Author: Aki Wu Talks Blockchain With the joint exposure and crackdown by the British and American governments on the transnational criminal empire of Chen Zhi, the de facto controller of the Prince Group in Cambodia, the intricate global business network behind it has also come to light. Shockingly, this group, notorious for its "pig butchering" style telecom fraud, human trafficking, and forced labor, controlled 50% of the shares of Habanos, a top Cuban cigar company, through a complex offshore structure. China is Habanos' largest consumer market. This unexpected connection reveals that in the digital age, illegal economic activities and legitimate businesses are intertwined through blockchain and offshore financial networks, forming a new "capital spider web." This article attempts to analyze the operational logic of so-called "spider web capitalism 2.0"—that is, the upgrade of traditional offshore capitalism under the special circumstances of blockchain technology and Southeast Asia—starting from the Chen Zhi case, and to demonstrate how a decentralized offshore capital network is formed. Spider Capitalism 2.0 = Offshore Capitalism × Cryptocurrency × Southeast Asia "Spiderweb Capitalism 2.0" can be understood as a new form of capitalism where traditional offshore financial networks upgrade themselves using blockchain technology. Offshore capitalism refers to the traditional practice of capital moving globally through offshore financial centers and shell companies to evade regulation and taxation. In the past, wealthy individuals and conglomerates often used tax havens such as the Cayman Islands and Swiss banks to hide assets and evade domestic regulations. The rise of cryptocurrencies has provided a completely new technological tool for this offshore operation: blockchain assets such as Bitcoin can be transferred peer-to-peer globally, without relying on the traditional banking system, thus constructing a "decentralized offshore structure." Today, opening an on-chain wallet or exchanging stablecoins on a decentralized exchange is like having a Swiss account without a trust intermediary; funds can flow freely globally and are difficult to intercept. These on-chain assets, combined with shadow trading networks, allow huge amounts of wealth to be hidden in code and anonymous addresses, making it difficult for regulatory agencies to intervene effectively. Southeast Asianization highlights the geographical foothold of this new form of capitalism. Emerging market countries in Southeast Asia, with their weak regulation, underdeveloped financial systems, and thirst for foreign investment, coupled with cheap labor and certain gray areas of political-business collusion, have become a frontier testing ground for the convergence of offshore capital and on-chain assets. This region possesses the fertile ground for traditional offshore finance (such as lax foreign exchange controls and a corrupt environment) while also providing a safe haven for new technologies like cryptocurrencies. In other words, Southeast Asia acts as a "sandbox" for the invisible structure of global capitalism. Various capital forces can boldly experiment here, circulating gray funds digitally overseas. The emergence of numerous online fraud zones and underground financial activities dominated by foreign funds in recent years, exemplified by Cambodia, Sihanoukville, and Myanmar's "Special Economic Zones," exemplifies this trend. Chen Zhi and the Prince Group: A Perfect Microcosm of Spider Web 2.0 Chen Zhi and his Cambodian Prince Group are a prime example of "spider web capitalism 2.0": traditional elite protection, local gray industries, on-chain money laundering channels, and global offshore structures are all integrated into one. Looking at Chen Zhi's business empire, its registered entities span mainland China, Hong Kong, Singapore, and offshore jurisdictions such as the British Virgin Islands (BVI) and the Cayman Islands, forming a complex holding network. According to an investigation by Singapore's Lianhe Zaobao, Chen Zhi is associated with as many as 128 companies globally, 17 of which are registered in Singapore. Most of these companies declare their business activities as investment consulting, real estate, and intermediary services, but their actual functions are questionable. Many shell companies also employ a "multiple names in multiple locations" strategy—for example, names like Alphaconnect, Alphaconnect Investments II, Greenbay, Binary, and Drew appear simultaneously in the registers of both Singapore and Taiwan. Four companies with the same name were established almost simultaneously in early 2019, all controlled by Singaporean citizen Lim Zhongliang, who is not on the sanctions list. These companies declare business activities in both locations covering investment consulting and international trade, and utilize local legal structures (such as Singapore's exempted private companies) to conceal the identity of the actual controller. Furthermore, it was revealed that many of the companies directly held by Chen Zhi in Singapore are registered as private limited companies (requiring shareholder disclosure), while the aforementioned exempted companies are directly held by him with no more than 20 shareholders, exempting them from institutional shareholder disclosure. Real estate and infrastructure Chen Zhi's aggressive expansion is also inseparable from Hong Kong's capital market, Asia's financial center. Between 2017 and 2019, he successively took control of two Hong Kong main board listed companies, Zhihaoda Holdings (01707.HK) and Kun Group Holdings (00924.HK). Zhihaoda Holdings (01707.HK): Originally a Hong Kong-based engineering contractor, it went public in October 2017. Just over a year after its listing, the original shareholders swiftly sold off their entire stake in December 2018, allowing Chen Zhi to acquire all shares and instantly become the controlling shareholder with a 54.79% stake. In the same month, Chen Zhi became an executive director and brought in his confidant, Qiu Dong, a senior executive of Prince Group, to co-direct the board. Subsequently, the company began to "Cambodia-ize," expanding into Cambodian real estate development from 2019 while maintaining its core Hong Kong engineering business, and further entering the luxury goods sales sector in 2023. Chen Zhi himself served as a director of its luxury goods subsidiary until his resignation in mid-2023. It is noteworthy that even though Chen Zhi ostensibly resigned from Zhihaoda in July of this year, companies he controls still maintain business dealings with Zhihaoda. For example, Zhihaoda admitted to providing property management services for Hong Kong properties held by companies under Chen Zhi's control, and the company's cash was once deposited in Prince Bank, controlled by Chen Zhi. This indicates that Chen Zhi's financial ties with the listed company have not been completely severed. Kun Group Holdings (00924.HK): A Singapore-based electromechanical engineering company registered in the Cayman Islands, it was listed in Hong Kong in July 2019. In January 2023, the founding Hong family sold all their shares, and Chen Zhi took over, holding 55% and becoming the controlling shareholder. Kun Group's main business is providing electromechanical engineering for Singapore government housing projects. After the listing, it was still operated by the original management. It is worth mentioning that after the US OFAC sanctions list was announced, Kun Group acknowledged Chen Zhi as the actual controlling shareholder and announced that his shareholding ratio was approximately 55%. Although Chen Zhi does not hold a director position in Kun Group, he has clearly achieved control of the company through behind-the-scenes investment. In Hong Kong, including the two listed companies mentioned above, Chen Zhi directly or indirectly controls 10 other companies. Most of these companies are for holding and investment purposes. For example, the US indictment reveals that the Hong Kong shell company Hing Seng Ltd. acted as Chen Zhi's underground bank for transferring huge sums of money across borders. Investigations show that in just four months, from November 2022 to March 2023, Hing Seng transferred approximately US$60 million to an affiliated company in Laos responsible for the Prince Group's cryptocurrency mining business. The funds from this Lao mining company were subsequently used to pay for the luxury consumption of the spouses of Prince Group executives, including the purchase of Rolex watches and Picasso paintings. Sun Weiqiang, the sole shareholder and director of Hing Seng, is registered with a Shantou, China ID card, but has no other publicly available resume and is not listed on any sanctions list. This suggests that these Hong Kong shell companies are merely "fronts" for Chen Zhi's cash flow, potentially corresponding to real financial