Legal practitioners supporting Vice-President Sara Duterte-Carpio on Friday asked the Supreme Court to intervene in the attempt to oust her through impeachment,Legal practitioners supporting Vice-President Sara Duterte-Carpio on Friday asked the Supreme Court to intervene in the attempt to oust her through impeachment,

Lawyers file SC petition to challenge VP Duterte impeachment

2026/03/29 14:02
3분 읽기
이 콘텐츠에 대한 의견이나 우려 사항이 있으시면 crypto.news@mexc.com으로 연락주시기 바랍니다

Legal practitioners supporting Vice-President Sara Duterte-Carpio on Friday asked the Supreme Court to intervene in the attempt to oust her through impeachment, as the House maintains the process complies with constitutional requirements and earlier rulings.

In a petition filed before the high court, the lawyers led by Israelito P. Torreon sought to halt the ongoing impeachment process, arguing that the House Committee on Justice committed grave abuse of discretion when it allowed multiple complaints against Ms. Duterte to proceed despite alleged defects. The petitioners also prayed for the issuance of a temporary restraining order, saying the move was meant to ensure that constitutional limits are observed in the impeachment process.

“The core vice we challenge is simple but serious: the House Committee on Justice abandoned the strict threshold discipline required by the Constitution and by the House Rules on Impeachment,” Mr. Torreon said during a news briefing held via teleconference.

“It allowed the third and fourth impeachment complaints to survive despite defects in form and substance, and then attempted to cure those defects through a subpoena-driven evidentiary process,” he added.

On March 25, the committee authorized subpoenas for witnesses and documents tied to the impeachment complaints against Ms. Duterte, covering her statements of assets, liabilities and net worth, her related tax filings, financial statements, and audit reports, as well as supporting affidavits, among others. This comes as the committee moves forward with impeachment complaints against Ms. Duterte, alleging misuse of confidential funds, threats against top officials, and other acts constituting betrayal of public trust and constitutional breaches — all which Ms. Duterte has consistently denied. At least 106 lawmakers must back the complaints for the case to proceed to a Senate trial.

Ombudsman Jesus Crispin C. Remulla said on Thursday his office is ready to provide Congress with all available SALNs of Ms. Duterte, citing the legality of the process.

Mr. Torreon said the subpoenas turned the proceedings into a “fishing expedition,” noting that the materials sought were not originally included in the complaints and that such a move is illegal.

“You do not subpoena first and theorize later,” Mr. Torreon said, adding that the Constitution requires impeachment complaints to already contain sufficient factual basis before any evidentiary process begins.

He also raised due process concerns, saying the respondent is entitled to answer a fixed complaint and not one that evolves through subsequent evidence-gathering. According to him, allowing complaints to proceed and then expanding them through subpoenas undermines fairness and constitutional safeguards.

The petitioners clarified they filed the case as “citizens and taxpayers” rather than as part of the Vice President’s official defense team.

The petition further alleged that the committee applied a “double standard” in handling impeachment complaints, citing how previous complaints against Ferdinand R. Marcos Jr. were dismissed for lack of evidence, while those against Ms. Duterte were allowed to proceed despite what they described as similar deficiencies.

For its part, the House leadership rejected the allegations, insisting that the impeachment proceedings are being conducted in accordance with the Constitution and Supreme Court jurisprudence.

In a statement on Friday, Joel R. Chua, chair of the Committee on Good Government and Public Accountability, said the supposed constitutional issues raised by Ms. Duterte’s lawyers are “mere hallucinations.” He added that the House deliberately adopted a method designed to avoid the legal pitfalls encountered in earlier impeachment attempts.

“We followed the due process guidelines the Supreme Court meticulously laid out in its two decisions on the previous Articles,” Mr. Chua said. — Erika Mae P. Sinaking

시장 기회
시아코인 로고
시아코인 가격(SC)
$0.00092
$0.00092$0.00092
-1.68%
USD
시아코인 (SC) 실시간 가격 차트
면책 조항: 본 사이트에 재게시된 글들은 공개 플랫폼에서 가져온 것으로 정보 제공 목적으로만 제공됩니다. 이는 반드시 MEXC의 견해를 반영하는 것은 아닙니다. 모든 권리는 원저자에게 있습니다. 제3자의 권리를 침해하는 콘텐츠가 있다고 판단될 경우, crypto.news@mexc.com으로 연락하여 삭제 요청을 해주시기 바랍니다. MEXC는 콘텐츠의 정확성, 완전성 또는 시의적절성에 대해 어떠한 보증도 하지 않으며, 제공된 정보에 기반하여 취해진 어떠한 조치에 대해서도 책임을 지지 않습니다. 본 콘텐츠는 금융, 법률 또는 기타 전문적인 조언을 구성하지 않으며, MEXC의 추천이나 보증으로 간주되어서는 안 됩니다.