The post Lazarus Group Suspected in $37M Upbit Hack Amid Naver Deal appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. The Suspect: South Korea links the $30.6M Upbit hack to North Korea’s Lazarus Group. The Timing: The breach hit 24 hours after Naver agreed to buy Upbit’s parent for $10B. The Method: Hackers likely compromised admin keys, mirroring Lazarus’s 2019 tactics. South Korean authorities have launched a high-level probe into the security breach at Upbit, with initial forensic markers pointing to North Korea’s state-sponsored Lazarus Group. The investigation has refined the scope of the damage, confirming a loss of 44.5 billion won ($30.6 million), revised down from initial estimates of $37 million following a precise valuation of the stolen Solana assets. Related: Upbit Confirms $37M Hack: Exchange Says It Will Cover Every Lost Dollar The ‘Merger Chaos’ Theory Investigators are now focused on a critical temporal anomaly: the attack commenced less than 24 hours after tech giant Naver Corp. announced a massive $10.3 billion share-swap deal to acquire Dunamu, the exchange’s parent company.  On Wednesday, Naver Financial confirmed plans to acquire Dunamu as a wholly owned subsidiary. And by Thursday morning, Upbit’s internal alarms triggered.  Related: Naver to Acquire Upbit Operator Dunamu in $10.3 Billion Stock Swap Attackers siphoned approximately $30.6 million in Solana (SOL) and ecosystem tokens including Bonk and Jupiter, exploiting the operational friction of the corporate transition. Forensic Signature: The Admin Key The attack vector bears the distinct signature of the Lazarus Group’s 2019 offensive against Upbit (which resulted in a $50 million ETH loss). Rather than a complex smart contract exploit, this appears to be an “Administrator Compromise.” Authorities reported that the latest incident showed similarities to the 2019 theft involving administrator-level compromise. According to one official, it is possible the attackers accessed or impersonated internal administrator accounts rather than breaching server infrastructure directly. This technique aligns with previous hacking patterns attributed to Lazarus, which has… The post Lazarus Group Suspected in $37M Upbit Hack Amid Naver Deal appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. The Suspect: South Korea links the $30.6M Upbit hack to North Korea’s Lazarus Group. The Timing: The breach hit 24 hours after Naver agreed to buy Upbit’s parent for $10B. The Method: Hackers likely compromised admin keys, mirroring Lazarus’s 2019 tactics. South Korean authorities have launched a high-level probe into the security breach at Upbit, with initial forensic markers pointing to North Korea’s state-sponsored Lazarus Group. The investigation has refined the scope of the damage, confirming a loss of 44.5 billion won ($30.6 million), revised down from initial estimates of $37 million following a precise valuation of the stolen Solana assets. Related: Upbit Confirms $37M Hack: Exchange Says It Will Cover Every Lost Dollar The ‘Merger Chaos’ Theory Investigators are now focused on a critical temporal anomaly: the attack commenced less than 24 hours after tech giant Naver Corp. announced a massive $10.3 billion share-swap deal to acquire Dunamu, the exchange’s parent company.  On Wednesday, Naver Financial confirmed plans to acquire Dunamu as a wholly owned subsidiary. And by Thursday morning, Upbit’s internal alarms triggered.  Related: Naver to Acquire Upbit Operator Dunamu in $10.3 Billion Stock Swap Attackers siphoned approximately $30.6 million in Solana (SOL) and ecosystem tokens including Bonk and Jupiter, exploiting the operational friction of the corporate transition. Forensic Signature: The Admin Key The attack vector bears the distinct signature of the Lazarus Group’s 2019 offensive against Upbit (which resulted in a $50 million ETH loss). Rather than a complex smart contract exploit, this appears to be an “Administrator Compromise.” Authorities reported that the latest incident showed similarities to the 2019 theft involving administrator-level compromise. According to one official, it is possible the attackers accessed or impersonated internal administrator accounts rather than breaching server infrastructure directly. This technique aligns with previous hacking patterns attributed to Lazarus, which has…

Lazarus Group Suspected in $37M Upbit Hack Amid Naver Deal

  • The Suspect: South Korea links the $30.6M Upbit hack to North Korea’s Lazarus Group.
  • The Timing: The breach hit 24 hours after Naver agreed to buy Upbit’s parent for $10B.
  • The Method: Hackers likely compromised admin keys, mirroring Lazarus’s 2019 tactics.

South Korean authorities have launched a high-level probe into the security breach at Upbit, with initial forensic markers pointing to North Korea’s state-sponsored Lazarus Group.

The investigation has refined the scope of the damage, confirming a loss of 44.5 billion won ($30.6 million), revised down from initial estimates of $37 million following a precise valuation of the stolen Solana assets.

Related: Upbit Confirms $37M Hack: Exchange Says It Will Cover Every Lost Dollar

The ‘Merger Chaos’ Theory

Investigators are now focused on a critical temporal anomaly: the attack commenced less than 24 hours after tech giant Naver Corp. announced a massive $10.3 billion share-swap deal to acquire Dunamu, the exchange’s parent company. 