operators and the destination of overseas assets. Hong Kong, as a free financial center, provided Chen Zhi with an excellent breeding ground for money laundering. He laundered funds through businesses such as engineering, real estate, and luxury goods sales, and owned local luxury homes and commercial properties. According to the Hong Kong Economic Journal, Chen Zhi's affiliated companies owned the entire building at 68 Kimberley Road, Tsim Sha Tsui, and purchased the Mount Nicholsson villa, a top-tier luxury residence on The Peak, for HK$1.4 billion. Source: Photo by Yu Junliang Gaming industry investment and money laundering Cambodia's gambling industry was once booming, and Prince Group actively engaged in casinos and online gambling. Besides participating in several casino hotels in Sihanoukville, Prince Group also undertook projects such as the Golden Fortune Technology Park in the Cambodia-China border region, which was essentially a center for online casinos and fraud. Simultaneously, it controlled online gambling platforms such as Amiga Entertainment, registered online casino licenses overseas, and recruited gamblers in China through websites and apps. Chinese courts determined that Prince Group obtained over 5 billion yuan in revenue through illegal online gambling and engaged in large-scale money laundering. The highly anonymous and cross-border nature of funds in the gambling industry made it a crucial channel for Chen Zhi's money laundering—the buying and selling of gambler chips and the offsetting transactions between gambling companies allowed illicit funds to be mixed into cash flow. US prosecutors pointed out that some of Prince Group's fraudulent proceeds were laundered through its gambling operations before flowing into legitimate accounts. Huione Group has been identified as one of the core channels through which Chen Zhi secretly operated massive financial flows in Hong Kong and Southeast Asia. Huione Group claims to provide leading financial technology services, including electronic payments (HuionePay). According to multiple sources, Huione's founder was a former financial manager under Chen Zhi in his Prince Group, thus maintaining a close relationship with him. FinCEN disclosed that between August 2021 and January 2025, Huione Group assisted in laundering at least $4 billion in illicit funds, including approximately $37 million stolen from North Korean hackers, $36 million from cryptocurrency investment scams, and approximately $300 million related to other cybercrimes. Huione has even been called the "world's largest online black market" platform—an investigation by the US blockchain analytics firm Elliptic found that Huione had built a "one-stop crime platform" on Telegram, aggregating black market merchants selling malware, personal data, and money laundering services, primarily serving Southeast Asian cryptocurrency scam groups. Back in May 2015, Telegram had already banned all channels and groups related to HSBC, indicating the platform's long-standing notoriety. In this joint US-UK crackdown, HSBC Group was directly identified by FinCEN as a key hub in the Prince Group's money laundering network and was ordered by the US, under Section 311 of the Patriot Act, to sever any connection between it and the US financial system. The sanctions notice requires all financial institutions to prohibit opening or maintaining agent accounts for HSBC and to prevent it from indirectly accessing the US dollar system. Chen Zhi, through shadow financial institutions like HSBC, wove a vast money laundering network both overtly and covertly. Following the recent news of the US-UK sanctions, large numbers of Cambodians flocked to HSBC's offline currency exchange points, even selling their electronic cash at a 10% discount in an attempt to escape as quickly as possible. Some of the exposed affiliated companies Cryptocurrency and Cigars Bitcoin mining was the most "innovative" money laundering method in Chen Zhi's criminal network. The indictment reveals that Chen Zhi invested large sums of money obtained through fraud into cryptocurrency mining operations he controlled, thereby "mining" brand-new Bitcoins without any criminal taint. In this seemingly legitimate Bitcoin mining process, the original illicit funds were transformed into "clean" digital assets derived from blockchain rewards, attempting to sever the link between the funds and the crime. Even more noteworthy is Chen Zhi's quiet acquisition of a stake in Habanos SA, the world's largest Cuban cigar company. Habanos is a cigar monopoly jointly owned by the Cuban government and Spain, holding exclusive distribution rights for high-end cigar brands worldwide. In 2020, British tobacco giant Imperial Brands decided to sell its high-end cigar business, including a 50% stake in Habanos. Chen Zhi, through Hong Kong-registered Allied Cigar Corporation, acquired this stake for €1.04 billion that year. Following the transaction, Allied Cigar underwent frequent structural changes within months. In April, the shares were transferred to Allied Cigar Fund LP, a fund registered in the Cayman Islands. In May, the company was renamed Instant Alliance Ltd., and in November, the shares were transferred to an individual named Zhang Pingshun. The company was dissolved in June 2021. This series of dazzling changes made it difficult for outsiders to identify the actual beneficiary behind Habanos. In late 2023, Gothenburg police in Sweden obtained documents (file number MKN-2025–5445) during an investigation into a cigar smuggling case, revealing the shareholding structure of Habanos Nordic, which involved Chen Zhi and a Hong Kong company, Asia Uni Corporation Ltd. The Swedish cigar media outlet Cigar World published the police document, confirming that Chen Zhi indirectly controlled 50% of Habanos' shares through multiple layers of companies (including Asia Uni, a Hong Kong-based company). Asset recovery and fund destination To date, in addition to the aforementioned massive amount of Bitcoin seized by the US, law enforcement agencies are also tracking the whereabouts of other assets of the Chen Zhi Group. For example, the US Department of Justice is seeking civil seizure of Chen Zhi's assets and bank accounts in the US and has issued an arrest warrant for him. Properties frozen in the UK are awaiting court rulings for confiscation. Under international pressure, Cambodian authorities have stated that they will cooperate with foreign law enforcement if there is sufficient evidence and will not protect violators. However, the Cambodian government has not yet taken action against Chen Zhi himself, and the apparent operations of his domestic companies remain largely unaffected. The Prince Group has even publicly denied all allegations, claiming it was due to "criminals misappropriating his name." Attempts by some Prince Group executives to transfer assets are also underway; for example, the Hong Kong-listed company involved hastily clarified its separation from Chen Zhi. According to the Hong Kong Economic Journal, Hong Kong police announced that they have frozen assets of a group suspected of international telecommunications fraud and money laundering, involving HK$2.75 billion. Although not named, it is known that this group is related to Chen Zhi, the founder of the Cambodian Prince Group. Police indicated that the frozen assets included cash, stocks, and funds, which they believed to be proceeds of crime. The global capital network woven by Chen Zhi and his Prince Group has been dismantled layer by layer by law enforcement agencies in multiple countries. This network, through a model of "fraud parks — underground banks — Bitcoin mining farms — shell companies — luxury goods," facilitated the cross-border flow and laundering of illicit gains from Southeast Asia to Europe and America. From luxury homes in Hong Kong and office buildings in London to shares in a Cuban cigar company and tens of thousands of Bitcoin wallets, all reveal alarming traces of wealth transfer. Behind this wealth lies the blood and tears of hundreds of thousands of victims who have lost everything, and the suffering and forced labor of tens of thousands who have been trafficked, imprisoned, and forced into labor. Just as Herman Karl Ram established the "industry standard" for 20th-century American robbers, Chen Zhi and his affiliated group may have demonstrated to the public how 21st-century offshore capitalism can use geographical advantages and emerging technologies to launder large sums of gray income. However, Web3 is not a lawless zone. Although the gray market once attempted to evade regulation by leveraging the decentralization and anonymity of blockchain, they will ultimately face systemic liquidation due to on-chain transparency. This traceability, in turn, provides an unprecedented technological foundation for global anti-money laundering and anti-fraud efforts.Author: