TLDR The New York Times filed a lawsuit against Perplexity AI on Friday The lawsuit alleges Perplexity used millions of Times articles without authorization The AI startup allegedly copied, distributed and displayed the content without permission The content was used to train Perplexity’s chatbot systems This case adds to growing tensions between news publishers and [...] The post New York Times Sues Perplexity AI Over Unauthorized Use of Articles appeared first on Blockonomi.TLDR The New York Times filed a lawsuit against Perplexity AI on Friday The lawsuit alleges Perplexity used millions of Times articles without authorization The AI startup allegedly copied, distributed and displayed the content without permission The content was used to train Perplexity’s chatbot systems This case adds to growing tensions between news publishers and [...] The post New York Times Sues Perplexity AI Over Unauthorized Use of Articles appeared first on Blockonomi.

New York Times Sues Perplexity AI Over Unauthorized Use of Articles

2025/12/05 22:20

TLDR

  • The New York Times filed a lawsuit against Perplexity AI on Friday
  • The lawsuit alleges Perplexity used millions of Times articles without authorization
  • The AI startup allegedly copied, distributed and displayed the content without permission
  • The content was used to train Perplexity’s chatbot systems
  • This case adds to growing tensions between news publishers and AI companies over copyrighted content

The New York Times filed a lawsuit against Perplexity AI on Friday. The legal action targets the artificial intelligence startup for alleged copyright violations.

The lawsuit claims Perplexity AI used millions of Times articles without authorization. The complaint states the company copied, distributed and displayed the newspaper’s content without permission.

According to the filing, Perplexity used the Times content to train its chatbot systems. The AI startup develops conversational artificial intelligence tools for users.

The Times alleges the use of its journalistic material was unlawful. The newspaper says Perplexity took copyrighted content to develop its AI technology.

The lawsuit represents another legal challenge in the growing dispute between media companies and AI firms. News publishers have raised concerns about AI companies using their content without compensation.

Perplexity AI has not responded to requests for comment on the lawsuit. The company has not issued a public statement about the legal action.

The case was filed in court on Friday. The Times is seeking legal remedies for the alleged copyright infringement.

The lawsuit details how Perplexity allegedly accessed Times articles. The company is accused of using this content to improve its chatbot capabilities.

Publishers argue AI companies should pay for using their content. They say the articles required investment in reporting and journalism.

AI companies have faced multiple lawsuits from content creators. These cases question how AI systems can legally use existing works for training.

The Times has been active in protecting its intellectual property. The newspaper has previously taken legal action against other tech companies.

The lawsuit comes as AI technology continues to advance rapidly. Companies are developing more sophisticated chatbots and language models.

Perplexity AI operates in the competitive AI chatbot market. The company competes with other firms developing similar technology.

The case will test legal boundaries around AI training data. Courts will need to determine how copyright law applies to AI development.

The New York Times filed the lawsuit to protect its copyrighted works. The newspaper alleges Perplexity AI unlawfully copied, distributed and displayed millions of its articles without permission to train chatbots.

The post New York Times Sues Perplexity AI Over Unauthorized Use of Articles appeared first on Blockonomi.

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Here’s How Consumers May Benefit From Lower Interest Rates

Here’s How Consumers May Benefit From Lower Interest Rates

The post Here’s How Consumers May Benefit From Lower Interest Rates appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Topline The Federal Reserve on Wednesday opted to ease interest rates for the first time in months, leading the way for potentially lower mortgage rates, bond yields and a likely boost to cryptocurrency over the coming weeks. Average long-term mortgage rates dropped to their lowest levels in months ahead of the central bank’s policy shift. Copyright{2018} The Associated Press. All rights reserved. Key Facts The central bank’s policymaking panel voted this week to lower interest rates, which have sat between 4.25% and 4.5% since December, to a new range of 4% and 4.25%. How Will Lower Interest Rates Impact Mortgage Rates? Mortgage rates tend to fall before and during a period of interest rate cuts: The average 30-year fixed-rate mortgage dropped to 6.35% from 6.5% last week, the lowest level since October 2024, mortgage buyer Freddie Mac reported. Borrowing costs on 15-year fixed-rate mortgages also dropped to 5.5% from 5.6% as they neared the year-ago rate of 5.27%. When the Federal Reserve lowered the funds rate to between 0% and 0.25% during the pandemic, 30-year mortgage rates hit record lows between 2.7% and 3% by the end of 2020, according to data published by Freddie Mac. Consumers who refinanced their mortgages in 2020 saved about $5.3 billion annually as rates dropped, according to the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau. Similarly, mortgage rates spiked around 7% as interest rates were hiked in 2022 and 2023, though mortgage rates appeared to react within weeks of the Fed opting to cut or raise rates. How Do Treasury Bonds Respond To Lower Interest Rates? Long-term Treasury yields are more directly influenced by interest rates, as lower rates tend to result in lower yields. When the Fed pushed rates to near zero during the pandemic, 10-year Treasury yields fell to an all-time low of 0.5%. As…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 05:59
The GENIUS Act Is Already Law. Banks Shouldn’t Try to Rewrite It Now

The GENIUS Act Is Already Law. Banks Shouldn’t Try to Rewrite It Now

The post The GENIUS Act Is Already Law. Banks Shouldn’t Try to Rewrite It Now appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Healthy competition drives innovation and better products for consumers; it is at the center of American economic leadership. Unfortunately, now that the bipartisan GENIUS Act has been signed into law, major legacy financial institutions seem to be having second thoughts about the innovations that stablecoins can bring to financial markets. Bank lobbying groups and public affairs teams have been peppering Congress with complaints about the law, urging members to reopen debate and introduce changes to the legislation that will ensure the stablecoin market doesn’t grow too quickly, protecting banks’ profits and stifling consumer choice. This reactionary response is both overblown and unnecessary. What legacy financial firms should do instead is embrace competition and offer exciting new products and services that consumers want, not try to kneecap emerging players through anti-innovation rules and regulations. The GENIUS Act was carefully designed with a thorough bipartisan process to strengthen consumer safeguards, ensure regulatory oversight, and preserve financial stability. Efforts to roll back its provisions are less about protecting families and more about protecting entrenched banking interests from the competition that helps ensure the U.S. banking system stays the strongest and most innovative in the world. Critics warn that allowing stablecoins to provide rewards could lead to massive deposit outflows from community banks, with figures as high as $6.6 trillion cited. But closer examination shows this fear is unfounded. A July 2025 analysis by consulting firm Charles River Associates found no statistically significant relationship between stablecoin adoption and community bank deposit outflows. In fact, the overwhelming majority of stablecoin reserves remain in the traditional financial system — either in commercial bank accounts or in short-term Treasuries — where they continue to support liquidity and credit in the broader U.S. economy. The dire estimates rely on unrealistic assumptions that every dollar of stablecoin issuance permanently…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 09:39