MNST vs WFC Stock Comparison: Price, Growth & Valuation (2026)

Use MEXC Stock Compare for a detailed MNST vs WFC analysis. Compare MNST and WFC across price performance, growth, valuation, profitability and risk, based on market data and the latest reported financials.

MNST vs WFC Stock Comparison Summary

MNST reported year-over-year revenue growth of 20.4%, compared with 5.3% for WFC. Their P/E ratios are 39.7x and 11.6x, dividend yields are 0.00% and 2.62%, and 30-day volatility levels are 24.4% and 23.7%, respectively. These metrics highlight key differences in growth, valuation, dividend income and market risk. Overall WFC leads across more of the selected comparison metrics.

Risk Disclaimer: MEXC Stock Compare provides information and comparisons on actual U.S.-listed stocks for reference only. Data may be delayed or inaccurate, does not constitute investment advice, and past performance does not guarantee future results.

MNST vs WFC Stock Return Comparison (1W)

MNSTWFC

Compare the cumulative total returns of Monster Beverage Corporation (MNST) and Wells Fargo & Co. (WFC) over the selected 1W period. Data as of 2026-09-28 12:00:00.

MNST vs WFC Key Equity Metrics Comparison Summary

Monster Beverage Corporation (MNST) has a market capitalization of $41.73B and operates in the Consumer Staples sector, with its main business classified under Soft Drinks & Non-alcoholic Beverages. Its latest quarterly revenue changed +20.4% year over year.

Wells Fargo & Co. (WFC) has a market capitalization of $251.31B and operates in the Financials sector, with its main business classified under Diversified Banks. Its latest quarterly revenue changed +5.3% year over year.

MNST vs WFC Key Stock Indicators

Comparison MetricMonster Beverage Corporation
MNST
Wells Fargo & Co.
WFC
Comparison results

Stock Price & Returns

Latest delayed stock price with 1-day, 1-month and year-to-date returns.

$42.601D: -2.9%1M: -8.8%1Y: +27.2%$83.101D: -2.6%1M: -6.5%1Y: -1.8%MNSTWin

Market Capitalization

Total market value of the company's outstanding shares.

$41.73B$251.31BWFCWin

Sector & Industry

The company's market sector and primary industry classification.

Consumer Staples / Soft Drinks & Non-alcoholic BeveragesFinancials / Diversified Banks--
Based on delayed market data, MNST is trading at $42.60, compared with $83.10 for WFC. Their market capitalizations are $41.73B and $251.31B, respectively. MNST operates in the Consumer Staples sector, while WFC belongs to Financials.
MNST vs WFC Growth & Profitability

Revenue Growth (YoY)

Year-over-year change in revenue.

+20.4%+5.3%MNSTWin

EPS Growth (YoY)

Year-over-year change in earnings per share.

+33.3%+17.8%MNSTWin

ROIC

Return generated from invested capital.

34.4%6.4%MNSTWin

Gross Margin / Operating Margin

Profitability before and after operating expenses.

55.5% / 29.2%67.4% / 21.3%WFCWin
On growth, MNST posted revenue growth of +20.4% and TTM EPS growth of +33.3%. WFC, by comparison, posted revenue growth of +5.3% and TTM EPS growth of +17.8%.On profitability, MNST recorded a gross margin of 55.5%, an operating margin of 29.2%, and ROIC of 34.4%. For WFC, the corresponding figures were 67.4%, 21.3%, and 6.4%.Overall, MNST shows stronger overall growth and profitability.
MNST vs WFC Valuation & Balance Sheet

Free Cash Flow Yield

Free cash flow as a percentage of market capitalization.

2.5%7.6%WFCWin

Net Debt / EBITDA

Net debt relative to EBITDA; a negative value indicates net cash.

-0.7x5.6xMNSTWin

Dividend Yield / Payout Ratio

Dividend returns relative to share price and the share of earnings paid as dividends.