Aki Wu Talks Blockchain With the joint exposure and crackdown by the British and American governments on the transnational criminal empire of Chen Zhi, the de facto controller of the Prince Group in Cambodia, the intricate global business network behind it has also come to light. Shockingly, this group, notorious for its "pig butchering" style telecom fraud, human trafficking, and forced labor, controlled 50% of the shares of Habanos, a top Cuban cigar company, through a complex offshore structure. China is Habanos' largest consumer market. This unexpected connection reveals that in the digital age, illegal economic activities and legitimate businesses are intertwined through blockchain and offshore financial networks, forming a new "capital spider web." This article attempts to analyze the operational logic of so-called "spider web capitalism 2.0"—that is, the upgrade of traditional offshore capitalism under the special circumstances of blockchain technology and Southeast Asia—starting from the Chen Zhi case, and to demonstrate how a decentralized offshore capital network is formed. Spider Capitalism 2.0 = Offshore Capitalism × Cryptocurrency × Southeast Asia "Spiderweb Capitalism 2.0" can be understood as a new form of capitalism where traditional offshore financial networks upgrade themselves using blockchain technology. Offshore capitalism refers to the traditional practice of capital moving globally through offshore financial centers and shell companies to evade regulation and taxation. In the past, wealthy individuals and conglomerates often used tax havens such as the Cayman Islands and Swiss banks to hide assets and evade domestic regulations. The rise of cryptocurrencies has provided a completely new technological tool for this offshore operation: blockchain assets such as Bitcoin can be transferred peer-to-peer globally, without relying on the traditional banking system, thus constructing a "decentralized offshore structure." Today, opening an on-chain wallet or exchanging stablecoins on a decentralized exchange is like having a Swiss account without a trust intermediary; funds can flow freely globally and are difficult to intercept. These on-chain assets, combined with shadow trading networks, allow huge amounts of wealth to be hidden in code and anonymous addresses, making it difficult for regulatory agencies to intervene effectively. Southeast Asianization highlights the geographical foothold of this new form of capitalism. Emerging market countries in Southeast Asia, with their weak regulation, underdeveloped financial systems, and thirst for foreign investment, coupled with cheap labor and certain gray areas of political-business collusion, have become a frontier testing ground for the convergence of offshore capital and on-chain assets. This region possesses the fertile ground for traditional offshore finance (such as lax foreign exchange controls and a corrupt environment) while also providing a safe haven for new technologies like cryptocurrencies. In other words, Southeast Asia acts as a "sandbox" for the invisible structure of global capitalism. Various capital forces can boldly experiment here, circulating gray funds digitally overseas. The emergence of numerous online fraud zones and underground financial activities dominated by foreign funds in recent years, exemplified by Cambodia, Sihanoukville, and Myanmar's "Special Economic Zones," exemplifies this trend. Chen Zhi and the Prince Group: A Perfect Microcosm of Spider Web 2.0 Chen Zhi and his Cambodian Prince Group are a prime example of "spider web capitalism 2.0": traditional elite protection, local gray industries, on-chain money laundering channels, and global offshore structures are all integrated into one. Looking at Chen Zhi's business empire, its registered entities span mainland China, Hong Kong, Singapore, and offshore jurisdictions such as the British Virgin Islands (BVI) and the Cayman Islands, forming a complex holding network. According to an investigation by Singapore's Lianhe Zaobao, Chen Zhi is associated with as many as 128 companies globally, 17 of which are registered in Singapore. Most of these companies declare their business activities as investment consulting, real estate, and intermediary services, but their actual functions are questionable. Many shell companies also employ a "multiple names in multiple locations" strategy—for example, names like Alphaconnect, Alphaconnect Investments II, Greenbay, Binary, and Drew appear simultaneously in the registers of both Singapore and Taiwan. Four companies with the same name were established almost simultaneously in early 2019, all controlled by Singaporean citizen Lim Zhongliang, who is not on the sanctions list. These companies declare business activities in both locations covering investment consulting and international trade, and utilize local legal structures (such as Singapore's exempted private companies) to conceal the identity of the actual controller. Furthermore, it was revealed that many of the companies directly held by Chen Zhi in Singapore are registered as private limited companies (requiring shareholder disclosure), while the aforementioned exempted companies are directly held by him with no more than 20 shareholders, exempting them from institutional shareholder disclosure. Real estate and infrastructure Chen Zhi's aggressive expansion is also inseparable from Hong Kong's capital market, Asia's financial center. Between 2017 and 2019, he successively took control of two Hong Kong main board listed companies, Zhihaoda Holdings (01707.HK) and Kun Group Holdings (00924.HK). Zhihaoda Holdings (01707.HK): Originally a Hong Kong-based engineering contractor, it went public in October 2017. Just over a year after its listing, the original shareholders swiftly sold off their entire stake in December 2018, allowing Chen Zhi to acquire all shares and instantly become the controlling shareholder with a 54.79% stake. In the same month, Chen Zhi became an executive director and brought in his confidant, Qiu Dong, a senior executive of Prince Group, to co-direct the board. Subsequently, the company began to "Cambodia-ize," expanding into Cambodian real estate development from 2019 while maintaining its core Hong Kong engineering business, and further entering the luxury goods sales sector in 2023. Chen Zhi himself served as a director of its luxury goods subsidiary until his resignation in mid-2023. It is noteworthy that even though Chen Zhi ostensibly resigned from Zhihaoda in July of this year, companies he controls still maintain business dealings with Zhihaoda. For example, Zhihaoda admitted to providing property management services for Hong Kong properties held by companies under Chen Zhi's control, and the company's cash was once deposited in Prince Bank, controlled by Chen Zhi. This indicates that Chen Zhi's financial ties with the listed company have not been completely severed. Kun Group Holdings (00924.HK): A Singapore-based electromechanical engineering company registered in the Cayman Islands, it was listed in Hong Kong in July 2019. In January 2023, the founding Hong family sold all their shares, and Chen Zhi took over, holding 55% and becoming the controlling shareholder. Kun Group's main business is providing electromechanical engineering for Singapore government housing projects. After the listing, it was still operated by the original management. It is worth mentioning that after the US OFAC sanctions list was announced, Kun Group acknowledged Chen Zhi as the actual controlling shareholder and announced that his shareholding ratio was approximately 55%. Although Chen Zhi does not hold a director position in Kun Group, he has clearly achieved control of the company through behind-the-scenes investment. In Hong Kong, including the two listed companies mentioned above, Chen Zhi directly or indirectly controls 10 other companies. Most of these companies are for holding and investment purposes. For example, the US indictment reveals that the Hong Kong shell company Hing Seng Ltd. acted as Chen Zhi's underground bank for transferring huge sums of money across borders. Investigations show that in just four months, from November 2022 to March 2023, Hing Seng transferred approximately US$60 million to an affiliated company in Laos responsible for the Prince Group's cryptocurrency mining business. The funds from this Lao mining company were subsequently used to pay for the luxury consumption of the spouses of Prince Group executives, including the purchase of Rolex watches and Picasso paintings. Sun Weiqiang, the sole shareholder and director of Hing Seng, is registered with a Shantou, China ID card, but has no other publicly available resume and is not listed on any sanctions list. This suggests that these Hong Kong shell companies are merely "fronts" for Chen Zhi's cash flow, potentially corresponding to real financial