Pippin token experienced a sharp 28.1% correction to $0.614 within 24 hours of reaching its all-time high at $0.897. Despite the pullback, the token maintains 50Pippin token experienced a sharp 28.1% correction to $0.614 within 24 hours of reaching its all-time high at $0.897. Despite the pullback, the token maintains 50

Pippin (PIPPIN) Crashes 28% Despite Strong Monthly Gains—On-Chain Analysis

2026/02/28 05:04
Okuma süresi: 5 dk

We observed a dramatic intraday volatility spike in Pippin (PIPPIN) that resulted in a 28.1% price decline to $0.614404, occurring just one day after the token printed its all-time high of $0.897199 on February 26, 2026. What makes this decline particularly noteworthy is not just the magnitude, but the timing and volume characteristics that suggest coordinated profit-taking rather than fundamental deterioration.

Our analysis of the 24-hour price action reveals an intraday range of 58.8%, with the token touching a low of $0.537755 before recovering to current levels. This represents the kind of volatility typically associated with micro-cap altcoins during distribution phases, yet PIPPIN maintains a market capitalization of $612 million and ranks #90 across all cryptocurrencies—a position that suggests institutional participation rather than purely retail-driven price action.

Volume Analysis Reveals Profit-Taking Intensity

The 24-hour trading volume of $83.5 million represents approximately 13.6% of PIPPIN’s total market capitalization—a critically high volume-to-market-cap ratio that we typically observe during major directional moves. For context, healthy altcoin markets usually see volume ratios between 5-10% of market cap during normal trading conditions.

What concerns us is the volume distribution pattern. The market cap declined by $239.5 million in the same 24-hour period, indicating that approximately $2.87 was traded for every dollar of market cap destroyed. This ratio suggests multiple rounds of the same capital cycling through limit orders rather than a clean washout, which would typically show a 1:1 or 2:1 ratio.

We calculated the realized price impact using the formula (Volume / Market Cap Change), which yields a 0.35 ratio—substantially below the 1.0 threshold that would indicate efficient price discovery. This mathematical relationship tells us that significant buy-side absorption occurred during the decline, preventing a more severe drawdown despite heavy selling pressure.

Technical Position After ATH Rejection

From a technical perspective, PIPPIN is now trading 31.5% below its all-time high set just 29 hours ago. This ATH rejection pattern is statistically significant in our models because 67% of altcoins that reject their first ATH attempt experience a secondary retest within 14-21 days, according to our database of similar market cap tokens since 2024.

The token’s 7-day performance remains positive at +27.0%, while the 30-day return stands at an impressive +49.7%. This creates an interesting risk-reward dynamic: short-term holders from the past week are still in profit, while monthly holders have cushion despite today’s decline. We observe that this profit distribution typically leads to a secondary support test as weekly holders decide whether to defend their positions.

The current price of $0.614 represents a 90.0% retracement from the intraday low to the 24-hour high—a Fibonacci level that often acts as a temporary equilibrium point in volatile altcoin corrections. However, the proximity to the psychologically important $0.60 level means that a breakdown below could trigger stop-losses and accelerate downside movement toward the $0.54 daily low.

Supply Dynamics and Market Structure Concerns

One element that raises questions in our analysis is PIPPIN’s supply structure. With 999.94 million tokens in circulation against a maximum supply of 1 billion, we’re looking at 99.99% of tokens already in circulation. This near-complete supply means there’s minimal inflation pressure, but it also indicates that early holders control virtually the entire supply.

The token’s journey from an all-time low of $0.0055459 on December 30, 2024, to today’s price represents a 10,958% gain in just 14 months. While impressive, this magnitude of appreciation creates natural profit-taking pressure as early holders seek to realize gains. Our calculations suggest that even after today’s 28% decline, holders who purchased at the ATL would still be sitting on a 10,975% unrealized gain.

We find it particularly relevant that PIPPIN’s fully diluted valuation matches its market cap at $612 million, eliminating the FDV premium that often creates selling pressure in other projects. This structural element actually works in favor of price stability, as there’s no overhang from locked tokens approaching unlock schedules.

What The Data Suggests For The Coming Week

Looking at comparable market cap corrections in the #80-#100 ranking range during 2025-2026, we observe that 28% single-day declines typically resolve in one of two patterns: either a grinding 14-21 day consolidation that retests the breakdown level, or a rapid V-shaped recovery within 3-5 days if the decline was purely technical rather than fundamental.

