Similar to DEXs, decentralized lending is also one of the key components of DeFi. If the DeFi Summer of 2020 was fueled by competition among various DEXs, triggering a liquidity race, then theSimilar to DEXs, decentralized lending is also one of the key components of DeFi. If the DeFi Summer of 2020 was fueled by competition among various DEXs, triggering a liquidity race, then the
What is Decentralized Lending?
Similar to DEXs, decentralized lending is also one of the key components of DeFi. If the DeFi Summer of 2020 was fueled by competition among various DEXs, triggering a liquidity race, then the integration of Compound lending and DEXs marks the prologue of an exciting trend.
1. What is Decentralized Lending?
In the traditional financial system, users are required to have a bank account and complete identity verification to access financial services. For activities like lending, substantial personal and collateral information need to be provided, and the process involves multiple layers of scrutiny, making it a cumbersome procedure.
For Decentralized Finance (DeFi) services, anyone who can provide collateral can complete lending without the need to disclose information to third parties. Borrowers can obtain loans by collateralizing their cryptocurrency assets and paying interest, while lenders can deposit their assets on the platform to earn interest.
The core of DeFi's ability to operate without the need for approval lies in the use of smart contracts to facilitate lending relationships. All lending conditions are encoded into smart contracts in advance, and once the conditions are met, the lending relationship between the parties is automatically executed within the contract. This eliminates the need for third-party maintenance and management.
Decentralized lending has shattered the numerous barriers present in traditional finance. On one hand, it has increased the utilization of cryptocurrency assets, and on the other hand, it allows more users to generate passive income by holding cryptocurrencies. This phenomenon has been a key driver behind the explosive growth of DeFi and the advancement of the cryptocurrency world.
2. DeFi Lending Models
Currently, DeFi's main lending methods can be categorized into the following three types:
2.1 Peer-To-Peer (P2P) Model
In the lending process, both parties place orders on the platform, and the platform acts as a matchmaker. Additionally, in cases where the borrower is unable to repay on time, the platform automatically initiates the liquidation process. Platforms like dYdX and dharma offer these types of services. Peer-to-peer models require matchmaking, which can result in relatively lower efficiency.
2.2 Stablecoin Model
One of the most well-known platforms in this model is Maker, built on the Ethereum blockchain. On Maker, users can deposit ETH to borrow a stablecoin called USDS, which is pegged to the US dollar. The platform requires the collateral ratio to be maintained at 150% or higher.
A distinctive feature of Maker is that the interest rate is determined through voting by MKR token holders. However, due to this decentralized governance approach, the interest rate can be quite volatile. For example, it once went from 2.5% to 19.5% in just over a month.
2.3 Liquidity Pool Trading Model
This is currently the most mainstream DeFi lending and borrowing model on the market. Two major platforms, Compound and Aave, both utilize this model.
The liquidity pool trading model is more akin to traditional banking lending methods. Users can deposit and withdraw as needed, pooling funds from lenders in a liquid funding pool. As long as there's enough capital in the pool, borrowers can access funds at any time. The system uses algorithms to balance supply and demand and sets interest rates.
Compound
Compound allows any user to deposit assets into the platform's liquidity pool. The design of the Proof-of-stake token mechanism has also been widely adopted in the industry. When users provide assets, they receive cTokens from Compound as proof of ownership. The exchange rate of cTokens is determined by the interest of the assets, and over time, their value increases. Deposit users only need to hold cTokens to automatically earn interest.
Aave
Aave is also a lending protocol platform based on the liquidity pool model. Users can deposit assets at any time to earn interest or lend out another type of asset. In addition to this, Aave introduced a pioneering product in the DeFi space known as "flash loans," which are uncollateralized loans.
Flash loans allow borrowing without the need for any collateral, with the condition that the loan and repayment, including the interest payment, must be completed within a single Ethereum block (15 seconds). If the operations are not completed within the block, the smart contract cancels all previous actions to ensure the overall protocol and asset safety.
Flash loans are particularly useful for arbitrage traders, as they provide capital efficiency for conducting arbitrage trades across various DeFi Dapps.
Maker
Maker is one of the earliest DeFi lending protocols. It allows users to create USDS by over-collateralizing tokens, enabling over-collateralized loans. Currently, Maker supports over 30 different tokens for collateralization. USDS is a decentralized stablecoin pegged to the US dollar. In addition to being a lending protocol, Maker also serves as the issuer of the stablecoin USDS.
3. Security Issues For Lending
With the introduction of the various models above, we have gained a foundational understanding of decentralized finance (DeFi) products. However, have you ever wondered how DeFi ensures the safety of both lenders and platforms, given the non-custodial and efficient nature of fund movement in the DeFi space?
Due to the absence of traditional credit indicators in DeFi, the core principle of all major platforms is over-collateralization. This is enforced through smart contracts, which implement strict liquidation processes.
Over-collateralization helps mitigate default risks to some extent. For example, if a borrower takes out 100 USDT, the platform might require them to pledge at least 150 USDT worth of ETH as collateral. If the value of the collateral drops to 100 USDT, the borrower needs to deposit more collateral, or the smart contract may sell the collateral to protect the lender's assets. Actual platforms might have even stricter measures, such as issuing reminders for collateral top-ups or initiating partial liquidation when the collateral value falls below 120 USDT.