operators and the destination of overseas assets. Hong Kong, as a free financial center, provided Chen Zhi with an excellent breeding ground for money laundering. He laundered funds through businesses such as engineering, real estate, and luxury goods sales, and owned local luxury homes and commercial properties. According to the Hong Kong Economic Journal, Chen Zhi's affiliated companies owned the entire building at 68 Kimberley Road, Tsim Sha Tsui, and purchased the Mount Nicholsson villa, a top-tier luxury residence on The Peak, for HK$1.4 billion. Source: Photo by Yu Junliang Gaming industry investment and money laundering Cambodia's gambling industry was once booming, and Prince Group actively engaged in casinos and online gambling. Besides participating in several casino hotels in Sihanoukville, Prince Group also undertook projects such as the Golden Fortune Technology Park in the Cambodia-China border region, which was essentially a center for online casinos and fraud. Simultaneously, it controlled online gambling platforms such as Amiga Entertainment, registered online casino licenses overseas, and recruited gamblers in China through websites and apps. Chinese courts determined that Prince Group obtained over 5 billion yuan in revenue through illegal online gambling and engaged in large-scale money laundering. The highly anonymous and cross-border nature of funds in the gambling industry made it a crucial channel for Chen Zhi's money laundering—the buying and selling of gambler chips and the offsetting transactions between gambling companies allowed illicit funds to be mixed into cash flow. US prosecutors pointed out that some of Prince Group's fraudulent proceeds were laundered through its gambling operations before flowing into legitimate accounts. Huione Group has been identified as one of the core channels through which Chen Zhi secretly operated massive financial flows in Hong Kong and Southeast Asia. Huione Group claims to provide leading financial technology services, including electronic payments (HuionePay). According to multiple sources, Huione's founder was a former financial manager under Chen Zhi in his Prince Group, thus maintaining a close relationship with him. FinCEN disclosed that between August 2021 and January 2025, Huione Group assisted in laundering at least $4 billion in illicit funds, including approximately $37 million stolen from North Korean hackers, $36 million from cryptocurrency investment scams, and approximately $300 million related to other cybercrimes. Huione has even been called the "world's largest online black market" platform—an investigation by the US blockchain analytics firm Elliptic found that Huione had built a "one-stop crime platform" on Telegram, aggregating black market merchants selling malware, personal data, and money laundering services, primarily serving Southeast Asian cryptocurrency scam groups. Back in May 2015, Telegram had already banned all channels and groups related to HSBC, indicating the platform's long-standing notoriety. In this joint US-UK crackdown, HSBC Group was directly identified by FinCEN as a key hub in the Prince Group's money laundering network and was ordered by the US, under Section 311 of the Patriot Act, to sever any connection between it and the US financial system. The sanctions notice requires all financial institutions to prohibit opening or maintaining agent accounts for HSBC and to prevent it from indirectly accessing the US dollar system. Chen Zhi, through shadow financial institutions like HSBC, wove a vast money laundering network both overtly and covertly. Following the recent news of the US-UK sanctions, large numbers of Cambodians flocked to HSBC's offline currency exchange points, even selling their electronic cash at a 10% discount in an attempt to escape as quickly as possible. Some of the exposed affiliated companies Cryptocurrency and Cigars Bitcoin mining was the most "innovative" money laundering method in Chen Zhi's criminal network. The indictment reveals that Chen Zhi invested large sums of money obtained through fraud into cryptocurrency mining operations he controlled, thereby "mining" brand-new Bitcoins without any criminal taint. In this seemingly legitimate Bitcoin mining process, the original illicit funds were transformed into "clean" digital assets derived from blockchain rewards, attempting to sever the link between the funds and the crime. Even more noteworthy is Chen Zhi's quiet acquisition of a stake in Habanos SA, the world's largest Cuban cigar company. Habanos is a cigar monopoly jointly owned by the Cuban government and Spain, holding exclusive distribution rights for high-end cigar brands worldwide. In 2020, British tobacco giant Imperial Brands decided to sell its high-end cigar business, including a 50% stake in Habanos. Chen Zhi, through Hong Kong-registered Allied Cigar Corporation, acquired this stake for €1.04 billion that year. Following the transaction, Allied Cigar underwent frequent structural changes within months. In April, the shares were transferred to Allied Cigar Fund LP, a fund registered in the Cayman Islands. In May, the company was renamed Instant Alliance Ltd., and in November, the shares were transferred to an individual named Zhang Pingshun. The company was dissolved in June 2021. This series of dazzling changes made it difficult for outsiders to identify the actual beneficiary behind Habanos. In late 2023, Gothenburg police in Sweden obtained documents (file number MKN-2025–5445) during an investigation into a cigar smuggling case, revealing the shareholding structure of Habanos Nordic, which involved Chen Zhi and a Hong Kong company, Asia Uni Corporation Ltd. The Swedish cigar media outlet Cigar World published the police document, confirming that Chen Zhi indirectly controlled 50% of Habanos' shares through multiple layers of companies (including Asia Uni, a Hong Kong-based company). Asset recovery and fund destination To date, in addition to the aforementioned massive amount of Bitcoin seized by the US, law enforcement agencies are also tracking the whereabouts of other assets of the Chen Zhi Group. For example, the US Department of Justice is seeking civil seizure of Chen Zhi's assets and bank accounts in the US and has issued an arrest warrant for him. Properties frozen in the UK are awaiting court rulings for confiscation. Under international pressure, Cambodian authorities have stated that they will cooperate with foreign law enforcement if there is sufficient evidence and will not protect violators. However, the Cambodian government has not yet taken action against Chen Zhi himself, and the apparent operations of his domestic companies remain largely unaffected. The Prince Group has even publicly denied all allegations, claiming it was due to "criminals misappropriating his name." Attempts by some Prince Group executives to transfer assets are also underway; for example, the Hong Kong-listed company involved hastily clarified its separation from Chen Zhi. According to the Hong Kong Economic Journal, Hong Kong police announced that they have frozen assets of a group suspected of international telecommunications fraud and money laundering, involving HK$2.75 billion. Although not named, it is known that this group is related to Chen Zhi, the founder of the Cambodian Prince Group. Police indicated that the frozen assets included cash, stocks, and funds, which they believed to be proceeds of crime. The global capital network woven by Chen Zhi and his Prince Group has been dismantled layer by layer by law enforcement agencies in multiple countries. This network, through a model of "fraud parks — underground banks — Bitcoin mining farms — shell companies — luxury goods," facilitated the cross-border flow and laundering of illicit gains from Southeast Asia to Europe and America. From luxury homes in Hong Kong and office buildings in London to shares in a Cuban cigar company and tens of thousands of Bitcoin wallets, all reveal alarming traces of wealth transfer. Behind this wealth lies the blood and tears of hundreds of thousands of victims who have lost everything, and the suffering and forced labor of tens of thousands who have been trafficked, imprisoned, and forced into labor. Just as Herman Karl Ram established the "industry standard" for 20th-century American robbers, Chen Zhi and his affiliated group may have demonstrated to the public how 21st-century offshore capitalism can use geographical advantages and emerging technologies to launder large sums of gray income. However, Web3 is not a lawless zone. Although the gray market once attempted to evade regulation by leveraging the decentralization and anonymity of blockchain, they will ultimately face systemic liquidation due to on-chain transparency. This traceability, in turn, provides an unprecedented technological foundation for global anti-money laundering and anti-fraud efforts.

