Tata Group's 16 listed companies lost over $75 billion in market value this year, with $20 billion gone since September 19.Tata Group's 16 listed companies lost over $75 billion in market value this year, with $20 billion gone since September 19.

Tata loses $75 billion in market value after visa fees hikes and cyberattack

India’s Tata Group has seen its market value plummet by more than $75 billion this year, with recent weeks bringing especially sharp losses as the conglomerate grapples with new American visa restrictions and a damaging cyberattack on its luxury car operations.

The total market worth of the conglomerate’s 16 publicly traded companies fell to its lowest point in almost two years on Friday, according to data from Bloomberg.

More than $20 billion of this year’s decline, representing over one-fifth of the total loss, has occurred since September 19, when President Donald Trump introduced stricter rules for work visas to the United States. The changes have particularly affected Tata Consultancy Services.

Tata Consultancy Services, widely regarded as the jewel in the group’s crown and a representation of India’s technology strength, has suffered the heaviest losses.

The company’s shares dropped more than 8% last week, marking its worst weekly performance since 2020. The stock declined for five straight trading sessions alongside other major Indian tech firms Infosys and Wipro after Trump increased fees for H-1B visas.

Analysts Anurag Rana and Andrew Girard from Bloomberg Intelligence explained in a research note that these companies might avoid bidding on contracts requiring significant on-site presence in America, which could damage new contract acquisitions over the coming quarters. They noted that companies like TCS that focus purely on services face the greatest danger.

Cyberattack cripples Jaguar Land Rover

Tata Motors also took a hit following a cyberattack that paralyzed operations at Jaguar Land Rover facilities. The luxury automaker later received support from the United Kingdom government for a $2 billion loan designed to help ease financial pressure on its suppliers.

The automaker has said vehicle production at its plants will not resume until October 1 at the earliest. Reports from the BBC indicate the shutdown is costing JLR around $50 million each week in lost output, with several smaller suppliers now facing potential bankruptcy. One analyst speaking to the Financial Times estimated the total revenue loss could reach $4.7 billion if JLR remains unable to manufacture vehicles through November.

The Financial Times reported that the impact on JLR’s bottom line will be worse because the company lacked insurance protection against cyberattacks and must absorb the complete cost.

Government steps in with emergency support

Business Secretary Peter Kyle announced on September 28 that the government agreed to support Jaguar Land Rover with a guarantee expected to provide up to £1.5 billion in financing to stabilize its supply network following the cyberattack.

The loan from a commercial bank, backed by the Export Development Guarantee provided by UK Export Finance, will be paid back over five years and boost JLR’s cash reserves to help suppliers hit hard by the shutdown.

Looking at the wider Tata Group, shares of 12 out of its 16 publicly traded firms have fallen this year. Tejas Networks has seen half its value disappear, while Trent and Nelco have each dropped nearly a third.

Ties between the United States and India have gotten worse over recent months as Washington put extra tariffs on Indian goods after New Delhi kept buying Russian oil.

In India, shares of technology companies fell after the United States announced its visa fee plans for bringing new workers into the country. The changes pose a major threat to companies in the technology and finance industries that depend heavily on highly skilled workers from abroad, especially from India and China.

Don’t just read crypto news. Understand it. Subscribe to our newsletter. It's free.

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The post The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Visions of future technology are often prescient about the broad strokes while flubbing the details. The tablets in “2001: A Space Odyssey” do indeed look like iPads, but you never see the astronauts paying for subscriptions or wasting hours on Candy Crush.  Channel factories are one vision that arose early in the history of the Lightning Network to address some challenges that Lightning has faced from the beginning. Despite having grown to become Bitcoin’s most successful layer-2 scaling solution, with instant and low-fee payments, Lightning’s scale is limited by its reliance on payment channels. Although Lightning shifts most transactions off-chain, each payment channel still requires an on-chain transaction to open and (usually) another to close. As adoption grows, pressure on the blockchain grows with it. The need for a more scalable approach to managing channels is clear. Channel factories were supposed to meet this need, but where are they? In 2025, subnetworks are emerging that revive the impetus of channel factories with some new details that vastly increase their potential. They are natively interoperable with Lightning and achieve greater scale by allowing a group of participants to open a shared multisig UTXO and create multiple bilateral channels, which reduces the number of on-chain transactions and improves capital efficiency. Achieving greater scale by reducing complexity, Ark and Spark perform the same function as traditional channel factories with new designs and additional capabilities based on shared UTXOs.  Channel Factories 101 Channel factories have been around since the inception of Lightning. A factory is a multiparty contract where multiple users (not just two, as in a Dryja-Poon channel) cooperatively lock funds in a single multisig UTXO. They can open, close and update channels off-chain without updating the blockchain for each operation. Only when participants leave or the factory dissolves is an on-chain transaction…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:09
‘KPop Demon Hunters’ Gets ‘Golden’ Ticket With 2 Nominations

‘KPop Demon Hunters’ Gets ‘Golden’ Ticket With 2 Nominations

The post ‘KPop Demon Hunters’ Gets ‘Golden’ Ticket With 2 Nominations appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Mira (voice of May Hong), Rumi (Arden Cho) and Zoey (
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/01/22 23:28
Tron Founder Justin Sun Invests $8M in River’s Stablecoin Abstraction Technology

Tron Founder Justin Sun Invests $8M in River’s Stablecoin Abstraction Technology

Justin Sun commits $8 million to River for stablecoin abstraction deployment across Tron ecosystem, including SUN pools and JustLend integration, as RIVER token
Share
Coinstats2026/01/22 22:59