With $35 million in funding, led by veteran VCs like PolyChain and Framework, Allora has been performing incredibly well recently. I've seen many people call it a "prediction market." Wrong. Let me share my understanding of this project: 1) To be precise, Allora is a decentralized AI reasoning service platform. Users can pay for AI agents to provide services for any needs requiring AI judgment, including price prediction, strategy optimization, and risk assessment. Therefore, the prediction market is only one application scenario of Allora, not the only one. 2) Given the inherently uneven inference and output capabilities of AI models, how can Allora become a mature upstream supplier of mass output? The answer lies in building an aggregation platform that leverages the collective power and competitive collaboration of AI models. The mechanism is straightforward. For example, if a user wants to predict whether ETH will rise or fall and decide how to set the LP price range, the traditional approach involves observing K-line charts, listening to key opinion leaders (KOLs) analysis, or purchasing customized AI model APIs for predictions, which often yield a variety of inconsistent answers. Is it possible to develop an aggregated inference service platform that can handle this comparative screening process? The key lies here. After the user sends the demand to Allora, the 280,000 nodes in the network architecture will compete to give answers. Some say it will rise, some say it will fall, and some say it will go sideways. Allora will vote for these models and record historical performance reports. It will give higher weight to AI models with a high prediction success rate and send token rewards. At the same time, it will deduct points and deposits from those who make blind guesses. This creates a positive flywheel: models with accurate predictions earn more, gain increasing weight, and take on more tasks; those that keep guessing are eliminated. 3) Therefore, I prefer Allora as the infrastructure layer for AI inference services, with the ability to call AI model combinations on demand. There are two main application scenarios: DeFAI: When the AI Agent executes on-chain transactions, it needs to determine whether a transaction is MEV, provide the optimal price range in real time when adjusting Uniswap LP, determine whether AAVE has liquidation risks, and how the Yield pool dynamically adjusts the leverage ratio, etc. Prediction market: Use AI models to dynamically adjust and update probabilities. Compared with the pricing mechanism based solely on trading volume, AI's aggregate reasoning can provide users with a smarter prediction starting point, avoiding pure follow-the-crowd. However, Allora is essentially just an infrastructure service facility. In the early stages, when there are few models, little data, and insufficient accuracy, it will also go through a long period of accumulating energy. However, if DeFAi and prediction markets, two promising markets, can become mainstream in the future, the value of its infrastructure services will be highlighted.With $35 million in funding, led by veteran VCs like PolyChain and Framework, Allora has been performing incredibly well recently. I've seen many people call it a "prediction market." Wrong. Let me share my understanding of this project: 1) To be precise, Allora is a decentralized AI reasoning service platform. Users can pay for AI agents to provide services for any needs requiring AI judgment, including price prediction, strategy optimization, and risk assessment. Therefore, the prediction market is only one application scenario of Allora, not the only one. 2) Given the inherently uneven inference and output capabilities of AI models, how can Allora become a mature upstream supplier of mass output? The answer lies in building an aggregation platform that leverages the collective power and competitive collaboration of AI models. The mechanism is straightforward. For example, if a user wants to predict whether ETH will rise or fall and decide how to set the LP price range, the traditional approach involves observing K-line charts, listening to key opinion leaders (KOLs) analysis, or purchasing customized AI model APIs for predictions, which often yield a variety of inconsistent answers. Is it possible to develop an aggregated inference service platform that can handle this comparative screening process? The key lies here. After the user sends the demand to Allora, the 280,000 nodes in the network architecture will compete to give answers. Some say it will rise, some say it will fall, and some say it will go sideways. Allora will vote for these models and record historical performance reports. It will give higher weight to AI models with a high prediction success rate and send token rewards. At the same time, it will deduct points and deposits from those who make blind guesses. This creates a positive flywheel: models with accurate predictions earn more, gain increasing weight, and take on more tasks; those that keep guessing are eliminated. 3) Therefore, I prefer Allora as the infrastructure layer for AI inference services, with the ability to call AI model combinations on demand. There are two main application scenarios: DeFAI: When the AI Agent executes on-chain transactions, it needs to determine whether a transaction is MEV, provide the optimal price range in real time when adjusting Uniswap LP, determine whether AAVE has liquidation risks, and how the Yield pool dynamically adjusts the leverage ratio, etc. Prediction market: Use AI models to dynamically adjust and update probabilities. Compared with the pricing mechanism based solely on trading volume, AI's aggregate reasoning can provide users with a smarter prediction starting point, avoiding pure follow-the-crowd. However, Allora is essentially just an infrastructure service facility. In the early stages, when there are few models, little data, and insufficient accuracy, it will also go through a long period of accumulating energy. However, if DeFAi and prediction markets, two promising markets, can become mainstream in the future, the value of its infrastructure services will be highlighted.

PolyChain leads the investment. How does Allora use the "model flywheel" to reshape AI reasoning services?

2025/10/21 09:00

With $35 million in funding, led by veteran VCs like PolyChain and Framework, Allora has been performing incredibly well recently. I've seen many people call it a "prediction market." Wrong. Let me share my understanding of this project:

1) To be precise, Allora is a decentralized AI reasoning service platform. Users can pay for AI agents to provide services for any needs requiring AI judgment, including price prediction, strategy optimization, and risk assessment. Therefore, the prediction market is only one application scenario of Allora, not the only one.