The Dark Money Behind the Cuban Cigar Empire: Unveiling Chen Zhi's "Spider Web Capitalism 2.0"

2025/11/24 18:00
Okuma süresi: 14 dk

Author: Aki Wu Talks Blockchain

With the joint exposure and crackdown by the British and American governments on the transnational criminal empire of Chen Zhi, the de facto controller of the Prince Group in Cambodia, the intricate global business network behind it has also come to light. Shockingly, this group, notorious for its "pig butchering" style telecom fraud, human trafficking, and forced labor, controlled 50% of the shares of Habanos, a top Cuban cigar company, through a complex offshore structure. China is Habanos' largest consumer market. This unexpected connection reveals that in the digital age, illegal economic activities and legitimate businesses are intertwined through blockchain and offshore financial networks, forming a new "capital spider web." This article attempts to analyze the operational logic of so-called "spider web capitalism 2.0"—that is, the upgrade of traditional offshore capitalism under the special circumstances of blockchain technology and Southeast Asia—starting from the Chen Zhi case, and to demonstrate how a decentralized offshore capital network is formed.

Spider Capitalism 2.0 = Offshore Capitalism × Cryptocurrency × Southeast Asia

"Spiderweb Capitalism 2.0" can be understood as a new form of capitalism where traditional offshore financial networks upgrade themselves using blockchain technology. Offshore capitalism refers to the traditional practice of capital moving globally through offshore financial centers and shell companies to evade regulation and taxation. In the past, wealthy individuals and conglomerates often used tax havens such as the Cayman Islands and Swiss banks to hide assets and evade domestic regulations. The rise of cryptocurrencies has provided a completely new technological tool for this offshore operation: blockchain assets such as Bitcoin can be transferred peer-to-peer globally, without relying on the traditional banking system, thus constructing a "decentralized offshore structure." Today, opening an on-chain wallet or exchanging stablecoins on a decentralized exchange is like having a Swiss account without a trust intermediary; funds can flow freely globally and are difficult to intercept. These on-chain assets, combined with shadow trading networks, allow huge amounts of wealth to be hidden in code and anonymous addresses, making it difficult for regulatory agencies to intervene effectively.

Southeast Asianization highlights the geographical foothold of this new form of capitalism. Emerging market countries in Southeast Asia, with their weak regulation, underdeveloped financial systems, and thirst for foreign investment, coupled with cheap labor and certain gray areas of political-business collusion, have become a frontier testing ground for the convergence of offshore capital and on-chain assets. This region possesses the fertile ground for traditional offshore finance (such as lax foreign exchange controls and a corrupt environment) while also providing a safe haven for new technologies like cryptocurrencies. In other words, Southeast Asia acts as a "sandbox" for the invisible structure of global capitalism. Various capital forces can boldly experiment here, circulating gray funds digitally overseas. The emergence of numerous online fraud zones and underground financial activities dominated by foreign funds in recent years, exemplified by Cambodia, Sihanoukville, and Myanmar's "Special Economic Zones," exemplifies this trend.

Chen Zhi and the Prince Group: A Perfect Microcosm of Spider Web 2.0

Chen Zhi and his Cambodian Prince Group are a prime example of "spider web capitalism 2.0": traditional elite protection, local gray industries, on-chain money laundering channels, and global offshore structures are all integrated into one. Looking at Chen Zhi's business empire, its registered entities span mainland China, Hong Kong, Singapore, and offshore jurisdictions such as the British Virgin Islands (BVI) and the Cayman Islands, forming a complex holding network.

According to an investigation by Singapore's Lianhe Zaobao, Chen Zhi is associated with as many as 128 companies globally, 17 of which are registered in Singapore. Most of these companies declare their business activities as investment consulting, real estate, and intermediary services, but their actual functions are questionable. Many shell companies also employ a "multiple names in multiple locations" strategy—for example, names like Alphaconnect, Alphaconnect Investments II, Greenbay, Binary, and Drew appear simultaneously in the registers of both Singapore and Taiwan. Four companies with the same name were established almost simultaneously in early 2019, all controlled by Singaporean citizen Lim Zhongliang, who is not on the sanctions list. These companies declare business activities in both locations covering investment consulting and international trade, and utilize local legal structures (such as Singapore's exempted private companies) to conceal the identity of the actual controller. Furthermore, it was revealed that many of the companies directly held by Chen Zhi in Singapore are registered as private limited companies (requiring shareholder disclosure), while the aforementioned exempted companies are directly held by him with no more than 20 shareholders, exempting them from institutional shareholder disclosure.

