AI’s mega-data centers that could reshape enterprise blockchain

This post is a guest contribution by George Siosi Samuels, managing director at Faiā. See how Faiā is committed to staying at the forefront of technological advancements here.

TL;DR: The global artificial intelligence (AI) industry is on track to spend $8 trillion on data centers over the next decade—economics that don’t work at current energy costs. But if a documented contrarian thesis about exotic energy systems proves even partly correct, the single largest barrier to enterprise blockchain adoption vanishes overnight. Meanwhile, Bitcoin’s hashrate could scale 10×, proof-of-stake loses its ESG moat, and DePIN networks explode. With this, enterprise leaders should treat this as a tail-risk scenario worth 3–7% treasury allocation now, not science fiction.

Every boardroom conversation about AI in 2025 eventually collides with the same uncomfortable truth IBM CEO (NASDAQ: IBM) Arvind Krishna laid out in early December: the global AI industry is on a path to spend roughly $8 trillion on new data centers over the next decade. At current construction and power costs, that requires ~$800 billion in annual profit just to service capital and depreciation—a figure exceeding the entire current revenue of cloud hyperscalers combined.

Enterprise leaders have accepted three mainstream explanations for this apparent insanity:

1. A winner-take-all technology arms race (U.S. vs. China)
2. A short-term bubble fueled by cheap debt and FOMO
3. A long-term bet that AI will eventually generate trillions in new GDP

There is, however, a fourth explanation—one that ties the AI buildout directly to blockchain’s oldest constraint: energy cost.

The fourth explanation: A documented contrarian thesis

The Schumer-Rounds UAP Disclosure Act, currently in amendment phase, includes provisions for eminent domain over “recovered exotic materials” and creates a legal framework for commercialization pathways. Enterprise leaders must treat this as a tail-risk scenario, not science fiction, because it’s no longer speculative.

Why enterprise blockchain leaders should care

I’ve been thinking about why this scenario matters so much for blockchain strategy—maybe it’s because the implications are structural, not speculative.

1. Energy arbitrage vanishes overnight

BTC mining’s 2025 all-in sustaining cost sits between $55,000 and $80,000 per coin, of which 70–80% is electricity. Unlimited clean energy at source collapses that cost structure toward hardware depreciation alone. BTC’s hashrate, and therefore its security budget, could scale by an order of magnitude within 2–3 years, not decades. For example, Kazakhstan’s mining exodus in 2021 proved that hashrate can migrate globally within months when economic incentives shift.

2. Proof-of-stake loses its primary moat

Ethereum and the Layer-1 cohort sold enterprise clients on “99.95% less energy” as an ESG feature. If energy becomes abundant and carbon-free at the point of generation, that relative advantage evaporates. Capital may rotate back into high-throughput PoW or hybrid systems where proven security models offer lower slashing risk.

3. Decentralized Physical Infrastructure Networks (DePIN) explode

4. Tokenized energy markets become strategic treasury assets

If commercialization occurs gradually, value will initially flow through transparent and auditable energy-trading protocols. Enterprise treasuries holding SOL, NEAR, or energy-specific DePIN tokens could capture asymmetric upside while hedging grid dependence. Solana’s DePIN ecosystem already processes 2 million transactions monthly, with $400 million in annual rewards distributed.

Illustrative scenario weighting (2026–2030)

• Weighting derived from hyperscaler capex IRR analysis, Q3 2025 earnings guidance, and classified federal R&D budget trends.

Practical takeaways for enterprise leaders

Watch three tripwires in 2026:

1. Legislative Signal: Amendments to the Schumer-Rounds Act that broaden commercialization pathways or create energy carve-outs
2. Power Purchase Anomalies: Contracts from AI data-center campuses that appear oversized even for projected AI loads (watch SEC filings from Meta, Microsoft)
3. Defense Capex Spikes: Unexplained capital expenditure increases at Lockheed Martin, Northrop Grumman, or Boeing that exceed public program budgets by >15%

Conclusion: The limiting reagent

Energy has always been blockchain‘s (perceived) limiting reagent—the constraint that determines scalability, security, and sustainability. If that reagent becomes abundant, the entire economic equation inverts.

The base case remains that Krishna is correct: we are in the largest technology bubble in history. But if the contrarian thesis is even partly correct, if those data centers are being built for a post-oil energy reality—then enterprise leaders who position modestly today will capture asymmetric returns tomorrow.

My advice? Prepare accordingly.

In order for artificial intelligence (AI) to work right within the law and thrive in the face of growing challenges, it needs to integrate an enterprise blockchain system that ensures data input quality and ownership—allowing it to keep data safe while also guaranteeing the immutability of data. Check out CoinGeek’s coverage on this emerging tech to learn more why Enterprise blockchain will be the backbone of AI.

Watch: AI Is a Must-Have for Businesses—Gabby Roxas & Rudy Guiao Jr. Explain Why