On Wednesday, Naver Financial confirmed plans to acquire Dunamu as a wholly owned subsidiary. And by Thursday morning, Upbit’s internal alarms triggered. 

Related: Naver to Acquire Upbit Operator Dunamu in $10.3 Billion Stock Swap

Attackers siphoned approximately $30.6 million in Solana (SOL) and ecosystem tokens including Bonk and Jupiter, exploiting the operational friction of the corporate transition.

Forensic Signature: The Admin Key

The attack vector bears the distinct signature of the Lazarus Group’s 2019 offensive against Upbit (which resulted in a $50 million ETH loss). Rather than a complex smart contract exploit, this appears to be an “Administrator Compromise.”

Authorities reported that the latest incident showed similarities to the 2019 theft involving administrator-level compromise. According to one official, it is possible the attackers accessed or impersonated internal administrator accounts rather than breaching server infrastructure directly. This technique aligns with previous hacking patterns attributed to Lazarus, which has a documented history of targeting digital-asset platforms.

Upbit Identifies Unauthorized Solana Outflow

Dunamu, the operator of Upbit, confirmed that 44.5 billion won in Solana-affiliated digital assets were moved without authorization. However, the exchange stated that it plans to cover the full amount using its own reserves.

Upbit separately reported an outflow of 54 billion won (nearly $38 million) across multiple Solana ecosystem tokens, including Double Zero (2Z), Official Trump (TRUMP), Bonk, and Jupiter (JUP). The exchange attributed the transfers to a wallet compromise.

Following the detection of the outflow, Upbit suspended deposits and withdrawals to conduct a review of its wallets and security procedures. The exchange stated that it identified the scale of the unauthorized withdrawals immediately and would ensure no losses are passed on to customers.

Geopolitical Context: The Cash Crunch 

Analysts note that Pyongyang is facing a critical shortage of foreign currency. With international sanctions tightening, the regime has historically turned to crypto theft to fund strategic objectives. 

The complexity of the Upbit operation, moving funds through a high-throughput chain like Solana rather than Bitcoin, suggests an evolution in their money laundering capabilities, designed to outpace tracing tools before the stolen assets can be frozen.

Disclaimer: The information presented in this article is for informational and educational purposes only. The article does not constitute financial advice or advice of any kind. Coin Edition is not responsible for any losses incurred as a result of the utilization of content, products, or services mentioned. Readers are advised to exercise caution before taking any action related to the company.

Source: https://coinedition.com/upbit-hack-lazarus-group-naver-dunamu-acquisition-solana/

Market Opportunity
Nowchain Logo
Nowchain Price(NOW)
$0.00092
$0.00092$0.00092
0.00%
USD
Nowchain (NOW) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Is Hyperliquid the new frontier for innovation?

Is Hyperliquid the new frontier for innovation?

The post Is Hyperliquid the new frontier for innovation? appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. This is a segment from the 0xResearch newsletter. To read full editions, subscribe. One of the key things I like to track in crypto is a subjective criterion I call “where are new interesting developments and proposals taking place.” There are plenty of dashboards and analytics sites for this, the most popular being the Electric Capital site. The issue is that it still shows Polkadot as having a lot of developers. (At Blockworks we solved the noise problem with active users; maybe we can try the same for active developers.) Because of this noise, I prefer to track two simple observations: What is the velocity of new products launching, and how much mindshare are these products capturing? Are many people getting nerdsniped into discussing the novelties and intricacies of the chain? A related point is the caliber of people being attracted to new ecosystems. For example, over the past few years, Solana (and Ethereum) attracted the majority of talent. Talent generally goes where: It can solve interesting problems or create interesting projects. It can make a lot of money. In a podcast I did with Icebergy about a year ago, we discussed how crypto still wasn’t attracting talent at the levels AI was, despite offering faster exits and more money. AI was (and probably still is) more interesting to most talent and seen as more prestigious. After FTX, crypto lost a lot of credibility and has only recently started recovering as larger institutional players re-entered. Apart from FTX, crypto has also been criticized for being full of low-effort forks and limited utility products. This dynamic isn’t unique to crypto though. Many AI companies are also just building wrappers around GPT, which is as uninteresting as some projects in crypto. Anyway, to the point: Historically, Solana has captured the majority of…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 08:13
Stronger capital, bigger loans: Africa’s banking outlook for 2026

Stronger capital, bigger loans: Africa’s banking outlook for 2026

African banks spent 2025 consolidating, shoring up capital, tightening risk controls, and investing in digital infrastructure, following years of macroeconomic
Share
Techcabal2026/01/14 23:06
Crucial US Stock Market Update: What Wednesday’s Mixed Close Reveals

