The post EU Fines X $140M for Misleading Verified Badges and Data Denial appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. X’s blue checkmark system was judged a deceptive design, because it misleads users about account authenticity The social media platform didn’t create the required clear, public log of ads, as mandated by new EU rules X now has 60 working days to present a remediation plan for the blue check issue, and 90 days to address ad transparency and data access shortcomings The European Commission fined Elon Musk’s social network X €120 million (roughly $140 million) for violations of the Digital Services Act (DSA), which represents the first major enforcement under the regulation. The case centers on X’s paid blue check verification system, missing transparency around political and commercial ads, and barriers that researchers faced when they tried to study public posts. Under the DSA, regulators want people in Europe to see who paid for content, why they see it, and how platforms handle risks such as disinformation and targeted manipulation. Related: ‘Impossible to Fake Energy’: Musk Doubles Down on Bitcoin’s Intrinsic Value How X misled users with Blue Checks According to the Commission, there were several breaches involved: X’s blue checkmark (verification badge) system, where users can pay for verified” status, was judged a deceptive design because it misleads users about account authenticity. X didn’t create the required clear, public log of ads, as mandated by new EU rules. Key details like who bought an ad, what it said, and who it was shown to were often missing or hard to find. Researchers were denied adequate access to public data, such as metrics and content data. The platform’s interface and terms of service were found to impose unnecessary barriers that hindered legitimate data collection and analysis of public information. The fine is broken down into three segments: approximately €45 million for checkmark-related deception, €35 million for advertising transparency failures,… The post EU Fines X $140M for Misleading Verified Badges and Data Denial appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. X’s blue checkmark system was judged a deceptive design, because it misleads users about account authenticity The social media platform didn’t create the required clear, public log of ads, as mandated by new EU rules X now has 60 working days to present a remediation plan for the blue check issue, and 90 days to address ad transparency and data access shortcomings The European Commission fined Elon Musk’s social network X €120 million (roughly $140 million) for violations of the Digital Services Act (DSA), which represents the first major enforcement under the regulation. The case centers on X’s paid blue check verification system, missing transparency around political and commercial ads, and barriers that researchers faced when they tried to study public posts. Under the DSA, regulators want people in Europe to see who paid for content, why they see it, and how platforms handle risks such as disinformation and targeted manipulation. Related: ‘Impossible to Fake Energy’: Musk Doubles Down on Bitcoin’s Intrinsic Value How X misled users with Blue Checks According to the Commission, there were several breaches involved: X’s blue checkmark (verification badge) system, where users can pay for verified” status, was judged a deceptive design because it misleads users about account authenticity. X didn’t create the required clear, public log of ads, as mandated by new EU rules. Key details like who bought an ad, what it said, and who it was shown to were often missing or hard to find. Researchers were denied adequate access to public data, such as metrics and content data. The platform’s interface and terms of service were found to impose unnecessary barriers that hindered legitimate data collection and analysis of public information. The fine is broken down into three segments: approximately €45 million for checkmark-related deception, €35 million for advertising transparency failures,…

EU Fines X $140M for Misleading Verified Badges and Data Denial

2025/12/06 06:53
  • X’s blue checkmark system was judged a deceptive design, because it misleads users about account authenticity
  • The social media platform didn’t create the required clear, public log of ads, as mandated by new EU rules
  • X now has 60 working days to present a remediation plan for the blue check issue, and 90 days to address ad transparency and data access shortcomings

The European Commission fined Elon Musk’s social network X €120 million (roughly $140 million) for violations of the Digital Services Act (DSA), which represents the first major enforcement under the regulation.

The case centers on X’s paid blue check verification system, missing transparency around political and commercial ads, and barriers that researchers faced when they tried to study public posts. Under the DSA, regulators want people in Europe to see who paid for content, why they see it, and how platforms handle risks such as disinformation and targeted manipulation.

Related: ‘Impossible to Fake Energy’: Musk Doubles Down on Bitcoin’s Intrinsic Value

How X misled users with Blue Checks

According to the Commission, there were several breaches involved:

  • X’s blue checkmark (verification badge) system, where users can pay for verified” status, was judged a deceptive design because it misleads users about account authenticity.
  • X didn’t create the required clear, public log of ads, as mandated by new EU rules. Key details like who bought an ad, what it said, and who it was shown to were often missing or hard to find.
  • Researchers were denied adequate access to public data, such as metrics and content data. The platform’s interface and terms of service were found to impose unnecessary barriers that hindered legitimate data collection and analysis of public information.

The fine is broken down into three segments: approximately €45 million for checkmark-related deception, €35 million for advertising transparency failures, and €40 million for data access violations.

Under the DSA, penalties could have reached up to 6% of global revenue, meaning this is more of a proportionate penalty rather than a maximal one.

Henna Virkkunen, the European Commission’s Executive Vice President for tech regulation, said the fine was appropriate and not about censorship. She clarified that the purpose is not to censor but to ensure companies are more open and users are safer online.

