TLDR MSCI is consulting on excluding companies with crypto holdings over 50% of total assets from its indices, with a decision due January 15, 2026 JPMorgan analysts estimate Strategy could face $2.8 billion in outflows if removed from MSCI indices, and $8.8 billion total if other index providers follow About $9 billion of Strategy’s $50 [...] The post MSCI Threatens to Boot Strategy and 38 Crypto Companies From Major Indices appeared first on CoinCentral.TLDR MSCI is consulting on excluding companies with crypto holdings over 50% of total assets from its indices, with a decision due January 15, 2026 JPMorgan analysts estimate Strategy could face $2.8 billion in outflows if removed from MSCI indices, and $8.8 billion total if other index providers follow About $9 billion of Strategy’s $50 [...] The post MSCI Threatens to Boot Strategy and 38 Crypto Companies From Major Indices appeared first on CoinCentral.

MSCI Threatens to Boot Strategy and 38 Crypto Companies From Major Indices

2025/11/21 15:34
4 min read
For feedback or concerns regarding this content, please contact us at crypto.news@mexc.com

TLDR

  • MSCI is consulting on excluding companies with crypto holdings over 50% of total assets from its indices, with a decision due January 15, 2026
  • JPMorgan analysts estimate Strategy could face $2.8 billion in outflows if removed from MSCI indices, and $8.8 billion total if other index providers follow
  • About $9 billion of Strategy’s $50 billion market value currently sits in passive index-tracking funds
  • At least 38 crypto companies are on MSCI’s preliminary list, including Strategy, Riot Platforms, and Marathon Digital Holdings
  • Any changes would take effect during the February 2026 index review

Meta Description: MSCI considers excluding Strategy and other crypto treasury companies from indices. JPMorgan warns of $11.6B in potential outflows. Decision due Jan 15.

MSCI announced in October it is consulting with the investment community about excluding Bitcoin and digital asset treasury companies from its indices. The consultation targets companies with balance sheets containing more than 50% crypto assets.

The index provider stated that some feedback indicates these companies exhibit characteristics similar to investment funds. Investment funds are currently not eligible for index inclusion under MSCI rules.

JPMorgan analysts led by Nikolaos Panigirtzoglou released a report warning of the potential impact on Strategy, formerly known as MicroStrategy. The analysts estimate approximately $9 billion of Strategy’s $50 billion market value sits in passive funds tracking MSCI indices.

If MSCI removes Strategy from its indices, passive index-tracking funds would be required to sell their holdings. The analysts calculate this could result in $2.8 billion in outflows from MSCI-tracked funds alone.

The impact could extend further if other index providers follow MSCI’s lead. JPMorgan estimates total outflows could reach $11.6 billion if all index providers adopt similar exclusion criteria.

Strategy currently appears in major indices including the Nasdaq-100, MSCI USA, and MSCI World. This inclusion has allowed bitcoin exposure to enter retail and institutional portfolios through passive investment vehicles.

Charlie Sherry, Head of Finance at Australian crypto exchange BTC Markets, told Cointelegraph the odds favor MSCI excluding these companies. He noted MSCI typically only consults on changes when already leaning toward implementation.

Impact on Company Valuation

The JPMorgan analysts noted Strategy’s share price has fallen more than bitcoin in recent months. The company’s valuation premium has compressed as investors question its sustainability.

The analysts stated that Strategy’s ratio of total market value to its bitcoin holdings has fallen to its lowest level since the pandemic. An MSCI exclusion would push this ratio closer to 1, effectively valuing the company primarily as a bitcoin holding vehicle.

Active fund managers are not required to mirror index changes. However, the analysts said removal would signal concerns about Strategy’s ability to raise capital in the future.

Timeline and Scope

The consultation period runs through December 31, 2025. MSCI will announce its decision on January 15, 2026.

If MSCI proceeds with the exclusion, changes would take effect during the February 2026 index review. Index-tracking funds would need to adjust their holdings accordingly.

MSCI’s preliminary list identifies 38 crypto companies that could be affected. The list includes Strategy, Sharplink Gaming, Riot Platforms, and Marathon Digital Holdings.

The index provider is also seeking input on additional parameters. These include whether a company defines itself as a digital asset treasury or has raised capital primarily to accumulate crypto.

Sherry said the decision reflects a shift in how the market views crypto-heavy corporate strategies. When most company value comes from balance sheet assets rather than business operations, MSCI views this as outside traditional equity benchmarks.

The consultation asks whether companies holding crypto assets primarily on their balance sheets should remain in equity indices. MSCI designed this as a risk-management decision to keep indexes aligned with business fundamentals.

The post MSCI Threatens to Boot Strategy and 38 Crypto Companies From Major Indices appeared first on CoinCentral.

Market Opportunity
Major Logo
Major Price(MAJOR)
$0.06262
$0.06262$0.06262
+0.82%
USD
Major (MAJOR) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact crypto.news@mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The post The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Visions of future technology are often prescient about the broad strokes while flubbing the details. The tablets in “2001: A Space Odyssey” do indeed look like iPads, but you never see the astronauts paying for subscriptions or wasting hours on Candy Crush.  Channel factories are one vision that arose early in the history of the Lightning Network to address some challenges that Lightning has faced from the beginning. Despite having grown to become Bitcoin’s most successful layer-2 scaling solution, with instant and low-fee payments, Lightning’s scale is limited by its reliance on payment channels. Although Lightning shifts most transactions off-chain, each payment channel still requires an on-chain transaction to open and (usually) another to close. As adoption grows, pressure on the blockchain grows with it. The need for a more scalable approach to managing channels is clear. Channel factories were supposed to meet this need, but where are they? In 2025, subnetworks are emerging that revive the impetus of channel factories with some new details that vastly increase their potential. They are natively interoperable with Lightning and achieve greater scale by allowing a group of participants to open a shared multisig UTXO and create multiple bilateral channels, which reduces the number of on-chain transactions and improves capital efficiency. Achieving greater scale by reducing complexity, Ark and Spark perform the same function as traditional channel factories with new designs and additional capabilities based on shared UTXOs.  Channel Factories 101 Channel factories have been around since the inception of Lightning. A factory is a multiparty contract where multiple users (not just two, as in a Dryja-Poon channel) cooperatively lock funds in a single multisig UTXO. They can open, close and update channels off-chain without updating the blockchain for each operation. Only when participants leave or the factory dissolves is an on-chain transaction…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:09
Top 3 Altcoins for the Next Bull Run Ethereum, Solana and Mutuum Finance

Top 3 Altcoins for the Next Bull Run Ethereum, Solana and Mutuum Finance

Ethereum and Solana already sit near the top of most serious altcoin watchlists, and Mutuum Finance is starting to enter that same conversation from a very different
Share
Techbullion2026/03/20 23:07
Trump: We want to negotiate with Iran, but we have no negotiating partner.

Trump: We want to negotiate with Iran, but we have no negotiating partner.

PANews reported on March 20 that US President Trump stated: "We want to negotiate with Iran, but we have no one to negotiate with. Nobody wants to be Iran's leader
Share
PANews2026/03/20 23:04