Decentralised finance protocols are passing on revenue to holders of their tokens at a record rate as they work to earn investors’ trust, but it could be a waste of money.That’s according to a new report from crypto market maker Keyrock, which looked at token buybacks, one of the most popular ways for protocols to tie their success to the price of the tokens they issue.Keyrock found that the top 12 revenue-distributing protocols spent almost $800 million on token buybacks and other revenue-sharing activities in July, a more than 400% increase since the start of 2024. “Much like public companies that use buybacks to signal long-term commitment and instill investor trust, crypto teams leverage them to enhance token value and communicate conviction in the project’s future,” Amir Hajian, the Keyrock researcher who wrote the report, said. Token buybacks have become increasingly popular in recent months.The idea is that buybacks — paid for with fees generated from the protocol’s users — will tie the value of a token to the success of its associated DeFi protocol, regardless of how the broader crypto market trades.In other words, the more profit a protocol generates, the more it will spend buying back its token, increasing its market value.Poor use of capital? It’s not clear how effective token buybacks are, however.“Buybacks are broken, but can be improved,” Hajian said in the report, adding that many programmes overspend when prices are high and underspend in downturns, when they matter most.Buybacks can also be inefficient because they may divert funds from marketing and growth initiatives, Hajian added.It’s not just Keyrock making that case. In March, a report from crypto research firm Messari also argued that buybacks are a poor use of capital. “Our analysis finds no clear evidence that the market rewards these initiatives, as token performance remains driven by metrics growth and narrative formation,” Sunny Shi, the report’s author, said.Still, the perception that buybacks help shore up token prices is powerful. Perpetual futures exchange Hyperliquid has made token buybacks an integral part of its strategy. Many investors equate Hyperliquid’s buyback programme with the strong performance of its HYPE token, which has soared 500% since its November 2024 launch. Seeing this success, others, such as the top lending protocol Aave, are also implementing buyback programmes. Uncertain valueWhile DeFi tokens soared in 2021 as excitement around the sector peaked, many have since underperformed as the hype died down and investors began to question their high valuations. Even the tokens of successful DeFi protocols, like liquid staking protocol Lido and credit protocol Sky, are trading well below their 2021 highs, despite their revenues increasing significantly since then.“Tokens do not guarantee dividends, confer legal rights, or offer the clarity of earnings metrics,” the Keyrock report said. “The link between protocol performance and tokenholder value is therefore indirect and often uncertain.”Buybacks are an attempt to ground token valuation in something tangible, such as a percentage of the protocol’s total revenue.Despite their issues, the data shows buybacks aren’t a bad idea altogether, according to the Keyrock report.“Disciplined programmes, grounded in revenue stability, treasury strength, and valuation awareness, can reinforce alignment and credibility,” Hajian said.Tim Craig is DL News’ Edinburgh-based DeFi Correspondent. Reach out with tips at tim@dlnews.com.Decentralised finance protocols are passing on revenue to holders of their tokens at a record rate as they work to earn investors’ trust, but it could be a waste of money.That’s according to a new report from crypto market maker Keyrock, which looked at token buybacks, one of the most popular ways for protocols to tie their success to the price of the tokens they issue.Keyrock found that the top 12 revenue-distributing protocols spent almost $800 million on token buybacks and other revenue-sharing activities in July, a more than 400% increase since the start of 2024. “Much like public companies that use buybacks to signal long-term commitment and instill investor trust, crypto teams leverage them to enhance token value and communicate conviction in the project’s future,” Amir Hajian, the Keyrock researcher who wrote the report, said. Token buybacks have become increasingly popular in recent months.The idea is that buybacks — paid for with fees generated from the protocol’s users — will tie the value of a token to the success of its associated DeFi protocol, regardless of how the broader crypto market trades.In other words, the more profit a protocol generates, the more it will spend buying back its token, increasing its market value.Poor use of capital? It’s not clear how effective token buybacks are, however.“Buybacks are broken, but can be improved,” Hajian said in the report, adding that many programmes overspend when prices are high and underspend in downturns, when they matter most.Buybacks can also be inefficient because they may divert funds from marketing and growth initiatives, Hajian added.It’s not just Keyrock making that case. In March, a report from crypto research firm Messari also argued that buybacks are a poor use of capital. “Our analysis finds no clear evidence that the market rewards these initiatives, as token performance remains driven by metrics growth and narrative formation,” Sunny Shi, the report’s author, said.Still, the perception that buybacks help shore up token prices is powerful. Perpetual futures exchange Hyperliquid has made token buybacks an integral part of its strategy. Many investors equate Hyperliquid’s buyback programme with the strong performance of its HYPE token, which has soared 500% since its November 2024 launch. Seeing this success, others, such as the top lending protocol Aave, are also implementing buyback programmes. Uncertain valueWhile DeFi tokens soared in 2021 as excitement around the sector peaked, many have since underperformed as the hype died down and investors began to question their high valuations. Even the tokens of successful DeFi protocols, like liquid staking protocol Lido and credit protocol Sky, are trading well below their 2021 highs, despite their revenues increasing significantly since then.“Tokens do not guarantee dividends, confer legal rights, or offer the clarity of earnings metrics,” the Keyrock report said. “The link between protocol performance and tokenholder value is therefore indirect and often uncertain.”Buybacks are an attempt to ground token valuation in something tangible, such as a percentage of the protocol’s total revenue.Despite their issues, the data shows buybacks aren’t a bad idea altogether, according to the Keyrock report.“Disciplined programmes, grounded in revenue stability, treasury strength, and valuation awareness, can reinforce alignment and credibility,” Hajian said.Tim Craig is DL News’ Edinburgh-based DeFi Correspondent. Reach out with tips at tim@dlnews.com.

