AMD vs COST Stock Comparison: Price, Growth & Valuation (2026)
Use MEXC Stock Compare for a detailed AMD vs COST analysis. Compare AMD and COST across price performance, growth, valuation, profitability and risk, based on market data and the latest reported financials.
AMD vs COST Stock Comparison Summary
AMD reported year-over-year revenue growth of 39.5%, compared with 9.2% for COST. Their P/E ratios are 159.7x and 45.0x, dividend yields are 0.00% and 0.58%, and 30-day volatility levels are 53.1% and 17.3%, respectively. These metrics highlight key differences in growth, valuation, dividend income and market risk. Overall COST leads across more of the selected comparison metrics.
Risk Disclaimer: MEXC Stock Compare provides information and comparisons on actual U.S.-listed stocks for reference only. Data may be delayed or inaccurate, does not constitute investment advice, and past performance does not guarantee future results.
AMD vs COST Stock Return Comparison (1W)
Compare the cumulative total returns of Advanced Micro Devices (AMD) and Costco Wholesale Corp. (COST) over the selected 1W period. Data as of 2026-09-25 12:00:00.
AMD vs COST Key Equity Metrics Comparison Summary
Advanced Micro Devices (AMD) has a market capitalization of $1.05T and operates in the Information Technology sector, with its main business classified under Semiconductors. Its latest quarterly revenue changed +39.5% year over year.
Costco Wholesale Corp. (COST) has a market capitalization of $397.03B and operates in the Consumer Staples sector, with its main business classified under Consumer Staples Merchandise Retail. Its latest quarterly revenue changed +9.2% year over year.
AMD vs COST Key Stock Indicators
| Comparison Metric | AMD | COST | Comparison results |
Stock Price & Returns Latest delayed stock price with 1-day, 1-month and year-to-date returns. | $644.601D: +0.2%1M: +32.3%1Y: +299.6% | $895.261D: +3.0%1M: -1.4%1Y: -5.1% | AMDWin |
Market Capitalization Total market value of the company's outstanding shares. | $1.05T | $397.03B | AMDWin |
Sector & Industry The company's market sector and primary industry classification. | Information Technology / Semiconductors | Consumer Staples / Consumer Staples Merchandise Retail | -- |
| Based on delayed market data, AMD is trading at $644.60, compared with $895.26 for COST. Their market capitalizations are $1.05T and $397.03B, respectively. AMD operates in the Information Technology sector, while COST belongs to Consumer Staples. | |||
| AMD vs COST Growth & Profitability | |||
Revenue Growth (YoY) Year-over-year change in revenue. | +39.5% | +9.2% | AMDWin |
EPS Growth (YoY) Year-over-year change in earnings per share. | +123.6% | +12.8% | AMDWin |
ROIC Return generated from invested capital. | 8.4% | 42.8% | COSTWin |
Gross Margin / Operating Margin Profitability before and after operating expenses. | 53.2% / 15.7% | 12.9% / 3.8% | AMDWin |
| On growth, AMD posted revenue growth of +39.5% and TTM EPS growth of +123.6%. COST, by comparison, posted revenue growth of +9.2% and TTM EPS growth of +12.8%.On profitability, AMD recorded a gross margin of 53.2%, an operating margin of 15.7%, and ROIC of 8.4%. For COST, the corresponding figures were 12.9%, 3.8%, and 42.8%.Overall, AMD shows stronger overall growth and profitability. | |||
| AMD vs COST Valuation & Balance Sheet | |||
Free Cash Flow Yield Free cash flow as a percentage of market capitalization. | 0.8% | 2.2% | COSTWin |
Net Debt / EBITDA Net debt relative to EBITDA; a negative value indicates net cash. | -0.3x | -0.6x | COSTWin |
Dividend Yield / Payout Ratio Dividend returns relative to share price and the share of earnings paid as dividends. | 0.00% / 0.0% | 0.58% / 26.8% | COSTWin |