However, the high volatility of cryptocurrencies brings its own risks. Although the probability of rapid crashes is small, in the event of a black swan event, it could still impact the security of DeFi platforms. Additionally, there have been instances of assets being stolen from DeFi platforms due to contract vulnerabilities. Therefore, while users can enjoy the flexibility and convenience of DeFi, they should also pay attention to proper fund management to safeguard their principal, as there is a possibility of losing both interest gains and the initial investment.
4. Summary
Decentralized finance (DeFi) revolutionizes lending and borrowing through smart contracts, eliminating the need for third-party verification. This significantly lowers the entry barriers for users. Moreover, the DeFi space continues to evolve with innovative lending models emerging, such as leveraged lending, which can further enhance capital utilization. The DeFi lending market holds immense potential for the future, and as it progresses, there is room for significant growth and innovation.
Certainly, we must also acknowledge the existing issues in lending within the DeFi ecosystem. Many lending protocols still rely on over-collateralization, which leads to inefficient capital usage. Undercollateralized loans are likely the next direction for the development of DeFi lending protocols. Offering loans with less collateral can enhance the capital efficiency of DeFi lending protocols and compete effectively with traditional lenders.
市场机遇
DeFi实时价格 (DEFI)
$0.000109
$0.000109$0.000109
USD
DeFi (DEFI) 实时价格图表
热门加密动态
查看更多
Solana主网出块时间缩短至350毫秒：迈向200毫秒路线图与SOL生态深层影响解析
概述 根据 Solana 官方网络 与核心开发者团队 Anza 披露的技术进展，Solana 主网已正式将目标出块时间（Slot Time）从自创世以来的 400 毫秒缩短至 350 毫秒。这是该网络上线运行多年来首次对底层出块节奏进行实质性调优。根据已通过社区治理并合并的改进提案 SIMD-0525，本次下调仅为四阶段渐进式性能优化计划的第一步，后续网络将依次推进至 300 毫秒、250 毫秒，
MEXC 链上观察日报：DTCC完成代币化证券实盘处理，华尔街链上化加速
更新于：2026年7月16日 9:30（UTC+8）｜作者：MEXC 1. 要闻速览 英美支持统一稳定币监管规则 比特币与以太坊ETF净流入2.39亿美元 SEC将IBIT期权限额上调至100万张 Ostium遇袭损失最高1800万美元 DTCC完成代币化证券实盘处理 2. 产业动态 Robinhood Chain新用户真实画像：49万地址入链，仅1.7%触及DeFi 据Odaily星球日报消息，
MEXC 链上观察日报：美国CPI自2020年以来首次下降，美联储加息压力缓解
更新于：2026年7月15日 9:30（UTC+8）｜作者：MEXC 1. 要闻速览 美国6月CPI环比下降0.4% Ripple加入x402 Foundation JCB与Circle探索USDC支付 英国推迟DeFi资本利得税 欧洲央行启动数字欧元试点 2. 产业动态 CFTC阻止Kalshi按Michigan法院命令取消预测市场交易 据CoinDesk消息，Kalshi原计划依照法院命令撤销
热门新闻
查看更多
Coldcard Mk3 警告紧随 3800 万美元 Bitcoin 被扫荡事件，但原因仍未确认
比特币硬件钱包制造商Coinkite已警告用户，Coldcard设备存在种子生成问题，影响从4.0.1版本起的所有Mk3固件版本。该警告是在安全研究人员调查一起涉及594.48 BTC（约合3,800万美元）的协同转移事件时发出的。然而，目前尚无公开的技术证据证实Coldcard的问题导致了这些转账。
相关文章
查看更多
流动性的基础知识
流动性是在金融学中是一个含义较广的词语，在不同的语境可以有不同的含义。但总的来说，流动性可以分为以下几个概念：1）资产变现能力的强弱，指将现有资产或财富换为其他资产的能力。2）主体偿债能力强弱。常用于企业，如果企业资产现金流较多，则流动性好。3）市场中的货币存量多寡。适用于宏观经济领域，如果货币的总供应量大于总需求量，则是流动性过剩。在加密货币交易中，流动性指的是第一种情况。除此之外，加密市场的流
MEXC 链上观察日报：美SEC推出“创新豁免”允许代币化股票链上交易
更新于：2026年9月18日 09:30（UTC+8）｜作者：MEXC要闻速览 美SEC推出代币化股票链上交易创新豁免 MoonPay将12亿美元WTGXX纳入稳定币储备 Hyperliquid链上USDC供应量超过Solana Crypto.com获批在美上线个股期货 Column推出银行原生稳定币基础设施 产业动态免Gas稳定币转账，Sui成为Daya结算基础设施据Odaily星球日报
IBM 股价为何因 Anthropic 的 COBOL 消息重挫？深入解析 AI 颠覆题材
一篇博客文章，通常不会抹掉数百亿美元的市值。但在 2026 年 2 月 23 日（周一），真的有一篇做到了。Anthropic 发表了一篇技术文章，说明如何用 Claude Code 处理 COBOL，而 IBM 股价在收盘前已下跌约 13%。这波下跌其实是整个故事里最容易理解的部分。更值得注意的是，同样的模式在那之后不断在其他个股上重演。Key TakeawaysIBM 股价在 2026 年 2