Why DeFi teams dropped record $800m on ‘broken’ buyback programmes

Decentralised finance protocols are passing on revenue to holders of their tokens at a record rate as they work to earn investors’ trust, but it could be a waste of money.

That’s according to a new report from crypto market maker Keyrock, which looked at token buybacks, one of the most popular ways for protocols to tie their success to the price of the tokens they issue.

Keyrock found that the top 12 revenue-distributing protocols spent almost $800 million on token buybacks and other revenue-sharing activities in July, a more than 400% increase since the start of 2024.

“Much like public companies that use buybacks to signal long-term commitment and instill investor trust, crypto teams leverage them to enhance token value and communicate conviction in the project’s future,” Amir Hajian, the Keyrock researcher who wrote the report, said.

Token buybacks have become increasingly popular in recent months.

The idea is that buybacks — paid for with fees generated from the protocol’s users — will tie the value of a token to the success of its associated DeFi protocol, regardless of how the broader crypto market trades.

In other words, the more profit a protocol generates, the more it will spend buying back its token, increasing its market value.

Poor use of capital?

It’s not clear how effective token buybacks are, however.

“Buybacks are broken, but can be improved,” Hajian said in the report, adding that many programmes overspend when prices are high and underspend in downturns, when they matter most.

Buybacks can also be inefficient because they may divert funds from marketing and growth initiatives, Hajian added.

It’s not just Keyrock making that case. In March, a report from crypto research firm Messari also argued that buybacks are a poor use of capital.

“Our analysis finds no clear evidence that the market rewards these initiatives, as token performance remains driven by metrics growth and narrative formation,” Sunny Shi, the report’s author, said.

Still, the perception that buybacks help shore up token prices is powerful.

Perpetual futures exchange Hyperliquid has made token buybacks an integral part of its strategy. Many investors equate Hyperliquid’s buyback programme with the strong performance of its HYPE token, which has soared 500% since its November 2024 launch.

Seeing this success, others, such as the top lending protocol Aave, are also implementing buyback programmes.

Uncertain value

While DeFi tokens soared in 2021 as excitement around the sector peaked, many have since underperformed as the hype died down and investors began to question their high valuations.

Even the tokens of successful DeFi protocols, like liquid staking protocol Lido and credit protocol Sky, are trading well below their 2021 highs, despite their revenues increasing significantly since then.

