The post Bank of Italy Warns of Ethereum Infrastructure Collapse appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Economist Biancotti paper analyzes how an ETH price collapseThe post Bank of Italy Warns of Ethereum Infrastructure Collapse appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Economist Biancotti paper analyzes how an ETH price collapse

Bank of Italy Warns of Ethereum Infrastructure Collapse

  • Economist Biancotti paper analyzes how an ETH price collapse could spread risk across crypto markets.
  • Bank of Italy’s analysis recasts Ether not just as an investment, but as a vital piece of the Ethereum system’s inner workings.
  • The bank also warns that such an event could disrupt digital financial assets even if those assets are usually considered low-risk.

The Bank of Italy has issued a striking warning of a big collapse in the price of Ethereum (the second-largest cryptocurrency). It could transform what many view as market risk into infrastructure and financial stability risk, potentially freezing more than $800 billion worth of assets that rely on the Ethereum network.

In a research paper called “What if Ether Goes to Zero? How Market Risk Becomes Infrastructure Risk in Crypto,” economist Claudia Biancotti examines a what-if scenario where the price of ETH plummets. She studies how such a crash could spread and destabilize the broader crypto financial ecosystem.

The Bank of Italy’s analysis recasts Ether not just as an investment, but as a vital piece of the Ethereum system’s inner workings, mainly because:

  • Validators, the entities that secure Ethereum’s proof-of-stake network, earn rewards paid in ETH. If ETH’s price crashes, the real-world cash value of these payments might not cover their costs, which could lead them to shut down their operations.
  • Fewer validators would reduce the total stake securing the network, lowering the blockchain’s security and increasing its vulnerability to attacks.
  • If too many validators shut down, creating new blocks could slow or stop, preventing the Ethereum network from confirming transactions, which would leave assets on the blockchain stuck and untransferable.

Why Stablecoins and Bonds Are at Risk

The Bank of Italy warns that such an event could also disrupt digital financial assets (such as tokenized bonds, stocks, stablecoins, and other DeFi tokens) even if those assets are usually considered low-risk.

At the core of the warning is the strong link between the price of ETH, the earnings of the network’s validators, and the reliability of a blockchain that many use to settle financial transactions.

As per the report, Ethereum hosts a huge network of digital assets worth much more than ETH itself. These include widely used stablecoins like USDC and USDT for payments and trading, digitized versions of stocks, bonds, and other real-world assets, and DeFi platforms and funds locked in automated contracts.

Together, these assets are valued at over $800 billion. A collapse in ETH prices could cascade from weakened validator incentives to network instability, ultimately putting on-chain assets at risk of being locked in place.

Related: Bank of America Says Own Bitcoin, Markets Respond With Silence

Disclaimer: The information presented in this article is for informational and educational purposes only. The article does not constitute financial advice or advice of any kind. Coin Edition is not responsible for any losses incurred as a result of the utilization of content, products, or services mentioned. Readers are advised to exercise caution before taking any action related to the company.

Source: https://coinedition.com/800-billion-freeze-bank-of-italy-warns-of-ethereum-infrastructure-collapse/

Market Opportunity
Lorenzo Protocol Logo
Lorenzo Protocol Price(BANK)
$0,04596
$0,04596$0,04596
+%0,61
USD
Lorenzo Protocol (BANK) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Aave DAO to Shut Down 50% of L2s While Doubling Down on GHO

Aave DAO to Shut Down 50% of L2s While Doubling Down on GHO

The post Aave DAO to Shut Down 50% of L2s While Doubling Down on GHO appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Aave DAO is gearing up for a significant overhaul by shutting down over 50% of underperforming L2 instances. It is also restructuring its governance framework and deploying over $100 million to boost GHO. This could be a pivotal moment that propels Aave back to the forefront of on-chain lending or sparks unprecedented controversy within the DeFi community. Sponsored Sponsored ACI Proposes Shutting Down 50% of L2s The “State of the Union” report by the Aave Chan Initiative (ACI) paints a candid picture. After a turbulent period in the DeFi market and internal challenges, Aave (AAVE) now leads in key metrics: TVL, revenue, market share, and borrowing volume. Aave’s annual revenue of $130 million surpasses the combined cash reserves of its competitors. Tokenomics improvements and the AAVE token buyback program have also contributed to the ecosystem’s growth. Aave global metrics. Source: Aave However, the ACI’s report also highlights several pain points. First, regarding the Layer-2 (L2) strategy. While Aave’s L2 strategy was once a key driver of success, it is no longer fit for purpose. Over half of Aave’s instances on L2s and alt-L1s are not economically viable. Based on year-to-date data, over 86.6% of Aave’s revenue comes from the mainnet, indicating that everything else is a side quest. On this basis, ACI proposes closing underperforming networks. The DAO should invest in key networks with significant differentiators. Second, ACI is pushing for a complete overhaul of the “friendly fork” framework, as most have been unimpressive regarding TVL and revenue. In some cases, attackers have exploited them to Aave’s detriment, as seen with Spark. Sponsored Sponsored “The friendly fork model had a good intention but bad execution where the DAO was too friendly towards these forks, allowing the DAO only little upside,” the report states. Third, the instance model, once a smart…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 02:28
Academic Publishing and Fairness: A Game-Theoretic Model of Peer-Review Bias

Academic Publishing and Fairness: A Game-Theoretic Model of Peer-Review Bias

Exploring how biases in the peer-review system impact researchers' choices, showing how principles of fairness relate to the production of scientific knowledge based on topic importance and hardness.
Share
Hackernoon2025/09/17 23:15
Why Is Crypto Up Today? – January 14, 2026

Why Is Crypto Up Today? – January 14, 2026

The crypto market is up today, with the cryptocurrency market capitalisation rising by 3.6% to $3.33 trillion. At the time of writing, 95 of the top 100 coins have
Share
CryptoNews2026/01/14 20:04