The post IRS Must Make Those Confusing Math-Error Notices Easier To Understand appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. A new law hopes to put an end to confusing tax notices from the IRS. getty Tired of confusing IRS notices? You could see a difference in some notices, thanks to the Internal Revenue Service Math and Taxpayer Help Act (H.R. 998), which was signed into law this month. The new law has been widely praised by the National Taxpayer Advocate as a long-overdue step toward clearer and fairer IRS communication with taxpayers. The IRS MATH Act requires the IRS to change the format of millions of “math-error” notices. Although these notices are meant to handle simple errors quickly, they have often been characterized as vague and confusing. The result is that many taxpayers have struggled to understand exactly what the IRS changed on their tax return, or how to contest it. The new law fixes those problems by requiring the IRS to explain exactly what the agency thinks is wrong, why it made the adjustment, and what rights the taxpayer has to challenge that action. Math Errors Math-error notices are authorized under section 6213(b) of the Tax Code, which allows the IRS to immediately assess additional tax without going through the normal deficiency process. By law, that shortcut is allowed only for simple, obvious mistakes—math errors, using the wrong line of the tax table, missing or mismatched Social Security numbers, inconsistent entries between forms, or missing required schedules and forms. The authority does not apply to more complex issues, like verifying whether it’s appropriate to claim dependents, determining whether business expenses can be supported, or determining stock basis. A quick rule of thumb: If the issue requires interpretation, investigation, or document review, it is not a math error. Those matters must follow the standard audit and deficiency procedures. If you disagree with a math-error adjustment, you have 60 days… The post IRS Must Make Those Confusing Math-Error Notices Easier To Understand appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. A new law hopes to put an end to confusing tax notices from the IRS. getty Tired of confusing IRS notices? You could see a difference in some notices, thanks to the Internal Revenue Service Math and Taxpayer Help Act (H.R. 998), which was signed into law this month. The new law has been widely praised by the National Taxpayer Advocate as a long-overdue step toward clearer and fairer IRS communication with taxpayers. The IRS MATH Act requires the IRS to change the format of millions of “math-error” notices. Although these notices are meant to handle simple errors quickly, they have often been characterized as vague and confusing. The result is that many taxpayers have struggled to understand exactly what the IRS changed on their tax return, or how to contest it. The new law fixes those problems by requiring the IRS to explain exactly what the agency thinks is wrong, why it made the adjustment, and what rights the taxpayer has to challenge that action. Math Errors Math-error notices are authorized under section 6213(b) of the Tax Code, which allows the IRS to immediately assess additional tax without going through the normal deficiency process. By law, that shortcut is allowed only for simple, obvious mistakes—math errors, using the wrong line of the tax table, missing or mismatched Social Security numbers, inconsistent entries between forms, or missing required schedules and forms. The authority does not apply to more complex issues, like verifying whether it’s appropriate to claim dependents, determining whether business expenses can be supported, or determining stock basis. A quick rule of thumb: If the issue requires interpretation, investigation, or document review, it is not a math error. Those matters must follow the standard audit and deficiency procedures. If you disagree with a math-error adjustment, you have 60 days…

IRS Must Make Those Confusing Math-Error Notices Easier To Understand

2025/12/04 11:47

A new law hopes to put an end to confusing tax notices from the IRS.

getty

Tired of confusing IRS notices? You could see a difference in some notices, thanks to the Internal Revenue Service Math and Taxpayer Help Act (H.R. 998), which was signed into law this month. The new law has been widely praised by the National Taxpayer Advocate as a long-overdue step toward clearer and fairer IRS communication with taxpayers.

The IRS MATH Act requires the IRS to change the format of millions of “math-error” notices. Although these notices are meant to handle simple errors quickly, they have often been characterized as vague and confusing. The result is that many taxpayers have struggled to understand exactly what the IRS changed on their tax return, or how to contest it.

The new law fixes those problems by requiring the IRS to explain exactly what the agency thinks is wrong, why it made the adjustment, and what rights the taxpayer has to challenge that action.

Math Errors

Math-error notices are authorized under section 6213(b) of the Tax Code, which allows the IRS to immediately assess additional tax without going through the normal deficiency process. By law, that shortcut is allowed only for simple, obvious mistakes—math errors, using the wrong line of the tax table, missing or mismatched Social Security numbers, inconsistent entries between forms, or missing required schedules and forms.