Real estate and infrastructure

Chen Zhi's aggressive expansion is also inseparable from Hong Kong's capital market, Asia's financial center. Between 2017 and 2019, he successively took control of two Hong Kong main board listed companies, Zhihaoda Holdings (01707.HK) and Kun Group Holdings (00924.HK).

Zhihaoda Holdings (01707.HK): Originally a Hong Kong-based engineering contractor, it went public in October 2017. Just over a year after its listing, the original shareholders swiftly sold off their entire stake in December 2018, allowing Chen Zhi to acquire all shares and instantly become the controlling shareholder with a 54.79% stake. In the same month, Chen Zhi became an executive director and brought in his confidant, Qiu Dong, a senior executive of Prince Group, to co-direct the board. Subsequently, the company began to "Cambodia-ize," expanding into Cambodian real estate development from 2019 while maintaining its core Hong Kong engineering business, and further entering the luxury goods sales sector in 2023. Chen Zhi himself served as a director of its luxury goods subsidiary until his resignation in mid-2023. It is noteworthy that even though Chen Zhi ostensibly resigned from Zhihaoda in July of this year, companies he controls still maintain business dealings with Zhihaoda. For example, Zhihaoda admitted to providing property management services for Hong Kong properties held by companies under Chen Zhi's control, and the company's cash was once deposited in Prince Bank, controlled by Chen Zhi. This indicates that Chen Zhi's financial ties with the listed company have not been completely severed.

Kun Group Holdings (00924.HK): A Singapore-based electromechanical engineering company registered in the Cayman Islands, it was listed in Hong Kong in July 2019. In January 2023, the founding Hong family sold all their shares, and Chen Zhi took over, holding 55% and becoming the controlling shareholder. Kun Group's main business is providing electromechanical engineering for Singapore government housing projects. After the listing, it was still operated by the original management. It is worth mentioning that after the US OFAC sanctions list was announced, Kun Group acknowledged Chen Zhi as the actual controlling shareholder and announced that his shareholding ratio was approximately 55%. Although Chen Zhi does not hold a director position in Kun Group, he has clearly achieved control of the company through behind-the-scenes investment.

In Hong Kong, including the two listed companies mentioned above, Chen Zhi directly or indirectly controls 10 other companies. Most of these companies are for holding and investment purposes. For example, the US indictment reveals that the Hong Kong shell company Hing Seng Ltd. acted as Chen Zhi's underground bank for transferring huge sums of money across borders. Investigations show that in just four months, from November 2022 to March 2023, Hing Seng transferred approximately US$60 million to an affiliated company in Laos responsible for the Prince Group's cryptocurrency mining business. The funds from this Lao mining company were subsequently used to pay for the luxury consumption of the spouses of Prince Group executives, including the purchase of Rolex watches and Picasso paintings. Sun Weiqiang, the sole shareholder and director of Hing Seng, is registered with a Shantou, China ID card, but has no other publicly available resume and is not listed on any sanctions list. This suggests that these Hong Kong shell companies are merely "fronts" for Chen Zhi's cash flow, potentially corresponding to real financial operators and the destination of overseas assets. Hong Kong, as a free financial center, provided Chen Zhi with an excellent breeding ground for money laundering. He laundered funds through businesses such as engineering, real estate, and luxury goods sales, and owned local luxury homes and commercial properties. According to the Hong Kong Economic Journal, Chen Zhi's affiliated companies owned the entire building at 68 Kimberley Road, Tsim Sha Tsui, and purchased the Mount Nicholsson villa, a top-tier luxury residence on The Peak, for HK$1.4 billion.

Source: Photo by Yu Junliang

Gaming industry investment and money laundering

Cambodia's gambling industry was once booming, and Prince Group actively engaged in casinos and online gambling. Besides participating in several casino hotels in Sihanoukville, Prince Group also undertook projects such as the Golden Fortune Technology Park in the Cambodia-China border region, which was essentially a center for online casinos and fraud. Simultaneously, it controlled online gambling platforms such as Amiga Entertainment, registered online casino licenses overseas, and recruited gamblers in China through websites and apps. Chinese courts determined that Prince Group obtained over 5 billion yuan in revenue through illegal online gambling and engaged in large-scale money laundering. The highly anonymous and cross-border nature of funds in the gambling industry made it a crucial channel for Chen Zhi's money laundering—the buying and selling of gambler chips and the offsetting transactions between gambling companies allowed illicit funds to be mixed into cash flow. US prosecutors pointed out that some of Prince Group's fraudulent proceeds were laundered through its gambling operations before flowing into legitimate accounts.

Huione Group has been identified as one of the core channels through which Chen Zhi secretly operated massive financial flows in Hong Kong and Southeast Asia. Huione Group claims to provide leading financial technology services, including electronic payments (HuionePay). According to multiple sources, Huione's founder was a former financial manager under Chen Zhi in his Prince Group, thus maintaining a close relationship with him. FinCEN disclosed that between August 2021 and January 2025, Huione Group assisted in laundering at least $4 billion in illicit funds, including approximately $37 million stolen from North Korean hackers, $36 million from cryptocurrency investment scams, and approximately $300 million related to other cybercrimes. Huione has even been called the "world's largest online black market" platform—an investigation by the US blockchain analytics firm Elliptic found that Huione had built a "one-stop crime platform" on Telegram, aggregating black market merchants selling malware, personal data, and money laundering services, primarily serving Southeast Asian cryptocurrency scam groups. Back in May 2015, Telegram had already banned all channels and groups related to HSBC, indicating the platform's long-standing notoriety. In this joint US-UK crackdown, HSBC Group was directly identified by FinCEN as a key hub in the Prince Group's money laundering network and was ordered by the US, under Section 311 of the Patriot Act, to sever any connection between it and the US financial system. The sanctions notice requires all financial institutions to prohibit opening or maintaining agent accounts for HSBC and to prevent it from indirectly accessing the US dollar system. Chen Zhi, through shadow financial institutions like HSBC, wove a vast money laundering network both overtly and covertly. Following the recent news of the US-UK sanctions, large numbers of Cambodians flocked to HSBC's offline currency exchange points, even selling their electronic cash at a 10% discount in an attempt to escape as quickly as possible.