Crucial US Stock Market Update: What Wednesday’s Mixed Close Reveals

BitcoinWorld Crucial US Stock Market Update: What Wednesday’s Mixed Close Reveals The financial world often keeps us on our toes, and Wednesday was no exception. Investors watched closely as the US stock market concluded the day with a mixed performance across its major indexes. This snapshot offers a crucial glimpse into current investor sentiment and economic undercurrents, prompting many to ask: what exactly happened? Understanding the Latest US Stock Market Movements On Wednesday, the closing bell brought a varied picture for the US stock market. While some indexes celebrated gains, others registered slight declines, creating a truly mixed bag for investors. The Dow Jones Industrial Average showed resilience, climbing by a notable 0.57%. This positive movement suggests strength in some of the larger, more established companies. Conversely, the S&P 500, a broader benchmark often seen as a barometer for the overall market, experienced a modest dip of 0.1%. The technology-heavy Nasdaq Composite also saw a slight retreat, sliding by 0.33%. This particular index often reflects investor sentiment towards growth stocks and the tech sector. These divergent outcomes highlight the complex dynamics currently at play within the American economy. It’s not simply a matter of “up” or “down” for the entire US stock market; rather, it’s a nuanced landscape where different sectors and company types are responding to unique pressures and opportunities. Why Did the US Stock Market See Mixed Results? When the US stock market delivers a mixed performance, it often points to a tug-of-war between various economic factors. Several elements could have contributed to Wednesday’s varied closings. For instance, positive corporate earnings reports from certain industries might have bolstered the Dow. At the same time, concerns over inflation, interest rate policies by the Federal Reserve, or even global economic uncertainties could have pressured growth stocks, affecting the S&P 500 and Nasdaq. Key considerations often include: Economic Data: Recent reports on employment, manufacturing, or consumer spending can sway market sentiment. Corporate Announcements: Strong or weak earnings forecasts from influential companies can significantly impact their respective sectors. Interest Rate Expectations: The prospect of higher or lower interest rates directly influences borrowing costs for businesses and consumer spending, affecting future profitability. Geopolitical Events: Global tensions or trade policies can introduce uncertainty, causing investors to become more cautious. Understanding these underlying drivers is crucial for anyone trying to make sense of daily market fluctuations in the US stock market. Navigating Volatility in the US Stock Market A mixed close, while not a dramatic downturn, serves as a reminder that market volatility is a constant companion for investors. For those involved in the US stock market, particularly individuals managing their portfolios, these days underscore the importance of a well-thought-out strategy. It’s important not to react impulsively to daily movements. Instead, consider these actionable insights: Diversification: Spreading investments across different sectors and asset classes can help mitigate risk when one area underperforms. Long-Term Perspective: Focusing on long-term financial goals rather than short-term gains can help weather daily market swings. Stay Informed: Keeping abreast of economic news and company fundamentals provides context for market behavior. Consult Experts: Financial advisors can offer personalized guidance based on individual risk tolerance and objectives. Even small movements in major indexes can signal shifts that require attention, guiding future investment decisions within the dynamic US stock market. What’s Next for the US Stock Market? Looking ahead, investors will be keenly watching for further economic indicators and corporate announcements to gauge the direction of the US stock market. Upcoming inflation data, statements from the Federal Reserve, and quarterly earnings reports will likely provide more clarity. The interplay of these factors will continue to shape investor confidence and, consequently, the performance of the Dow, S&P 500, and Nasdaq. Remaining informed and adaptive will be key to understanding the market’s trajectory. Conclusion: Wednesday’s mixed close in the US stock market highlights the intricate balance of forces influencing financial markets. While the Dow showed strength, the S&P 500 and Nasdaq experienced slight declines, reflecting a nuanced economic landscape. This reminds us that understanding the ‘why’ behind these movements is as important as the movements themselves. As always, a thoughtful, informed approach remains the best strategy for navigating the complexities of the market. Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) Q1: What does a “mixed close” mean for the US stock market? A1: A mixed close indicates that while some major stock indexes advanced, others declined. It suggests that different sectors or types of companies within the US stock market are experiencing varying influences, rather than a uniform market movement. Q2: Which major indexes were affected on Wednesday? A2: On Wednesday, the Dow Jones Industrial Average gained 0.57%, while the S&P 500 edged down 0.1%, and the Nasdaq Composite slid 0.33%, illustrating the mixed performance across the US stock market. Q3: What factors contribute to a mixed stock market performance? A3: Mixed performances in the US stock market can be influenced by various factors, including specific corporate earnings, economic data releases, shifts in interest rate expectations, and broader geopolitical events that affect different market segments uniquely. Q4: How should investors react to mixed market signals? A4: Investors are generally advised to maintain a long-term perspective, diversify their portfolios, stay informed about economic news, and avoid impulsive decisions. Consulting a financial advisor can also provide personalized guidance for navigating the US stock market. Q5: What indicators should investors watch for future US stock market trends? A5: Key indicators to watch include upcoming inflation reports, statements from the Federal Reserve regarding monetary policy, and quarterly corporate earnings reports. These will offer insights into the future direction of the US stock market. Did you find this analysis of the US stock market helpful? Share this article with your network on social media to help others understand the nuances of current financial trends! To learn more about the latest stock market trends, explore our article on key developments shaping the US stock market‘s future performance. This post Crucial US Stock Market Update: What Wednesday’s Mixed Close Reveals first appeared on BitcoinWorld.
Share
Coinstats2025/09/18 05:30