The post EU Fines X $140M for Misleading Verified Badges and Data Denial appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. X’s blue checkmark system was judged a deceptive design, because it misleads users about account authenticity The social media platform didn’t create the required clear, public log of ads, as mandated by new EU rules X now has 60 working days to present a remediation plan for the blue check issue, and 90 days to address ad transparency and data access shortcomings The European Commission fined Elon Musk’s social network X €120 million (roughly $140 million) for violations of the Digital Services Act (DSA), which represents the first major enforcement under the regulation. The case centers on X’s paid blue check verification system, missing transparency around political and commercial ads, and barriers that researchers faced when they tried to study public posts. Under the DSA, regulators want people in Europe to see who paid for content, why they see it, and how platforms handle risks such as disinformation and targeted manipulation. Related: ‘Impossible to Fake Energy’: Musk Doubles Down on Bitcoin’s Intrinsic Value How X misled users with Blue Checks According to the Commission, there were several breaches involved: X’s blue checkmark (verification badge) system, where users can pay for verified” status, was judged a deceptive design because it misleads users about account authenticity. X didn’t create the required clear, public log of ads, as mandated by new EU rules. Key details like who bought an ad, what it said, and who it was shown to were often missing or hard to find. Researchers were denied adequate access to public data, such as metrics and content data. The platform’s interface and terms of service were found to impose unnecessary barriers that hindered legitimate data collection and analysis of public information. The fine is broken down into three segments: approximately €45 million for checkmark-related deception, €35 million for advertising transparency failures,… The post EU Fines X $140M for Misleading Verified Badges and Data Denial appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. X’s blue checkmark system was judged a deceptive design, because it misleads users about account authenticity The social media platform didn’t create the required clear, public log of ads, as mandated by new EU rules X now has 60 working days to present a remediation plan for the blue check issue, and 90 days to address ad transparency and data access shortcomings The European Commission fined Elon Musk’s social network X €120 million (roughly $140 million) for violations of the Digital Services Act (DSA), which represents the first major enforcement under the regulation. The case centers on X’s paid blue check verification system, missing transparency around political and commercial ads, and barriers that researchers faced when they tried to study public posts. Under the DSA, regulators want people in Europe to see who paid for content, why they see it, and how platforms handle risks such as disinformation and targeted manipulation. Related: ‘Impossible to Fake Energy’: Musk Doubles Down on Bitcoin’s Intrinsic Value How X misled users with Blue Checks According to the Commission, there were several breaches involved: X’s blue checkmark (verification badge) system, where users can pay for verified” status, was judged a deceptive design because it misleads users about account authenticity. X didn’t create the required clear, public log of ads, as mandated by new EU rules. Key details like who bought an ad, what it said, and who it was shown to were often missing or hard to find. Researchers were denied adequate access to public data, such as metrics and content data. The platform’s interface and terms of service were found to impose unnecessary barriers that hindered legitimate data collection and analysis of public information. The fine is broken down into three segments: approximately €45 million for checkmark-related deception, €35 million for advertising transparency failures,…

EU Fines X $140M for Misleading Verified Badges and Data Denial

2025/12/06 06:53
  • X’s blue checkmark system was judged a deceptive design, because it misleads users about account authenticity
  • The social media platform didn’t create the required clear, public log of ads, as mandated by new EU rules
  • X now has 60 working days to present a remediation plan for the blue check issue, and 90 days to address ad transparency and data access shortcomings

The European Commission fined Elon Musk’s social network X €120 million (roughly $140 million) for violations of the Digital Services Act (DSA), which represents the first major enforcement under the regulation.

The case centers on X’s paid blue check verification system, missing transparency around political and commercial ads, and barriers that researchers faced when they tried to study public posts. Under the DSA, regulators want people in Europe to see who paid for content, why they see it, and how platforms handle risks such as disinformation and targeted manipulation.

