The post Why Bitcoin Keeps Falling When NASDAQ Recovers appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Bitcoin The recent price turmoil in Bitcoin has triggered frustration for some and fascination for others – and analyst Jeff Sica says both reactions prove why Bitcoin isn’t a casual investment. Key Takeaways: Bitcoin’s volatility shows the asset isn’t suitable for every type of investor. Its weak rebound compared with the NASDAQ suggests the market could be approaching a bottom. Institutional involvement through ETFs and leverage has intensified price swings rather than reducing them. Despite turbulence, Bitcoin is still viewed as a long-term fixture in global markets.  Instead of focusing on the price level itself, Sica argues that the emotional chaos around the chart exposes whether someone actually understands the nature of the asset. According to him, people forgot that Bitcoin can go months looking unstoppable and then erase a significant portion of gains in only a few sessions. That whiplash effect, he says, should never surprise anyone who chooses to be involved. “It’s like keeping an exotic predator for a pet,” Sica said – not because Bitcoin is destined to destroy portfolios, but because taming it is impossible, and anyone who believes otherwise eventually gets bitten. A Familiar Pattern: Tech Stocks Down, Bitcoin Down – Tech Stocks Up, Bitcoin Barely Moves Sica’s latest analysis doesn’t focus on support levels, RSI readings or liquidation spikes. His attention is on something much simpler: Bitcoin’s behavior relative to the NASDAQ. He notes that when the NASDAQ slides, Bitcoin mirrors it almost instantly. But when the tech index bounces, Bitcoin’s recovery is slow and incomplete. Historically, he said, that pattern appears near market bottoms, not the beginning of deeper crashes – although timing remains unpredictable. Wall Street Exposure Comes With a Price Institutional involvement was supposed to bring stability. Sica thinks the opposite has happened. ETFs and leveraged products allowed large capital to… The post Why Bitcoin Keeps Falling When NASDAQ Recovers appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Bitcoin The recent price turmoil in Bitcoin has triggered frustration for some and fascination for others – and analyst Jeff Sica says both reactions prove why Bitcoin isn’t a casual investment. Key Takeaways: Bitcoin’s volatility shows the asset isn’t suitable for every type of investor. Its weak rebound compared with the NASDAQ suggests the market could be approaching a bottom. Institutional involvement through ETFs and leverage has intensified price swings rather than reducing them. Despite turbulence, Bitcoin is still viewed as a long-term fixture in global markets.  Instead of focusing on the price level itself, Sica argues that the emotional chaos around the chart exposes whether someone actually understands the nature of the asset. According to him, people forgot that Bitcoin can go months looking unstoppable and then erase a significant portion of gains in only a few sessions. That whiplash effect, he says, should never surprise anyone who chooses to be involved. “It’s like keeping an exotic predator for a pet,” Sica said – not because Bitcoin is destined to destroy portfolios, but because taming it is impossible, and anyone who believes otherwise eventually gets bitten. A Familiar Pattern: Tech Stocks Down, Bitcoin Down – Tech Stocks Up, Bitcoin Barely Moves Sica’s latest analysis doesn’t focus on support levels, RSI readings or liquidation spikes. His attention is on something much simpler: Bitcoin’s behavior relative to the NASDAQ. He notes that when the NASDAQ slides, Bitcoin mirrors it almost instantly. But when the tech index bounces, Bitcoin’s recovery is slow and incomplete. Historically, he said, that pattern appears near market bottoms, not the beginning of deeper crashes – although timing remains unpredictable. Wall Street Exposure Comes With a Price Institutional involvement was supposed to bring stability. Sica thinks the opposite has happened. ETFs and leveraged products allowed large capital to…

Why Bitcoin Keeps Falling When NASDAQ Recovers

Bitcoin

The recent price turmoil in Bitcoin has triggered frustration for some and fascination for others – and analyst Jeff Sica says both reactions prove why Bitcoin isn’t a casual investment.

Key Takeaways:

  • Bitcoin’s volatility shows the asset isn’t suitable for every type of investor.
  • Its weak rebound compared with the NASDAQ suggests the market could be approaching a bottom.
  • Institutional involvement through ETFs and leverage has intensified price swings rather than reducing them.
  • Despite turbulence, Bitcoin is still viewed as a long-term fixture in global markets. 

Instead of focusing on the price level itself, Sica argues that the emotional chaos around the chart exposes whether someone actually understands the nature of the asset.

According to him, people forgot that Bitcoin can go months looking unstoppable and then erase a significant portion of gains in only a few sessions. That whiplash effect, he says, should never surprise anyone who chooses to be involved.

“It’s like keeping an exotic predator for a pet,” Sica said – not because Bitcoin is destined to destroy portfolios, but because taming it is impossible, and anyone who believes otherwise eventually gets bitten.

A Familiar Pattern: Tech Stocks Down, Bitcoin Down – Tech Stocks Up, Bitcoin Barely Moves

Sica’s latest analysis doesn’t focus on support levels, RSI readings or liquidation spikes. His attention is on something much simpler: Bitcoin’s behavior relative to the NASDAQ.