0.00% / 0.0%2.62% / 29.6%WFCWin
WFC offers a higher free cash flow yield, indicating a less demanding valuation. MNST has the stronger balance sheet, while WFC provides the higher dividend yield. Overall, the two stocks differ mainly in valuation, financial strength and dividend income.
MNST vs WFC Returns & Risk

Total Return (Dividend-Adjusted)

Cumulative return over 1, 5 and 10 years, including dividends.

1Y: +27.2%5Y: +90.4%10Y: +248.2%1Y: -1.8%5Y: +81.0%10Y: +83.4%MNSTWin

30-Day Realized Volatility

Annualized volatility based on the past 30 days of daily returns.

24.4%23.7%WFCWin

Beta (5Y vs S&P 500)

Sensitivity to market movements; above 1 indicates greater market volatility.

0.570.97MNSTWin
MNST has delivered stronger long-term returns, but the risk indicators show mixed results.

MNST vs WFC Valuation & Dividend Metrics

Review MNST compared with WFC across valuation, cash flow and dividend metrics, including P/E, forward P/E, free cash flow yield and dividend yield. These figures are provided for reference only and do not represent a fair-value estimate, price target or investment recommendation.

MetricMonster Beverage Corporation
MNST
Wells Fargo & Co.
WFC
Comparison results

Market Cap

$41.73B$251.31BWFCWin

P/E (TTM)

39.7x11.6xWFCWin

P/S

9.2x1.9xWFCWin

EV/EBITDA

29.3x15.2xWFCWin

Dividend Yield

0.00%2.62%WFCWin

MNST vs WFC Profitability Over Time

Compare MNST and WFC across gross margin and operating margin trends over time to understand how each company's profitability has changed. Based on reported financial data only; not a forecast or investment advice.

TTM3Y Avg5Y Avg10Y Avg
MNST55.8%54.3%53.9%57.6%
WFC67.8%68.3%77.9%83.2%

Technical & Fundamental Stock Analysis

RSI (14, daily)Updated as of 2026-09-28 market close

MNST 35.09 • WFC 38.97

Measures short-term price momentum and helps identify possible overbought or oversold conditions.

50/200-DMA PositionUpdated as of 2026-09-28 market close

MNST 50D Below / 200D Above • WFC 50D Below / 200D Below

Shows whether the stock is trading above or below its medium- and long-term trend lines.

R&D % of Revenue

MNST 0.0% • WFC --

Shows how much of revenue is invested in research and development.

Share Count Trend (3Y)

MNST Decreased • WFC Decreased

Shows whether the company's share count has increased or decreased over the past three years.

Company Profiles

Monster Beverage Corporation

Soft Drinks & Non-alcoholic Beverages

Monster Beverage is a leader in the energy drink category within the nonalcoholic ready-to-drink beverage market, generating two-thirds of revenue in the US and Canada. The well-known Monster trademark includes brands such as Monster Energy, Monster Ultra, Java Monster, and Juice Monster. The firm also owns other energy drink brands, such as Reign, NOS, Burn, Bang, and Mother, and brews and distributes beers and flavored malt beverages following the acquisition of a craft brewer in 2022. Monster controls branding and innovation but outsources beverage manufacturing and packaging to co-packers and finished goods distribution to bottlers in the global Coca-Cola system (pursuant to a 20-year agreement inked in 2015). Coke is the largest shareholder of Monster, owning a 20% stake.

Wells Fargo & Co.

Diversified Banks

Wells Fargo is a premier, North American-focused banking titan that commands a $2.3 trillion balance sheet and the third-highest deposit market share in the United States. The bank uses a dense, expansive network of 4,079 branches to champion retail consumers and the middle market, where the firm has built a particularly strong reputation. Following the removal of its federal asset cap in 2025, the firm is set to deploy its legacy excess liquidity to expand each of its four segments: consumer & business lending, commercial banking, corporate & investment banking, and wealth & investment management.

