Rep. Jennifer A. Kiggans (R-VA) agreed with a radio host after he used a racially-charged term to attack House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries (D-NY) because heRep. Jennifer A. Kiggans (R-VA) agreed with a radio host after he used a racially-charged term to attack House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries (D-NY) because he

Virginia Republican agrees with radio host's racially-coded attack against Hakeem Jeffries

2026/05/12 05:38
2 min read
For feedback or concerns regarding this content, please contact us at crypto.news@mexc.com

Rep. Jennifer A. Kiggans (R-VA) agreed with a radio host after he used a racially-charged term to attack House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries (D-NY) because he spoke out about Virginia redistricting efforts.

Kiggans reportedly made the remarks this week during an interview with Richmond's Morning News.

Virginia Republican agrees with radio host's racially-coded attack against Hakeem Jeffries

"If Hakeem Jeffries wants to be involved in Virginia politics, then I suggest he does what a bunch of New Yorkers are doing. Leave New York, move down here to Virginia, run for office down here. You can represent us, if not, get your cotton-picking and hands off of Virginia," the show's host told Kiggans.

"That's right. Ditto, yes. Yes, to that," the Republican lawmaker replied.

The phrase "cotton-picking hands" carries deeply offensive racial connotations rooted in the history of American slavery and racial exploitation.

The term originates from the brutal reality of enslaved Black Americans forced to pick cotton on Southern plantations, work that was backbreaking, physically damaging, and performed under conditions of extreme suffering and inhumanity. When used colloquially—often in phrases like "keep your cotton-picking hands off"—the expression invokes this traumatic history, reducing Black people to the dehumanizing labor they were forced to endure and perpetuating stereotypes about Black bodies being suited only for manual servitude.

The phrase became embedded in American vernacular as a casual insult, with speakers often unaware of or indifferent to its connection to slavery and racial degradation. Critics argue that continued use of the term, even in seemingly innocuous contexts, normalizes references to slavery and keeps alive the association between Black people and exploitative labor, making it a jarring reminder of systemic racism and the lasting legacy of chattel slavery in American culture.

Market Opportunity
ConstitutionDAO Logo
ConstitutionDAO Price(PEOPLE)
$0.0068
$0.0068$0.0068
+0.66%
USD
ConstitutionDAO (PEOPLE) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact crypto.news@mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

No Chart Skills? Still Profit

No Chart Skills? Still ProfitNo Chart Skills? Still Profit

Copy top traders in 3s with auto trading!