He notes that when the NASDAQ slides, Bitcoin mirrors it almost instantly. But when the tech index bounces, Bitcoin’s recovery is slow and incomplete. Historically, he said, that pattern appears near market bottoms, not the beginning of deeper crashes – although timing remains unpredictable.

Wall Street Exposure Comes With a Price

Institutional involvement was supposed to bring stability. Sica thinks the opposite has happened. ETFs and leveraged products allowed large capital to flow in rapidly, which means it can exit just as rapidly, intensifying every shock.

He’s not telling traders to jump in – or run away. His message is simply that not everyone should be here. Bitcoin, especially at these volatility levels, is only for people who can psychologically and financially withstand huge swings without panicking.

Survival, Not Smoothness, Defines Bitcoin’s Legacy

Despite all the warnings, Sica remains convinced that Bitcoin isn’t a temporary experiment. He points to its market value approaching gold’s as proof that the asset has staying power, even if its path to maturity is violent and uncomfortable.

From his perspective, every cycle ends the same way: new investors learn how dangerous Bitcoin can be, the impatient exit the market, and long-term believers stay to see another uptrend emerge.


The information provided in this article is for educational purposes only and does not constitute financial, investment, or trading advice. Coindoo.com does not endorse or recommend any specific investment strategy or cryptocurrency. Always conduct your own research and consult with a licensed financial advisor before making any investment decisions.

Author

Alex is an experienced financial journalist and cryptocurrency enthusiast. With over 8 years of experience covering the crypto, blockchain, and fintech industries, he is well-versed in the complex and ever-evolving world of digital assets. His insightful and thought-provoking articles provide readers with a clear picture of the latest developments and trends in the market. His approach allows him to break down complex ideas into accessible and in-depth content. Follow his publications to stay up to date with the most important trends and topics.

Next article

Source: https://coindoo.com/why-bitcoin-keeps-falling-when-nasdaq-recovers-and-what-it-really-means/

Market Opportunity
WHY Logo
WHY Price(WHY)
$0.0000000165
$0.0000000165$0.0000000165
0.00%
USD
WHY (WHY) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny

Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny

The post Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. The cryptocurrency world is buzzing with a recent controversy surrounding a bold OpenVPP partnership claim. This week, OpenVPP (OVPP) announced what it presented as a significant collaboration with the U.S. government in the innovative field of energy tokenization. However, this claim quickly drew the sharp eye of on-chain analyst ZachXBT, who highlighted a swift and official rebuttal that has sent ripples through the digital asset community. What Sparked the OpenVPP Partnership Claim Controversy? The core of the issue revolves around OpenVPP’s assertion of a U.S. government partnership. This kind of collaboration would typically be a monumental endorsement for any private cryptocurrency project, especially given the current regulatory climate. Such a partnership could signify a new era of mainstream adoption and legitimacy for energy tokenization initiatives. OpenVPP initially claimed cooperation with the U.S. government. This alleged partnership was said to be in the domain of energy tokenization. The announcement generated considerable interest and discussion online. ZachXBT, known for his diligent on-chain investigations, was quick to flag the development. He brought attention to the fact that U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Commissioner Hester Peirce had directly addressed the OpenVPP partnership claim. Her response, delivered within hours, was unequivocal and starkly contradicted OpenVPP’s narrative. How Did Regulatory Authorities Respond to the OpenVPP Partnership Claim? Commissioner Hester Peirce’s statement was a crucial turning point in this unfolding story. She clearly stated that the SEC, as an agency, does not engage in partnerships with private cryptocurrency projects. This response effectively dismantled the credibility of OpenVPP’s initial announcement regarding their supposed government collaboration. Peirce’s swift clarification underscores a fundamental principle of regulatory bodies: maintaining impartiality and avoiding endorsements of private entities. Her statement serves as a vital reminder to the crypto community about the official stance of government agencies concerning private ventures. Moreover, ZachXBT’s analysis…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 02:13
Coinbase Joins Ethereum Foundation to Back Open Intents Framework

Coinbase Joins Ethereum Foundation to Back Open Intents Framework

Coinbase Payments has joined the Open Intents Framework as a core contributor, working alongside Ethereum Foundation and other major players. The initiative aims to simplify complex multi-chain interactions through automated solver technology. The post Coinbase Joins Ethereum Foundation to Back Open Intents Framework appeared first on Coinspeaker.
Share
Coinspeaker2025/09/18 02:43
Unleashing A New Era Of Seller Empowerment

Unleashing A New Era Of Seller Empowerment

The post Unleashing A New Era Of Seller Empowerment appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Amazon AI Agent: Unleashing A New Era Of Seller Empowerment Skip to content Home AI News Amazon AI Agent: Unleashing a New Era of Seller Empowerment Source: https://bitcoinworld.co.in/amazon-ai-seller-tools/
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:10