Trade MNST & WFC Stock Futures on MEXC

Trade USDT-margined Stock Futures referencing MNST and WFC on MEXC, with 24/7 access and leverage of up to 10x. These products are derivatives, do not represent ownership of the underlying shares and involve a significant risk of loss.

Everything You Need to Know About MNST vs WFC Stocks

What is MEXC Stock Compare?

MEXC Stock Compare is a side-by-side US stock comparison tool. It helps users compare two companies across stock price performance, market cap, valuation, growth, profitability, balance-sheet strength, dividends and risk. The results are provided for research purposes only and do not constitute investment advice.

Which metrics should I use to evaluate a company's growth?

Start with revenue growth to see how quickly the business is expanding, then review EPS growth to determine whether that growth is translating into higher earnings per share. Gross margin, operating margin and ROIC help assess the quality of that growth by showing profitability and capital efficiency. A company with fast revenue growth but declining margins may be expanding without improving its earnings quality.

How do MNST and WFC compare in growth and profitability?

In the latest reported period, MNST recorded revenue growth of +20.4% and TTM EPS growth of +33.3%, compared with +5.3% and +17.8% for WFC. MNST leads on both growth and profitability. This comparison is based on reported financial metrics and does not predict future performance.

What is the difference between P/E (TTM) and Forward P/E?

P/E (TTM) compares the current share price with actual earnings reported over the past 12 months. Forward P/E uses estimated earnings for the next 12 months, so it reflects market expectations but depends on forecasts that may change. Both ratios should be considered alongside growth, profitability and industry peers.

How do the risk profiles of MNST and WFC compare?

MNST has a 30-day realized volatility of 24.4% and a five-year Beta of 0.57, compared with 23.7% and 0.97 for WFC. The risk indicators show mixed results. These indicators describe historical price movements and market sensitivity, but they do not cover every source of investment risk.

What do dividend yield and payout ratio indicate?

Dividend yield shows the annual dividend relative to the current share price, while the payout ratio shows how much of a company's earnings is distributed as dividends. A higher yield may provide more income, but it can also rise because the share price has fallen. Dividend sustainability should therefore be considered together with earnings, cash flow and the payout ratio.

How should I compare a high-growth stock with a lower-valued stock?

A high-growth stock may trade at a higher valuation if investors expect its revenue and earnings to continue expanding. A lower-valued stock may offer a more conservative entry point, but the lower valuation could also reflect slower growth or higher business risk. Growth, valuation, profitability, cash flow and risk should therefore be considered together.

Which is the better stock, MNST or WFC?

There is no single answer for every investor. Growth-focused investors may place greater weight on revenue growth, EPS growth and ROIC, while income-focused investors may prioritize dividend yield and payout sustainability. Investors with lower risk tolerance may focus more on volatility, Beta and balance-sheet strength. MEXC Stock Compare presents the relevant metrics but does not provide a buy or sell recommendation.

Can I trade MNST and WFC as RealStocks on MEXC?

Eligible users can trade MNST and WFC as real US stocks through MEXC RealStocks if both stocks are currently supported. Users must first open and verify a RealStocks account with MEXC's partner licensed broker. RealStocks represents ownership of actual shares rather than tokenized stock exposure. Availability may vary by stock and region, so users should check the corresponding RealStocks trading page before placing an order.

Disclaimer

The stock prices, financial metrics, comparison results and related information displayed on this page are sourced from third-party providers and are provided for informational and educational purposes only. Data may be delayed, incomplete or inaccurate, and MEXC does not guarantee its accuracy, completeness or timeliness. The comparisons and automated summaries do not constitute financial, investment, legal or tax advice, nor a recommendation to buy, sell or hold any security or financial product. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Users should independently verify the information and assess their own objectives, financial circumstances and risk tolerance before making any decision. Where MEXC stock futures or other derivative products are referenced, such products do not represent ownership of the underlying shares and may involve leverage and a substantial risk of loss. Product availability is subject to applicable laws and regional restrictions.