The post UNI Whale Liquidation Triggers 2.2% Drop Despite Recent Fee Burn Rally appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. James Ding Nov 22, 2025 03:17 Uniswap trades at $6.48 following whale’s $11.7M loss liquidation, testing technical support after 35% surge from fee burn proposal momentum fades. Quick Take • UNI trading at $6.48 (down 2.2% in 24h) • Major whale liquidation creates selling pressure after five-year holding period • Testing key support near $6.35 pivot level • Bitcoin correlation weakens as UNI shows relative strength despite broader crypto decline Market Events Driving Uniswap Price Movement The dominant narrative affecting UNI price centers on a significant whale liquidation that concluded this week. A crypto whale deposited 512,440 UNI tokens into Binance, ending a five-year holding period with an unrealized loss of $11.7 million. This substantial selling pressure represents approximately $3.3 million worth of UNI at current prices, creating immediate downward momentum for the token. However, the current UNI price movement reflects a complex interplay between bearish whale activity and bullish governance developments. Earlier this week, Uniswap’s governance proposal to implement a fee burn mechanism, including burning 100 million UNI tokens from the treasury, led to a remarkable 35% weekly surge in UNI’s price. This proposal represents a fundamental shift toward deflationary tokenomics that initially drove significant buying interest. The broader cryptocurrency market headwinds are also influencing UNI price action. Bitcoin’s decline below $90,000 for the first time since April has contributed to sector-wide selling pressure, while US stock markets experienced their fourth consecutive day of losses amid tech sector concerns. Despite these macro challenges, UNI has demonstrated relative resilience compared to many altcoins, suggesting the fee burn proposal continues to provide underlying support. UNI Technical Analysis: Consolidation Below Moving Averages Price Action Context UNI price currently trades below all major short-term moving averages, with the token sitting beneath the 7-day SMA at… The post UNI Whale Liquidation Triggers 2.2% Drop Despite Recent Fee Burn Rally appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. James Ding Nov 22, 2025 03:17 Uniswap trades at $6.48 following whale’s $11.7M loss liquidation, testing technical support after 35% surge from fee burn proposal momentum fades. Quick Take • UNI trading at $6.48 (down 2.2% in 24h) • Major whale liquidation creates selling pressure after five-year holding period • Testing key support near $6.35 pivot level • Bitcoin correlation weakens as UNI shows relative strength despite broader crypto decline Market Events Driving Uniswap Price Movement The dominant narrative affecting UNI price centers on a significant whale liquidation that concluded this week. A crypto whale deposited 512,440 UNI tokens into Binance, ending a five-year holding period with an unrealized loss of $11.7 million. This substantial selling pressure represents approximately $3.3 million worth of UNI at current prices, creating immediate downward momentum for the token. However, the current UNI price movement reflects a complex interplay between bearish whale activity and bullish governance developments. Earlier this week, Uniswap’s governance proposal to implement a fee burn mechanism, including burning 100 million UNI tokens from the treasury, led to a remarkable 35% weekly surge in UNI’s price. This proposal represents a fundamental shift toward deflationary tokenomics that initially drove significant buying interest. The broader cryptocurrency market headwinds are also influencing UNI price action. Bitcoin’s decline below $90,000 for the first time since April has contributed to sector-wide selling pressure, while US stock markets experienced their fourth consecutive day of losses amid tech sector concerns. Despite these macro challenges, UNI has demonstrated relative resilience compared to many altcoins, suggesting the fee burn proposal continues to provide underlying support. UNI Technical Analysis: Consolidation Below Moving Averages Price Action Context UNI price currently trades below all major short-term moving averages, with the token sitting beneath the 7-day SMA at…

UNI Whale Liquidation Triggers 2.2% Drop Despite Recent Fee Burn Rally



James Ding
Nov 22, 2025 03:17

Uniswap trades at $6.48 following whale’s $11.7M loss liquidation, testing technical support after 35% surge from fee burn proposal momentum fades.

Quick Take

• UNI trading at $6.48 (down 2.2% in 24h)
• Major whale liquidation creates selling pressure after five-year holding period
• Testing key support near $6.35 pivot level
• Bitcoin correlation weakens as UNI shows relative strength despite broader crypto decline

Market Events Driving Uniswap Price Movement

The dominant narrative affecting UNI price centers on a significant whale liquidation that concluded this week. A crypto whale deposited 512,440 UNI tokens into Binance, ending a five-year holding period with an unrealized loss of $11.7 million. This substantial selling pressure represents approximately $3.3 million worth of UNI at current prices, creating immediate downward momentum for the token.

However, the current UNI price movement reflects a complex interplay between bearish whale activity and bullish governance developments. Earlier this week, Uniswap’s governance proposal to implement a fee burn mechanism, including burning 100 million UNI tokens from the treasury, led to a remarkable 35% weekly surge in UNI’s price. This proposal represents a fundamental shift toward deflationary tokenomics that initially drove significant buying interest.