| COST offers a higher free cash flow yield, indicating a less demanding valuation. COST has the stronger balance sheet, while COST provides the higher dividend yield. Overall, the two stocks differ mainly in valuation, financial strength and dividend income. | |||
| AMD vs COST Returns & Risk | |||
Total Return (Dividend-Adjusted) Cumulative return over 1, 5 and 10 years, including dividends. | 1Y: +299.6%5Y: +495.9%10Y: +10,097.9% | 1Y: -5.1%5Y: +94.4%10Y: +492.1% | AMDWin |
30-Day Realized Volatility Annualized volatility based on the past 30 days of daily returns. | 53.1% | 17.3% | COSTWin |
Beta (5Y vs S&P 500) Sensitivity to market movements; above 1 indicates greater market volatility. | 2.14 | 0.68 | COSTWin |
| AMD has delivered stronger long-term returns, but AMD also shows higher recent volatility and market sensitivity. | |||
AMD vs COST Valuation & Dividend Metrics
Review AMD compared with COST across valuation, cash flow and dividend metrics, including P/E, forward P/E, free cash flow yield and dividend yield. These figures are provided for reference only and do not represent a fair-value estimate, price target or investment recommendation.
| Metric | AMD | COST | Comparison results |
|---|---|---|---|
Market Cap | $1.05T | $397.03B | AMDWin |
P/E (TTM) | 159.7x | 45.0x | COSTWin |
P/S | 24.9x | 1.4x | COSTWin |
EV/EBITDA | 121.8x | 27.9x | COSTWin |
Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 0.58% | COSTWin |
AMD vs COST Profitability Over Time
Compare AMD and COST across gross margin and operating margin trends over time to understand how each company's profitability has changed. Based on reported financial data only; not a forecast or investment advice.
| TTM | 3Y Avg | 5Y Avg | 10Y Avg | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AMD | 49.5% | 48.3% | 47.6% | 42.0% |
| COST | 12.8% | 12.6% | 12.5% | 12.8% |
Technical & Fundamental Stock Analysis
RSI (14, daily)
AMD 74.65 • COST 37.82
Measures short-term price momentum and helps identify possible overbought or oversold conditions.
50/200-DMA Position
AMD 50D Above / 200D Above • COST 50D Below / 200D Below
Shows whether the stock is trading above or below its medium- and long-term trend lines.
R&D % of Revenue
AMD 22.7% • COST 0.0%
Shows how much of revenue is invested in research and development.
Share Count Trend (3Y)
AMD Stable • COST Stable
Shows whether the company's share count has increased or decreased over the past three years.
Company Profiles
Advanced Micro Devices
Semiconductors
Advanced Micro Devices designs a variety of digital semiconductors for markets such as PCs, gaming consoles, data centers (including artificial intelligence), industrial, and automotive applications. AMD's traditional strength was in central processing units and graphics processing units used in PCs and data centers. However, AMD is emerging as a prominent player in AI GPUs and related hardware. Additionally, the firm supplies the chips found in prominent game consoles such as the Sony PlayStation and Microsoft Xbox.
Costco Wholesale Corp.
Consumer Staples Merchandise Retail
Founded in 1983, Costco Wholesale now operates a global chain of membership-based warehouse clubs, delivering high-quality goods and services at consistently low prices. As of its most recent fiscal year, Costco operated approximately 910 warehouses, serving more than 80 million members across its three geographic segments: Costco US (approximately 73% of total revenue), Costco Canada (13%), and Costco International (14%).Costco's core value proposition—quality products at unbeatable prices—has yielded consistently strong member renewal rates (93% in the US and Canada and nearly 90% internationally). About 55% of Costco's fiscal 2025 revenue came from its grocery offerings, and another 25% from general merchandise.