“Tokens do not guarantee dividends, confer legal rights, or offer the clarity of earnings metrics,” the Keyrock report said. “The link between protocol performance and tokenholder value is therefore indirect and often uncertain.”

Buybacks are an attempt to ground token valuation in something tangible, such as a percentage of the protocol’s total revenue.

Despite their issues, the data shows buybacks aren’t a bad idea altogether, according to the Keyrock report.

“Disciplined programmes, grounded in revenue stability, treasury strength, and valuation awareness, can reinforce alignment and credibility,” Hajian said.

Tim Craig is DL News’ Edinburgh-based DeFi Correspondent. Reach out with tips at tim@dlnews.com.

Market Opportunity
DeFi Logo
DeFi Price(DEFI)
$0,000424
$0,000424$0,000424
0,00%
USD
DeFi (DEFI) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Polygon Tops RWA Rankings With $1.1B in Tokenized Assets

Polygon Tops RWA Rankings With $1.1B in Tokenized Assets

The post Polygon Tops RWA Rankings With $1.1B in Tokenized Assets appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Key Notes A new report from Dune and RWA.xyz highlights Polygon’s role in the growing RWA sector. Polygon PoS currently holds $1.13 billion in RWA Total Value Locked (TVL) across 269 assets. The network holds a 62% market share of tokenized global bonds, driven by European money market funds. The Polygon POL $0.25 24h volatility: 1.4% Market cap: $2.64 B Vol. 24h: $106.17 M network is securing a significant position in the rapidly growing tokenization space, now holding over $1.13 billion in total value locked (TVL) from Real World Assets (RWAs). This development comes as the network continues to evolve, recently deploying its major “Rio” upgrade on the Amoy testnet to enhance future scaling capabilities. This information comes from a new joint report on the state of the RWA market published on Sept. 17 by blockchain analytics firm Dune and data platform RWA.xyz. The focus on RWAs is intensifying across the industry, coinciding with events like the ongoing Real-World Asset Summit in New York. Sandeep Nailwal, CEO of the Polygon Foundation, highlighted the findings via a post on X, noting that the TVL is spread across 269 assets and 2,900 holders on the Polygon PoS chain. The Dune and https://t.co/W6WSFlHoQF report on RWA is out and it shows that RWA is happening on Polygon. Here are a few highlights: – Leading in Global Bonds: Polygon holds 62% share of tokenized global bonds (driven by Spiko’s euro MMF and Cashlink euro issues) – Spiko U.S.… — Sandeep | CEO, Polygon Foundation (※,※) (@sandeepnailwal) September 17, 2025 Key Trends From the 2025 RWA Report The joint publication, titled “RWA REPORT 2025,” offers a comprehensive look into the tokenized asset landscape, which it states has grown 224% since the start of 2024. The report identifies several key trends driving this expansion. According to…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:40
Vitalik Buterin Reveals Ethereum’s Long-Term Focus on Quantum Resistance

Vitalik Buterin Reveals Ethereum’s Long-Term Focus on Quantum Resistance

TLDR Ethereum focuses on quantum resistance to secure the blockchain’s future. Vitalik Buterin outlines Ethereum’s long-term development with security goals. Ethereum aims for improved transaction efficiency and layer-2 scalability. Ethereum maintains a strong market position with price stability above $4,000. Vitalik Buterin, the co-founder of Ethereum, has shared insights into the blockchain’s long-term development. During [...] The post Vitalik Buterin Reveals Ethereum’s Long-Term Focus on Quantum Resistance appeared first on CoinCentral.
Share
Coincentral2025/09/18 00:31
Academic Publishing and Fairness: A Game-Theoretic Model of Peer-Review Bias

Academic Publishing and Fairness: A Game-Theoretic Model of Peer-Review Bias

Exploring how biases in the peer-review system impact researchers' choices, showing how principles of fairness relate to the production of scientific knowledge based on topic importance and hardness.
Share
Hackernoon2025/09/17 23:15