MS vs VRT Stock Comparison: Price, Growth & Valuation (2026)

Use MEXC Stock Compare for a detailed MS vs VRT analysis. Compare MS and VRT across price performance, growth, valuation, profitability and risk, based on market data and the latest reported financials.

MS vs VRT Stock Comparison Summary

MS reported year-over-year revenue growth of 14.0%, compared with 26.2% for VRT. Their P/E ratios are 15.8x and 56.3x, dividend yields are 2.20% and 0.09%, and 30-day volatility levels are 23.1% and 58.2%, respectively. These metrics highlight key differences in growth, valuation, dividend income and market risk. Overall MS leads across more of the selected comparison metrics.

Risk Disclaimer: MEXC Stock Compare provides information and comparisons on actual U.S.-listed stocks for reference only. Data may be delayed or inaccurate, does not constitute investment advice, and past performance does not guarantee future results.

MS vs VRT Stock Return Comparison (1W)

MSVRT

Compare the cumulative total returns of Morgan Stanley (MS) and Vertiv Holdings Co (VRT) over the selected 1W period. Data as of 2026-09-28 12:00:00.

MS vs VRT Key Equity Metrics Comparison Summary

Morgan Stanley (MS) has a market capitalization of $308.81B and operates in the Financials sector, with its main business classified under Investment Banking & Brokerage. Its latest quarterly revenue changed +14.0% year over year.

Vertiv Holdings Co (VRT) has a market capitalization of $95.36B and operates in the Industrials sector, with its main business classified under Electrical Components & Equipment. Its latest quarterly revenue changed +26.2% year over year.

MS vs VRT Key Stock Indicators

Comparison MetricMorgan Stanley
MS
Vertiv Holdings Co
VRT
Comparison results

Stock Price & Returns

Latest delayed stock price with 1-day, 1-month and year-to-date returns.

$195.781D: -1.2%1M: -8.8%1Y: +21.5%$247.701D: -3.2%1M: -4.6%1Y: +72.8%VRTWin

Market Capitalization

Total market value of the company's outstanding shares.

$308.81B$95.36BMSWin

Sector & Industry

The company's market sector and primary industry classification.

Financials / Investment Banking & BrokerageIndustrials / Electrical Components & Equipment--
Based on delayed market data, MS is trading at $195.78, compared with $247.70 for VRT. Their market capitalizations are $308.81B and $95.36B, respectively. MS operates in the Financials sector, while VRT belongs to Industrials.
MS vs VRT Growth & Profitability

Revenue Growth (YoY)

Year-over-year change in revenue.

+14.0%+26.2%VRTWin

EPS Growth (YoY)

Year-over-year change in earnings per share.

+40.1%+112.5%VRTWin

ROIC

Return generated from invested capital.

5.3%33.6%VRTWin

Gross Margin / Operating Margin

Profitability before and after operating expenses.

60.6% / 20.3%38.0% / 19.0%MSWin
On growth, MS posted revenue growth of +14.0% and TTM EPS growth of +40.1%. VRT, by comparison, posted revenue growth of +26.2% and TTM EPS growth of +112.5%.On profitability, MS recorded a gross margin of 60.6%, an operating margin of 20.3%, and ROIC of 5.3%. For VRT, the corresponding figures were 38.0%, 19.0%, and 33.6%.Overall, the two stocks have different strengths across growth and profitability.
MS vs VRT Valuation & Balance Sheet

Free Cash Flow Yield

Free cash flow as a percentage of market capitalization.

-6.0%3.0%VRTWin

Net Debt / EBITDA

Net debt relative to EBITDA; a negative value indicates net cash.

10.6x0.5xVRTWin

Dividend Yield / Payout Ratio

Dividend returns relative to share price and the share of earnings paid as dividends.

2.20% / 34.4%0.09% / 4.9%MSWin
VRT offers a higher free cash flow yield, indicating a less demanding valuation. VRT has the stronger balance sheet, while MS provides the higher dividend yield. Overall, the two stocks differ mainly in valuation, financial strength and dividend income.
MS vs VRT Returns & Risk

Total Return (Dividend-Adjusted)

Cumulative return over 1, 5 and 10 years, including dividends.

1Y: +21.5%5Y: +91.9%10Y: +516.3%1Y: +72.8%5Y: +946.0%10Y: +1,805.4%VRTWin

30-Day Realized Volatility

Annualized volatility based on the past 30 days of daily returns.

23.1%58.2%MSWin

Beta (5Y vs S&P 500)

Sensitivity to market movements; above 1 indicates greater market volatility.

1.162.16MSWin
VRT has delivered stronger long-term returns, but VRT also shows higher recent volatility and market sensitivity.

MS vs VRT Valuation & Dividend Metrics

Review MS compared with VRT across valuation, cash flow and dividend metrics, including P/E, forward P/E, free cash flow yield and dividend yield. These figures are provided for reference only and do not represent a fair-value estimate, price target or investment recommendation.

MetricMorgan Stanley
MS
Vertiv Holdings Co
VRT
Comparison results

Market Cap

$308.81B$95.36BMSWin

P/E (TTM)

15.8x56.3xMSWin

P/S

2.4x8.5xMSWin

EV/EBITDA

22.6x37.5xMSWin

Dividend Yield

2.20%0.09%MSWin

MS vs VRT Profitability Over Time

Compare MS and VRT across gross margin and operating margin trends over time to understand how each company's profitability has changed. Based on reported financial data only; not a forecast or investment advice.

TTM3Y Avg5Y Avg10Y Avg
MS59.0%58.5%71.0%78.3%
VRT36.3%36.0%33.4%33.4%

Technical & Fundamental Stock Analysis

RSI (14, daily)Updated as of 2026-09-28 market close

MS 31.04 • VRT 45.29

Measures short-term price momentum and helps identify possible overbought or oversold conditions.