The authority does not apply to more complex issues, like verifying whether it’s appropriate to claim dependents, determining whether business expenses can be supported, or determining stock basis. A quick rule of thumb: If the issue requires interpretation, investigation, or document review, it is not a math error. Those matters must follow the standard audit and deficiency procedures.

If you disagree with a math-error adjustment, you have 60 days to ask the IRS to reverse it. Missing that deadline generally means the assessment becomes final and you lose the right to appeal to the Tax Court. After that, the only path forward is to pay the tax, submit a claim for refund, and, if necessary, file a refund suit in either the U.S. district court or the U.S. Court of Federal Claims.

For years, the National Taxpayer Advocate has warned that these notices often fail to clearly explain the issue—and may even leave out the 60-day deadline information altogether. That means that that taxpayers might note be aware of the right to appeal or what steps to take. The Advocate has repeatedly stressed that clarity and transparency are essential to protecting due process. The goal of the new bill is to allow taxpayers to know what the IRS changed and why.

How The Bill Became Law

H.R. 998 (now Public Law No. 119-39) answers these concerns directly. The bill was introduced in the House in February 2025 by Rep. Randy Feenstra (R-Iowa) and Rep. Brad Schneider (D-Ill.), with Sens. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) and Bill Cassidy (R-La.) leading the effort in the Senate. The measure quickly gained broad bipartisan support. The House passed the bill by voice vote, and the Senate approved it unanimously, moving it to the President’s desk where it was signed into law.

What The Law Says

Under the new law, math-error notices must be much clearer and more specific. Each notice must describe the type of error, cite the relevant tax code provision, and identify the exact line or schedule on the return that is impacted. The notice must also explain any adjustments made to the return, including changes to adjusted gross income, taxable income, deductions, credits, and tax liability.

How specific will the notice be? According to the Taxpayer Advocate, instead of a vague message like “There is an error in your Recovery Rebate Credit,” a notice must now say something like: “We adjusted line 30 of your Form 1040 because our records show you already received the full Recovery Rebate Credit amount for which you were eligible. As a result, you are not entitled to claim an additional credit.”

To help taxpayers understand important deadlines, the 60-day window to request abatement or challenge the IRS’s determination must be shown in the notice in bold, size 14 font, immediately next to the taxpayer’s address on the notice’s first page.

The notice must also include IRS contact information.

And, importantly, if the IRS takes action, it must issue a follow-up notice that explains what happened in plain language and provides an itemized computation of the adjustments.

Pilot Program

To make sure taxpayers actually receive these time-sensitive letters, the law also creates a pilot program requiring some math-error notices to be sent by certified or registered mail (the idea is that sending mail by certified or registered mail conveys a sense of urgency). The pilot program should begin in the next 18 months. To track the progress, the law requires the IRS to report to Congress on the pilot program’s impact.

What’s Next

Clearer notices are expected to reduce confusion and anxiety, making it more likely that taxpayers will respond. That’s the good news.

But don’t expect to see a change overnight. The new law gives the IRS has 12 months to make the changes. With a skinnier IRS in place and a potentially complicated tax season in the cards, most tax practitioners don’t expect the agency to act quickly.

ForbesIRS Has Significant Backlogs Following The Shutdown: What’s Moving And What’s Still StuckForbesWatchdog Finds 2025 Tax Filing Season Was A Success, Worries About 2026

Source: https://www.forbes.com/sites/kellyphillipserb/2025/12/03/new-law-requires-irs-to-make-those-confusing-math-error-notices-easier-to-understand/

