U.S. regulators, including the SEC, the CFTC, or South Dakota’s Division of Banking.

Manhart has referred to Bitcoin as “strong money” suited for a “strong state,” presenting the proposal as a way to address inflation and long-term currency risks.

A revived proposal with familiar hurdles

In January 2025, he introduced the state’s first Bitcoin investment bill, along with a resolution calling for a formal review of Bitcoin as a hedge against inflation. That initiative did not advance, as lawmakers expressed concerns about price volatility, valuation challenges, and regulatory uncertainty.

State Investment Officer Matt Clark was among those who expressed reservations at the time. Despite the setback, Manhart said he planned to bring the proposal back in a future session.

The proposal comes as several U.S. states consider whether digital assets should be used in public finance. Lawmakers across the country are weighing the potential benefits and risks of Bitcoin in government-managed funds.

The bill has not yet reached a vote and is still at an early stage of the legislative process. If it passes, South Dakota would be among the few states that have taken steps to hold or invest in Bitcoin, usually under clear limits and regulatory oversight.

At this stage, HB 1155 revives debate over risk exposure, diversification, and how digital assets might fit into state investment policies.

면책 조항: 본 사이트에 재게시된 글들은 공개 플랫폼에서 가져온 것으로 정보 제공 목적으로만 제공됩니다. 이는 반드시 MEXC의 견해를 반영하는 것은 아닙니다. 모든 권리는 원저자에게 있습니다. 제3자의 권리를 침해하는 콘텐츠가 있다고 판단될 경우, service@support.mexc.com으로 연락하여 삭제 요청을 해주시기 바랍니다. MEXC는 콘텐츠의 정확성, 완전성 또는 시의적절성에 대해 어떠한 보증도 하지 않으며, 제공된 정보에 기반하여 취해진 어떠한 조치에 대해서도 책임을 지지 않습니다. 본 콘텐츠는 금융, 법률 또는 기타 전문적인 조언을 구성하지 않으며, MEXC의 추천이나 보증으로 간주되어서는 안 됩니다.