50/200-DMA PositionUpdated as of 2026-09-28 market close

MS 50D Below / 200D Above • VRT 50D Below / 200D Below

Shows whether the stock is trading above or below its medium- and long-term trend lines.

R&D % of Revenue

MS -- • VRT 0.0%

Shows how much of revenue is invested in research and development.

Share Count Trend (3Y)

MS Decreased • VRT Increased

Shows whether the company's share count has increased or decreased over the past three years.

Company Profiles

Morgan Stanley

Investment Banking & Brokerage

Morgan Stanley is a massive global financial services firm, with offices in 42 countries and more than 82,000 employees as of year-end 2025. The firm cut its teeth in investment banking and institutional trading, where it maintains a strong presence today, but generates the lion share of its income from wealth and asset management franchises, across which it boasted $9.3 trillion in client assets at the end of 2025. After reincorporation as a bank holding company in the wake of the global financial crisis, Morgan Stanley also boasts a top 10 banking franchise by deposits, with more than $400 billion in customer deposits, predominately attributable to cash sweeps from its wealth management and brokerage businesses.

Vertiv Holdings Co

Electrical Components & Equipment

Vertiv has roots tracing back to 1946 when its founder, Ralph Liebert, developed an air-cooling system for mainframe data rooms. As computers started making their way into commercial applications in 1965, Liebert developed one of the first computer room air conditioning, or CRAC, units, enabling the precise control of temperature and humidity. The firm has slowly expanded its data center portfolio through internal product development and the acquisition of thermal and power management products like condensers, busways, and switches. Vertiv has global operations today; its products can be found in data centers in most regions throughout the world.

Trade MS & VRT Stock Futures on MEXC

Trade USDT-margined Stock Futures referencing MS and VRT on MEXC, with 24/7 access and leverage of up to 10x. These products are derivatives, do not represent ownership of the underlying shares and involve a significant risk of loss.

Everything You Need to Know About MS vs VRT Stocks

What is MEXC Stock Compare?

MEXC Stock Compare is a side-by-side US stock comparison tool. It helps users compare two companies across stock price performance, market cap, valuation, growth, profitability, balance-sheet strength, dividends and risk. The results are provided for research purposes only and do not constitute investment advice.

Which metrics should I use to evaluate a company's growth?

Start with revenue growth to see how quickly the business is expanding, then review EPS growth to determine whether that growth is translating into higher earnings per share. Gross margin, operating margin and ROIC help assess the quality of that growth by showing profitability and capital efficiency. A company with fast revenue growth but declining margins may be expanding without improving its earnings quality.

How do MS and VRT compare in growth and profitability?

In the latest reported period, MS recorded revenue growth of +14.0% and TTM EPS growth of +40.1%, compared with +26.2% and +112.5% for VRT. VRT leads on growth, while MS has stronger profitability. This comparison is based on reported financial metrics and does not predict future performance.

What is the difference between P/E (TTM) and Forward P/E?

P/E (TTM) compares the current share price with actual earnings reported over the past 12 months. Forward P/E uses estimated earnings for the next 12 months, so it reflects market expectations but depends on forecasts that may change. Both ratios should be considered alongside growth, profitability and industry peers.

How do the risk profiles of MS and VRT compare?

MS has a 30-day realized volatility of 23.1% and a five-year Beta of 1.16, compared with 58.2% and 2.16 for VRT. VRT shows higher historical volatility and market sensitivity. These indicators describe historical price movements and market sensitivity, but they do not cover every source of investment risk.

What do dividend yield and payout ratio indicate?

Dividend yield shows the annual dividend relative to the current share price, while the payout ratio shows how much of a company's earnings is distributed as dividends. A higher yield may provide more income, but it can also rise because the share price has fallen. Dividend sustainability should therefore be considered together with earnings, cash flow and the payout ratio.

How should I compare a high-growth stock with a lower-valued stock?

A high-growth stock may trade at a higher valuation if investors expect its revenue and earnings to continue expanding. A lower-valued stock may offer a more conservative entry point, but the lower valuation could also reflect slower growth or higher business risk. Growth, valuation, profitability, cash flow and risk should therefore be considered together.

Which is the better stock, MS or VRT?

There is no single answer for every investor. Growth-focused investors may place greater weight on revenue growth, EPS growth and ROIC, while income-focused investors may prioritize dividend yield and payout sustainability. Investors with lower risk tolerance may focus more on volatility, Beta and balance-sheet strength. MEXC Stock Compare presents the relevant metrics but does not provide a buy or sell recommendation.

Can I trade MS and VRT as RealStocks on MEXC?

Eligible users can trade MS and VRT as real US stocks through MEXC RealStocks if both stocks are currently supported. Users must first open and verify a RealStocks account with MEXC's partner licensed broker. RealStocks represents ownership of actual shares rather than tokenized stock exposure. Availability may vary by stock and region, so users should check the corresponding RealStocks trading page before placing an order.

Disclaimer

The stock prices, financial metrics, comparison results and related information displayed on this page are sourced from third-party providers and are provided for informational and educational purposes only. Data may be delayed, incomplete or inaccurate, and MEXC does not guarantee its accuracy, completeness or timeliness. The comparisons and automated summaries do not constitute financial, investment, legal or tax advice, nor a recommendation to buy, sell or hold any security or financial product. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Users should independently verify the information and assess their own objectives, financial circumstances and risk tolerance before making any decision. Where MEXC stock futures or other derivative products are referenced, such products do not represent ownership of the underlying shares and may involve leverage and a substantial risk of loss. Product availability is subject to applicable laws and regional restrictions.