Airlines that plan to impose the surcharge during this period must first secure approval from the Civil Aeronautics Board and ensure that rates do not exceed theAirlines that plan to impose the surcharge during this period must first secure approval from the Civil Aeronautics Board and ensure that rates do not exceed the

Higher airfares? How much fuel surcharges may cost from April 1 to 15

2026/03/17 19:51
Okuma süresi: 2 dk
Bu içerikle ilgili geri bildirim veya endişeleriniz için lütfen crypto.news@mexc.com üzerinden bizimle iletişime geçin.

MANILA, Philippines – Air passengers may face higher fuel surcharge fees on both domestic and international flights from April 1 to 15 as rising fuel costs — driven by ongoing tensions in the Middle East — prompt airlines to adjust pricing.

On Tuesday, March 17, the Civil Aeronautics Board (CAB) approved an increase in the fuel surcharge level from Level 4 to Level 8, describing the move as an “interim and temporary measure.”

With the shift to Level 8, fuel surcharges for domestic flights may climb to between P253 and P787. This is a significant jump from the previous P117 to P342 range under Level 4.

Meanwhile, international flight surcharges will be set at P835.05 to P6,208.98, depending on distance, marking an approximate 116-percent rise from the earlier P385.70 to P2,867.82 range.

Airlines that plan to impose the surcharge during this period must first secure approval from the CAB and ensure that rates do not exceed the Level 8 cap, according to Executive Director Carmelo Arcilla.

“The more gradual and incremental implementation of fuel surcharge to be collected from passengers can be a way of softening the impact of higher fuel surcharge increases, and enable faster reduction when fuel prices decline,” CAB said. – Rappler.com

Sorumluluk Reddi: Bu sitede yeniden yayınlanan makaleler, halka açık platformlardan alınmıştır ve yalnızca bilgilendirme amaçlıdır. MEXC'nin görüşlerini yansıtmayabilir. Tüm hakları telif sahiplerine aittir. Herhangi bir içeriğin üçüncü taraf haklarını ihlal ettiğini düşünüyorsanız, kaldırılması için lütfen crypto.news@mexc.com ile iletişime geçin. MEXC, içeriğin doğruluğu, eksiksizliği veya güncelliği konusunda hiçbir garanti vermez ve sağlanan bilgilere dayalı olarak alınan herhangi bir eylemden sorumlu değildir. İçerik, finansal, yasal veya diğer profesyonel tavsiye niteliğinde değildir ve MEXC tarafından bir tavsiye veya onay olarak değerlendirilmemelidir.

Ayrıca Şunları da Beğenebilirsiniz

Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny

Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny

The post Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. The cryptocurrency world is buzzing with a recent controversy surrounding a bold OpenVPP partnership claim. This week, OpenVPP (OVPP) announced what it presented as a significant collaboration with the U.S. government in the innovative field of energy tokenization. However, this claim quickly drew the sharp eye of on-chain analyst ZachXBT, who highlighted a swift and official rebuttal that has sent ripples through the digital asset community. What Sparked the OpenVPP Partnership Claim Controversy? The core of the issue revolves around OpenVPP’s assertion of a U.S. government partnership. This kind of collaboration would typically be a monumental endorsement for any private cryptocurrency project, especially given the current regulatory climate. Such a partnership could signify a new era of mainstream adoption and legitimacy for energy tokenization initiatives. OpenVPP initially claimed cooperation with the U.S. government. This alleged partnership was said to be in the domain of energy tokenization. The announcement generated considerable interest and discussion online. ZachXBT, known for his diligent on-chain investigations, was quick to flag the development. He brought attention to the fact that U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Commissioner Hester Peirce had directly addressed the OpenVPP partnership claim. Her response, delivered within hours, was unequivocal and starkly contradicted OpenVPP’s narrative. How Did Regulatory Authorities Respond to the OpenVPP Partnership Claim? Commissioner Hester Peirce’s statement was a crucial turning point in this unfolding story. She clearly stated that the SEC, as an agency, does not engage in partnerships with private cryptocurrency projects. This response effectively dismantled the credibility of OpenVPP’s initial announcement regarding their supposed government collaboration. Peirce’s swift clarification underscores a fundamental principle of regulatory bodies: maintaining impartiality and avoiding endorsements of private entities. Her statement serves as a vital reminder to the crypto community about the official stance of government agencies concerning private ventures. Moreover, ZachXBT’s analysis…
Paylaş
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 02:13
Solana Sees $10M Capital Rotation, Eyes $100 Breakout

Solana Sees $10M Capital Rotation, Eyes $100 Breakout

The post Solana Sees $10M Capital Rotation, Eyes $100 Breakout appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Capital rotation into Solana accelerated this week as traders
Paylaş
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/03/18 00:18
ZKsync Powers Tokenized Deposits in Major U.S. Bank Network

ZKsync Powers Tokenized Deposits in Major U.S. Bank Network

Key Takeaways: Five U.S. regional banks are building a tokenized deposit network on ZKsync. Deposits remain FDIC-insured bank liabilities, not stablecoins. The
Paylaş
Crypto Ninjas2026/03/18 00:41