Some of the exposed affiliated companies

Cryptocurrency and Cigars

Bitcoin mining was the most "innovative" money laundering method in Chen Zhi's criminal network. The indictment reveals that Chen Zhi invested large sums of money obtained through fraud into cryptocurrency mining operations he controlled, thereby "mining" brand-new Bitcoins without any criminal taint. In this seemingly legitimate Bitcoin mining process, the original illicit funds were transformed into "clean" digital assets derived from blockchain rewards, attempting to sever the link between the funds and the crime.

Even more noteworthy is Chen Zhi's quiet acquisition of a stake in Habanos SA, the world's largest Cuban cigar company. Habanos is a cigar monopoly jointly owned by the Cuban government and Spain, holding exclusive distribution rights for high-end cigar brands worldwide. In 2020, British tobacco giant Imperial Brands decided to sell its high-end cigar business, including a 50% stake in Habanos. Chen Zhi, through Hong Kong-registered Allied Cigar Corporation, acquired this stake for €1.04 billion that year. Following the transaction, Allied Cigar underwent frequent structural changes within months. In April, the shares were transferred to Allied Cigar Fund LP, a fund registered in the Cayman Islands. In May, the company was renamed Instant Alliance Ltd., and in November, the shares were transferred to an individual named Zhang Pingshun. The company was dissolved in June 2021. This series of dazzling changes made it difficult for outsiders to identify the actual beneficiary behind Habanos.

In late 2023, Gothenburg police in Sweden obtained documents (file number MKN-2025–5445) during an investigation into a cigar smuggling case, revealing the shareholding structure of Habanos Nordic, which involved Chen Zhi and a Hong Kong company, Asia Uni Corporation Ltd. The Swedish cigar media outlet Cigar World published the police document, confirming that Chen Zhi indirectly controlled 50% of Habanos' shares through multiple layers of companies (including Asia Uni, a Hong Kong-based company).

Asset recovery and fund destination

To date, in addition to the aforementioned massive amount of Bitcoin seized by the US, law enforcement agencies are also tracking the whereabouts of other assets of the Chen Zhi Group. For example, the US Department of Justice is seeking civil seizure of Chen Zhi's assets and bank accounts in the US and has issued an arrest warrant for him. Properties frozen in the UK are awaiting court rulings for confiscation. Under international pressure, Cambodian authorities have stated that they will cooperate with foreign law enforcement if there is sufficient evidence and will not protect violators. However, the Cambodian government has not yet taken action against Chen Zhi himself, and the apparent operations of his domestic companies remain largely unaffected. The Prince Group has even publicly denied all allegations, claiming it was due to "criminals misappropriating his name." Attempts by some Prince Group executives to transfer assets are also underway; for example, the Hong Kong-listed company involved hastily clarified its separation from Chen Zhi. According to the Hong Kong Economic Journal, Hong Kong police announced that they have frozen assets of a group suspected of international telecommunications fraud and money laundering, involving HK$2.75 billion. Although not named, it is known that this group is related to Chen Zhi, the founder of the Cambodian Prince Group. Police indicated that the frozen assets included cash, stocks, and funds, which they believed to be proceeds of crime.

The global capital network woven by Chen Zhi and his Prince Group has been dismantled layer by layer by law enforcement agencies in multiple countries. This network, through a model of "fraud parks — underground banks — Bitcoin mining farms — shell companies — luxury goods," facilitated the cross-border flow and laundering of illicit gains from Southeast Asia to Europe and America. From luxury homes in Hong Kong and office buildings in London to shares in a Cuban cigar company and tens of thousands of Bitcoin wallets, all reveal alarming traces of wealth transfer. Behind this wealth lies the blood and tears of hundreds of thousands of victims who have lost everything, and the suffering and forced labor of tens of thousands who have been trafficked, imprisoned, and forced into labor.

Just as Herman Karl Ram established the "industry standard" for 20th-century American robbers, Chen Zhi and his affiliated group may have demonstrated to the public how 21st-century offshore capitalism can use geographical advantages and emerging technologies to launder large sums of gray income. However, Web3 is not a lawless zone. Although the gray market once attempted to evade regulation by leveraging the decentralization and anonymity of blockchain, they will ultimately face systemic liquidation due to on-chain transparency. This traceability, in turn, provides an unprecedented technological foundation for global anti-money laundering and anti-fraud efforts.

Sorumluluk Reddi: Bu sitede yeniden yayınlanan makaleler, halka açık platformlardan alınmıştır ve yalnızca bilgilendirme amaçlıdır. MEXC'nin görüşlerini yansıtmayabilir. Tüm hakları telif sahiplerine aittir. Herhangi bir içeriğin üçüncü taraf haklarını ihlal ettiğini düşünüyorsanız, kaldırılması için lütfen service@support.mexc.com ile iletişime geçin. MEXC, içeriğin doğruluğu, eksiksizliği veya güncelliği konusunda hiçbir garanti vermez ve sağlanan bilgilere dayalı olarak alınan herhangi bir eylemden sorumlu değildir. İçerik, finansal, yasal veya diğer profesyonel tavsiye niteliğinde değildir ve MEXC tarafından bir tavsiye veya onay olarak değerlendirilmemelidir.