The broader cryptocurrency market headwinds are also influencing UNI price action. Bitcoin’s decline below $90,000 for the first time since April has contributed to sector-wide selling pressure, while US stock markets experienced their fourth consecutive day of losses amid tech sector concerns. Despite these macro challenges, UNI has demonstrated relative resilience compared to many altcoins, suggesting the fee burn proposal continues to provide underlying support.

UNI Technical Analysis: Consolidation Below Moving Averages

Price Action Context

UNI price currently trades below all major short-term moving averages, with the token sitting beneath the 7-day SMA at $6.97 and the 20-day SMA at $6.77. This positioning indicates the recent bullish momentum from the fee burn announcement is losing steam. However, UNI remains above the critical 50-day SMA at $6.67, suggesting the broader uptrend structure remains intact despite recent weakness.

The 24-hour trading range between $5.91 and $6.66 shows elevated volatility with an ATR of $0.81, reflecting the market’s uncertainty as bulls and bears battle over direction. Trading volume on Binance spot reached $74.7 million, indicating sustained institutional interest despite the price decline.

Key Technical Indicators

The RSI at 46.50 positions UNI in neutral territory, avoiding oversold conditions that might trigger immediate buying interest. The MACD histogram at -0.0757 signals bearish momentum, with the MACD line trading below its signal line. Most concerning for bulls, the Stochastic indicators show %K at 15.18 and %D at 18.48, suggesting UNI is approaching oversold levels that could either trigger a bounce or indicate further weakness ahead.

Uniswap technical analysis reveals the token is trading at 43.29% of its Bollinger Band range, positioning it closer to the lower band at $4.60 than the upper resistance at $8.94.

Critical Price Levels for Uniswap Traders

Immediate Levels (24-48 hours)

• Resistance: $6.97 (7-day moving average and recent rejection level)
• Support: $6.35 (pivot point and previous consolidation zone)

Breakout/Breakdown Scenarios

A break below the $6.35 pivot could accelerate selling toward the immediate support at $4.74, representing the lower range of recent trading activity. Conversely, reclaiming the $6.97 resistance would target the 20-day moving average at $6.77, with further upside toward $7.50 if momentum builds.

UNI Correlation Analysis

Bitcoin’s influence on UNI price has diminished significantly during this governance-driven rally period. While Bitcoin trades below $90,000 and continues declining, UNI has maintained relative strength, suggesting the fee burn proposal has created token-specific buying interest that transcends broader market sentiment.

The correlation with traditional markets appears muted, as UNI’s recent 35% surge occurred during a period when the S&P 500 experienced consecutive losses. This divergence indicates that DeFi governance developments are currently more influential than macro risk sentiment for UNI price action.

Trading Outlook: Uniswap Near-Term Prospects

Bullish Case

The fee burn proposal implementation timeline could reignite buying pressure if governance voting proceeds favorably. A successful hold above $6.35 support, combined with Bitcoin stabilization above $90,000, could trigger a retest of recent highs near $8.00. The deflationary tokenomics represent a fundamental catalyst that extends beyond short-term technical trading.

Bearish Case

Continued whale liquidations from long-term holders could overwhelm governance-driven demand. A breakdown below $6.35 support would likely accelerate toward the $4.74 level, particularly if Bitcoin continues declining and risk sentiment deteriorates further across crypto markets.

Risk Management

Given the elevated ATR of $0.81, traders should implement wider stop-losses around $5.90 for long positions. The current volatility environment suggests position sizing should account for potential 15-20% intraday swings as the market processes both governance developments and macro headwinds.

Image source: Shutterstock

Source: https://blockchain.news/news/20251122-uni-whale-liquidation-triggers-22-drop-despite-recent-fee-burn

Market Opportunity
UNISWAP Logo
UNISWAP Price(UNI)
$5.472
$5.472$5.472
-0.50%
USD
UNISWAP (UNI) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

FBI says North Korea’s Kimsuky APT uses malicious QR codes to spearphish U.S. entities

FBI says North Korea’s Kimsuky APT uses malicious QR codes to spearphish U.S. entities

The post FBI says North Korea’s Kimsuky APT uses malicious QR codes to spearphish U.S. entities appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. The FBI says Kimsuky APT, a
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/01/10 02:55
a16z targets AI and crypto after $15B fundraising year in 2025

a16z targets AI and crypto after $15B fundraising year in 2025

The post a16z targets AI and crypto after $15B fundraising year in 2025 appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Andreessen Horowitz (a16z) secured over $15 billion
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/01/10 03:13
Stablecoin Market: Urgent Warning of a Zero-Sum Future