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

US Prosecutors Seek 12-Year Prison for Do Kwon Over Terra Collapse

US Prosecutors Seek 12-Year Prison for Do Kwon Over Terra Collapse

        Highlights:  US prosecutors requested a 12-year prison sentence for Do Kwon after the Terra collapse. Terraform’s $40 billion downfall caused huge losses and sparked a long downturn in crypto markets.  Do Kwon will face sentencing on December 11 and must give up $19 million in earnings.   US prosecutors have asked a judge to give Do Kwon, Terraform Labs co-founder, a 12-year prison sentence for his role in the remarkable $40 billion collapse of the Terra and Luna tokens. The request also seeks to finalize taking away Kwon’s criminal earnings.  The court filing came in New York’s Southern District on Thursday. This is about four months after Kwon admitted guilt on two charges: wire fraud and conspiracy to defraud. Prosecutors said Kwon caused more losses than Samuel Bankman-Fried, Alexander Mashinsky, and Karl Sebastian Greenwood combined.  U.S. prosecutors have asked a New York federal judge to sentence Terraform Labs co-founder Do Kwon to 12 years in prison, calling his role in the 2022 TerraUSD collapse a “colossal” fraud that triggered broader crypto-market failures, including the downfall of FTX. Sentencing is… — Wu Blockchain (@WuBlockchain) December 5, 2025  Terraform Collapse Shakes Crypto Market Authorities explained that Terraform’s collapse affected the entire crypto market. They said it helped trigger what is now called the ‘Crypto Winter.’ The filing stressed that Kwon’s conduct harmed many investors and the broader crypto world. On Thursday, prosecutors said Kwon must give up just over $19 million. They added that they will not ask for any additional restitution. They said: “The cost and time associated with calculating each investor-victim’s loss, determining whether the victim has already been compensated through the pending bankruptcy, and then paying out a percentage of the victim’s losses, will delay payment and diminish the amount of money ultimately paid to victims.” Authorities will sentence Do Kwon on December 11. They charged him in March 2023 with multiple crimes, including securities fraud, market manipulation, money laundering, and wire fraud. All connections are tied to his role at Terraform. After Terra fell in 2022, authorities lost track of Kwon until they arrested him in Montenegro on unrelated charges and sent him to the U.S. Do Kwon’s Legal Case and Sentencing In April last year, a jury ruled that both Terraform and Kwon committed civil fraud. They found the company and its co-founder misled investors about how the business operated and its finances. Jay Clayton, U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York, submitted the sentencing request in November.  TERRA STATEMENT: “We are very disappointed with the verdict, which we do not believe is supported by the evidence. We continue to maintain that the SEC does not have the legal authority to bring this case at all, and we are carefully weighing our options and next steps.” — Zack Guzmán  (@zGuz) April 5, 2024  The news of Kwon’s sentencing caused Terraform’s token, LUNA, to jump over 40% in one day, from $0.07 to $0.10. Still, this rise remains small compared to its all-time high of more than $19, which the ecosystem reached before collapsing in May 2022. In a November court filing, Do Kwon’s lawyers asked for a maximum five-year sentence. They argued for a shorter term partly because he could face up to 40 years in prison in South Korea, where prosecutors are also pursuing a case against him. The legal team added that even if Kwon serves time in the U.S., he would not be released freely. He would be moved from prison to an immigration detention center and then sent to Seoul to face pretrial detention for his South Korea charges.    eToro Platform    Best Crypto Exchange   Over 90 top cryptos to trade Regulated by top-tier entities User-friendly trading app 30+ million users    9.9   Visit eToro eToro is a multi-asset investment platform. The value of your investments may go up or down. Your capital is at risk. Don’t invest unless you’re prepared to lose all the money you invest. This is a high-risk investment, and you should not expect to be protected if something goes wrong. 
Share
Coinstats2025/12/06 02:14
Cashing In On University Patents Means Giving Up On Our Innovation Future

Cashing In On University Patents Means Giving Up On Our Innovation Future

The post Cashing In On University Patents Means Giving Up On Our Innovation Future appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. “It’s a raid on American innovation that would deliver pennies to the Treasury while kneecapping the very engine of our economic and medical progress,” writes Pipes. Getty Images Washington is addicted to taxing success. Now, Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick is floating a plan to skim half the patent earnings from inventions developed at universities with federal funding. It’s being sold as a way to shore up programs like Social Security. In reality, it’s a raid on American innovation that would deliver pennies to the Treasury while kneecapping the very engine of our economic and medical progress. Yes, taxpayer dollars support early-stage research. But the real payoff comes later—in the jobs created, cures discovered, and industries launched when universities and private industry turn those discoveries into real products. By comparison, the sums at stake in patent licensing are trivial. Universities collectively earn only about $3.6 billion annually in patent income—less than the federal government spends on Social Security in a single day. Even confiscating half would barely register against a $6 trillion federal budget. And yet the damage from such a policy would be anything but trivial. The true return on taxpayer investment isn’t in licensing checks sent to Washington, but in the downstream economic activity that federally supported research unleashes. Thanks to the bipartisan Bayh-Dole Act of 1980, universities and private industry have powerful incentives to translate early-stage discoveries into real-world products. Before Bayh-Dole, the government hoarded patents from federally funded research, and fewer than 5% were ever licensed. Once universities could own and license their own inventions, innovation exploded. The result has been one of the best returns on investment in government history. Since 1996, university research has added nearly $2 trillion to U.S. industrial output, supported 6.5 million jobs, and launched more than 19,000 startups. Those companies pay…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 03:26