Trade AMD & COST Stock Futures on MEXC
Trade USDT-margined Stock Futures referencing AMD and COST on MEXC, with 24/7 access and leverage of up to 10x. These products are derivatives, do not represent ownership of the underlying shares and involve a significant risk of loss.
Everything You Need to Know About AMD vs COST Stocks
What is MEXC Stock Compare?
MEXC Stock Compare is a side-by-side US stock comparison tool. It helps users compare two companies across stock price performance, market cap, valuation, growth, profitability, balance-sheet strength, dividends and risk. The results are provided for research purposes only and do not constitute investment advice.
Which metrics should I use to evaluate a company's growth?
Start with revenue growth to see how quickly the business is expanding, then review EPS growth to determine whether that growth is translating into higher earnings per share. Gross margin, operating margin and ROIC help assess the quality of that growth by showing profitability and capital efficiency. A company with fast revenue growth but declining margins may be expanding without improving its earnings quality.
How do AMD and COST compare in growth and profitability?
In the latest reported period, AMD recorded revenue growth of +39.5% and TTM EPS growth of +123.6%, compared with +9.2% and +12.8% for COST. AMD leads on both growth and profitability. This comparison is based on reported financial metrics and does not predict future performance.
What is the difference between P/E (TTM) and Forward P/E?
P/E (TTM) compares the current share price with actual earnings reported over the past 12 months. Forward P/E uses estimated earnings for the next 12 months, so it reflects market expectations but depends on forecasts that may change. Both ratios should be considered alongside growth, profitability and industry peers.
How do the risk profiles of AMD and COST compare?
AMD has a 30-day realized volatility of 53.1% and a five-year Beta of 2.14, compared with 17.3% and 0.68 for COST. AMD shows higher historical volatility and market sensitivity. These indicators describe historical price movements and market sensitivity, but they do not cover every source of investment risk.
What do dividend yield and payout ratio indicate?
Dividend yield shows the annual dividend relative to the current share price, while the payout ratio shows how much of a company's earnings is distributed as dividends. A higher yield may provide more income, but it can also rise because the share price has fallen. Dividend sustainability should therefore be considered together with earnings, cash flow and the payout ratio.
How should I compare a high-growth stock with a lower-valued stock?
A high-growth stock may trade at a higher valuation if investors expect its revenue and earnings to continue expanding. A lower-valued stock may offer a more conservative entry point, but the lower valuation could also reflect slower growth or higher business risk. Growth, valuation, profitability, cash flow and risk should therefore be considered together.
Which is the better stock, AMD or COST?
There is no single answer for every investor. Growth-focused investors may place greater weight on revenue growth, EPS growth and ROIC, while income-focused investors may prioritize dividend yield and payout sustainability. Investors with lower risk tolerance may focus more on volatility, Beta and balance-sheet strength. MEXC Stock Compare presents the relevant metrics but does not provide a buy or sell recommendation.
Can I trade AMD and COST as RealStocks on MEXC?
Eligible users can trade AMD and COST as real US stocks through MEXC RealStocks if both stocks are currently supported. Users must first open and verify a RealStocks account with MEXC's partner licensed broker. RealStocks represents ownership of actual shares rather than tokenized stock exposure. Availability may vary by stock and region, so users should check the corresponding RealStocks trading page before placing an order.
Disclaimer
The stock prices, financial metrics, comparison results and related information displayed on this page are sourced from third-party providers and are provided for informational and educational purposes only. Data may be delayed, incomplete or inaccurate, and MEXC does not guarantee its accuracy, completeness or timeliness. The comparisons and automated summaries do not constitute financial, investment, legal or tax advice, nor a recommendation to buy, sell or hold any security or financial product. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Users should independently verify the information and assess their own objectives, financial circumstances and risk tolerance before making any decision. Where MEXC stock futures or other derivative products are referenced, such products do not represent ownership of the underlying shares and may involve leverage and a substantial risk of loss. Product availability is subject to applicable laws and regional restrictions.