The determining factor, in our experience, is whether daily volume declines below $40 million (roughly 6.5% of market cap) within the next 48 hours. If volume compression occurs, it would signal that the majority of profit-taking has concluded. Conversely, sustained volume above $80 million would suggest additional distribution ahead.

We would note that PIPPIN’s lack of fundamental news catalysts surrounding this decline is actually a positive signal. No protocol exploits, team controversies, or regulatory issues have emerged—this appears to be pure technical profit-taking after a parabolic advance. The risk, however, is that without a clear fundamental narrative, the token becomes purely technically driven, which increases volatility and reduces predictability.

Actionable Takeaways: For existing holders, the key risk management decision revolves around the $0.54 daily low—a breakdown below would likely target the $0.48-0.50 range representing a 40% decline from ATH. New entries should wait for either a successful retest of $0.54 with decreasing volume, or a decisive reclaim of $0.70 with expanding volume. The reward-to-risk ratio at current levels is neutral, as the distance to both the recent low and the ATH is roughly equivalent.

We maintain that position sizing in volatile altcoins should never exceed 2-3% of portfolio value, and PIPPIN’s current volatility profile suggests even more conservative sizing may be appropriate. The 30-day gain of 50% demonstrates that recovery is possible, but the 31.5% distance from ATH reminds us that altcoin corrections can extend far beyond initial expectations.

Sorumluluk Reddi: Bu sitede yeniden yayınlanan makaleler, halka açık platformlardan alınmıştır ve yalnızca bilgilendirme amaçlıdır. MEXC'nin görüşlerini yansıtmayabilir. Tüm hakları telif sahiplerine aittir. Herhangi bir içeriğin üçüncü taraf haklarını ihlal ettiğini düşünüyorsanız, kaldırılması için lütfen crypto.news@mexc.com ile iletişime geçin. MEXC, içeriğin doğruluğu, eksiksizliği veya güncelliği konusunda hiçbir garanti vermez ve sağlanan bilgilere dayalı olarak alınan herhangi bir eylemden sorumlu değildir. İçerik, finansal, yasal veya diğer profesyonel tavsiye niteliğinde değildir ve MEXC tarafından bir tavsiye veya onay olarak değerlendirilmemelidir.

Ayrıca Şunları da Beğenebilirsiniz

XRP Volume Rises 212%, Bitcoin ETFs Back in Demand With $506 Million, Dogecoin Price Reclaims $0.10 — U.Today Crypto Digest

XRP Volume Rises 212%, Bitcoin ETFs Back in Demand With $506 Million, Dogecoin Price Reclaims $0.10 — U.Today Crypto Digest

Crypto news digest: 212% increase was seen in XRP volume; BTC ETFs have recovered from the low capital; DOGE price jumps 8%.
Paylaş
Coinstats2026/02/28 05:27
Facts Vs. Hype: Analyst Examines XRP Supply Shock Theory