2) Given the inherently uneven inference and output capabilities of AI models, how can Allora become a mature upstream supplier of mass output? The answer lies in building an aggregation platform that leverages the collective power and competitive collaboration of AI models.

The mechanism is straightforward. For example, if a user wants to predict whether ETH will rise or fall and decide how to set the LP price range, the traditional approach involves observing K-line charts, listening to key opinion leaders (KOLs) analysis, or purchasing customized AI model APIs for predictions, which often yield a variety of inconsistent answers. Is it possible to develop an aggregated inference service platform that can handle this comparative screening process?

The key lies here. After the user sends the demand to Allora, the 280,000 nodes in the network architecture will compete to give answers. Some say it will rise, some say it will fall, and some say it will go sideways. Allora will vote for these models and record historical performance reports. It will give higher weight to AI models with a high prediction success rate and send token rewards. At the same time, it will deduct points and deposits from those who make blind guesses.

This creates a positive flywheel: models with accurate predictions earn more, gain increasing weight, and take on more tasks; those that keep guessing are eliminated.

3) Therefore, I prefer Allora as the infrastructure layer for AI inference services, with the ability to call AI model combinations on demand. There are two main application scenarios:

DeFAI: When the AI Agent executes on-chain transactions, it needs to determine whether a transaction is MEV, provide the optimal price range in real time when adjusting Uniswap LP, determine whether AAVE has liquidation risks, and how the Yield pool dynamically adjusts the leverage ratio, etc.

Prediction market: Use AI models to dynamically adjust and update probabilities. Compared with the pricing mechanism based solely on trading volume, AI's aggregate reasoning can provide users with a smarter prediction starting point, avoiding pure follow-the-crowd.

However, Allora is essentially just an infrastructure service facility. In the early stages, when there are few models, little data, and insufficient accuracy, it will also go through a long period of accumulating energy.

However, if DeFAi and prediction markets, two promising markets, can become mainstream in the future, the value of its infrastructure services will be highlighted.

Market Opportunity
null Logo
null Price(null)
--
----
USD
null (null) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

XRP Price Prediction  — Recovery on Thin Ice as Ripple’s Global License Count Soars Past 75

XRP Price Prediction — Recovery on Thin Ice as Ripple’s Global License Count Soars Past 75

XRP Recovery Hits Resistance: $1.95 Breakout Needed to Reignite Bullish MomentumAccording to market analyst HolderStat, XRP’s rebound is at a pivotal juncture,
Share
Coinstats2026/01/24 15:11
House Judiciary Rejects Vote To Subpoena Banks CEOs For Epstein Case

House Judiciary Rejects Vote To Subpoena Banks CEOs For Epstein Case

The post House Judiciary Rejects Vote To Subpoena Banks CEOs For Epstein Case appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Topline House Judiciary Committee Republicans blocked a Democrat effort Wednesday to subpoena a group of major banks as part of a renewed investigation into late sex offender Jeffrey Epstein’s financial ties. Congressman Jim Jordan, R-OH, is the chairman of the committee. (Photo by Nathan Posner/Anadolu via Getty Images) Anadolu via Getty Images Key Facts A near party-line vote squashed the effort to vote on a subpoena, with Rep. Thomas Massie, R-Ky., who is leading a separate effort to force the Justice Department to release more Epstein case materials, voting alongside Democrats. The vote, if successful, would have resulted in the issuing of subpoenas to JPMorgan Chase CEO Jamie Dimon, Bank of America CEO Brian Moynihan, Deutsche Bank CEO Christian Sewing and Bank of New York Mellon CEO Robin Vince. The subpoenas would have specifically looked into multiple reports that claimed the four banks flagged $1.5 billion in suspicious transactions linked to Epstein. The failed effort from Democrats followed an FBI oversight hearing in which agency director Kash Patel misleadingly claimed the FBI cannot release many of the files it has on Epstein. Get Forbes Breaking News Text Alerts: We’re launching text message alerts so you’ll always know the biggest stories shaping the day’s headlines. Text “Alerts” to (201) 335-0739 or sign up here. Crucial Quote Dimon, who attended a lunch with Senate Republicans before the vote, according to Politico, told reporters, “We regret any association with that man at all. And, of course, if it’s a legal requirement, we would conform to it. We have no issue with that.” Chief Critic “Republicans had the chance to subpoena the CEOs of JPMorgan, Bank of America, Deutsche Bank, and Bank of New York Mellon to expose Epstein’s money trail,” the House Judiciary Democrats said in a tweet. “Instead, they tried to bury…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 08:02
Surprising February Gains Elevate Shiba Inu Over Dogecoin in Meme Coin Arena

Surprising February Gains Elevate Shiba Inu Over Dogecoin in Meme Coin Arena

The post Surprising February Gains Elevate Shiba Inu Over Dogecoin in Meme Coin Arena appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. In a twist of expectations within the
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/01/24 16:30