The post Ethereum Co-Founder Vitalik Buterin Redefines ZK and FHE Performance with ‘Efficiency Ratio’ Metric appeared first on Coinpedia Fintech News Ethereum co-founder Vitalik Buterin is calling on developers in zero-knowledge proofs (ZK) and fully homomorphic encryption (FHE) to rethink how they measure performance. Right now, many developers focus on “operations per second,” but Vitalik says that doesn’t give the full picture. He suggests using an efficiency ratio instead, this shows how much slower a computation …The post Ethereum Co-Founder Vitalik Buterin Redefines ZK and FHE Performance with ‘Efficiency Ratio’ Metric appeared first on Coinpedia Fintech News Ethereum co-founder Vitalik Buterin is calling on developers in zero-knowledge proofs (ZK) and fully homomorphic encryption (FHE) to rethink how they measure performance. Right now, many developers focus on “operations per second,” but Vitalik says that doesn’t give the full picture. He suggests using an efficiency ratio instead, this shows how much slower a computation …

Ethereum Co-Founder Vitalik Buterin Redefines ZK and FHE Performance with ‘Efficiency Ratio’ Metric

2025/10/18 20:01
Ethereum Co-Founder Vitalik Buterin Redefines ZK and FHE Performance with ‘Efficiency Ratio’ Metric

The post Ethereum Co-Founder Vitalik Buterin Redefines ZK and FHE Performance with ‘Efficiency Ratio’ Metric appeared first on Coinpedia Fintech News

Ethereum co-founder Vitalik Buterin is calling on developers in zero-knowledge proofs (ZK) and fully homomorphic encryption (FHE) to rethink how they measure performance. Right now, many developers focus on “operations per second,” but Vitalik says that doesn’t give the full picture. He suggests using an efficiency ratio instead, this shows how much slower a computation gets when it’s encrypted compared to running it normally.

Making Performance Clear

Vitalik explained on X that the efficiency ratio is easy to understand and helps developers see the real trade-offs. “You already know how long a raw computation takes, so you just multiply to get the encrypted time,” he said. This makes it more hardware-independent and practical.

He also noted that the ratio isn’t perfect, things like memory access, parallel processing, and SIMD operations can affect results. Still, he believes it’s a much better measure than just saying “we can do N operations per second,” which doesn’t tell you how efficient the encryption really is.

Experts Join the Conversation

Crypto analyst Wei Dai agreed with Vitalik and called this measurement kappa. Kappa shows the extra time needed to prove a computation cryptographically compared to running it normally. Vitalik predicted that in the future, many computations could have single-digit kappa, meaning encryption would add very little overhead. He said some operations, like Poseidon hashing, are already very efficient, which is important for quantum-resistant cryptography.

Crypto user, Lukas Helminger joined the discussion, asking how to benchmark FHE overhead for blockchain use cases, where the network and number of participants could affect performance. Vitalik clarified that FHE is mostly single-party, so the network matters little except when sending inputs or doing threshold decryption. Lukas said that for blockchain applications, assuming a small number of nodes is important, because large networks could slow things down. Vitalik added that threshold decryption should be measured using bandwidth and network latency, while raw runtime is more useful for real-world estimates.

  • Also Read :
  •   How Low Can Bitcoin, Ethereum, and XRP Prices Go? Key Targets Revealed
  •   ,

Ethereum’s Scaling Issues

Ethereum still faces challenges with efficiency. Every node currently verifies every block, which limits how much data each block can hold. Raising the gas limit could allow more transactions but also risks overloading validators, who have only a few seconds to process each block.

Meanwhile, Ethereum developer Dankrad Feist, who helped design the Danksharding system, has joined Tempo, a new Layer-1 blockchain project backed by Stripe and Paradigm. Feist is working on making networks faster and more efficient.

Why Metrics Matter

Vitalik’s push for clearer metrics is about helping developers make better decisions. By using efficiency ratios or kappa, developers can see the true cost of encryption, design faster apps, and help Ethereum scale in a balanced and reliable way. These simple measures could make a big difference in the future of crypto development.

Never Miss a Beat in the Crypto World!

Stay ahead with breaking news, expert analysis, and real-time updates on the latest trends in Bitcoin, altcoins, DeFi, NFTs, and more.

bell icon Subscribe to News

FAQs

What is a zero-knowledge proof (ZK) in cryptocurrency?

A zero-knowledge proof is a cryptographic method that allows one party to prove to another that a statement is true, without revealing any information beyond the validity of the statement itself.

What is the “efficiency ratio” Vitalik Buterin is proposing?

It’s a measure comparing how much slower a computation runs when it’s encrypted versus running normally, giving a clearer picture of cryptographic performance than raw speed.

How could new performance metrics help Ethereum scale?

Clearer metrics like the efficiency ratio help developers optimize apps and layer-2 solutions, reducing the computational burden on the main Ethereum network for faster, cheaper transactions.

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

BFX Presale Raises $7.5M as Solana Holds $243 and Avalanche Eyes $1B Treasury — Best Cryptos to Buy in 2025

BFX Presale Raises $7.5M as Solana Holds $243 and Avalanche Eyes $1B Treasury — Best Cryptos to Buy in 2025

BFX presale hits $7.5M with tokens at $0.024 and 30% bonus code BLOCK30, while Solana holds $243 and Avalanche builds a $1B treasury to attract institutions.
Share
Blockchainreporter2025/09/18 01:07
OCC Findings Suggest Major U.S. Banks Restricted Access for Digital Asset Firms Amid Debanking Probe

OCC Findings Suggest Major U.S. Banks Restricted Access for Digital Asset Firms Amid Debanking Probe

The post OCC Findings Suggest Major U.S. Banks Restricted Access for Digital Asset Firms Amid Debanking Probe appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. The Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) has confirmed that nine major U.S. banks engaged in debanking practices from 2020 to 2023, restricting access for digital asset firms and other sectors. This marks the first official acknowledgment of these policies, which limited services based on customer types, affecting crypto businesses significantly. OCC report highlights inappropriate distinctions by banks like JPMorgan Chase and Bank of America, targeting crypto and high-risk sectors. Nine banks reviewed showed similar policies restricting customer access without objective risk assessments. Impacted industries include digital asset firms, with potential referrals to the Attorney General for unlawful practices. Discover how major U.S. banks’ debanking policies hit crypto firms hard, per OCC’s 2025 report. Learn the implications for digital assets and what regulators are doing next—stay informed on banking risks today! What Are the OCC’s Findings on Banks Debanking Crypto Firms? Banks debanking crypto firms involves major financial institutions limiting or denying services to digital asset businesses based on perceived risks, as detailed in a recent Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) report. From 2020 to 2023, nine of the largest U.S. banks implemented policies that required escalated reviews or outright restrictions for certain customers, including those in the crypto sector. This practice, now publicly confirmed, underscores ongoing tensions between traditional banking and emerging digital asset industries. How Did These Debanking Practices Affect Digital Asset Companies? The OCC’s six-page report, released on Wednesday, revealed that institutions such as JPMorgan Chase, Bank of America, Citigroup, Wells Fargo, U.S. Bancorp, Capital One, PNC Financial Services Group, Toronto-Dominion Bank, and Bank of Montreal made distinctions among customers that were deemed inappropriate. For digital asset firms, this meant heightened scrutiny or complete denial of banking services, hindering operations in an already volatile market. The regulator noted that these policies spanned…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/12/11 11:01