Related: ‘Impossible to Fake Energy’: Musk Doubles Down on Bitcoin’s Intrinsic Value

How X misled users with Blue Checks

According to the Commission, there were several breaches involved:

  • X’s blue checkmark (verification badge) system, where users can pay for verified” status, was judged a deceptive design because it misleads users about account authenticity.
  • X didn’t create the required clear, public log of ads, as mandated by new EU rules. Key details like who bought an ad, what it said, and who it was shown to were often missing or hard to find.
  • Researchers were denied adequate access to public data, such as metrics and content data. The platform’s interface and terms of service were found to impose unnecessary barriers that hindered legitimate data collection and analysis of public information.

The fine is broken down into three segments: approximately €45 million for checkmark-related deception, €35 million for advertising transparency failures, and €40 million for data access violations.

Under the DSA, penalties could have reached up to 6% of global revenue, meaning this is more of a proportionate penalty rather than a maximal one.

Henna Virkkunen, the European Commission’s Executive Vice President for tech regulation, said the fine was appropriate and not about censorship. She clarified that the purpose is not to censor but to ensure companies are more open and users are safer online.

X has yet to respond

For X, the blue check model represented a way to monetize. The social media platform now has 60 working days to present a remediation plan for the blue check issue, and 90 days to address ad transparency and data access shortcomings. If it fails, higher fines or further sanctions under DSA are possible.

Interestingly, a similar situation happened with TikTok, where the company recently avoided a fine by committing to improve its ad transparency and compliance.

All eyes are now on whether X will follow the EU’s instructions and, if so, how fast. What the company does next will show if it plans to play by the new rules or fight against them.

Related: Europe’s 10 Largest Banks Form ‘Qivalis’ to Break US Dollar’s 99% Grip on Stablecoin Market

Disclaimer: The information presented in this article is for informational and educational purposes only. The article does not constitute financial advice or advice of any kind. Coin Edition is not responsible for any losses incurred as a result of the utilization of content, products, or services mentioned. Readers are advised to exercise caution before taking any action related to the company.

Source: https://coinedition.com/eu-fines-musk-x-140m-for-misleading-verified-badges-and-data-denial/

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

When Is ‘Five Nights At Freddy’s 2’ Coming To Streaming?

When Is ‘Five Nights At Freddy’s 2’ Coming To Streaming?

The post When Is ‘Five Nights At Freddy’s 2’ Coming To Streaming? appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Mike (Josh Hutcherson) and Balloon Boy in “Five Nights at Freddy’s 2.” Universal Pictures/Ryan Green The horror thriller Five Nights at Freddy’s 2 is new in theaters. How soon will the second movie adaptation of the blockbuster video game be available to stream at home? Rated PG-13, Five Nights at Freddy’s 2 opened in theaters nationwide on Friday. The official synopsis for the film reads, “One year has passed since the supernatural nightmare at Freddy Fazbear’s Pizza. The stories about what transpired there have been twisted into a campy local legend, inspiring the town’s first-ever Fazfest. ForbesRotten Tomatoes Critics Crush ‘Five Nights At Freddy’s 2’By Tim Lammers Former security guard Mike (Josh Hutcherson) and police officer Vanessa (Elizabeth Lail) have kept the truth from Mike’s 11-year-old sister, Abby (Piper Rubio), concerning the fate of her animatronic friends. But when Abby sneaks out to reconnect with Freddy, Bonnie, Chica, and Foxy, it will set into motion a terrifying series of events, revealing dark secrets about the true origin of Freddy’s, and unleashing a long-forgotten horror hidden away for decades.” Directed by Emma Tammi, Five Nights at Freddy’s 2 also stars Theodus Crane and Matthew Lillard as William Afton, as well as the voices of Freddy Carter, Wayne Knight, Mckenna Grace and Skeet Ulrich. ForbesHow Soon Will ‘Chainsaw Man – The Movie: Reze Arc’ Arrive On Streaming?By Tim Lammers The first place Five Nights at Freddy’s 2 will be available in the home entertainment marketplace is digital streaming via premium video on demand. Generally, Five Nights at Freddy’s 2’s studio, Universal Pictures (and its subsidiary Focus Features), releases its films on digital streaming via premium video on demand anywhere from 18 days to a month after they open in theaters. For example, Universal’s crime comedy Nobody 2 opened in theaters on Aug.…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/12/06 09:55
STRF Has Performed Best During the Recent Bounce