X has yet to respond

For X, the blue check model represented a way to monetize. The social media platform now has 60 working days to present a remediation plan for the blue check issue, and 90 days to address ad transparency and data access shortcomings. If it fails, higher fines or further sanctions under DSA are possible.

Interestingly, a similar situation happened with TikTok, where the company recently avoided a fine by committing to improve its ad transparency and compliance.

All eyes are now on whether X will follow the EU’s instructions and, if so, how fast. What the company does next will show if it plans to play by the new rules or fight against them.

Related: Europe’s 10 Largest Banks Form ‘Qivalis’ to Break US Dollar’s 99% Grip on Stablecoin Market

Disclaimer: The information presented in this article is for informational and educational purposes only. The article does not constitute financial advice or advice of any kind. Coin Edition is not responsible for any losses incurred as a result of the utilization of content, products, or services mentioned. Readers are advised to exercise caution before taking any action related to the company.

Source: https://coinedition.com/eu-fines-musk-x-140m-for-misleading-verified-badges-and-data-denial/

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

A ‘Detonation’ May Be Next, Analyst Says

A ‘Detonation’ May Be Next, Analyst Says

The post A ‘Detonation’ May Be Next, Analyst Says appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. They say journalists never truly clock out. But for Christian, that’s not just a metaphor, it’s a lifestyle. By day, he navigates the ever-shifting tides of the cryptocurrency market, wielding words like a seasoned editor and crafting articles that decipher the jargon for the masses. When the PC goes on hibernate mode, however, his pursuits take a more mechanical (and sometimes philosophical) turn. Christian’s journey with the written word began long before the age of Bitcoin. In the hallowed halls of academia, he honed his craft as a feature writer for his college paper. This early love for storytelling paved the way for a successful stint as an editor at a data engineering firm, where his first-month essay win funded a months-long supply of doggie and kitty treats – a testament to his dedication to his furry companions (more on that later). Christian then roamed the world of journalism, working at newspapers in Canada and even South Korea. He finally settled down at a local news giant in his hometown in the Philippines for a decade, becoming a total news junkie. But then, something new caught his eye: cryptocurrency. It was like a treasure hunt mixed with storytelling – right up his alley! So, he landed a killer gig at NewsBTC, where he’s one of the go-to guys for all things crypto. He breaks down this confusing stuff into bite-sized pieces, making it easy for anyone to understand (he salutes his management team for teaching him this skill). Think Christian’s all work and no play? Not a chance! When he’s not at his computer, you’ll find him indulging his passion for motorbikes. A true gearhead, Christian loves tinkering with his bike and savoring the joy of the open road on his 320-cc Yamaha R3. Once a speed demon who hit…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/20 05:20
Maryland Man Sentenced for Allegedly Aiding North Korea’s US Company Infiltration and Sensitive Data Access

Maryland Man Sentenced for Allegedly Aiding North Korea’s US Company Infiltration and Sensitive Data Access

The post Maryland Man Sentenced for Allegedly Aiding North Korea’s US Company Infiltration and Sensitive Data Access appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. North Korea’s IT workers infiltrated US companies through a Maryland man’s scheme, earning over $970,000 while enabling access to sensitive government systems. This operation supported the regime’s cyber activities, including crypto hacks that stole $2 billion in 2025, funding nuclear programs. Minh Phuong Ngoc Vong sentenced to 15 months in prison for aiding North Korean infiltration. He used fake credentials to secure jobs at 13 US firms, passing work to overseas conspirators. North Korea stole $2 billion in crypto in 2025 via hacks, totaling over $6 billion recently, per blockchain analytics firm Elliptic. Discover how North Korea’s IT infiltration and crypto hacking schemes threaten US security. Learn the details of the Maryland case and regime’s $6B theft. Stay informed on cybersecurity risks today. What is North Korea’s IT Infiltration Scheme in US Companies? North Korea’s IT infiltration scheme involves covertly placing regime-affiliated workers into US companies using fake identities to generate revenue and access sensitive systems. In a recent Maryland case, Minh Phuong Ngoc Vong was sentenced to 15 months in prison and three years of supervised release for facilitating this for three years across 13 companies. The operation netted over $970,000, much of which funded North Korea’s weapons programs through software work performed by overseas actors, including those in China near the border. How Does North Korea Use Crypto Hacking to Fund Its Programs? North Korea employs sophisticated cyber groups to target cryptocurrency exchanges and wallets, stealing digital assets that convert to fiat for regime funding. According to blockchain analytics firm Elliptic, these groups pilfered approximately $2 billion in cryptocurrencies in 2025 alone, contributing to a total exceeding $6 billion in recent years from hacks on platforms like Bybit and Upbit. This influx directly supports nuclear and missile development, as confirmed by US intelligence assessments. Experts note the regime’s…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/12/06 09:12