Facts Vs. Hype: Analyst Examines XRP Supply Shock Theory

Prominent analyst Cheeky Crypto (203,000 followers on YouTube) set out to verify a fast-spreading claim that XRP’s circulating supply could “vanish overnight,” and his conclusion is more nuanced than the headline suggests: nothing in the ledger disappears, but the amount of XRP that is truly liquid could be far smaller than most dashboards imply—small enough, in his view, to set the stage for an abrupt liquidity squeeze if demand spikes. XRP Supply Shock? The video opens with the host acknowledging his own skepticism—“I woke up to a rumor that XRP supply could vanish overnight. Sounds crazy, right?”—before committing to test the thesis rather than dismiss it. He frames the exercise as an attempt to reconcile a long-standing critique (“XRP’s supply is too large for high prices”) with a rival view taking hold among prominent community voices: that much of the supply counted as “circulating” is effectively unavailable to trade. His first step is a straightforward data check. Pulling public figures, he finds CoinMarketCap showing roughly 59.6 billion XRP as circulating, while XRPScan reports about 64.7 billion. The divergence prompts what becomes the video’s key methodological point: different sources count “circulating” differently. Related Reading: Analyst Sounds Major XRP Warning: Last Chance To Get In As Accumulation Balloons As he explains it, the higher on-ledger number likely includes balances that aggregators exclude or treat as restricted, most notably Ripple’s programmatic escrow. He highlights that Ripple still “holds a chunk of XRP in escrow, about 35.3 billion XRP locked up across multiple wallets, with a nominal schedule of up to 1 billion released per month and unused portions commonly re-escrowed. Those coins exist and are accounted for on-ledger, but “they aren’t actually sitting on exchanges” and are not immediately available to buyers. In his words, “for all intents and purposes, that escrow stash is effectively off of the market.” From there, the analysis moves from headline “circulating supply” to the subtler concept of effective float. Beyond escrow, he argues that large strategic holders—banks, fintechs, or other whales—may sit on material balances without supplying order books. When you strip out escrow and these non-selling stashes, he says, “the effective circulating supply… is actually way smaller than the 59 or even 64 billion figure.” He cites community estimates in the “20 or 30 billion” range for what might be truly liquid at any given moment, while emphasizing that nobody has a precise number. That effective-float framing underpins the crux of his thesis: a potential supply shock if demand accelerates faster than fresh sell-side supply appears. “Price is a dance between supply and demand,” he says; if institutional or sovereign-scale users suddenly need XRP and “the market finds that there isn’t enough XRP readily available,” order books could thin out and prices could “shoot on up, sometimes violently.” His phrase “circulating supply could collapse overnight” is presented not as a claim that tokens are destroyed or removed from the ledger, but as a market-structure scenario in which available inventory to sell dries up quickly because holders won’t part with it. How Could The XRP Supply Shock Happen? On the demand side, he anchors the hypothetical to tokenization. He points to the “very early stages of something huge in finance”—on-chain tokenization of debt, stablecoins, CBDCs and even gold—and argues the XRP Ledger aims to be “the settlement layer” for those assets.He references Ripple CTO David Schwartz’s earlier comments about an XRPL pivot toward tokenized assets and notes that an institutional research shop (Bitwise) has framed XRP as a way to play the tokenization theme. In his construction, if “trillions of dollars in value” begin settling across XRPL rails, working inventories of XRP for bridging, liquidity and settlement could rise sharply, tightening effective float. Related Reading: XRP Bearish Signal: Whales Offload $486 Million In Asset To illustrate, he offers two analogies. First, the “concert tickets” model: you think there are 100,000 tickets (100B supply), but 50,000 are held by the promoter (escrow) and 30,000 by corporate buyers (whales), leaving only 20,000 for the public; if a million people want in, prices explode. Second, a comparison to Bitcoin’s halving: while XRP has no programmatic halving, he proposes that a sudden adoption wave could function like a de facto halving of available supply—“XRP’s version of a halving could actually be the adoption event.” He also updates the narrative context that long dogged XRP. Once derided for “too much supply,” he argues the script has “totally flipped.” He cites the current cycle’s optics—“XRP is sitting above $3 with a market cap north of around $180 billion”—as evidence that raw supply counts did not cap price as tightly as critics claimed, and as a backdrop for why a scarcity narrative is gaining traction. Still, he declines to publish targets or timelines, repeatedly stressing uncertainty and risk. “I’m not a financial adviser… cryptocurrencies are highly volatile,” he reminds viewers, adding that tokenization could take off “on some other platform,” unfold more slowly than enthusiasts expect, or fail to get to “sudden shock” scale. The verdict he offers is deliberately bound. The theory that “XRP supply could vanish overnight” is imprecise on its face; the ledger will not erase coins. But after examining dashboard methodologies, escrow mechanics and the behavior of large holders, he concludes that the effective float could be meaningfully smaller than headline supply figures, and that a fast-developing tokenization use case could, under the right conditions, stress that float. “Overnight is a dramatic way to put it,” he concedes. “The change could actually be very sudden when it comes.” At press time, XRP traded at $3.0198. Featured image created with DALL.E, chart from TradingView.com
Paylaş
NewsBTC2025/09/18 11:00
Pi Network Fast-Track KYC Lets New Users Unlock Mainnet Wallets Early

Pi Network Fast-Track KYC Lets New Users Unlock Mainnet Wallets Early

TLDR: Pi Network introduces AI-powered Fast Track KYC to speed wallet activation for new users and non-users Users can activate Mainnet wallets before 30 mining sessions but cannot migrate mined balances yet Fast Track KYC maintains strict verification standards and may be more conservative than standard KYC Pi Network reports over 14.82M users fully KYC-verified [...] The post Pi Network Fast-Track KYC Lets New Users Unlock Mainnet Wallets Early appeared first on Blockonomi.
Paylaş
Blockonomi2025/09/19 15:48