STRF Has Performed Best During the Recent Bounce

The post STRF Has Performed Best During the Recent Bounce appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Strategy’s (MSTR) senior perpetual preferred stock, STRF, is increasingly standing out as the company’s most successful credit instrument since its launch in March. Trading at $110, STRF has risen 36% from issuance and has rebounded 20% from its Nov. 21 low of $92. That date also marked bitcoin’s local bottom near $80,000, highlighting the strong correlation between STRF and bitcoin. STRF occupies the top tier of Strategy’s preferred structure. It pays a fixed 10% annual cash dividend and features governance rights plus penalty based step ups if payments are missed. Even with its premium pricing pushing the effective yield down to about 9.03%, demand remains strong due to the security’s senior protections and long duration credit profile. In late October, executive chairman Michael Saylor highlighted a growing credit spread between STRF and the junior STRD. The spread measures the extra yield investors demand to hold higher risk junior securities, which is now at 12.5%. At the Nov. 21 low, that differential widened to an all time high of 1.5 as investors crowded into senior exposure, STRD was trading as low as $65. The spread has since normalized to around 1.3. Divergence is now visible across Strategy’s preferred suite. STRC, has seen four dividend rate increases to sustain investor interest. Strategy’s equity has also rebounded, climbing from a Dec 1 low of $155 to about $185, reflecting improved sentiment across both the company’s balance sheet and the bitcoin market since announcing a $1.44 billion cash buffer resevere for the preferred dividend payments. Source: https://www.coindesk.com/markets/2025/12/05/strf-emerges-as-strategy-s-standout-credit-instrument-after-nine-months-of-trading
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/12/06 10:11
Virginia Office Recovers $1.7M in USDT for Crypto Fraud Victims

Virginia Office Recovers $1.7M in USDT for Crypto Fraud Victims

The post Virginia Office Recovers $1.7M in USDT for Crypto Fraud Victims appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. The U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Eastern District of Virginia has recovered approximately $1.7 million in cryptocurrency from perpetrators of an investment scam, returning the funds to two victims who lost money to fraudulent trading platforms. This action highlights ongoing federal efforts to protect consumers from rising crypto fraud schemes. U.S. authorities seized 420,740 USDT and 1,249,996 BUSD, totaling around $1.7 million from three wallets. The scam involved initial contact via text or social media, followed by building trust and directing victims to fake investment sites. Federal data shows Americans lose billions yearly to crypto scams; in one year, the FBI alerted over 4,300 potential victims, preventing $285 million in losses, with 76% unaware of the fraud. Discover how US authorities recovered $1.7M in crypto from investment scams, aiding victims and combating fraud. Learn key recovery tactics and prevention tips for safer crypto investing today. What is the latest cryptocurrency recovery by US authorities in investment scams? Cryptocurrency recovery by US authorities in investment scams recently saw the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Eastern District of Virginia reclaim nearly $1.7 million from fraudsters, distributing it back to two affected individuals. The funds, consisting of seized USDT and BUSD from fraudulent wallets, underscore federal commitment to dismantling such schemes. This operation followed detailed investigations by the United States Secret Service, ensuring the assets could be legally returned. How do crypto investment scams typically operate to deceive victims? Crypto investment scams often begin with seemingly innocuous outreach, such as a text message or social media interaction that appears accidental, designed to pique curiosity and lower guards. Once engaged, scammers foster trust through consistent communication, eventually steering conversations to secure, encrypted apps to avoid detection. They promote fictitious trading platforms that mimic legitimate ones, displaying fabricated profits to encourage larger deposits; however, withdrawal…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/12/06 10:09