Ayrıca Şunları da Beğenebilirsiniz

The Role of Blockchain in Building Safer Web3 Gaming Ecosystems

The Role of Blockchain in Building Safer Web3 Gaming Ecosystems

The gaming industry is in the midst of a historic shift, driven by the rise of Web3. Unlike traditional games, where developers and publishers control assets and dictate in-game economies, Web3 gaming empowers players with ownership and influence. Built on blockchain technology, these ecosystems are decentralized by design, enabling true digital asset ownership, transparent economies, and a future where players help shape the games they play. However, as Web3 gaming grows, security becomes a focal point. The range of security concerns, from hacking to asset theft to vulnerabilities in smart contracts, is a significant issue that will undermine or erode trust in this ecosystem, limiting or stopping adoption. Blockchain technology could be used to create security processes around secure, transparent, and fair Web3 gaming ecosystems. We will explore how security is increasing within gaming ecosystems, which challenges are being overcome, and what the future of security looks like. Why is Security Important in Web3 Gaming? Web3 gaming differs from traditional gaming in that players engage with both the game and assets with real value attached. Players own in-game assets that exist as tokens or NFTs (Non-Fungible Tokens), and can trade and sell them. These game assets usually represent significant financial value, meaning security failure could represent real monetary loss. In essence, without security, the promises of owning “something” in Web3, decentralized economies within games, and all that comes with the term “fair” gameplay can easily be eroded by fraud, hacking, and exploitation. This is precisely why the uniqueness of blockchain should be emphasized in securing Web3 gaming. How Blockchain Ensures Security in Web3 Gaming?
  1. Immutable Ownership of Assets Blockchain records can be manipulated by anyone. If a player owns a sword, skin, or plot of land as an NFT, it is verifiably in their ownership, and it cannot be altered or deleted by the developer or even hacked. This has created a proven track record of ownership, providing control back to the players, unlike any centralised gaming platform where assets can be revoked.
  2. Decentralized Infrastructure Blockchain networks also have a distributed architecture where game data is stored in a worldwide network of nodes, making them much less susceptible to centralised points of failure and attacks. This decentralised approach makes it exponentially more difficult to hijack systems or even shut off the game’s economy.
  3. Secure Transactions with Cryptography Whether a player buys an NFT or trades their in-game tokens for other items or tokens, the transactions are enforced by cryptographic algorithms, ensuring secure, verifiable, and irreversible transactions and eliminating the risks of double-spending or fraudulent trades.
  4. Smart Contract Automation Smart contracts automate the enforcement of game rules and players’ economic exchanges for the developer, eliminating the need for intermediaries or middlemen, and trust for the developer. For example, if a player completes a quest that promises a reward, the smart contract will execute and distribute what was promised.
  5. Anti-Cheating and Fair Gameplay The naturally transparent nature of blockchain makes it extremely simple for anyone to examine a specific instance of gameplay and verify the economic outcomes from that play. Furthermore, multi-player games that enforce smart contracts on things like loot sharing or win sharing can automate and measure trustlessness and avoid cheating, manipulations, and fraud by developers.
  6. Cross-Platform Security Many Web3 games feature asset interoperability across platforms. This interoperability is made viable by blockchain, which guarantees ownership is maintained whenever assets transition from one game or marketplace to another, thereby offering protection to players who rely on transfers for security against fraud. Key Security Dangers in Web3 Gaming Although blockchain provides sound first principles of security, the Web3 gaming ecosystem is susceptible to threats. Some of the most serious threats include:
Smart Contract Vulnerabilities: Smart contracts that are poorly written or lack auditing will leave openings for exploitation and thereby result in asset loss. Phishing Attacks: Unintentionally exposing or revealing private keys or signing transactions that are not possible to reverse, under the assumption they were genuine transaction requests. Bridge Hacks: Cross-chain bridges, which allow players to move their assets between their respective blockchains, continually face hacks, requiring vigilance from players and developers. Scams and Rug Pulls: Rug pulls occur when a game project raises money and leaves, leaving player assets worthless. Regulatory Ambiguity: Global regulations remain unclear; risks exist for players and developers alike. While blockchain alone won’t resolve every issue, it remediates the responsibility of the first principles, more so when joined by processes such as auditing, education, and the right governance, which can improve their contribution to the security landscapes in game ecosystems. Real Life Examples of Blockchain Security in Web3 Gaming Axie Infinity (Ronin Hack): The Axie Infinity game and several projects suffered one of the biggest hacks thus far on its Ronin bridge; however, it demonstrated the effectiveness of multi-sig security and the effective utilization of decentralization. The industry benefited through learning and reflection, thus, as projects have implemented changes to reduce the risks of future hacks or misappropriation. Immutable X: This Ethereum scaling solution aims to ensure secure NFT transactions for gaming, allowing players to trade an asset without the burden of exorbitant fees and fears of being a victim of fraud. Enjin: Enjin is providing a trusted infrastructure for Web3 games, offering secure NFT creation and transfer while reiterating that ownership and an asset securely belong to the player. These examples indubitably illustrate that despite challenges to overcome, blockchain remains the foundational layer on which to build more secure Web3 gaming environments. Benefits of Blockchain Security for Players and Developers For Players: Confidence in true ownership of assets Transparency in in-game economies Protection against nefarious trades/scams For Developers: More trust between players and the platform Less reliance on centralized infrastructure Ability to attract wealth and players based on provable fairness By incorporating blockchain security within the mechanics of game design, developers can create and enforce resilient ecosystems where players feel reassured in investing time, money, and ownership within virtual worlds. The Future of Secure Web3 Gaming Ecosystems As the wisdom of blockchain technology and industry knowledge improves, the future for secure Web3 gaming looks bright. New growing trends include: Zero-Knowledge Proofs (ZKPs): A new wave of protocols that enable private transactions and secure smart contracts while managing user privacy with an element of transparency. Decentralized Identity Solutions (DID): Helping players control their identities and decrease account theft risks. AI-Enhanced Security: Identifying irregularities in user interactions by sampling pattern anomalies to avert hacks and fraud by time-stamping critical events. Interoperable Security Standards: Allowing secured and seamless asset transfers across blockchains and games. With these innovations, blockchain will not only secure gaming assets but also enhance the overall trust and longevity of Web3 gaming ecosystems. Conclusion Blockchain is more than a buzzword in Web3; it is the only way to host security, fairness, and transparency. With blockchain, players confirm immutable ownership of digital assets, there is a decentralized infrastructure, and finally, it supports smart contracts to automate code that protects players and developers from the challenges of digital economies. The threats, vulnerabilities, and scams that come from smart contracts still persist, but the industry is maturing with better security practices, cross-chain solutions, and increased formal cryptographic tools. In the coming years, blockchain will remain the base to digital economies and drive Web3 gaming environments that allow players to safely own, trade, and enjoy their digital experiences free from fraud and exploitation. While blockchain and gaming alone entertain, we will usher in an era of secure digital worlds where trust complements innovation. The Role of Blockchain in Building Safer Web3 Gaming Ecosystems was originally published in Coinmonks on Medium, where people are continuing the conversation by highlighting and responding to this story
Paylaş
Medium2025/09/18 14:40
Knocking Bitcoin's lack of yield shows your ‘Western financial privilege’

Knocking Bitcoin's lack of yield shows your ‘Western financial privilege’

                                                                               Macro analyst Luke Gromen’s comments come amid an ongoing debate over whether Bitcoin or Ether is the more attractive long-term option for traditional investors.                     Macro analyst Luke Gromen says the fact that Bitcoin doesn’t natively earn yield isn’t a weakness; it’s what makes it a safer store of value.“If you’re earning a yield, you are taking a risk,” Gromen told Natalie Brunell on the Coin Stories podcast on Wednesday, responding to a question about critics who dismiss Bitcoin (BTC) because they prefer yield-earning assets.“Anyone who says that is showing their Western financial privilege,” he added.Read more
Paylaş
Coinstats2025/09/18 14:22
Vitalik Buterin wants to build ‘the next generation of finance’ – Here’s how

Vitalik Buterin wants to build ‘the next generation of finance’ – Here’s how

The post Vitalik Buterin wants to build ‘the next generation of finance’ – Here’s how appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Journalist Posted: February 16, 2026
Paylaş
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/02/16 11:01