Coinbase clashes with U.S. banks over federal crypto trust charter.Coinbase clashes with U.S. banks over federal crypto trust charter.

Coinbase executive slams banks’ opposition to crypto trust charter

2025/11/05 07:57
4 min read
For feedback or concerns regarding this content, please contact us at crypto.news@mexc.com

Coinbase’s Chief Legal Officer, Paul Grewal, has criticized U.S. banks for pushing back against the company’s efforts to secure a federal trust charter, accusing traditional lenders of attempting to prevent competition in the financial sector. 

The disagreement follows a letter last month from the Independent Community Bankers of America (ICBA) urging the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) to reject Coinbase’s application because it could destabilize traditional banking.

In a letter to the OCC, the ICBA states that it “strongly opposes” Coinbase’s bid to establish Coinbase National Trust Company, as it considers the crypto exchange’s model to be “untested and risky.” The group stated that the company may face challenges in crypto market downturns and lacks the same protections and oversight as traditional banks.

Coinbase said the OCC, which regulates national banks and trust companies, will determine whether it may operate under a federal charter. This change would put the digital currency exchange under direct federal oversight and expand its business by allowing it to offer custodial services, as well as trading, clearing, and settlement services.

Coinbase fires back: “Banks fear competition, not risk”

Coinbase’s CLO publicly criticized the ICBA position in a post on X. “Imagine opposing a regulated trust charter because you prefer crypto to remain unregulated,” he wrote. “That’s the ICBA’s position — another example of bank lobbyists digging regulatory moats to insulate themselves,” he said.

Grewal’s words illustrate Coinbase’s increasing impatience with what it deems unfair resistance from traditional finance. The firm says it has no intention of becoming a full-service bank, but would prefer to operate within a single federal framework to enforce better, protect, and disclose its consumer practices.

The national trust charter would ease the company’s administrative and regulatory burden across states, enabling it to bring more products to more customers. The company states that passing its proposed charter would enhance oversight of the firm’s activities by bringing it under OCC surveillance, a goal banks have long lobbied for in relation to crypto firms.

Within Coinbase, this development is viewed as a milestone toward its mission of bridging the legacy financial world with the complex crypto economy. The executives note that subjecting crypto institutions to the same level of oversight as banks currently receive will foster confidence, attract institutional investors, and reduce systemic risk.

Banks fight to keep control of the financial system

At the center of the clash is a question that could determine the future evolution of global banking: Should crypto firms be allowed to operate under essentially the same federal framework as traditional banks, or should they remain separate and closely regulated?

The banking industry holds a near monopoly on the infrastructure that enables cash to circulate, deposits to be secured, and trust in the financial system. The rise of cryptocurrency and businesses like Coinbase, which provide services such as custody, trading, and settlement, is posing a threat to some of that stranglehold. 

If Coinbase were awarded a federal trust charter, the company would have automatic access to the state, local, and tribal regulatory structure that banks use to conduct business across all 50 states. Less friction, quicker innovation, and perhaps even a new model for financial inclusion that bypasses intermediaries as we’ve traditionally known them.

However, old-school banks believe that this would establish a risky precedent. Digital-asset companies have yet to demonstrate that they can handle risks such as money laundering, cybersecurity attacks, and market fluctuations under real-world banking conditions, they say. Adding a similar federal designation for such companies could create fissures in the system that allow companies that don’t take deposits or maintain reserves to benefit from the same kind of national footprint and credibility as banks.

They have fear that transcends compliance. Crypto companies like Coinbase can already serve millions, if not tens of millions, of customers with relatively little physical infrastructure, relying solely on technology and automation, as opposed to branches or complex legacy systems. This efficiency may pose a threat to the typical business models of banks.

Claim your free seat in an exclusive crypto trading community - limited to 1,000 members.

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact crypto.news@mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

The AI Price Collapse Is the Best Case for Bitcoin You’ve Never Heard

The AI Price Collapse Is the Best Case for Bitcoin You’ve Never Heard

Chain of Thoughts — Side Episode GPT-4 cost $30 per million tokens in 2023. Today it’s $0.25. That 120x price drop is the most underrated macro argument fo
Share
Medium2026/03/16 12:59
The Hidden Layer of Digital Equity: Why Every Token Leads Back to ITL

The Hidden Layer of Digital Equity: Why Every Token Leads Back to ITL

How the InterLink Settlement Layer Functions as the Operating System of a New Digital Economy ‌ In our previous analysis, we established the fundamental
Share
Medium2026/03/16 13:27
Wormhole Jumps 11% on Revised Tokenomics and Reserve Initiative

Wormhole Jumps 11% on Revised Tokenomics and Reserve Initiative

The post Wormhole Jumps 11% on Revised Tokenomics and Reserve Initiative appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Cross-chain bridge Wormhole plans to launch a reserve funded by both on-chain and off-chain revenues. Wormhole, a cross-chain bridge connecting over 40 blockchain networks, unveiled a tokenomics overhaul on Wednesday, hinting at updated staking incentives, a strategic reserve for the W token, and a smoother unlock schedule. The price of W jumped 11% on the news to $0.096, though the token is still down 92% since its debut in April 2024. W Chart In a blog post, Wormhole said it’s planning to set up a “Wormhole Reserve” that will accumulate on-chain and off-chain revenues “to support the growth of the Wormhole ecosystem.” The protocol also said it plans to target a 4% base yield for governance stakers, replacing the current variable APY system, noting that “yield will come from a combination of the existing token supply and protocol revenues.” It’s unclear whether Wormhole will draw from the reserve to fund this target. Wormhole did not immediately respond to The Defiant’s request for comment. Wormhole emphasized that the maximum supply of 10 billion W tokens will remain the same, while large annual token unlocks will be replaced by a bi-weekly distribution beginning Oct. 3 to eliminate “moments of concentrated market pressure.” Data from CoinGecko shows there are over 4.7 billion W tokens in circulation, meaning that more than half the supply is yet to be unlocked, with portions of that supply to be released over the next 4.5 years. Source: https://thedefiant.io/news/defi/wormhole-jumps-11-on-revised-tokenomics-and-reserve-initiative
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 01:31