China has ordered state-funded data centers to stop using foreign AI chips and switch to locally made ones.China has ordered state-funded data centers to stop using foreign AI chips and switch to locally made ones.

China orders state-funded projects against foreign AI chips

China has issued guidance ordering state-funded data center projects to use domestically produced artificial intelligence chips and to remove foreign chips from projects that are still in the early stages.

Lawmakers issued this order to ensure that it controls the important technology used for its major computing projects. The directive applies to AI accelerators used for model training and inference, and officials have already flagged high-end products from companies such as Nvidia, AMD, and Intel.

Beijing tells new data centers to stop using chips made by foreign companies

Chinese regulators want data centers funded by government money to use only AI chips made in the country. Centers that are less than 30% finished must also remove any foreign chips they have already installed and cancel future orders. Companies must adjust their plans, even if they have already invested in foreign chips.

However, suppose a project is over 30% complete. In that case, regulators will scrutinize it to determine if the chips can be left temporarily, especially if removing them would cause significant delays or incur high costs. However, these companies aren’t exempted permanently, as they must still switch to Chinese-made chips in the next upgrade. 

U.S. chipmakers, such as Nvidia, AMD, and Intel, will lose access to a significant portion of the Chinese market, particularly in public projects where they have sold numerous advanced chips in the past. On the other hand, companies such as Huawei and newer chip startups like Cambricon, MetaX, Moore Threads, and Enflame will profit from this new rule, as they will be the primary local suppliers. 

The U.S. and China rivalry over AI chips deepens

The U.S. government wants to prevent China from advancing its military systems and improving surveillance, so they limited the types of chips American companies can sell to the Asian country.

The U.S. knows China can build very large and powerful AI models with the right chips, so regulators said only weaker versions of Nvidia chips with the lowest speed can be shipped out of the country.

However, there is no such limitation now as the Chinese government has prohibited the use of foreign chips and is instead focusing on creating its own supply domestically.

Nvidia once controlled almost the entire market for AI training chips in China because its chips are fast, widely used, and supported by software that engineers were familiar with.

However, the chipmaker now has almost no remaining share in public projects due to the new Chinese ban on foreign chips. Switching to local chips is slow and expensive because engineers are already accustomed to Nvidia chips. Hence, they require additional training, testing, and time to rewrite programs to work smoothly on the new local hardware.

China is also struggling to make the most powerful chips because the U.S. has also blocked the Asian country from buying the most advanced machines needed to produce high-end semiconductors for the chips. Even if China develops strong chips, it will be challenging to mass-produce them at extremely high performance levels. 

At the same time, major tech companies in the U.S., such as Microsoft, Meta, Amazon, Google, and OpenAI, are building data centers using Nvidia’s most advanced chips. These giants are investing a lot of money to expand the country’s computing power and widen the gap in AI with China. 

If you're reading this, you’re already ahead. Stay there with our newsletter.

Market Opportunity
null Logo
null Price(null)
--
----
USD
null (null) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny

Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny

The post Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. The cryptocurrency world is buzzing with a recent controversy surrounding a bold OpenVPP partnership claim. This week, OpenVPP (OVPP) announced what it presented as a significant collaboration with the U.S. government in the innovative field of energy tokenization. However, this claim quickly drew the sharp eye of on-chain analyst ZachXBT, who highlighted a swift and official rebuttal that has sent ripples through the digital asset community. What Sparked the OpenVPP Partnership Claim Controversy? The core of the issue revolves around OpenVPP’s assertion of a U.S. government partnership. This kind of collaboration would typically be a monumental endorsement for any private cryptocurrency project, especially given the current regulatory climate. Such a partnership could signify a new era of mainstream adoption and legitimacy for energy tokenization initiatives. OpenVPP initially claimed cooperation with the U.S. government. This alleged partnership was said to be in the domain of energy tokenization. The announcement generated considerable interest and discussion online. ZachXBT, known for his diligent on-chain investigations, was quick to flag the development. He brought attention to the fact that U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Commissioner Hester Peirce had directly addressed the OpenVPP partnership claim. Her response, delivered within hours, was unequivocal and starkly contradicted OpenVPP’s narrative. How Did Regulatory Authorities Respond to the OpenVPP Partnership Claim? Commissioner Hester Peirce’s statement was a crucial turning point in this unfolding story. She clearly stated that the SEC, as an agency, does not engage in partnerships with private cryptocurrency projects. This response effectively dismantled the credibility of OpenVPP’s initial announcement regarding their supposed government collaboration. Peirce’s swift clarification underscores a fundamental principle of regulatory bodies: maintaining impartiality and avoiding endorsements of private entities. Her statement serves as a vital reminder to the crypto community about the official stance of government agencies concerning private ventures. Moreover, ZachXBT’s analysis…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 02:13
LMAX Group Deepens Ripple Partnership With RLUSD Collateral Rollout

LMAX Group Deepens Ripple Partnership With RLUSD Collateral Rollout

LMAX Group has revealed a multi-year partnership with Ripple to integrate traditional finance with digital asset markets. As part of the agreement, LMAX will introduce
Share
Tronweekly2026/01/16 23:00
Pastor Involved in High-Stakes Crypto Fraud

Pastor Involved in High-Stakes Crypto Fraud

A gripping tale of deception has captured the media’s spotlight, especially in foreign outlets, centering on a cryptocurrency fraud case from Denver, Colorado. Eli Regalado, a pastor, alongside his wife Kaitlyn, was convicted, but what makes this case particularly intriguing is their unconventional defense.Continue Reading:Pastor Involved in High-Stakes Crypto Fraud
Share
Coinstats2025/09/18 00:38