Stablecoin Market: Urgent Warning of a Zero-Sum Future

BitcoinWorld Stablecoin Market: Urgent Warning of a Zero-Sum Future A significant warning has emerged from financial giant JPMorgan, signaling a potentially challenging future for the stablecoin market. This isn’t just a minor blip; it’s a stark reminder that the booming world of digital assets faces a critical juncture, especially for those relying on the stability of stablecoins. JPMorgan’s recent research note suggests that unless the broader cryptocurrency market expands dramatically, stablecoin issuers are heading towards a fierce ‘zero-sum game’ scenario. The Alarming Truth About the Stablecoin Market What exactly does a ‘zero-sum game’ mean for the stablecoin market? Essentially, it implies that for one stablecoin to gain market share, another must lose it. This isn’t about overall growth where everyone benefits; it’s about a fixed pie where new entrants only succeed by taking a slice from existing players. JPMorgan analysts point to a rapidly increasing number of new stablecoin projects vying for attention. Tether recently announced its unregulated stablecoin, USAT. Hyperliquid plans to launch USDH, aiming to reduce its dependence on Circle’s USDC. Even traditional fintech powerhouses like Robinhood and Revolut are developing their own stablecoins. This surge of new issuers intensifies competition significantly. While the overall stablecoin market capitalization has reached an impressive $278 billion, its share of the total crypto market has remained stagnant, averaging below 8% since 2020. This stagnation, according to JPMorgan, is a key indicator of the brewing zero-sum challenge. Why is the Stablecoin Market Becoming So Crowded? The influx of new players into the stablecoin market isn’t accidental; it’s driven by various strategic motivations. Many projects aim to gain greater control over their financial infrastructure and reduce reliance on third-party stablecoins. For instance, Hyperliquid’s move to USDH is a clear example of a platform seeking self-sufficiency and potentially lower operational costs. Furthermore, established fintech firms like Robinhood and Revolut see stablecoins as a natural extension of their existing services. They can integrate these digital assets into their platforms, offering new functionalities and potentially attracting a broader user base. However, this expansion comes with a caveat: if the overall crypto market doesn’t grow proportionally, these new offerings will merely fragment the existing demand, making profitability and widespread adoption harder to achieve for all. The core challenge remains the limited expansion of the total crypto market relative to the growing supply of stablecoins. This dynamic creates an environment where innovation must go hand-in-hand with genuine market expansion, not just internal competition. Navigating the Competitive Stablecoin Market Landscape So, what does this intense competition mean for users and the broader crypto ecosystem? For one, it could lead to increased innovation as issuers strive to differentiate their offerings through better features, lower fees, or enhanced security. However, it also presents potential risks, particularly if some stablecoins fail to gain traction or face liquidity issues in a highly competitive environment. Users should exercise caution and conduct thorough due diligence when choosing stablecoins. For existing giants like USDC, the entry of new competitors means they must continue to innovate and maintain their market leadership. Regulatory clarity also plays a crucial role here. As more entities enter the space, the demand for clear, consistent regulations will only grow, potentially shaping the future landscape of the stablecoin market significantly. Ultimately, the long-term health of the stablecoin ecosystem hinges on the ability of the entire cryptocurrency market to attract new capital and users. Without this broader expansion, JPMorgan’s warning of a zero-sum game could become a stark reality. In conclusion, JPMorgan’s recent warning serves as a potent reminder of the escalating competition within the stablecoin market. While innovation and new entrants are exciting, the core challenge lies in the stagnant growth of the broader crypto market. For stablecoins to truly thrive beyond a zero-sum dynamic, a significant influx of new capital and users into the entire cryptocurrency ecosystem is paramount. The future success of these digital anchors depends on collective market expansion, not just internal rivalry. Frequently Asked Questions About the Stablecoin Market Q1: What is a ‘zero-sum game’ in the context of the stablecoin market? A1: A ‘zero-sum game’ means that for one stablecoin to gain market share, another stablecoin must lose an equivalent amount. It implies that the overall market size for stablecoins is not growing, forcing issuers to compete for a fixed pool of users and capital. Q2: Why is JPMorgan concerned about the stablecoin market? A2: JPMorgan is concerned because despite the stablecoin market’s growth in total value, its share of the overall crypto market capitalization has stagnated. With many new entrants, they believe competition will intensify, leading to a zero-sum dynamic unless the broader crypto market significantly expands. Q3: Which new stablecoin issuers are mentioned in the warning? A3: The warning highlights new entrants such as Tether’s unregulated stablecoin USAT, Hyperliquid’s planned USDH, and stablecoins being developed by fintech firms Robinhood and Revolut. Q4: What could be the implications for users of stablecoins? A4: For users, increased competition could lead to more innovative features, potentially lower fees, and better services. However, it also means a greater need for due diligence to assess the stability and reliability of various stablecoins, especially if some struggle in a crowded market. Q5: How can the stablecoin market avoid a zero-sum outcome? A5: According to JPMorgan, avoiding a zero-sum outcome requires significant expansion of the broader cryptocurrency market. This means attracting new capital and users into the entire crypto ecosystem, thereby growing the ‘pie’ rather than just re-dividing existing slices. Did JPMorgan’s warning about the stablecoin market catch your attention? Share this crucial insight with your network and join the conversation about the future of digital assets. Your thoughts and perspectives are invaluable! To learn more about the latest stablecoin market trends, explore our article on key developments shaping stablecoin market institutional adoption. This post Stablecoin Market: Urgent Warning of a Zero-Sum Future first appeared on BitcoinWorld.
Share
Coinstats2025/09/19 15:45